I just discovered him a year ago and I love it. I'm surprised that almost all of his books are near out of print, and he's never -ever- discussed when late 20th century literature pops up. Of course the same goes for authors like Harry Matthews.
Honestly I could've cared less for most of 20th century lit until I started discovering these guys. Any other fanz?
― burt_stanton, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 20:22 (fourteen years ago) link
*most of mid-late 20th century lit.
― burt_stanton, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 20:25 (fourteen years ago) link
I'm surprised that almost all of his books are near out of print
They're not.
https://id409.van.ca.siteprotect.com/centerforbookculture/dalkey/backlist/sorrentino_gilbert.html
he's never -ever- discussed when late 20th century literature pops up
http://www.bookforum.com/archive/feb_06/howard.html
― Mr. Que, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 20:26 (fourteen years ago) link
Well, do you have anything else to say, or did you just post that stuff to be a douchebag?
― burt_stanton, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 20:34 (fourteen years ago) link
i posted that stuff to be a douchebag.
however
i didn't like Imaginative Qualities of Actual Things. it never really jelled for me as a novel. the entire time i read it, i thought to myself: He's making fun of all these NYC art people, but I feel like I need a concordance to figure out who is who. Eh.
Mulligan Stew was very very funny as I recall. . .but I read it last summer and I realize now I don't remember a thing about it except for a funny list of books and magazines on a character's shelf.
My favorite is The Sky Changes, a bleak, brutal travelogue, just totally sad and depressing and great.
I'm going to read Aberration of Starlight soon-ish here
― Mr. Que, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 20:38 (fourteen years ago) link
Yeah, you get the Imaginative Qualities, but not so much the Actual Things he's talking about. I think some of it parallels to what you find in NYC today, so I just filled it in with what I've experienced from that.
I'm reading Mulligan Stew right now and it's pretty fun so far.
― burt_stanton, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 20:53 (fourteen years ago) link
and I guess what I meant about "nobody talking about him" is that he seems lost in the shuffle of mid-late century experimental authors. Like, you get a million NPR-accented nitwits who rave about Perec's cunning lack of using the letter E (to write one of the worst narratives I've ever read), but Sorrentino, Matthews, etc., don't ring as much of a bell. It's probably just up to fashion.
― burt_stanton, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 21:00 (fourteen years ago) link
mid-late century experimental authors
i see/read his name all the time as associated with this era
― Mr. Que, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 21:02 (fourteen years ago) link
oHHHHHH, it's probably just the people I encounter then. It just seemed like he wasn't as popular as a lot of others.
― burt_stanton, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 21:03 (fourteen years ago) link
he defintely wasn't, he's a little lower on the radar i think but yeah.
― Mr. Que, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 21:05 (fourteen years ago) link
Matthews I don't know from, but Mathews gets mentioned fairly often.
― James Redd and the Blecchs, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 21:12 (fourteen years ago) link
Har har.
I'm pretty sure we have a Sorrentino thread somewhere in the archive.
― Casuistry, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 04:20 (fourteen years ago) link
he's maybe a little lower on the radar in that his books tend to already assume a buncha knowledge that others don't - like mulligan stew assumes you know a buncha lamenesses about the 'postmodern novel', & imaginative qualities a buncha lamenesses about the fiction of the 50s-60s beats&hipsters
― thomp, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 10:36 (fourteen years ago) link
hubert selby jr. credits sorrentino with teaching him how to write in at least one introduction � does it show? mebbe �
ILB has RIP gilbert sorrentino RIP Gilbert Sorrentino. ILE has the plainer thread Gilbert Sorrentino
― thomp, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 10:38 (fourteen years ago) link
huh chris for some reason i thought you were a fan of mulligan stew
― thomp, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 10:39 (fourteen years ago) link
You'd think, right?
― Casuistry, Thursday, 1 May 2008 18:12 (fourteen years ago) link
We've done this before.
― James Redd and the Blecchs, Friday, 2 May 2008 14:30 (fourteen years ago) link
Does that make it suitably Sorrentinian?
― Casuistry, Friday, 2 May 2008 20:29 (fourteen years ago) link
Nope.
― James Redd and the Blecchs, Friday, 2 May 2008 21:05 (fourteen years ago) link
I didn't know that the Dalkey Archive had a street team.
― C0L1N B..., Saturday, 3 May 2008 03:43 (fourteen years ago) link
I didn't take advantage of that ridiculous 100 books for $500 deal they had at one point, or whatever it was, if that's what you're saying.
― Casuistry, Saturday, 3 May 2008 04:42 (fourteen years ago) link
I just came across Imaginative Qualities of Real Things on a booklist I was looking at. Thought it looked interesting so I was just thinking of ordering it as an Interlibrary loan. It's not a quick read then?
― Stevolende, Friday, 28 January 2022 13:37 (one year ago) link
Someone said that upthread? Oh I see. No you can read it pretty quickly. I know I did.
― Tapioca Tumbril (James Redd and the Blecchs), Friday, 28 January 2022 13:44 (one year ago) link