Can you remember exactly what you were searching for? Email me if you like - stet @ ilxor
― stet, Wednesday, 14 September 2016 17:21 (nine years ago)
Odd - thread searches should be markedly quicker than post searches!
If it's a problem, we might need to just rebuild the search index from scratch.
― Keith, Wednesday, 14 September 2016 17:26 (nine years ago)
i get slow searches sometimes too
i mentioned it to stet the first time
it happens every so often but i'll post when it does
― Fโฏ Aโฏ (โ), Wednesday, 14 September 2016 17:33 (nine years ago)
โ stet, Wednesday, September 14, 2016 1:21 PM (twenty-two minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
i was searching for the 2015 end of year tracks poll. I think I searched "ilm 2015", "ilm 2015 tracks", "ilm tracks" etc and selected "most recent first" -- each time the search would come up but as I clicked through and approached the matching threads from january clicking "next" wouldn't work. for some of the searches this was on the third page, for another it was the fourth, another the second...it was bizarre, almost like the search knew what thread I wanted to find and didn't want me to see it
― have you ever even read The Drudge Report? Have you gone on Stormfron (k3vin k.), Wednesday, 14 September 2016 17:48 (nine years ago)
I keep searching for "; drop table users;" and it doesn't work!!
― dr. mercurio arboria (mh ๐), Wednesday, 14 September 2016 18:20 (nine years ago)
ha
― Don't boo, vote (DJP), Wednesday, 14 September 2016 18:20 (nine years ago)
sorry, I really tried not to type that
― dr. mercurio arboria (mh ๐), Wednesday, 14 September 2016 18:21 (nine years ago)
it was quicker than trying to roll together a joke about apache commons problems with deserialization
― dr. mercurio arboria (mh ๐), Wednesday, 14 September 2016 18:23 (nine years ago)
Haha (injection thing).
― Keith, Wednesday, 14 September 2016 19:06 (nine years ago)
(Yes, they're not going to work)
― Keith, Wednesday, 14 September 2016 19:07 (nine years ago)
It's possible that what's happening is a function of how it works and housekeeping...
The way it works is that I run a big job at the beginning that scans all the threads and posts and creates two index files for the search: one for threads, one for posts. The threads one is miles smaller; hence, why it should be faster. With hindsight, I wouldn't even have bothered with the threads one, as subsequent to developing the search, I decided it was useful to just hold the whole list of threads in memory at all times anyway for fast access.
Anyway, that's cool for startup, but the way it keeps the index up-to-date with changes since the initial build is that a batch job runs every five minutes, scans the database for new or changes to threads and posts and updates the index.
I'd have thought that ultimately, this would fragment the index file and make it slow and I for one certainly haven't recreated the index file for at least five years, which would be half a million updates to the index files at least! So guessing somewhat here, but if Stet hasn't recreated the index file since I last did, which I might doubt, as I don't think we ever talked about what that thing did before, then it's possible that's what's going on and all we need to do is stop the site, recreate the index file and start it again.
― Keith, Wednesday, 14 September 2016 19:17 (nine years ago)
It's actually an all-new index file as of a couple of weeks ago, so I'm wondering if something went iffy there. No harm in making a new one, will kick that off later.
― stet, Wednesday, 14 September 2016 20:14 (nine years ago)
> 19:17 (fifty-six minutes ago)
It is 21:11 here now. Why is that saying 56 minutes?
― koogs, Wednesday, 14 September 2016 20:17 (nine years ago)
>
> 20:14 (three minutes ago)
Slightly better
― koogs, Wednesday, 14 September 2016 20:18 (nine years ago)
Although it's 21:18 here, not 20:18
― koogs, Wednesday, 14 September 2016 20:19 (nine years ago)
Someone else doing a big search
― stet, Wednesday, 14 September 2016 21:08 (nine years ago)
The index file could potentially be screwed if it were created when the site was running when that happened. I mean, I don't know whether it would or not, but I've never thought through whether it would cause issues. Certainly the initial job reads big fuckoff lumps of the database at a time and indexes that then moves on to the next; the database changing under its feet could render some of the already-created index incorrect, although it'd be up to Apache Lucene whether or not that cause the whole thing problems or not.
― Keith, Wednesday, 14 September 2016 21:26 (nine years ago)
Am I right in saying this was all TEN YEARS AGO now?
― Keith, Wednesday, 14 September 2016 21:32 (nine years ago)
is it just me or is the spacing all screwed up on the search page, like the css isn't loading right or something
― dr. mercurio arboria (mh ๐), Wednesday, 14 September 2016 21:53 (nine years ago)
โ Keith, Wednesday, 14 September 2016 22:32 Bookmark
no the right way to say it is 10 years ago now
― r|t|c, Thursday, 15 September 2016 10:55 (nine years ago)
Well clearly ten years on this place hasn't changed.
― Keith, Thursday, 15 September 2016 17:30 (nine years ago)
I just bought a new Android tab, and now I'm seeing banner ads on ILX even I log in with Chrome. The tablet has Android 6.0, I didn't seen any ads while using Chrome on my older tablet, which had an older version of Android.
― Tuomas, Tuesday, 4 October 2016 09:33 (nine years ago)
"even I after log in"
― Tuomas, Tuesday, 4 October 2016 09:34 (nine years ago)
http://i1326.photobucket.com/albums/u641/Lixenixen/Mobile%20Uploads/Screenshot_20161007-192926_zpsce6zozqq.png
Here's an example, I'm logged in, but I still see the as.
― Tuomas, Friday, 7 October 2016 16:37 (nine years ago)
not sure why, but half of the things I search for cause ILX to hang.
for instance, I searched for Lost Boys, and it comes up no problem.
I search for any variant of "let's shit our pants to something new", even without the word 'shit', and none of them work, except "Let's shit", and doesn't return that thread at all. I tried "our pants", "something new", "shit our pants", and it just hung for minutes at a time.
― Neanderthal, Tuesday, 18 October 2016 21:47 (nine years ago)
Don't know if it's related, but threads have been taking a long time to load the last couple of days.
― aaaaaaaauuuuuuuuu (melting robot) (WilliamC), Tuesday, 18 October 2016 21:48 (nine years ago)
help! the site is doing that thing where every last bookmark I've ever had is showing up at the top of SNA and I can't make them go away. I tried changing the Use Traditional Bookmarks setting, but it didn't do anything. How do I fix this? What am I doing to cause this?
― Al Moon Faced Poon (Moodles), Tuesday, 8 November 2016 13:20 (nine years ago)
hmmm, well I think I fixed this for now. I changed the Google account in my Chrome browser and that seemed to help, not sure why.
― Al Moon Faced Poon (Moodles), Tuesday, 8 November 2016 13:41 (nine years ago)
the search function is still super buggy and slow fyi
― k3vin k., Sunday, 13 November 2016 19:01 (nine years ago)
my versh of zing suddenly won't load any URLs, unless I jump out to safari. i.e. won't display em on zing. is it just me?
― Stoop Crone (Trayce), Sunday, 13 November 2016 21:09 (nine years ago)
Even though I'm logged in, I still see a banner ad on this thread:
Metallica ARE...HardwiredโฆTo Self-Destruct
It doesn't matter much to me, but it's strange that's the only thread (so far) where that happens.
FYI
― pplains, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 15:29 (nine years ago)
fuckin' lars
― not all those who chunder are sloshed (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 15:30 (nine years ago)
I get banner ads on every thread while logged in on my work computer.
― Horizontal Superman is invulnerable (aldo), Tuesday, 15 November 2016 19:16 (nine years ago)
โ k3vin k., Sunday, November 13, 2016 2:01 PM (four days ago)
is this just me? it's been going on for months. i can't find threads i want to find
― k3vin k., Thursday, 17 November 2016 20:34 (nine years ago)
no prob for me
― Spottie, Thursday, 17 November 2016 21:03 (nine years ago)
This keeps happening to me a lot when I use Chrome on Android, as I mentioned above. Not on my home tabletop computer though (I use Firefox with Adblock Plus).
― Tuomas, Friday, 18 November 2016 09:40 (nine years ago)
search: it depends on what you search.
e.g. search for Zimmerman: it hangs forever/timeoutsearch for Trayvon: it hangs forever/timeout
search for energy: immediate resultssearch for zooropa: immediate results (it's not that the end of the alphabet is slower)search for Ziegler: immediate result (it's not last names starting with capital letters either)
― StanM, Friday, 18 November 2016 09:48 (nine years ago)
^ googleproofed = no search results? But then I DID find that one thread I couldn't find here by going to google and searching for the same thing and site:ilxor.com so I don't know
― StanM, Friday, 18 November 2016 09:52 (nine years ago)
sounds like it might be thread specific causing problems
― Mordy, Friday, 18 November 2016 18:11 (nine years ago)
yeah my search problems vary depending on the search term
― k3vin k., Friday, 18 November 2016 19:36 (nine years ago)
Have rebuilt the indexes the search system uses. Zimmerman and Trayvon now both working for me; can people try things that were broken for them?
― stet, Friday, 18 November 2016 22:30 (nine years ago)
I still can't get "clickhole" to search
― rob, Friday, 18 November 2016 22:33 (nine years ago)
"trayvon" still broken for me too
― k3vin k., Friday, 18 November 2016 22:36 (nine years ago)
searching "2015 albums" also not working -- this is what brought this to my attention a few weeks ago when i was trying to find the year end poll
― k3vin k., Friday, 18 November 2016 22:49 (nine years ago)
Let me check i'm doing the same search as you โ when I try it's instant. I'm searching:
http://i.imgur.com/f4Zrvfk.png
― stet, Friday, 18 November 2016 22:55 (nine years ago)
i'm doing thread titles, not posts. i also was not using quotes -- however when i do use quotes (and search most relevant, all boards) it works!
― k3vin k., Friday, 18 November 2016 23:06 (nine years ago)
just tried again. 2015 albums, searching thread titles. quotes = works. no quotes = doesn't work
― k3vin k., Friday, 18 November 2016 23:07 (nine years ago)
i use google site search
― harold melvin and the bluetones (jim in vancouver), Friday, 18 November 2016 23:13 (nine years ago)
The search engine is Apache Lucene. Whatever works with Lucene will work with it. I didn't do anything special on top of it. Here is a page that describes some of the stuff you ought to be able to do, although to be fair, it may be that it does more now than it did back when this stuff was done:
https://lucene.apache.org/core/2_9_4/queryparsersyntax.html
― Keith, Friday, 18 November 2016 23:21 (nine years ago)