Dilbert - C or D?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Sharp truths about the modern workplace? The same old jokes done by someone who can't draw? Both? Neither?

Tom (Groke), Tuesday, 19 October 2004 16:06 (sixteen years ago) link

I don't read it religously, but it's got a true quality to it. Probably what The Office and Office Space are based upon...

Vermont Girl (Vermont Girl), Tuesday, 19 October 2004 16:09 (sixteen years ago) link

The jokes and writing: classic.
The artwork: dud.

n/a (Nick A.), Tuesday, 19 October 2004 16:18 (sixteen years ago) link

It's funny because it's true etc.

Jordan (Jordan), Tuesday, 19 October 2004 16:24 (sixteen years ago) link

I can sort of see a kind of funny in it that I just can't appreciate, which I think is because I've never had anything remotely like an office job. I think it's definitely in that category of "stuff you need to be able to relate to to like."

Tep (ktepi), Tuesday, 19 October 2004 16:28 (sixteen years ago) link

Oh, very very dud. I sorta blame them for the continuation of office culture, if only we could break free*

*I may be being a little melodramatic.

jel -- (jel), Tuesday, 19 October 2004 16:29 (sixteen years ago) link

C: occasional strains of rampant surrealism i.e. Hammerhead Bob, Floyd Remora, the Meeting Moth.

D: Elbonia. "It's a meeting - ABOUT MEETINGS!!!!!!! Do you see?"

Vic Fluro, Tuesday, 19 October 2004 16:30 (sixteen years ago) link

I think it was more accurate a few years ago than it is now - office culture is a lot less process-oriented and more, uh, Brentian.

Tom (Groke), Tuesday, 19 October 2004 16:31 (sixteen years ago) link

I blame Adams' shitty artwork on the proliferation of the auteur theory in types of art over the past few decades. It's not enough to be good at one thing anymore (ie, writing jokes), you have to do everything yourself to be considered an artist. In popular music, this is largely the fault of the Beatles (after which, it wasn't cool for bands to play songs by nonbandmember songwriters anymore, the bands had to write the songs themselves); I'm not sure who is to blame in terms of comics.

n/a (Nick A.), Tuesday, 19 October 2004 17:52 (sixteen years ago) link

Has the non-auteur model ever applied in newspaper strips though?

I read someone (Bill Watterson?) arguing that the rise of non-artist Adams types was down to the space available for a strip shrinking and a (linked) lack of editorial concern/respect for drawing and storytelling in cartoons.

Tom (Groke), Tuesday, 19 October 2004 17:54 (sixteen years ago) link

I like the really offensive Dilbert knock-offs. Set sail for Dick!

DV (dirtyvicar), Tuesday, 19 October 2004 18:31 (sixteen years ago) link

With something like Dilbert I don't think it matters at all whether the art's pretty or not. It's just the medium through which the gags reach us, and it serves that purpose fine.

Wooden (Wooden), Tuesday, 19 October 2004 19:34 (sixteen years ago) link

Is that what n/a stands for? "Non/autership"? Wild.
ANyway, uh, out of the 260 strips a year, there are some good ones, a lot of ones I wonder why I wasted 3 seconds reading, and a few I wish I had died before I noticed.

Huk-L, Tuesday, 19 October 2004 20:00 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm not anti-auteur, I just with that there wasn't so much shame in hiring someone to write songs for you if you're a good singer but a bad songwriter, or hiring someone to draw your comics if you're good at writing jokes but a bad artist. But I really have to emphasize that I know little to nothing about comics, so this whole auteur thing is just a theory I tossed up here, not really sure if it really applies to comics.

n/a (Nick A.), Tuesday, 19 October 2004 20:28 (sixteen years ago) link

I think in alternative comics writer/artists are the norm, and in newspaper strips. In mainstream (i.e. Marvel, DC, publishers who want to be either of those) comics division of labour still applies.

Obviously I agree with the pop stuff - outsource stuff you can't do well!

Tom (Groke), Tuesday, 19 October 2004 20:33 (sixteen years ago) link

One of the few division-of-labor comic strips I can think of is Penny Arcade. Maybe it's more common in webcomics, for some reason?

I just with that there wasn't so much shame in hiring someone to write songs for you if you're a good singer but a bad songwriter

It's true, you have to form a band with a good songwriter to make it socially acceptable. It would be kind of cool to be the Frank Sinatra of rock bands, though, like a cover band except you'd be playing songs no one has heard yet.

Jordan (Jordan), Tuesday, 19 October 2004 20:39 (sixteen years ago) link

There are a lot of the same jokes done over and over but fortunately I still find them funny.

"No way, I've gotta bring this sucker in for a landing! (Can I do that in Excel?)"

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 19 October 2004 20:41 (sixteen years ago) link

Dilbert jokes we still get mileage out of, #1 of ???:

The boss's laptop needs to be shaken to reboot it, because it is in fact an etch-a-sketch.

(I think it captured in detail that weird period when you had to have non-high-tech managers in high-tech companies, because that's all there was.)

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Tuesday, 19 October 2004 20:49 (sixteen years ago) link

#2 of ???

"I was just wondering, if you died, would the coffee cup walk around by itself?"

(this is more universal, I suspect)

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Tuesday, 19 October 2004 20:50 (sixteen years ago) link

#3 of ???

"40% of sick days are taken on Friday and Monday; this is unacceptable."

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 19 October 2004 21:00 (sixteen years ago) link

I find it pretty funny now and again, and hopeless other times. Yeah, the art is very weak. As for the auteur theory in comic strips, it's more honoured in name than fact, as loads of people have 'assistants' who actually draw the strips. This is generally but not always a good thing.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Tuesday, 19 October 2004 21:55 (sixteen years ago) link


Chriddof (Chriddof), Wednesday, 20 October 2004 02:50 (sixteen years ago) link

The art suits the subject, I think - monotony, focus shifted to the banality of hte conent and so on. Its also standard for the medium and does that understated line art trick of conveying a great deal through very little.

As for the comedy - sometimes stomach creasingly funny, innevitably suffers from massive production targets, of course. And the material, as pointed out above, IS dating, alas.

The books are plenty of the notions formalised and expanded to complete theories, and I'd hazard form a decent insight into employee motivations.

That Slazberg, Tuesday, 26 October 2004 22:05 (sixteen years ago) link

(I think it captured in detail that weird period when you had to have non-high-tech managers in high-tech companies, because that's all there was.)

but there is nothing weird about that... bosses have boss skills, which are entirely different to doing things skills, so small wonder that bosses become head of the World Wide Wicket Corporation when they don't really know what a wicket is and whether you can eat it.

anyway, this is what you should be looking at: http://pied.nu/banned/the_Dilbert_Hole/tn/14.gif.html

DV (dirtyvicar), Wednesday, 27 October 2004 18:12 (sixteen years ago) link


(the best part is how Wally is virtually unchanged from the real comic strip)

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 27 October 2004 18:24 (sixteen years ago) link


David R. (popshots75`), Wednesday, 27 October 2004 18:26 (sixteen years ago) link

"I thought he said cake boat."

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 27 October 2004 18:28 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm amazed that the rude Dilbert cartoon is still on the web (given that THE MAN made them re-draw Marxbert so that the characters were just square blocks).

DV (dirtyvicar), Wednesday, 27 October 2004 19:43 (sixteen years ago) link

more here (for those who can't trace back links): http://pied.nu/banned/the_Dilbert_Hole/

DV (dirtyvicar), Wednesday, 27 October 2004 19:45 (sixteen years ago) link

four years pass...

this guy is a right wing creationist douche

it's darn and ielle is hot (and what), Wednesday, 25 February 2009 18:39 (eleven years ago) link

Isn't he a Satanist?

Britpoppage (The stickman from the hilarious xkcd comics), Wednesday, 25 February 2009 18:45 (eleven years ago) link


^^^this is some high-end useful idiocy

Britpoppage (The stickman from the hilarious xkcd comics), Wednesday, 25 February 2009 18:46 (eleven years ago) link

If you let a guy like that express his views, before long the entire world will want freedom
of speech.

Um, is this sentence a joke?

chap, Wednesday, 25 February 2009 19:01 (eleven years ago) link

OK, the whole thing's a joke.

chap, Wednesday, 25 February 2009 19:03 (eleven years ago) link

I was gonna say!

Lots of praying with no breakfast! (HI DERE), Wednesday, 25 February 2009 19:03 (eleven years ago) link

Doesn't sound like a right wing creatonist here:


Tuomas, Thursday, 26 February 2009 14:35 (eleven years ago) link

Actuallt, if you read his blog, he sounds more like a science geek with some libertarian leanings rather than a right wing creationist. Where'd you get that idea?

Tuomas, Thursday, 26 February 2009 14:44 (eleven years ago) link

A cartoon engineer, that's what he is.

M.V., Thursday, 26 February 2009 15:47 (eleven years ago) link

two years pass...

Scott Adams, feminist

Ah, Dilbert. For so long, you have lingered there on the comics page, always ready to barrel-shoot the inanity of office culture with your humorously-coiffed characters and beleaguered engineers, locked forever in a corporate development hell that your humor at first mocked, and then later resembled.

Mostly, though, I haven't really paid attention to you at all, at least until today, when the internet discovered a post where Dilbert creator Scott Adams gave us all a piece of his mind in a post (since deleted) about men's rights, and the fact that he thinks men suffer a level of social injustice equal to women.

After all, women might get paid less than men in our society, but men die earlier, teen boys have to pay higher car insurance, and sometimes women want men to open doors for them, so it all comes out in the wash, right? I'm not making those examples up, either; those are his examples.

And then there's this:

"The reality is that women are treated differently by society for exactly the same reason that children and the mentally handicapped are treated differently. It's just easier this way for everyone. You don't argue with a four-year old about why he shouldn't eat candy for dinner. You don't punch a mentally handicapped guy even if he punches you first. And you don't argue when a women tells you she's only making 80 cents to your dollar. It's the path of least resistance. You save your energy for more important battles." -Scott Adams

Wow. Just wow. To recap: He's comparing women asking for equal pay to the selfishness and unreasonableness of children asking for candy, or mentally handicapped people lashing out violently. He's saying that women's concern for pay equity is a petty desire levied by an irrational group of people, and he's also suggesting a very specific strategy for the men in the audience: Remember not to care.

If the above block of text reminds you of Dave Sim at all, that's because this rhetoric does exactly the same thing as Sim's in terms of infantilizing women and casting them as primarily emotional and irrational beings that men can only deal with by ignoring them most of the time, or sighing bitterly while turning up the volume on their sports game.

Women, amirite? To his credit, he recognizes that this is basically an insane comparison to make, but then not to his credit, makes it anyway. (Note: Saying something and then saying that you're not saying it doesn't magically unsay it.) He continues:

"I realize I might take some heat for lumping women, children and the mentally handicapped in the same group. So I want to be perfectly clear. I'm not saying women are similar to either group. I'm saying that a man's best strategy for dealing with each group is disturbingly similar. If he's smart, he takes the path of least resistance most of the time, which involves considering the emotional realities of other people. A man only digs in for a good fight on the few issues that matter to him, and for which he has some chance of winning. This is a strategy that men are uniquely suited for because, on average, we genuinely don't care about 90% of what is happening around us."

Adams' original blog entry (since deleted): http://tinysprout.tumblr.com/post/3713649989/scott-adams-dilbert-deleted-post

Stockhausen's Ekranoplan Quartet (Elvis Telecom), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 19:33 (nine years ago) link

haha omg

I can never tell when Scott Adams is serious and when he's trolling

whelping at his sandpapery best (DJP), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 19:37 (nine years ago) link

If the above block of text reminds you of Dave Sim at all,

this was my first thought actually

in my world of loose geirs (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 20:41 (nine years ago) link

Practically everything Scott Adams writes is dripping with about five levels of bitter, self-hating sarcasm, though, which makes it difficult for me to take this completely at face value.

Like, I would not at all be surprised if he was taking a Neanderthal tone in order to set up and pull the rug out from underneath people, which seems to go along with the shellshocked reactions some of these critiques are posting.

Having said that, I haven't read it yet so maybe the whole piece really is way out of step with his usual steeze, or just an epic failure in conveying appropriate tone, or maybe he is Dave Sim 2.0.

whelping at his sandpapery best (DJP), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 21:09 (nine years ago) link

A woman had a show about bible secrets on the BBC the other week which was basically Chasing YooWHoo.

I said Omorotic, not homo-erotic (aldo), Thursday, 31 March 2011 18:02 (nine years ago) link

Adams since reposted the deleted blog entry and a "you are all idiots" followup. Perhaps downgrade from Dave Sim to Lileks territory?

Stockhausen's Ekranoplan Quartet (Elvis Telecom), Friday, 1 April 2011 01:20 (nine years ago) link

what a weird guy

call all destroyer, Friday, 1 April 2011 01:30 (nine years ago) link

If any of you have a Salon account, could you do me a favor and head over to the articles by these binarian unibators and provide a link to my explanation of the Men's Rights controversy in its proper context?

difficult listening hour, Friday, 1 April 2011 05:30 (nine years ago) link

I write material for a specific sort of audience. And when the piece on Men's Rights drew too much attention from outside my normal reading circle, it changed the meaning. Communication becomes distorted when you take it out of context, even if you don't change a word of the text. I image that you are dubious about this. It's hard to believe this sort of thing if you don't write for a living and see how often it happens. I'll explain.

(emphasis scott adams')

difficult listening hour, Friday, 1 April 2011 05:32 (nine years ago) link

two weeks pass...

Dude has not been helping his case lately.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 15 April 2011 20:43 (nine years ago) link

hoo boy

fat fat fat fat Usher (DJP), Friday, 15 April 2011 20:50 (nine years ago) link

this man is unwell

Has anyone published tips on defending a home from a mob? For example, it would not be obvious to me when to fire in self-defense and who to target first for maximum impact.

— Scott Adams (@ScottAdamsSays) June 30, 2020

If Biden is elected, there's a good chance you will be dead within the year.

— Scott Adams (@ScottAdamsSays) July 1, 2020

frogbs, Wednesday, 1 July 2020 15:22 (three months ago) link

who to target first for maximum impact

healer, heal thyself

Fuck the NRA (ulysses), Wednesday, 1 July 2020 15:32 (three months ago) link

It's a little unnerving to watch the titular character's mind come unglued in his new tweet-borne iteration of Dilbert. But the absence of 'artwork' is a plus, at least.

Well, that's a fine howdy adieu! (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 1 July 2020 15:32 (three months ago) link

I know people joked about how Biden would magically become a socialist in the eyes of the right the instant he got the nom but even still I did not expect this take

frogbs, Wednesday, 1 July 2020 15:54 (three months ago) link

he for sure is going to go out from a self-inflicted firearms accident, right? he's gotta have so many dumb expensive guns

turn the jawhatthefuckever on (One Eye Open), Wednesday, 1 July 2020 17:04 (three months ago) link

wikihow "how to defend your home from the mob"

mellon collie and the infinite bradness (BradNelson), Wednesday, 1 July 2020 17:06 (three months ago) link

Yeah no one is gonna be commando-crawling up your driveway and coming for your fucking Dogbert action figures, Scotty; no one is coming to rob you of your precious bodily fluids.

Though you richly deserve it.

zombeekeeper (Ye Mad Puffin), Wednesday, 1 July 2020 17:26 (three months ago) link

shouldn't a certified Genius already know these things

mookieproof, Wednesday, 1 July 2020 17:29 (three months ago) link

would be pretty funny if his twitter shittery inspired some gun-toting lunatic to come after his collection of collectable mousemats or whatever

Anti-Cop Ponceortium (Camaraderie at Arms Length), Wednesday, 1 July 2020 18:27 (three months ago) link

one month passes...

"Dilbert" creator Scott Adams uncover the hidden satanic symbolism in Joe Biden's name. https://t.co/gjyHQasTL6 pic.twitter.com/3JJt0aybSt

— Right Wing Watch (@RightWingWatch) August 26, 2020

“Pizza House!” (morrisp), Friday, 28 August 2020 02:07 (two months ago) link

god damn if only Dilbert was a fraction as creative as that

frogbs, Friday, 28 August 2020 02:11 (two months ago) link

backward sex and upside down sex are some of my favourite types of sex, I mean B is where I hide my sex. so yeah, I'm voting Biden.

No mean feat. DaBaby (breastcrawl), Friday, 28 August 2020 11:26 (two months ago) link

breaking down the symbolism of joe biden's name while sitting in the dilbert-shaped house he designed, just normal stuff

scampo, foggy and clegg (bizarro gazzara), Friday, 28 August 2020 12:17 (two months ago) link

well i think it's clear from the ad that the american association of advertising agencies are a bunch of tits

scampo, foggy and clegg (bizarro gazzara), Friday, 28 August 2020 15:40 (two months ago) link

66 6IDEN(TITY) wow, it's been right under our noses this whole time

turn the jawhatthefuckever on (One Eye Open), Friday, 28 August 2020 15:48 (two months ago) link

did you mean to say 66 6IDEN(TITTY)? because that would explain like, everything

No mean feat. DaBaby (breastcrawl), Friday, 28 August 2020 16:45 (two months ago) link

so says poster breastcrawl

scampo, foggy and clegg (bizarro gazzara), Friday, 28 August 2020 17:18 (two months ago) link

lol touché

No mean feat. DaBaby (breastcrawl), Friday, 28 August 2020 17:21 (two months ago) link

Browsing his Twitter lately and I see he’s really gone all in on both Biden = Satan and “they’ll murder me if he wins”

Is it just a coincidence that everyone who tries to make an “intellectual” case for Trump winds up going completely fucking nuts?

frogbs, Tuesday, 1 September 2020 23:46 (one month ago) link

“they’ll murder me if he wins”

just another campaign promise you know Biden's not gonna keep

Piven After Midnight (The Yellow Kid), Tuesday, 1 September 2020 23:48 (one month ago) link

Those who don't are the pure grifters, the coldblooded sociopaths who know exactly what it takes to finagle large segments of the population into fulfilling their nefarious ends.


pomenitul, Tuesday, 1 September 2020 23:50 (one month ago) link


mookieproof, Thursday, 10 September 2020 19:31 (one month ago) link

I LOLed.

Wow, what a deeply, deeply stupid man.

Don't be such an idot. (Old Lunch), Thursday, 10 September 2020 19:37 (one month ago) link

dang, antifa with the time machine flex

Fuck the NRA (ulysses), Thursday, 10 September 2020 19:51 (one month ago) link

The kind of time machine that can only transport you to Opposite Day.

Just...so goddamn deeply fucking stupid. Jesus wept.

Don't be such an idot. (Old Lunch), Thursday, 10 September 2020 19:59 (one month ago) link

on opposite day, satan laughed

Fuck the NRA (ulysses), Thursday, 10 September 2020 20:15 (one month ago) link

I think he's maybe confusing them with that other famous group Profa.

Mario Meatwagon (Moodles), Thursday, 10 September 2020 22:38 (one month ago) link

I checked Wikipedia:

Occasionally, the KPD cooperated with the Nazis in attacking the SPD and both sought to destroy the liberal democracy of the Weimar Republic.[18][19] While also opposed to the Nazis, the KPD regarded the Nazi Party as a less sophisticated and thus less dangerous fascist party than the SPD. In December 1931, KPD leader Ernst Thälmann declared that "some Nazi trees must not be allowed to overshadow a forest" of the SPD.[20][21] In 1931, under the leadership of Ernst Thälmann, the KPD internally used the slogan "After Hitler, our turn!", strongly believing that a united front against Nazis was not needed and that a Nazi dictatorship would ultimately crumble due to flawed economic policies and lead the KPD to power in Germany when the people realised that their economic policies were superior.[22][23]

centrist libs just can't catch a break!!

trapped out the barndo (crüt), Thursday, 10 September 2020 23:52 (one month ago) link

also on wikipedia, Griffy owns this dipshit:

In 1998, Bill Griffith, creator of Zippy the Pinhead, chided Dilbert for crude drawings and simplistic humor. He wrote, "Long since psychically kidnapped by the gaudy, mindlessly hyperactive world of television, (readers) no longer demand or expect comic strips to be compelling, challenging, or even interesting. Enter Cathy. And Dilbert. Sure, comics are still funny. It's just that the humor has almost no "nutritional" value. In the tiny space allotted to them, daily strips have all too successfully adapted to their new environment. In this Darwinian set-up, what thrives are simply drawn panels, minimal dialogue, and a lot of head-and-shoulder shots. Anything more complicated is deemed "too hard to read". A full, rich drawing style is a drawback. Simplicity, even crudity, rules."

Adams responded by creating two comic strips called Pippy the Ziphead, in which Dogbert creates a comic by "cramming as much artwork in as possible so no one will notice there's only one joke ... [and it's] on the reader." Dilbert says that the strip is "nothing but a clown with a small head who says random things", and Dogbert responds that he is "maintaining his artistic integrity by creating a comic that no one will enjoy". In September of the same year, Griffith mocked Adams' Pippy the Ziphead with a strip of the same name drawn in a simplistic, stiff, Dilbert-like style set in an office setting and featuring the characters Zippy and Griffy retorting, "I sense a joke was delivered. [...] Yes. It was. My one joke. Ha."


Fuck the NRA (ulysses), Friday, 11 September 2020 00:36 (one month ago) link

going to keep reposting this on occasion because it never stops being funny

Adams sent in a sketch of Dilbert and Dildog, but realized he had to make "Dildog" more newspaper friendly (any printing error that dropped the G would wreak havoc) so he changed it to Dogbert.

ah yes... a printing error is the only thing that could make Dildog a bad name

irn-scamp (mh), Friday, 11 September 2020 03:44 (one month ago) link

fwiw I think he should have stuck to his guns and called the character Dildog

irn-scamp (mh), Friday, 11 September 2020 03:45 (one month ago) link

the fact that he doesn't think the general public would get the joke behind "Dildog" is kinda Scott Adams in a nutshell, really

frogbs, Friday, 11 September 2020 03:48 (one month ago) link

two weeks pass...


.@ScottAdamsSays feels personally abused by Trump bombing on the white supremacy question during the debate. Adams says Trump lost his vote. pic.twitter.com/VQxQstqKso

— JD-800 💽 (@thejd800) October 1, 2020

idkwtf (Karl Malone), Thursday, 1 October 2020 19:12 (three weeks ago) link

The new issue of TCJ features a "meditation" on Adams: https://www.fantagraphics.com/products/the-comics-journal-306?_pos=1&_psq=comics%20journal&_ss=e&_v=1.0

I Hate the Aedes (morrisp), Thursday, 1 October 2020 19:21 (three weeks ago) link

sorry, I'll fix that url for any siclers out there: https://www.fantagraphics.com/products/the-comics-journal-306

I Hate the Aedes (morrisp), Thursday, 1 October 2020 19:22 (three weeks ago) link

"he left me on that table"

Fuck the NRA (ulysses), Thursday, 1 October 2020 19:22 (three weeks ago) link

has he not spent literally years whining about the "very fine people" hoax, surely he could've WELL ACTUALLY'd his way outta this one

or is it like in 2016 where the writing was on the wall and he doesn't wanna be seen backing a loser

frogbs, Thursday, 1 October 2020 19:28 (three weeks ago) link

(if you don't remember there was a point in 2016 when a dozen women came out to accuse Trump of sexual misconduct and Adams wrote a sad and very sexist post about how not only was Hillary gonna win but we'd never have a male president again)

frogbs, Thursday, 1 October 2020 19:29 (three weeks ago) link

"He lost my vote. Can he get it back? Yeah."

Hmm wonder if he'll manage to find a way for trump to get it back in the next 4 weeks...

turn the jawhatthefuckever on (One Eye Open), Thursday, 1 October 2020 19:38 (three weeks ago) link

what a weirdo

trapped out the barndo (crüt), Thursday, 1 October 2020 19:39 (three weeks ago) link

wait doesn't he brag all the time about how he doesn't vote

frogbs, Thursday, 1 October 2020 19:39 (three weeks ago) link

or has he fallen prey to the satanic mind control powers of 666IDENTITY??

turn the jawhatthefuckever on (One Eye Open), Thursday, 1 October 2020 19:42 (three weeks ago) link

reminded of the time I went on this egg’s new wife’s Instagram and there wasn’t a single picture of him on there

seumas milm (gyac), Thursday, 1 October 2020 20:00 (three weeks ago) link

Yeah, set a 2 week timer for this guy to be shouting his triumphantly re-affirmed faith in Trump from the rooftops

Dan I., Thursday, 1 October 2020 20:03 (three weeks ago) link

more like three hours

Today I learned that agreeing with Democrats and saying I won’t vote for Trump makes them hate me extra and threaten me. So I’ll be voting for Trump.

— Scott Adams (@ScottAdamsSays) October 1, 2020

mookieproof, Thursday, 1 October 2020 21:40 (three weeks ago) link

the mind of a small child

mookieproof, Thursday, 1 October 2020 21:44 (three weeks ago) link

ahhahahaah "i wish you LIBERALS hadn't MADE me vote for Trump but I simply had no choice!"

Guayaquil (eephus!), Thursday, 1 October 2020 21:46 (three weeks ago) link

man this guy can't catch a break

Piven After Midnight (The Yellow Kid), Thursday, 1 October 2020 21:58 (three weeks ago) link

two weeks pass...

now he says that Trump is polling badly bcz Trumpsters are collectively playing "the most epic practical joke" by pretending not to be voting for him, so that they will prove the polls wrong

Covidiots from UHF (sic), Tuesday, 20 October 2020 09:22 (one week ago) link

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.