"by night in chile" was good , and now i've got hyped "savage detectives" for me to explore.
any thoughts about him and this particular book?
also, "nazi litreture in america" is now published, and his other mega thick masterpiece(?!) novel "2666" is suppoosed to be out later this year.
― Zeno, Tuesday, 25 March 2008 22:53 (ten years ago) Permalink
I'm plowing through Nazi Literature in America right now. It probably owes more to Borges than anything else I've ever read by him. I'm enjoying it for the most part, but the best chapters out of it (the one on Irma Carrasco is my favorite so far) introduce characters so rich in potential that it's sad to see them disappear a few short pages later. That's a good problem to have, though.
The Savage Detectives was the first thing I ever read by him, and it's still one of my very favorite books. In some ways, especially in the middle section with all of the interviews, it does the same thing I mentioned above in introducing characters that are gone too soon. The difference is, given his format in that section, there's always a possibility that they'll pop up again, either as a person being directly interviewed, or as a character in someone else's version of events. And those are just the "minor" characters in the book. Joaquin Font, the bookstore owner, stood out for me. Seeing his name pop up on the next page is always a "yes!" moment, at least for me.
Then there's the main pair, Arturo Belano and Ulises Lima. Belano is supposed to be a stand-in for Roberto Bolano himself, which gives any scene that he's a part of another dimension to explore, if you want. Again, the interview format for the long middle section of the book is perfect for getting to know these characters. Some people think they're brilliant, others see them as mere drug dealers, some are teenagers who look up to them, others sleep with them, and so on.
It's a really rewarding book, so good that I'm almost sad I started with it, because although I've enjoyed the other books I've read by him, I think he's at his best with more space to work with, letting his characters unfold over hundreds of enjoyable pages. That's why I'm so excited for 2666, later this year!
― Z S, Sunday, 30 March 2008 17:17 (ten years ago) Permalink
Arg, Nazi Literature in THE AmericaS.
amazing how the style in "savage" is so different than "night in chile" - almost like they were written by a different writer.
my impressions from the first part of "savage detectives" is that like a combination between hemingway,kerouak and cortazar's "hopsctch" with great irony towards it's characters, and more of a direct,sometiems brutal writing approach (sex and viloence scenes).
but i havent reach to the second part yet which is a totaly differnt story and style.
"by night in chile", in big contradiction was kinda surrealist, and full of images and dark atmosphere, like a long poem.
― Zeno, Sunday, 30 March 2008 18:48 (ten years ago) Permalink
― remy bean, Sunday, 30 March 2008 19:00 (ten years ago) Permalink
I'm looking forward to the translations of his poetry, too. I remember reading somewhere that he pretty much dedicated his life to poetry until the mid-90s, when he turned to fiction to make some money to support his family, once he found out about his terminal illness.
― Z S, Sunday, 30 March 2008 20:12 (ten years ago) Permalink
except for belano and lima, most of the vicerrealistas are still alive > http://infrarrealismo.com/
the thin column that's at the left of this was afaik lima's only obituary.
― chiquita, Sunday, 30 March 2008 22:33 (ten years ago) Permalink
Los detectives salvajes is really great, there's a lot of Cortázar in it. I have 2666 and am looking forward to reading it.
― jim, Sunday, 30 March 2008 22:40 (ten years ago) Permalink
Wait, there really was a Belano? I thought he was modeled after Bolano?
― Z S, Sunday, 30 March 2008 22:51 (ten years ago) Permalink
He was. There was a real Lima though.
― jim, Sunday, 30 March 2008 22:56 (ten years ago) Permalink
belano is modeled after roberto bolaño.
lima is modeled after mario santiago papasquiaro.
there are some pictures here.
― chiquita, Sunday, 30 March 2008 22:58 (ten years ago) Permalink
i think the first part is more like a parody about cortazar's "hopscotch": the heroes here are young, naive, as oppose to those in "hopscotch" which are dead serious, and getting extremely deep (in thoughts and in action) in their quest for meaning.
in the "savage", it's more about the sex drugs and adventure of youth, while the "art" is usually and ironiclly of course, just a bunch of shallow words and/or name-dropping game,that covers naive and stupidity sometimes.
― Zeno, Monday, 31 March 2008 00:54 (ten years ago) Permalink
It's going to be a monster:
Somehow I want to start with that one, which I know is backwards.
― _Rockist__Scientist_, Monday, 7 April 2008 19:23 (ten years ago) Permalink
Agh, November! I was hoping that 2666 was coming out during the summer, when I actually have time to read it. Then again, it would be a great Winter break read as well.
― Z S, Tuesday, 8 April 2008 02:27 (ten years ago) Permalink
What Do Customers Ultimately Buy After Viewing This Item?
81% buy the item featured on this page:
2666: A Novel
I don't trust Amazon sometimes. After viewing this page, 81% chose to buy the book 7 months in advance? Seriously?
― Z S, Tuesday, 8 April 2008 02:32 (ten years ago) Permalink
I just got The Savage Detectives from the library, yay!
― franny glass, Tuesday, 8 April 2008 12:52 (ten years ago) Permalink
uh mentioned this in the other thread but savage detectives blew me away !!!
― deej, Friday, 25 April 2008 05:36 (ten years ago) Permalink
btw there's a great piece on it in the new yorker archives
― deej, Friday, 25 April 2008 13:11 (ten years ago) Permalink
I know the piece you're talking about...actually, I'd never even heard of Bolano before I read it, and it was one of those reviews that convinced me to immediately go out and buy the book.
― Z S, Friday, 25 April 2008 23:22 (ten years ago) Permalink
just started it.
― Jordan, Friday, 2 May 2008 14:36 (ten years ago) Permalink
Maybe I should give it another go, but it bored the hell out of me. I was so disappointed after reading James Wood's rave last spring.
Meanwhile By Night in Chile was damn impressive.
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 2 May 2008 17:54 (ten years ago) Permalink
Yeah, that New Yorker article was totally "Behold, a new dead genius in our midst" - it made me want to read everything by him too. I did read By Night in Chile, which was fairly interesting, though not exactly mind-blowing. Haven't tried anything else yet.
― o. nate, Friday, 2 May 2008 18:37 (ten years ago) Permalink
"savage" is much much better and totally different than "chile" in scope,style,everything.
infact, two weeks after ive done with "savage" i still cant get it out of my head.
― Zeno, Friday, 2 May 2008 20:10 (ten years ago) Permalink
I will give Savage Detectives another try, it seemed kind of wack when I tried the first time but then again I am myself wack.
― Dimension 5ive, Tuesday, 6 May 2008 21:21 (ten years ago) Permalink
OK, have got 'Nazi Literature' and 'Last Evenings' on the way in the post. Was very tempted by 'Savage Detectives' but bailed at the last moment due to its size (I just read the 900-page 'Fortunes of Richard Mahoney' and it exhausted me).
― James Morrison, Tuesday, 6 May 2008 23:10 (ten years ago) Permalink
i thought the beginning bit was pretty wack but after that - huge improvement (for me)
― t_g, Friday, 9 May 2008 11:12 (ten years ago) Permalink
Maybe I made a mistake in starting with Savage Detectives. By Night in Chile and Nazi Literature in the Americas are good, but the at the same level of Savage Detectives. I'm hoping 2666 will be at least at the same level, or step it up a notch.
― Z S, Saturday, 10 May 2008 05:31 (ten years ago) Permalink
but NOT at the same level, I meant, agh.
― Z S, Saturday, 10 May 2008 05:32 (ten years ago) Permalink
Oh, and I meant to make some dumb analogy to starting with some band's best album, and then being left with the great but comparatively weaker material afterward.
GREAT POST, sorry
― Z S, Saturday, 10 May 2008 05:33 (ten years ago) Permalink
this dude has some major heat on him right now - first time in ages that a friend has just handed me a book and said "here, I want you to have this, I know when you read it you'll love it" with that kind of evangelical self-assurance y'know
started that book today so far quite good
― J0hn D., Sunday, 1 June 2008 01:01 (ten years ago) Permalink
― t_g, Wednesday, 4 June 2008 12:22 (ten years ago) Permalink
there's some good bolano backlash on the "what's a noize dude reading?" thread.
― Jordan, Wednesday, 4 June 2008 12:57 (ten years ago) Permalink
of course there is
― n/a, Wednesday, 4 June 2008 13:09 (ten years ago) Permalink
did you finish it, nick?
― Jordan, Wednesday, 4 June 2008 13:11 (ten years ago) Permalink
yeah it was great
― n/a, Wednesday, 4 June 2008 13:37 (ten years ago) Permalink
― Jordan, Wednesday, 4 June 2008 13:40 (ten years ago) Permalink
now i'm reading 'clockers' and it's like whoah how are there so many amazing books?
― n/a, Wednesday, 4 June 2008 13:42 (ten years ago) Permalink
ha, i'm about to start 'lush life'.
― Jordan, Wednesday, 4 June 2008 13:50 (ten years ago) Permalink
2666 coming out november 11,
outstanding reviews all over.can't wait to read it.
“Bolaño’s masterwork . . . An often shockingly raunchy and violent tour de force (though the phrase seems hardly adequate to describe the novel’s narrative velocity, polyphonic range, inventiveness, and bravery) based in part on the still unsolved murders of hundreds of women in Ciudad Juárez, in the Sonora desert near the Texas border.” —FRANCISCO GOLDMAN, The New York Review of Books “Not just the great Spanish-language novel of [this] decade, but one of the cornerstones that define an entire literature.” —J. A. MASOLIVER RÓDENAS, La Vanguardia “One of those strange, exquisite, and astonishing experiences that literature offers us only once in a very long time . . . to see . . . a writer in full pursuit of the Total Novel, one that not only completes his life’s work but redefines it and raises it to new dizzying heights.” —RODRIGO FRESÁN, El País "Bolano's savoir-faire is incredible ... The exploded narrative reveals a virtuosity that we rarely encounter, and one cannot help being bowled over by certain bravura passages--to single one out, the series of reports describing murdered young women, which is both magnificent and unbearable. We won't even mention the 'resolution' of this infernal 2666, a world of a novel in which the power of words triumphs over savagery." --Baptiste Liger, L'EXPRESS
"Splendid ... The jaw-dropping synthesis of a brief but incredibly fertile career." --Fabrice Gabriel, LES INROCKUPTIBLES
"The event of the spring: with 2666 Roberto Bolano has given us his most dense, complex, and powerful novel, a meditation on literature and evil that begins with a sordid newspaper item in contemporary Mexico." --Morgan Boedec, CHRONIC ART
"Including the imaginary and the mythic alongside the real in his historiography, without ever dabbling in the magical realism dear to many of his Latin-American peers, Bolano strews his chronicle with dreams and visions. As in the films of David Lynch (with whom Bolano's novel shares a certain kinship) these become a catalyst for reflection ... In such darkness, one must keep one's eyes wide open. Bolano invites us to do just that." --Sabine Audrerie, LA CROIX
"An immense moment for literature ... With prodigious skill and his inimitable art of digression, Bolano leads us to the gates of his own hell. May he burn in peace." --TECHNIKART
"Bolano constructs a chaos that has an order all its own ... The state of the world today transmuted into literature." --Isabelle Ruf, LE TEMPS
"To confront the reader with the horror of the contemporary world was Bolano's guiding ambition. He succeeded, to say the least. Upset, shocked, sometimes even sickened, at times one is tempted to shut the book because it's unbearable to read. Don't shut it. Far from being a blood-and-guts thriller meant to entertain, 2666 is a 'visceral realist" portrait of the human condition in the twenty-first century." --Anna Topaloff, MARIANNE
"On every page the reader marvels, hypnotized, at the capacity of this baroque writer to encompass all literary genres in a single fascinating, enigmatic story. No doubt many readers will find 2666 inexhaustible to interpretation. It is a fully realized work by a pure genius at the height of his powers." --LIRE
"His masterpiece ... Bolano borrows from vaudeville and the campus novel, from noir and pulp, from science fiction, from the Bildungsroman, from war novels; the tone of his writing oscillates between humor and total darkness, between the simplicity of a fairytale and the false neutrality of a police report." --Minh Tran Huy, LE MAGAZINE LITTERAIRE (Paris)
"The book explores evil with irony, without any theory or resolution, relying on storytelling alone as its saving grace... Each story is an adventure: a fresco at once horrifying, delicate, grotesque, redundant, and absurd, revealed by the flashlight of a child who stands at the threshold of a cave he will never leave." --Philippe Lancon, LIBERATION
"If THE SAVAGE DETECTIVES recounted the end of a century of avant-gardes and ideological battles, 2666, more radically, evokes the end of humanity as we know it. Apocalyptic in this sense, wavering between decomposition and totality, endlessly in love with people and books, Bolano's last novel ranges over the world and history like the knight Percival, who in Bolano's words 'wears his fool's motley underneath his armor.'" --Fabienne Dumontet, LE MONDE DES LIVRES (Paris)
"A work of genius: a work of immense lucidity and narrative cunning, written with a unique mixture of creative power and intimate existential desperation, the work of a master whose voice has all the authority and seeming effortlessness that we associate with the great classics of the ages ... It is impossible to read this book without feeling the earth shift beneath one's feet. It is impossible to venture deep into writing so unforgiving without feeling inwardly moved--by a shudder of fear, maybe even horror, but also by its need to pay attention, by its desire for clarity, by its hunger for the real." --Andres Ibanaz, BLANCO Y NEGRO
"Without a doubt the greatest of Bolano's productions ... The five parts of this masterwork can be read separately, as five isolated novels; none loses any of its brilliance, but what's lost is the grandeur that they achieve in combination, the grandeur of a project truly rare in fiction nowadays, one that can be enjoyed only in its totality." --Ana Maria Moix, EL PAIS
"Make no mistake, 2666 is a work of huge importance ... a complex literary experience, in which the author seeks to set down his nightmares while he feels time running out. Bolano inspires passion, even when his material, his era, and his volume seem overwhelming. This could only be published in a single volume, and it can only be read as one." --EL MUNDO
"An absolute masterpiece ... Bolano writes almost without adjectives, but in his prose this leads to double meanings. The narration is pure metonymy: it omits feelings in favor of facts. A phone call or a sex act can express real tragedy, the sweep of the vast human condition." --Andres Lomena, LA OPINION DE MALAGA
― Zeno, Wednesday, 15 October 2008 14:56 (ten years ago) Permalink
I've still got 2666 to read, in a pile that includes the Recognitions by Gaddis and Underworld by DeLillo. I think I'll get to it first, really liked detectives salvages a lot.
― what U cry 4 (jim), Wednesday, 15 October 2008 14:58 (ten years ago) Permalink
+ don't want to wait 'til next year to be reading it of course.
man that does sound exciting. just pre-ordered that 3 volume box set now.
― t_g, Wednesday, 15 October 2008 15:05 (ten years ago) Permalink
savage detective was awesome.the ambivalent of Bolano's thoughts and feelings towards art and artists (supreme or pretentious/naive? maybe both at the same time)is deliverd in a highly original way
― Zeno, Wednesday, 15 October 2008 15:05 (ten years ago) Permalink
oh man, i want to read this but after finishing infinite jest i don't think i'll want to read another 900+ pager
― Jordan, Wednesday, 15 October 2008 16:16 (ten years ago) Permalink
I'm put off by the size, but the boxed set is a thing of beauty
― James Morrison, Wednesday, 15 October 2008 22:32 (ten years ago) Permalink
i think i might order this as a present for myself to read once i'm done with this semester of grad school. i can't handle anything this heavy while i'm doing school, unfortunately
― metametadata (n/a), Wednesday, 15 October 2008 22:40 (ten years ago) Permalink
^^yah me too. this might be my winter break book. heard mixed stuff about savage detectives but i may give this one a go.
― Mr. Que, Friday, 7 November 2008 17:18 (ten years ago) Permalink
savage detectives was great. i never actually ordered 2066, i should do that now.
― metametadata (n/a), Friday, 7 November 2008 17:23 (ten years ago) Permalink
done ... now i just need to forget i ordered it before next week so it'll be a pleasant surprise when it arrives
― metametadata (n/a), Friday, 7 November 2008 17:29 (ten years ago) Permalink
I ordered it a few days ago, along with Saramago's Death With Interruptions. I probably will not get a chance to start either until May 17th, 2009, my 26th birthday, graduate school graduation day, end of a personal nightmare, and beginning of the better part of my life. I'm really looking forward to that day.
― z "R" s (Z S), Friday, 7 November 2008 17:29 (ten years ago) Permalink
I started enjoying it a lot more after I posted how much I wasn't enjoying it.
the point about a poem is an interesting one, Cherish, cos I was sitting there thinking hmm shd this probably be a short poem? What's the stuff here that cdnt be in a poem. the accumulated stylistic monotony (I mean that neutrally) is one thing + now I'm getting on with it a bit better it feels about the right length for its fragments. getting a feel for this non place. fragmentary articulated film images.
― Fizzles, Friday, 7 September 2012 08:04 (six years ago) Permalink
^short story collection
― xyzzzz__, Sunday, 23 September 2012 08:04 (six years ago) Permalink
See there is a bk by Clarice Lispector out so maybe I ought to switch my attention from one dead South American author to another.
― xyzzzz__, Sunday, 23 September 2012 08:14 (six years ago) Permalink
There are $ books by Clarice Lispector out:
― computers are the new "cool tool" (James Morrison), Sunday, 23 September 2012 08:30 (six years ago) Permalink
Got to hit my library again :)
― xyzzzz__, Sunday, 23 September 2012 08:38 (six years ago) Permalink
i have the passion according to gh next to my bed right now, ive tried to get into it but really can't.
― tell it to my arse (jim in glasgow), Sunday, 23 September 2012 09:22 (six years ago) Permalink
try this on for a first paragraph:
------ I'M SEARCHING, I'M SEARCHING. I'M trying to understand. Trying to give what I've lived to somebody else and I don't know to whom, but I don't want to keep what I lived. I don't know what to do with what I lived, I'm afraid of that profound disorder. I don't trust what happened to me. Did something happen to me that I, because i didn;t know how to live it, lived as something else? That's what I'd like to call disorganization, and I'd have the confidence to venture on, because i would know where to return afterward: to the previous organization. Id rather call it disorganization because I don't want to confirm myself in what I lived - in the confirmation of me I would lose the world as I had it, and I know I don't have the fortitude for another.
― tell it to my arse (jim in glasgow), Sunday, 23 September 2012 09:27 (six years ago) Permalink
My reaction would be to keep reading to know what happened to her and how she lived, but maybe that's just me..
― xyzzzz__, Sunday, 23 September 2012 09:33 (six years ago) Permalink
it goes on in that vein, i find it a real slog. the fact that i started it after reading the unnameable and it somehow makes that book seem a light, breezy read is pretty daunting to me. going to read something a bit easier instead, got mao II by delillo sitting around so might give that a bash instead.
back on topic, ive read one of stories alluded to in that piece about that new bolano collection (the one featuring necrophilia), but not the others. the way his stories are collected in spanish and english differs, i have a collection called cuentos that comprises a large chunk of his published short fiction but i really want to read the rest. i may even prefer his short stories to his novels, altho ive only read 2666 and savage detectives.
― tell it to my arse (jim in glasgow), Sunday, 23 September 2012 09:38 (six years ago) Permalink
and 2666 is p much my favourite book of the last few decades so maybe im talking shite.
― tell it to my arse (jim in glasgow), Sunday, 23 September 2012 09:39 (six years ago) Permalink
probably tied with infinite jest, jesus my taste is insufferable!
― tell it to my arse (jim in glasgow), Sunday, 23 September 2012 09:41 (six years ago) Permalink
the third reich!!!
― Yorkshire lass born and bred, that's me, said Katriona's hologram. (thomp), Friday, 16 November 2012 22:27 (six years ago) Permalink
i never thought about it but nazis were kind of a wellspring for this guy huh
― Yorkshire lass born and bred, that's me, said Katriona's hologram. (thomp), Friday, 16 November 2012 22:28 (six years ago) Permalink
― j., Saturday, 17 November 2012 04:34 (six years ago) Permalink
Certainly. His fascination w/Ernst Junger (a favourte of Adolf and the question of whether he was a fascist or not) ties into that.
― xyzzzz__, Saturday, 17 November 2012 10:56 (six years ago) Permalink
at 135 pages i am less into the third reich than i was at 35 i guess
― Yorkshire lass born and bred, that's me, said Katriona's hologram. (thomp), Saturday, 17 November 2012 11:17 (six years ago) Permalink
yup that was definitely a desk novel
― attempt to look intentionally nerdy, awkward or (thomp), Monday, 26 November 2012 12:57 (six years ago) Permalink
So in 2666 and related narratives people struggle with something they're in the midst of, a part of living and killing history on the other side(s) of a curtain, just across the border. Call it Murder, Inc, but a non-profit, just played for kinky kicks, apparently. A hobby of gangsters, maybe. Nothing personal, just insatiably twisted. Spooky in a way a grand visionary conspiracy isn't. Not that the Nazis etc. don't figure, but we keep coming back to Santa Teresa. All those invalid writers in asylums, etc, have connections, even though they don't know it, and despite their lines of magnetism (they're figures of fascination for other characters), those are the same lines that lead us back. Even Archimboldi, who's lived through so much, and still roves the periphery of Europe at 80, is drawn into Santa Teresa, to sort it all out, or deal with it as he can. Disappears into that, as far as we know now (but I haven't read Woes of the True Policeman yet). It's the way things are.
― dow, Tuesday, 27 November 2012 19:48 (six years ago) Permalink
As it still does occasionally, 2666 is finding its way through the traffic in my head tonight: the onslaught of monologues, but not to overload like in those early DeLillos: all the words find their voices again, still testifying, still trying to drown out the silence (of the killers, for instance, but also everything else waiting indifferently, obvliously, and thus ominously, at least for those of us who need the attention,or think we do)
― dow, Tuesday, 6 August 2013 04:27 (five years ago) Permalink
this book is pretty unforgettable, i agree. i prefer early delillo though, to bolano's relentless, seemingly humorless bleakness. he really wants the reader to feel, palpably, the overwhelming cruelty that exists in the world, which is irreconcilable with most of the ways that people like to think about things. and this is, in a way, an ethical project... especially if it can sensitize people to the suffering of others in a way that allows them to be better "global citizens" or something. the issue is that, for bolano, a disillusioned ex-marxist iirc, i suspect this is impossible... that we are already too far gone, already living in the apocalypse but just don't realize it. so in this sense, the book feels -- at times -- somewhat gratuitous, even sadistic. but that's a part of why it's so powerful.
― Treeship, Tuesday, 6 August 2013 04:32 (five years ago) Permalink
(Not to dismiss early DeLillo--I was thinking of Americana and Great Jones Street, with many appealing set pieces, but they pile up)Tonight I'm thinking of the old witch lady on a Mexican talk show, who wants to drive the murdering bastards out; and the old African-American man, telling his story and how to eat right and live right--that's what I meant, at the moment I wrote it, by testifying, and it seemed like Bolano was gentle with those characters, and holding them up to say, "Hell yeah---see?" Raging in his cage, as much as an authorial god can allow himself to do (even if I didn't know he was dying, I think I would still think this) But yeah, by-his-bootstraps ex-Marxist exile still droppin' science etc, that too.
― dow, Tuesday, 6 August 2013 04:54 (five years ago) Permalink
(dropping the other hobnail boot too; def relentless)
― dow, Tuesday, 6 August 2013 04:59 (five years ago) Permalink
Like James Agee circa Let Us Now etc.: evan more than (or at least, in the midst of)art-in-your-face/King James Bible shitstorms/smell of brimstone looming, a gut reaction to the state of things is palpable.
― dow, Tuesday, 6 August 2013 05:05 (five years ago) Permalink
maybe it's most similar to das kapital, especially the parts where marx leads you through the awful conditions of the factories and forces you, at the same time, to consider the relationships among people in a much bleaker way than you are accustomed to doing. so like, what you are seeing is in a sense familiar -- urban squalor in the case of marx, terrible violence in impoverished areas of latin america in bolano -- but due to the way it is presented, it is like you are seeing it all for the first time, and recognizing that you live in hell in a way that you haven't before. the main difference, i think, is that revolution/redemption seems out of reach in bolano's universe.
― Treeship, Tuesday, 6 August 2013 05:09 (five years ago) Permalink
Yes, maybe especially like when Marx is writing with Engels. Also, it's like B.'s gotta be Walker Evans, seemingly austere, *and* Agee: deadpan and audacious. Dante and Virgil too (who are both Dante).
― dow, Tuesday, 6 August 2013 05:15 (five years ago) Permalink
(but it can be pretty entertaining too, in different ways: the first section can seem like a Woody Allen movie at times, until...and no wonder that science fiction writer finally fell out of favor with Stalin!)
― dow, Tuesday, 6 August 2013 05:34 (five years ago) Permalink
really concerned about the idea of bolano being 'humourless'
― i better not get any (thomp), Tuesday, 6 August 2013 18:28 (five years ago) Permalink
I think his is a kind of humorlessness that knows what humor is, and can mimic it, but ultimately the absurd elements if 2666 dont add up to levity, in my view.
― Treeship, Tuesday, 6 August 2013 19:35 (five years ago) Permalink
Springtime 2010, and fancies lightly turn to what are you reading?
― zvookster, Tuesday, 6 August 2013 19:58 (five years ago) Permalink
Interesting. I find lots of things, like Poe for instance, hilarious when other ppl dont comment as much on it. This wasnt my experience of 2666 though, clearly
― Treeship, Tuesday, 6 August 2013 20:02 (five years ago) Permalink
'that's when the battle began. the visceral realists questioned álamo's critical system and he responded by calling them cut-rate surrealists and fake marxists. five members of the workshop backed him up; in other words, everyone but me and a skinny kid who always carried around a book by lewis carroll and never spoke.'
― j., Saturday, 17 August 2013 07:06 (five years ago) Permalink
The Third Reich -- yea or nay?
― the objections to Drake from non-REAL HIPHOP people (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 3 January 2014 16:59 (five years ago) Permalink
Qualified yea - it's pretty obviously an earlier work while he was still finding his feet but the conceit is good and the central character is very funny. It's enjoyable enough if you don't expect anything near the level of The Savage Detectives or 2666.
― Matt DC, Friday, 3 January 2014 18:43 (five years ago) Permalink
Agreed, I enjoyed it. Sort of a mood piece, where the characters don't really act like humans but it's all internally consistent, reminded me of Lynch that way.
― festival culture (Jordan), Friday, 3 January 2014 18:49 (five years ago) Permalink
It also has the unexpected pleasure of Bolano talking about the Judge Dredd role-playing game
― ornamental cabbage (James Morrison), Sunday, 5 January 2014 04:40 (five years ago) Permalink
epigraph for bolaño’s a little lumpen novelita
― j., Sunday, 8 June 2014 15:07 (four years ago) Permalink
― arid banter (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 8 June 2014 15:20 (four years ago) Permalink
Hey! Some of my best friends are pigs.
― Aimless, Sunday, 8 June 2014 17:57 (four years ago) Permalink
I had a strange Bolaño-moment this week. In Bolaño's ´Between Parentheses´ he writes about the movie and book ´84 Charing Cross Road'. Watching that movie this week, I noticed that someone in the moview asks about a book on Archimboldi in a book shop. In the movie, Archimboldi's a graphic artist but I guess that's where Bolaño took his name from for ´2666´ (I havent´t read the book ´84 Charing Cross Road´ so I have no idea if his name is mentioned there).
― EvR, Wednesday, 2 July 2014 16:26 (four years ago) Permalink
I just finished Between Parenthesis. I'll need to find that film.
As a result of finishing the book I was doing some Bolano research tonight (or googling). Many (if not all the pieces) were written while he was feverishly writing 2666, so actually this turns into a keeper, something to read in parallel.
I made a little list of stuff to get (or keeping until it is translated):
Rodrigo Fresan - Mantra (not translated, although Kensington Gardens has been translated)Juan Rodolfo Wilcock - The Temple of IconoclastsJaime Bayly - I Love My Mommy (not trans.?)Roberto Arlt - short stories (not sure, but there is a bk)Rodrigo Rey Rosa - (couple of things knocking about)Carmen Boullosa - (as above)
Bolano is clearly made by Argentinian writing from the 30s and 40s (the group around Borges although he talks about Macedonio Fernandez (whose Museum of Eterna's Novel has been translated), then Sabato (keep meaning to read The Tunnel), Arlt, Borges of course (he loves his poetry which isn't as well regarded in English at least) (he is the absolute central figure and why not..), Bioy, Ocampo (NYRB really helping here, the latter just issued).
Bolano does have this love/hate r/ship w/the Latin American boom, seems to love as originally conceived but then hate with an equal zeal because of what it became in the hands of Isabel Allende and the like. Then again he seemed to have made a ton of friends through writing - so combative but v sociable too. Really good newspaper reviewer.
On the poetry front he idolizes Parra (whom I've read now), likes Lihn (not a hope in finding) and then Catalan and Spanish poets I'm not going to find.
― xyzzzz__, Friday, 3 April 2015 23:13 (three years ago) Permalink
Sorry Macedonio Hernandez is the person who invented Borges
― xyzzzz__, Friday, 3 April 2015 23:14 (three years ago) Permalink
that movie is available in the itunes store. i need to reread ´Between Parentheses'.
apparently he was friends with javier cercas, who casts him in his novel ´soldiers of salamis´. i think the swordfighting-on-the-beach scene in ´the savage detectives´ is about him and enrique vila-matas.
there´s a spanish book called ´bolaño por si mismo´ which is quite good if you want to know more about his influences.
― EvR, Saturday, 11 April 2015 13:03 (three years ago) Permalink
apparently he was friends with javier cercas, who casts him in his novel ´soldiers of salamis
Yeah Bolano reviews the book in Between Parentheses - such a strange reading experience..
― xyzzzz__, Saturday, 11 April 2015 13:13 (three years ago) Permalink
like the poem from romantic dogs you posted several thousand years ago upthread, xyzzzz. waiting to pick it up from the library, read some in a bookstore & felt prepped to really like it.
― tender is the late-night daypart (schlump), Saturday, 11 April 2015 18:43 (three years ago) Permalink
Cool, I actually have only read a couple of poems from that myself.
I do not own any Bolano, its all read from libraries. The copy I see of 2666 is so horrible looking though.
― xyzzzz__, Saturday, 11 April 2015 19:10 (three years ago) Permalink
The Rebeca Nodier bookstore is tended by Rebeca Nodier herself, an old woman in her eighties who is completely blind and wears unruly white dresses that match her dentures; armed with a cane and alerted by the creaky wooden floor, she hops up and introduces herself to everyone who walks into her store, I'm Rebeca Nodier, etc., finally asking in turn the name of the "lover of literature" she has the "pleasure of meeting" and inquires what kind of literature he or she is looking for. I told her that I was interested in my poetry, and to my surprise, Mrs. Nodier said all poets were bums but they weren't bad in bed. Especially if they don't have any money, she went on. Then she asked me how old I was. Seventeen, I said. Oh, you're still a pipsqueak, she exclaimed. And then: you're not planning to steal any of my books, are you? I promised her that I would rather die. We chatted for a while, and then I left.
― j., Tuesday, 22 December 2015 08:16 (three years ago) Permalink
thank you for that. Ms. Nodier deserves our boundless admiration.
― a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Tuesday, 22 December 2015 18:17 (three years ago) Permalink
There's now another theatrical adaptation of 2666 in Chicago, though this interview with its directors strangely never mentions the earlier attempt by Pablo Ley Fancelli and Alex Rigola in Barcelona, 2007: http://lithub.com/adapting-bolanos-unadaptable-masterpiece-for-the-stage/
― one way street, Wednesday, 17 February 2016 14:59 (three years ago) Permalink
i read Amulet last week and couldn't put it down. the reclusive painter honing in on Erigone and Orestes, Arturo Belano negotiating like he's in the mafia, the singing ghosts in the valley, Auxilio covering her missing teeth when she speaks. i enjoyed it despite not knowing anything about the Tlatelolco massacre, the topic the whole fucking book is dancing around. someday after i've learned one or two more things about the world i look forward to circling back to Amulet and reading it again.
― Karl Malone, Thursday, 5 July 2018 15:44 (seven months ago) Permalink
the character of Auxilio was based off of the story of Alcira Soust Scaffo, who really did remain hidden in a bathroom for 15 days during the military's occupation of the university.
― Karl Malone, Thursday, 5 July 2018 15:52 (seven months ago) Permalink