Neal Stephenson: Cryptonomicon & more...

Sci Fi announced that George Clooney will be part of the creative team bringing the retro cyberpunk book The 'Diamond Age' to the channel. Neal Stephenson will adapt the miniseries from his novel, which I'll basically sum up as the adventures a young girl goes through as she comes into the possession of a talking "smartbook." Clooney and partner Grant Heslov will executive produce.

I really liked Cryptonomicon and Snow Crash, but really madly loved The Baroque Cycle because I'm a huge fan of long works of historical fiction involving pirates, scientists, and conspiracies, and it has all three! In that respect, it's the closest thing to The Sot-Weed Factor I've read in years, which is my barometer of the most fun book ever. And I want more. So given that that's where my taste runs, what would ILX recommend?

Diamond Age would lend itself well to television, I think. We'll see.

Maria,

George Clooney has bought the rights to run Diamond Age as a limited series.

Stephenson update on the eve of the release of Anathem

it is a good book. or maybe two of them: the convent part and the space part. i read an advance copy, and i have to say it is a pretty swell release, espesh the early philosophy-lite stuff.

the CD that comes with it is ... i know, by eno (right?) ... but kind of terrible, even unlistenable.

oh, wait David Stutz, a former Microsoft techie now involved in early classical music—and an HBC member—composed and produced the effort, which is being considered for widespread release. "It's a pseudo-liturgical use of mathematics and higher thinking," Stutz says. Actually, to the untrained ear it sounds like the neo-Gregorian chanting that accompanies ritual baby sacrifice in horror films.

i am sorry david stutz. i do not have an untrained ear -- i just think it is ... too schematic or something.

Hardcover £9 at Amazon, paperback £23. Wtf?

I bought Quicksilver the week it came out. I put it aside because I thought once I started it, I wouldn't be able to stop so waited until I had a good long break. I opened it on New Year's Day and put it down after 50 pages due to excessive name-dropping and officiousness. Most disappointing.

[Daniel's] a nice piece of work. Eliza never comes together quite so well

i bought quicksilver over a month ago and it took me about four weeks of stopping and starting to get through the first book. once i got to the jack/eliza sections the going got better. confusion is a far more lively read if maybe a little lighter on ideas but i've been sucked into the series now.

i believe in eliza more than any of the others and her story is the one that gives the books their emotional heft. i can see what you mean, Dr. C, about daniel feeling real but he (has yet) to seem lovable. i always have this terrible clive james article in my head when i think about books like stephenson's and eliza feels like the kind of kate croy + a corpse character he claims can't exist.

Daniel comes into focus in The Confusion, I think, as he sort of realizes his own strengths and limitations. System of the World has him taking stock of these things and doing his best with them. Somewhere in the midst of all that is where he becomes lovable.

Elaborate on the Clive James thing? It sounds interesting but I can't fathom what exactly you're referring to here (corpse character?).

I like Eliza a little more on the second read, but moreso than Jack she seems saddled by the picaresque narrative - she wears so many hats and does so many things, but rather than a super-badass can-do lunkhead she's intended as a plausible human being...she makes sense to me in any given scene/subplot, but taken together it's just so much to bring together into one person.

clive james wrote this article for the new yorker a couple of years ago about detective fiction where he basically claims that the narrative demands of detective fiction make a psychologically complex character unachievable. some harvard real talk about characters acting as types rather than ppl blah blah blah if henry james was a murder mystery. so, i guess my point was that eliza's actions seemed to work structurally and still feel psychologically real.

maybe that's why i didn't really like system of the world since eliza's personality is obscured in favour of daniel's pov.

most prophetic 19th Century novelist evar

clive james wrote this article for the new yorker a couple of years ago about detective fiction where he basically claims that the narrative demands of detective fiction make a psychologically complex character unachievable

I actually used to teach a class in which it was demonstrated that ALL fiction is detective fiction. Good times.

On finishing up Confusion re-read - god, is Eliza's perspective ever dumped in this series! Her plots probably have more page time than either Daniel's or Jack's, through the first three-quarters of The Confusion, and then, what the hell happens to her? The seemingly really crucial moment of her and Jack coming face to face after all this time, and it's a really brief scene told in omniscient third person, maybe favoring Jack if anybody. (In general the ending to The Confusion is rushed, shocker I know, but really after all that gallivanting around the world you'd think he could linger on the actual getting-home as much as he does on the manufacture of watered steel or the primitive nature of the 17th century French credit economy...)

I was at the new B&N in Tupelo on Thursday (2nd day in business...seems like a risky venture in such a lowbrow town) picking up Anathem, and was appalled to see that for mass market publication, the Baroque Cycle is being broken down from three hardcovers to eight paperbacks.

"clive james wrote this article for the new yorker a couple of years ago about detective fiction where he basically claims that the narrative demands of detective fiction make a psychologically complex character unachievable"--i want to read this, link?

bump for the new one. anybody else doing REAMDE?

So far it's...a fun, techy shaggy-dog story that loves guns, maps, and MMORPGs. Stephenson can write a digression better than anybody, and I just read a fascinating 500 word treatise on the street design in Xianmin (?) city. One of his protagonists is a female African refugee, a hipster twice orphaned and raised in Iowa, who makes a living by writing code to represent the movement of magma in the underground of a virtual medieval world.

I loved REAMDE.

I just got it from the library. I tend to read on the subway ride to work, so this is a bit unwieldy! I'm finding it much more engaging than Anathem, however.

Didn't hate it, but have forgotten almost everything about it, as I thought I would. Just, "meh", really. Felt the lack of digressions; also felt like he'd tried to cater to his critics at the expense of the aspects enjoyed by his audience.

it was entertaining but seemed pretty dumb for stephenson. basically a nerdy, 900-page airplane book - which isn't necessarily a bad thing.

maybe "dumb" should have been in scare quotes there.

I loved REAMDE and totally annoyed Mr. Jaq by staying up too late reading it with single-minded purpose. And then not being able to tell him anything about why it was so engrossing, because it's really not his kind of thing so attempts were met with ????
¯\(°_0)/¯ ???? kinds of looks.

I've heard his campus comedy novel thing is horrible and I have no real desire to read it

i liked it a lot when i read it in college. it wasn't as funny when i re-read it a few years ago, but it's still good.

700 pages in, and i'm still liking this a lot. there's only been one weird digression (bears and the t/f of menstrual blood attraction) and i agree it's an 'airplane novel' but i'd be v. satisfied to read a lot more of these, if that's what NS wanted to write

i thought anathem was better, despite some long boring unnecessary stretches. reamde was fun and i also burned through it pretty fast but was ultimately pretty silly.

i should reread cryptonomicon, maybe it was more straight-ahead and reamde-esque than i remember. in my memory it was fun and exciting but also pretty smart, but i read it like 10 years ago i think.

I read the campus college thing when I was in college too, and around the same time that I read Ballard's high rise--I don't know if this is actually true anymore but at the time I felt like those two books were making the nature vs nurture argument with each other.

I think I was also greatly influenced by chunks of reamde being set in my neighborhood (Georgetown) - it always makes me happy when there's a bit of home an author's got right.

n/a, I described it to someone as much more Cryptonomicon than Snowcrash, but I think it's possibly more Zodiac than Cryptonomicon.

It took me 50 pages to realize re-u meant reunion. I kept seeing "re-up". Sigh.

Marathoned through the last 600 pages yesterday and today. Loads of fun. I enjoyed the structure of overlapping scenes -- like watching roofers shingle a house the size of a football field.

You know something? If I were a successful author and was looking for something different to do that can also take advantage of my obscure hobby, I'd probably do the same: http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/260688528/clang

i found a continuity error in anathem -- a character has a few lines in a scene despite supposedly being thousands of miles away -- and emailed him about it. three months later he wrote back admitting it and saying thanks. probably should have pressed him to hire me

Is anyone reading The Mongoliad?

Snow Crash to be directed by Joe Cornish (Attack the Block, Adam and Joe):
http://badassdigest.com/2012/06/14/attack-the-blocks-joe-cornish-to-direct-cyberpunk-classic-snow-crash/

Don't recall a think about snow crash. Should I reread or is life too short?

pizza delivery. lots of talk about sumerian proto language. lead character with stupid name.

His great 3:30 single before he started on the concept albums. (this reading kind of ignores the bit where it slows to a stop for Sumerian chanting, but that only makes me love him more).

A question: Neal Stephenson is the only writer for whom I'll think "I really enjoyed reading that sentence. I think I'll read it again!". Where else should I be looking for this (which I understand (and am completely at peace with) to be non-correlated with literary "quality")

<I>lead character with stupid name.</I>

Hiro Protagonist is a great name, a great character detail _and_ a great joke, all in one!

that name broke the spell, made you remember you were reading a book, didn't like it for that reason as much as anything.

great central premise though (one they used in the New Avengers...) and there was some well thought-out virtual reality thing in there as well. all this makes me want to re-read it.

A question: Neal Stephenson is the only writer for whom I'll think "I really enjoyed reading that sentence. I think I'll read it again!". Where else should I be looking for this

sounds like a cue for new ilb thread to me.

like david foster wallace, his non-fiction is a lot better. i kind of wish he did a 'remix' of all his fiction books reformulated as speculative essays.

also, a silly name is less of a spell-breaking thing than characters being mouthpieces for concepts and information stephenson wants to get across that he could do (and does) much better just speaking directly to the reader. I know that's a standard deficiency in SF writing, but I feel like other authors should get a pass because they don't seem to know any better way to communicate, but Stephenson is just fine at expressing weird or technical ideas to laymen without these unnecessary character props.

Seems like it should get the Game of Thrones treatment, not get edited down into meaninglessness in order to fit in two or so hours.

but Stephenson is just fine at expressing weird or technical ideas to laymen without these unnecessary character props.

Or was until he took misguided criticism of the infodumps to heart and started doing it via characters in Reamde

r(ea)mde

Really loving the hell out of Reamde.

Stephenson talks about REAMDE with lawyers at the UW Law School

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l6-gpVmHh4c

I think it's more or less meaningless tbh. I don't really think writers have obligations to society in this respect, and that the building of spaceships is more to do with funding/military advantage than it is the mood of writing.

that said, conveying wonder is a meaningful thread of the science-fiction tapestry. Robert Conquest put it well in one his poems:

Imagination that debars
The deeps of time, the endless stars,
May grow too numb to harmonize
Its own rag-doll's two button eyes.

I may be feeling slightly sour towards Stephenson at the moment - have put down Quicksilver and will never pick it up again, a thought that gives me some pleasure.

^ Yes

Reading the (great) analysis of Cryptonomicon in N. Katherine Hayles's (great) My Mother Was A Computer must have given me the Stephenson bug again. Picked up a paperback of Quicksilver for what I realize now must be my third reading of this monstrosity (twice in the hardbacks, which I ditched years ago). They had Reamde also but something in me wanted familiar, labyrinthine comfort food. Enjoying it tremendously, though a lot of that is just from knowing the characters and where this is all going. Kind of amazed I got through it the first time, since so much of it appears to be just period scene-setting and detail for the sake of detail, and the narrative arc is virtually invisible.

Excerpt from his new book's up on his site now
http://www.nealstephenson.com/news/2015/04/13/seveneves-excerpt/

i genuinely enjoyed the most recent book of his i read about parallel realities despite the fact that the word 'praxis' appeared on a single page of the hardcover copy i was reading six times.

seveneves: a bit better than the gun-nut one but man it was hard going as a novel sometimes. Some nice ideas, though.

about 2/3 of the way through. A lot of the zero-g mechanical engineering stuff could have been edited...but I'll definitely finish it

i thought it was pretty good, definitely could've tightened up the first part which made the second seem a little rushed by contrast. reflected afterwards that i wasn't sure if i would've preferred more of the second part or none of it.

wife finished it last night and loved it - guess I'll start it next

Carly Fiorina is going to get us all killed.

?

JBF parallels

100 pages into 'seveneves' and i've only just discovered it's not called 'seveneyes' (because seveneyes turns up no search results here)

Love Cryptonomicon. the physical comedy in the WWII parts was my favourite part

otm, i love those bits too

Seveneves is a palindrome, I now realise. Still not sure of the relevance of this though.

I need to pick up Seveneves, Reamde was so dumb I just kind of tuned him out for years, which was probably unfair. But the politics of it retroactively ruined Cryptonomicon.

Anyone read Cobweb, one of those books he wrote with his uncle in the 90s? The one about terrorists?

Gotta love a book that starts part 3 with "five thousand years later"

And he's just explained the name, and I totally missed it.

New one Dodge is out next week, but is available on Kindle now. It's back in the Waterhouse universe, post Reamde.

been plowing through Seveneves which i don't really recommend as isolation reading given the emphasis on global catastrophe and dread. also it's not really that good. i just hit the big shift about 2/3 of the way through and i'm really not feeling it, kinda exposes a ton of his weaknesses as a writer as well as his increasingly dodgy politics. this book is shockingly comfortable with eugenics and genetics-as-destiny! there's even a character who invokes a "bell curve" type argument about race and intelligence that just goes totally unchecked by anyone else, as if it's trustworthy scientific information like all the other nerdy shit people spout off in his books. i guess if you're really into orbital mechanics it'd be a blast. but after devouring the Mars Trilogy twice over i'm ready for a lot more self-conscious politics in my books about spacefaring nerds.

I couldn't get past the first sentence of that book, which was laugh-out-loud hilarious and bad.

The moon blew up without warning and for no apparent reason.

I mean, this is like Daniel Pinkwater-level (and I love Pinkwater and would probably like Stephenson's books more if he wrote like Pinkwater, which he generally does not)

I think what I may end up remembering best about this book is the rather brassy choice on the back cover for one of the two review blurbs to be blatantly plucked from a savage pan:

"Fascinating . . . . Insights into the human character shine like occasional full moons." - Boston Globe

"Still, she couldn't help but flinch as the final few flynks snapped around toward them." (p. 617)

gawwwwd the world-building in this final section is just so stupid, in the most blinkered, weird, nerd-author-can't-perceive-how-strange-he's-become kind of way.

author-can't-perceive-how-strange-he's-become kind of way.

― Doctor Casino, Friday, April 3, 2020 2:44 PM

This can either be the best thing or the worst thing.

worst in this case

watched The Core last night and was struck by how much it basically is a dumb and sometimes fun version of this book

the book is already dumb obv so what i mean is "less nerdy"