Herman Melville-The Confidence Man

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed

Any of you ever read this? Seems to weirdly pre-empt some of the Musil/Broch stuff from Europe so many years later. Obviously the style is a lot more genial and rogueish but the ambition of it I guess. It's also quite funny in its own way. It took me a long time to get into it but am really getting a kick out of this now.

Local Garda, Tuesday, 14 July 2009 20:22 (nine years ago) Permalink

I've bought but not tackled this one--it looks REALLY INTERESTING but also a bit forbidding. Maybe this is the kick in the arse I need to move it to the top of the pile.

Great Expectorations (James Morrison), Wednesday, 15 July 2009 00:41 (nine years ago) Permalink

I haven't finished it but from the bulk I of it I read it was my first time reading a novel where the allegorical part of it seemed a living entity within. How do I explain? You could see its mechanics, I mean, without it being obvious. It was like having a ghost underneath the text.

bamcquern, Wednesday, 15 July 2009 01:16 (nine years ago) Permalink

Yeah that's otm, not just that, there is a part where it kind of speaks to the reader like admitting it is a book of allegory, in this sort of prankish tone.

Local Garda, Wednesday, 15 July 2009 15:14 (nine years ago) Permalink

have tried and not got anywhere with this twice. probably still have two different copies.

thomp, Wednesday, 15 July 2009 15:31 (nine years ago) Permalink

i love this book, probably my second favorite melville
if you like it i would recommend reading Pierre, or the Ambiguities because it is completely insane. i mean, it is an absolutley strange, obsessive book, started as something of a pisstake on silly romance novels but then it becomes something else, sorta indescribable

tanny timmin (velko), Wednesday, 15 July 2009 15:40 (nine years ago) Permalink

tanny, did you see Carax's film adaptation of Pierre, Pola X? it's INSANE.

jed_, Wednesday, 15 July 2009 23:08 (nine years ago) Permalink

(i haven't read the book but it sounds like the same kind of insanity)

jed_, Wednesday, 15 July 2009 23:09 (nine years ago) Permalink

yeah, the film is an ok adaptation, modernized and other changes, i can't remember the details because it's been several years. but i do think the film captured the fevered and unhinged tone of the book. the movie also made the INCEST rather explicit

velko, Thursday, 16 July 2009 00:58 (nine years ago) Permalink

lol, seems we've been over this before
Pierre, Or the Ambiguities - CLASSIC & yet wtf at the same time

anyway, didn't mean to derail confidence man thread, it's great but it's been too long since i've read it to have any insights to share. weird thing is that i read all the obscure melville stuff before i read moby-dick and it was kinda an underwhelming experience when i finally did

velko, Thursday, 16 July 2009 01:26 (nine years ago) Permalink

yeah not read moby dick, no great desire to do so

Local Garda, Thursday, 16 July 2009 18:25 (nine years ago) Permalink

Ronan, you should read Bartleby the Scrivener. it's only about 50 pages but it's 50 amazing pages.

jed_, Friday, 17 July 2009 18:36 (nine years ago) Permalink

moby dick is great, you should read it.

i'm kind of daunted by the rest of melville's oeurve, not least because it seems like no one except his biographers has read half of it since 1890. has anyone here read, like, israel potter? or mardi? or redburn?

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Saturday, 18 July 2009 00:31 (nine years ago) Permalink

i read mardi, and a voyage thither (LOL)

it's really dull

velko, Saturday, 18 July 2009 02:29 (nine years ago) Permalink

two years pass...

Pola x is on tonight at the BFI -- I'll try and make it.

xyzzzz__, Tuesday, 5 June 2012 12:00 (six years ago) Permalink

H. Bruce Franklin's annotations for The Confidence-Man are so good.

poxen, Tuesday, 5 June 2012 13:47 (six years ago) Permalink

anyone read Clarel?

go down on you in a thyatrr (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 5 June 2012 13:47 (six years ago) Permalink

YES. So great.

To anybody who hasn't read The Confidence-Man please just read the first chapter, my favourite first chapter in the world with my favourite first sentence

"At sunrise on a first of April, there appeared, suddenly as Manco Capac at the lake Titicaca, a man in cream-colors, at the water-side in the city of St. Louis."

http://www.readbookonline.net/read/13359/32214/

poxen, Tuesday, 5 June 2012 13:51 (six years ago) Permalink

I started Moby Dick on Sunday - what a pace. I'm already on pg. 350.

go down on you in a thyatrr (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 5 June 2012 13:55 (six years ago) Permalink

What edition?

poxen, Tuesday, 5 June 2012 13:58 (six years ago) Permalink

oh a cheap Barnes & Noble classic one, received as a present from a student one Xmas. Well annotated though.

go down on you in a thyatrr (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 5 June 2012 13:59 (six years ago) Permalink

H. Bruce Franklin's annotations for The Confidence-Man are so good.

― poxen, Tuesday, June 5, 2012 1:47 PM

Yeah, they're amazing. That's the edition w/the Daniel Handler introduction, right?

etc, Wednesday, 6 June 2012 08:32 (six years ago) Permalink

Yes. Sometimes the annotations get so dense that I reverted to the online, non-annotated version for first reading. Especially the lengthy Banquo discussions.

poxen, Wednesday, 6 June 2012 13:15 (six years ago) Permalink

(The Dalkey Archive printing is aesthetically very pleasing as well)

poxen, Wednesday, 6 June 2012 13:16 (six years ago) Permalink

OK, inspired by this I started reading this today. Only 20 pages in, am enjoying, though have no idea where the fuck it's going.

seven league bootie (James Morrison), Thursday, 7 June 2012 08:30 (six years ago) Permalink

Remember to report back, etc.

Ò (Ówen P.), Thursday, 7 June 2012 12:43 (six years ago) Permalink

Now at p 105--loving this, and would be amazed if Gene Wolfe hadn't swallowed this book whole. I can see why reviewers at the time didn't know what to make of it.

seven league bootie (James Morrison), Thursday, 7 June 2012 23:35 (six years ago) Permalink

Just read 'The Metaphysics of Indian-Hating' chapter. THis is a very mad book, in a really good way.

seven league bootie (James Morrison), Saturday, 9 June 2012 02:29 (six years ago) Permalink

Oh man I am totally getting this

freebroheem (loves laboured breathing), Sunday, 10 June 2012 14:38 (six years ago) Permalink

Also: is this your first time reading Moby Dick, Alfred?

freebroheem (loves laboured breathing), Sunday, 10 June 2012 14:39 (six years ago) Permalink

yep! I loved it too. It's so far from being A Great Work of Art; it's like a graphic novel or something.

a regina spektor is haunting europe (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 10 June 2012 14:50 (six years ago) Permalink

I want to read Confidence-Man again right now but I'm halfway through five other books

Ò (Ówen P.), Sunday, 10 June 2012 20:21 (six years ago) Permalink

xp ha! I remember Neil Gaiman saying something similar; when he read it for the first time as a young child (!) He said he though it'd make a terrific comic book.

freebroheem (loves laboured breathing), Monday, 11 June 2012 02:54 (six years ago) Permalink

Finished! So cool and so strange. Though it does just sort of STOP, rather than end.

I wonder how much I would have missed if I hadn't had a heavily annotated copy, though.

seven league bootie (James Morrison), Monday, 11 June 2012 03:13 (six years ago) Permalink

This is such a brilliant book.

ooooiiiioooooooooooooooaaaaaaaaoooooh un - bi - leevable! (LocalGarda), Friday, 15 June 2012 11:34 (six years ago) Permalink

two years pass...

H. Bruce Franklin's annotations for The Confidence-Man are so good.

― poxen, Tuesday, June 5, 2012 1:47 PM

Yeah, they're amazing. That's the edition w/the Daniel Handler introduction, right?

― etc, Wednesday, 6 June 2012 Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Yes. Sometimes the annotations get so dense that I reverted to the online, non-annotated version for first reading. Especially the lengthy Banquo discussions.

― poxen, Wednesday, 6 June 2012 Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Finished it this morning - wanna cosign on the annotation front, real tour de force. Sometimes I needed to leave it, let the (sometimes v beautiful) prose breathe a little, but I'd rather have it in there.

xyzzzz__, Friday, 27 February 2015 15:38 (three years ago) Permalink

i read all the obscure melville stuff before i read moby-dick and it was kinda an underwhelming experience when i finally did Just now got to Moby Dick via the same route, but halfway in, and def. not underwhelmed. Can see the xpost pre-/early modernist thing, maybe influence on Borges, for inst.(ditto Twain, maybe others of Melville's era).

dow, Friday, 27 February 2015 15:56 (three years ago) Permalink

Its the most Pynchon-y thing I've read, just in terms of people disappearing/re-appearing, the way they...dissolve.

Probably interested in reading Emerson, Thoreau, Hawthorne more than Moby Dick.

xyzzzz__, Friday, 27 February 2015 16:07 (three years ago) Permalink

those guys are all very much worth reading, but you should read moby dick too

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Friday, 27 February 2015 22:30 (three years ago) Permalink

read this last year along with a collection of his short fiction in the oxford worlds classic editions (both great!) but may have to look out for the dalkey if that's the heavily annotated edition mentioned upthread. anyone ever checked out his poetry? i have a penguin selection but haven't tackled it as yet (or moby-dick for that matter).

no lime tangier, Saturday, 28 February 2015 07:04 (three years ago) Permalink

lol he published this on April fool's day!

no lime - the heavily annotated ed. is published by Dalkey.

Love to check out his poetry...Pierre... and Bartleby sound great! And I would probably read this over the writers he was in dialogue with in this book. I couldn't get into The Scarlet Letter when I tried it a couple of years ago although I'm sure I'd like it more now.

re: Moby Dick idk, length isn't a problem (I've read much longer books) its a bit like War and Peace where you can't see yourself caring about the subjects (whaling or the Napoleonic era) (yes I get that whaling stands for something else, but from the threads on ilx there seems to be a lot of technical bullshit). That kind adventure for boys lark (hunting, war). I suppose there must be some incredible descriptions of the sea (and many amazing digressions) and I would be up for that. His writing is unbelievably good but I also like that CM doesn't go anywhere in particular, just writing, Old testament quotes, digressions on misanthropy and well the whole issue of who you can put your trust to...this is incredibly contemporary: the loss of confidence in people, institutions. Lots of things in here I don't understand yet, a whole world in here.

xyzzzz__, Saturday, 28 February 2015 12:51 (three years ago) Permalink

ha, i'd forgotten about the april fools bit

the heavily annotated ed. is published by Dalkey

thanks, hopefully i'll spot it secondhand some day!

the whole issue of who you can put your trust to...this is incredibly contemporary: the loss of confidence in people, institutions

of course another writer melville was responding to was poe and specifically (according to the oxford intro) his piece diddling considered as one of the exact sciences and you've got all the hoaxes running throughout his work, and people not being quite as they appear: to take the most pertinent example 'the man that was used up'.

no lime tangier, Saturday, 28 February 2015 13:15 (three years ago) Permalink

Yeah Moby-Dick incl.a diddlin' joke on a French captain who doesn't have a lick of English. Suddenly to the last 100 pages, not wanting it to end, getting better all the time, I've posted about it on What Are You Reading, so won't paste of that here, though can just barely restrain myself from doing that with scanned grafs, if not whole chapters. Reading Library of America edition, with corrected texts, also Webster's Deluxe coming in handy, esp. re archaic senses, though usuage ofoten overlaps w more modern

dow, Saturday, 28 February 2015 22:49 (three years ago) Permalink

the napoleonic era stands for something else too, also half the book is girls at various kinds of parties iirc so it's not xactly http://img1.imagesbn.com/p/9781588657800_p0_v2_s260x420.JPG

anyway moby-dick is the most unbelievable book, the disappearing narrator (ishmael is way slothrop), the obsessive cataloging of knowledge (poor devil of a sub-sub!), the impossible expanding pov, the gradual ascent into lurid opera, the soliloquies!, the whale as the symbolically uncontainable that finally breaks the book from the inside, drags its epic protagonist into hell and leaves you back in first-person limited: only another orphan. strong acid.

difficult listening hour, Sunday, 1 March 2015 07:21 (three years ago) Permalink

What's the other half of W & P about then :-)

I'll look at Moby Dick.

xyzzzz__, Sunday, 1 March 2015 09:32 (three years ago) Permalink

I'll try to sign off on M-D with this: not so much one thing/component, in space or time, standing for another, as getting really into things-in-themselves, almost "No ideas but in things" at times, but then "only connect" often enough: how one thing and situation relates to another, with an increasing sense of hey presto, but also Ishmael really believes in each revelation, incl. re thee inner mystique of Ahab, and don't bother to ask how he knows (Ahab is I.'s own M-D, maybe?)

dow, Sunday, 1 March 2015 15:40 (three years ago) Permalink

From the latest issue:

http://www.bookslut.com/features/2015_03_021143.php

One night, while out with her at a graduate student party, I got to talking with a group of PhD candidates reading in American Literature who to my utter shock and astonishment had never read Herman Melville's Moby-Dick. In blinded amazement and energetic fury I directed them to sit down and give American Literature a read!

Never studied lit (just read some) so I was a tad surprised that postgrads ignore it.

xyzzzz__, Saturday, 7 March 2015 09:48 (three years ago) Permalink

canon ain't what it used to be

ryan, Saturday, 7 March 2015 14:15 (three years ago) Permalink

no gaps in the literature to fill

j., Saturday, 7 March 2015 15:23 (three years ago) Permalink

I doubt that it's all that ignored. The guy just needed a cool way to motivate his review.

jmm, Saturday, 7 March 2015 15:27 (three years ago) Permalink

'zactly

Cartesian Dual in the Sun (James Redd and the Blecchs), Saturday, 7 March 2015 15:49 (three years ago) Permalink

Edmund White on Jean Giono. Features quite a bit of Melville (Giono translated MD to French).

xyzzzz__, Saturday, 14 March 2015 00:20 (three years ago) Permalink

That is amazing, thanks. And re White saying that Faulkner* was maybe improved by translation into French, reminds me of Melville maybe influenced by Poe (who was also said to be improved by Baudelaire's translations)
*Don't agree with White that Faulkner is never funny; maybe he's just not that into Faulkner.

dow, Saturday, 14 March 2015 01:10 (three years ago) Permalink

Didn't know want to comment o Faulkner as he is a blind spot for me. Looking at the NYRB site and there were no letters about this. From what White is saying you could go on and argue that his translator took out the risk from Faulkner's writing, ultimately making him safe for the Nobel..

xyzzzz__, Saturday, 14 March 2015 09:40 (three years ago) Permalink

[...] he commits himself to the forest primeval; there, so long as life shall be his, to act upon a calm, cloistered scheme of strategical, implacable, and lonesome vengeance. Ever on the noiseless trail; cool, collected, patient; less seen than felt; snuffing, smelling—a Leather-stocking Nemesis. In the settlements he will not be seen again; in eyes of old companions tears may start at some chance thing that speaks of him; but they never look for him, nor call; they know he will not come. Suns and seasons fleet; the tiger-lily blows and falls; babes are born and leap in their mothers' arms; but, the Indian-hater is good as gone to his long home, and "Terror" is his epitaph.'

hot doug stamper (||||||||), Friday, 20 March 2015 13:24 (three years ago) Permalink

one year passes...

OK I should check it out, yes?

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 21 November 2016 03:13 (two years ago) Permalink

What's the worst that could happen?

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Monday, 21 November 2016 05:29 (two years ago) Permalink

it's great

velko, Monday, 21 November 2016 05:33 (two years ago) Permalink

I should pick this up again.

lol @ Wikipedia on Pierre: "One review which ran in the New York Day Book bore the title "Herman Melville Crazy" while the American Whig Review wrote that Melville's "fancy is diseased".[17]"

JoeStork, Monday, 21 November 2016 06:32 (two years ago) Permalink

Need to reup my subscription to American Whig Review

JoeStork, Monday, 21 November 2016 06:32 (two years ago) Permalink

Alfred alfred alfred you need this book in your life

I hear from this arsehole again, he's going in the river (James Morrison), Monday, 21 November 2016 07:27 (two years ago) Permalink

Yes - Melville had his magical writerly chops till the end.

xyzzzz__, Monday, 21 November 2016 09:14 (two years ago) Permalink

Inspired by reading Battle-Pieces and rereading "Las Encantadas."

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 21 November 2016 11:27 (two years ago) Permalink

love this book

Bein' Sean Bean (LocalGarda), Monday, 21 November 2016 17:35 (two years ago) Permalink

Co-sign on the above-expressed opinion that the best way to read this book is chapter-by-chapter, once with all the footnotes interrupting, then a second time just reading the straight prose

fgti, Monday, 21 November 2016 18:00 (two years ago) Permalink

On Chapter Four!

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 21 November 2016 20:07 (two years ago) Permalink

I checked out the Norton critical edition from the library.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 21 November 2016 20:08 (two years ago) Permalink

one year passes...

started Redburn, which has a scene in a homosexual brothel!

morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 18 April 2018 14:42 (seven months ago) Permalink

Any good? I see the Penguin edition has one of those generic 'Nobody buys this so we can't be fucked doing a cover' covers.
https://images.penguinrandomhouse.com/cover/9780140431056

Mince Pramthwart (James Morrison), Thursday, 19 April 2018 01:32 (seven months ago) Permalink

Perhaps trying to give Dover Thrift Editions a run for their money.

We’ll Take Chanhassen (James Redd and the Blecchs), Saturday, 21 April 2018 00:13 (seven months ago) Permalink

It's the easiest novel he ever wrote -- few of those flourishes and ponderosities we expect. Apparently he regarded as hack work.

morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 21 April 2018 00:17 (seven months ago) Permalink

Hmm nothing gay there, nope

valorous wokelord (silby), Saturday, 21 April 2018 20:20 (seven months ago) Permalink


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.