― un® (dayo), Friday, 15 June 2012 23:23 (eight years ago) link
Really loving the hell out of Reamde.
― Elvis Telecom, Friday, 4 January 2013 05:56 (seven years ago) link
Stephenson talks about REAMDE with lawyers at the UW Law School
― Elvis Telecom, Friday, 4 January 2013 05:57 (seven years ago) link
tried agin to read quicksilver and literally could not make it past 10 pages, what a piece of shit
― 乒乓, Tuesday, 8 January 2013 14:45 (seven years ago) link
rong but lol
― Roberto Spiralli, Tuesday, 8 January 2013 14:55 (seven years ago) link
haha I am a big stephenson fan! like back in high school I even read the big u and those things he published as 'stephen bury'
― 乒乓, Tuesday, 8 January 2013 14:56 (seven years ago) link
reamde is such a crock
― stet, Tuesday, 8 January 2013 15:28 (seven years ago) link
― Solange Knowles is my hero (DJP), Tuesday, 8 January 2013 15:29 (seven years ago) link
feels so like Stephenson trying to appease his critics and in the process toning down/losing the things I valued about his old ways. Have ranted on this before tho. Huge score on goodreads, higher than Cryptonomicon, so it must be working.
― stet, Tuesday, 8 January 2013 15:49 (seven years ago) link
Tried to read Quicksilver last year, not long after I wrote this in the SF poll results thread:
Enjoyed Snow Crash, but the awkwardness of the infodumps stayed with me more than the plot or anything else; thought The Diamond Age a lot better, & it made my ballot. Keep looking at that Baroque Cycle, but I fear it will basically be x,000 pages of me shouting 'NO NO NO WRONG NO NOT LIKE THAT' at the book, since I am ok at Europe 1640-1740 (and I didn't enjoy Cryptonomicon so much. It was ok).― portrait of velleity (woof), Wednesday, April 6, 2011 8:05 PM (1 year ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
The prophecy was fulfilled, except I stopped after 200pp. Might still read Anathem one of these days.
― woof, Tuesday, 8 January 2013 15:54 (seven years ago) link
yeah, awkwardness of the infodumps otm, also it seems to amplify the sci fi writer's belief that they can predict the future to an annoying degree since the novel is set in the past, all the horses have run so that you get a lot of "there's this obscure thing the british are importing from the indies ... you steep it in water, it makes you feel excited ... they call it ... thé" which is just awful awful awful to read
― 乒乓, Tuesday, 8 January 2013 16:12 (seven years ago) link
Nell's father, Bud, is presented as an archetypal cyberpunk character [...] Stephenson attempts to establish The Diamond Age as a "postcyberpunk" book by killing this character early on, while acknowledging the influence of the cyberpunk genre.
cackhanded symbolism or harmless fan service? anyway i couldn't really deal with the overall ridiculous try-hard ideas factory run wild of the diamond age, thought anathem was a lot more simple and grounded in its world building.
― ledge, Tuesday, 8 January 2013 16:32 (seven years ago) link
right and if he had a cute factoid about the past he would not hesitate to work it in; but in most ways it felt like a really underimagined version of history – weak sense for the language and politics, no feel for place, fixation on (relatively) Big Names. And not really trashy enough to be a romp; quite fancied itself.
I dunno, like I say, it's a period I'm a little too close to, but I couldn't deal with it.
― woof, Tuesday, 8 January 2013 16:46 (seven years ago) link
hey, i finished those. i had totally forgotten that.
'anathem' and 'reamde' are basically waiting for me to i. see cheap paperbacks and ii. have a long haul flight
well, no, i'm waiting for that to happen. nothing i do is going to make the books give a shit.
― attempt to look intentionally nerdy, awkward or (thomp), Tuesday, 8 January 2013 17:54 (seven years ago) link
xp no, it's precisely a romp, that's why the things you're complaining about are kind of irrelevant, or let me rephrase that, irrelevant to me. you can boil most of stephenson down to a good old adventure wheeze with part of an encyclopaedia brazenly regurgitated into it. that's not everyone's good time but i'd say if it's worth you bothering with him that has to be more of an attraction than a distraction.
― Roberto Spiralli, Tuesday, 8 January 2013 18:00 (seven years ago) link
i think anathem is his best book and the context that he makes for himself there - connected to our world but deliberately separated also, really works for him. what's less obvious is that the baroque cycle books are really the same thing - not quite our history, which i think becomes obvious. an not really just an alternative history. it is fiction with strands of our history papier machéd onto it.
― Roberto Spiralli, Tuesday, 8 January 2013 18:04 (seven years ago) link
reamde is embarrassing garbage half of it felt like tommy friedman travel lit and the rest was unconvincing characters acting unconvincingly but most importantly it wasnt really that fun. its not like jack shaftoe was a particularly well-realized character but he was a lot of fun to spend time with - none of reamde's sunday magazine composites are allowed to be that much of a joy since theyre so busy illustrating some aspect of how the world is now or w/e
― gray star, a settlement in the remotest northwest (Lamp), Tuesday, 8 January 2013 18:14 (seven years ago) link
lack of fun otm.
― stet, Tuesday, 8 January 2013 18:47 (seven years ago) link
I posted my first reaction to Reamde before the part of the book when the characters get to the Pacific NW which is when it all went flat. Would have rather read Cryptonomicon again.
sunday magazine composites are allowed to be that much of a joy since theyre so busy illustrating some aspect of how the world is now or w/e
― Elvis Telecom, Wednesday, 9 January 2013 00:01 (seven years ago) link
Really enjoyed Diamond Age and Snow Crash (though both had problems), but feel no desire at all to attempt these mountain-sized books
― ornamental cabbage (James Morrison), Wednesday, 9 January 2013 00:55 (seven years ago) link
Picked up Zodiac for a buck and plowed through it over the last few subway rides. I'd always expected it to be kind of dumb, but it wasically entertaining. The flaws do show pretty clearly (large, ill-defined cast, really awful 'bearded craze-o badass' protagonist (very Spider Jerusalem or King Mob), female characters are a mess, etc. etc.). Can see all kinds of stuff he comes back to in Snow Crash, or problems he tries to fix. Lot of... boating. If you can get past the stuff that just really doesn't make sense it's kind of fun - shorter than his others and structured a bit by being a neo-noir detective deal (that also feels a lot like it's pitching to be an action movie).
― Doctor Casino, Thursday, 5 June 2014 00:50 (six years ago) link
so wait what was the deal with enoch root again
― ♛ LIL UNIT ♛ (thomp), Thursday, 5 June 2014 16:40 (six years ago) link
There's a whole site dedicated to that I think. The best theory I read was that he was a robot sent back from the future to guide the timeline. The books, taken together, establish something rather different - is it safe to spoil Baroque Cycle at this point?
― Doctor Casino, Thursday, 5 June 2014 17:05 (six years ago) link
yeah i figure if ive forgotten once already I can forget again pretty effectively should i ever decide I want to read them
― ♛ LIL UNIT ♛ (thomp), Thursday, 5 June 2014 21:27 (six years ago) link
enoch root is a wizard
― dude (Lamp), Thursday, 5 June 2014 21:29 (six years ago) link
Still have trouble eating lobster tomalley ever since reading Zodiac xp
― 龜, Thursday, 5 June 2014 21:34 (six years ago) link
hahaha yeah the lobster thing is one of the definite "will stick with you" parts of the book.
Enoch Root is an alchemist, or alternately a wizard that is easily misinterpreted as an alchemist in the 17th century. He knows how to use the Solomonic heavier-than-normal gold to concoct a resurrection/eternal-life potion which is used successfuly on at least three other characters, shifting the books from science/historical fiction to fantasy I guess. He pokes around in history, meddling with things; his overall project isn't really explained, but his speeches in Cryptonomicon suggest it's a kind of quest to support 'Athena' over 'Ares' in Stephenson's moral universe. This seems to mean forcing the Waterhouses of the world (nebbish, apolitical thinkers) to get their hands dirty and take stands on good versus evil, and forcing the Shaftoes of the world (chaotic-neutral grunts who would, one suspects, be easily deployed by Ares) to some point of redemption, similarly pivoting them from selfish pursuits to morallly-driven quests. I think.
― Doctor Casino, Thursday, 5 June 2014 23:17 (six years ago) link
what a weird series of narrative decisions
do you remember his kickstarter, god
― ♛ LIL UNIT ♛ (thomp), Friday, 6 June 2014 07:26 (six years ago) link
I'm unsure where I fall on his call for New Optimism
― Elvis Telecom, Friday, 6 June 2014 09:04 (six years ago) link
I think it's more or less meaningless tbh. I don't really think writers have obligations to society in this respect, and that the building of spaceships is more to do with funding/military advantage than it is the mood of writing.
that said, conveying wonder is a meaningful thread of the science-fiction tapestry. Robert Conquest put it well in one his poems:
Imagination that debarsThe deeps of time, the endless stars,May grow too numb to harmonizeIts own rag-doll's two button eyes.
I may be feeling slightly sour towards Stephenson at the moment - have put down Quicksilver and will never pick it up again, a thought that gives me some pleasure.
― Fizzles, Friday, 6 June 2014 09:29 (six years ago) link
― 龜, Friday, 6 June 2014 10:19 (six years ago) link
Reading the (great) analysis of Cryptonomicon in N. Katherine Hayles's (great) My Mother Was A Computer must have given me the Stephenson bug again. Picked up a paperback of Quicksilver for what I realize now must be my third reading of this monstrosity (twice in the hardbacks, which I ditched years ago). They had Reamde also but something in me wanted familiar, labyrinthine comfort food. Enjoying it tremendously, though a lot of that is just from knowing the characters and where this is all going. Kind of amazed I got through it the first time, since so much of it appears to be just period scene-setting and detail for the sake of detail, and the narrative arc is virtually invisible.
― Doctor Casino, Monday, 12 January 2015 17:45 (five years ago) link
Excerpt from his new book's up on his site now http://www.nealstephenson.com/news/2015/04/13/seveneves-excerpt/
― stet, Monday, 13 April 2015 20:57 (five years ago) link
i genuinely enjoyed the most recent book of his i read about parallel realities despite the fact that the word 'praxis' appeared on a single page of the hardcover copy i was reading six times.
― no (Lamp), Monday, 13 April 2015 22:29 (five years ago) link
seveneves: a bit better than the gun-nut one but man it was hard going as a novel sometimes. Some nice ideas, though.
― stet, Wednesday, 3 June 2015 09:18 (five years ago) link
about 2/3 of the way through. A lot of the zero-g mechanical engineering stuff could have been edited...but I'll definitely finish it
― calstars, Friday, 28 August 2015 11:38 (four years ago) link
i thought it was pretty good, definitely could've tightened up the first part which made the second seem a little rushed by contrast. reflected afterwards that i wasn't sure if i would've preferred more of the second part or none of it.
― Roberto Spiralli, Friday, 28 August 2015 13:47 (four years ago) link
wife finished it last night and loved it - guess I'll start it next
― Οὖτις, Friday, 28 August 2015 15:21 (four years ago) link
Carly Fiorina is going to get us all killed.
― Kiarostami bag (milo z), Thursday, 8 October 2015 01:15 (four years ago) link
― calstars, Thursday, 8 October 2015 01:47 (four years ago) link
― Kiarostami bag (milo z), Friday, 9 October 2015 16:06 (four years ago) link
100 pages into 'seveneves' and i've only just discovered it's not called 'seveneyes' (because seveneyes turns up no search results here)
― koogs, Friday, 2 December 2016 18:22 (three years ago) link
Love Cryptonomicon. the physical comedy in the WWII parts was my favourite part
― flopson, Friday, 2 December 2016 18:37 (three years ago) link
otm, i love those bits too
― Flamenco Drop (VegemiteGrrl), Friday, 2 December 2016 23:47 (three years ago) link
Seveneves is a palindrome, I now realise. Still not sure of the relevance of this though.
― koogs, Saturday, 3 December 2016 08:47 (three years ago) link
I need to pick up Seveneves, Reamde was so dumb I just kind of tuned him out for years, which was probably unfair. But the politics of it retroactively ruined Cryptonomicon.
Anyone read Cobweb, one of those books he wrote with his uncle in the 90s? The one about terrorists?
― erry red flag (f. hazel), Wednesday, 7 December 2016 05:06 (three years ago) link
Gotta love a book that starts part 3 with "five thousand years later"
― koogs, Saturday, 10 December 2016 06:26 (three years ago) link
And he's just explained the name, and I totally missed it.
― koogs, Saturday, 10 December 2016 06:28 (three years ago) link
New one Dodge is out next week, but is available on Kindle now. It's back in the Waterhouse universe, post Reamde.
― stet, Friday, 5 July 2019 17:11 (one year ago) link