Did a search on John Crowley and didn't get any hits - at least for thread titles (saw some stuff on a Mieville thread, though, and I do like Mieville).
Anyway, tell me about him - I've read Little, Big on the recommendation of my future brother-in-law and felt like I was slogging through for the most part - anything else of his worth trying?
― MsLaura, Wednesday, 23 January 2008 22:20 (ten years ago) Permalink
I did an article at Bookslut about his shorter works, which might be more your speed (they're great) - see http://www.bookslut.com/small_but_perfectly_formed/2005_09_006545.php
― James Morrison, Thursday, 24 January 2008 00:40 (ten years ago) Permalink
Thanks for the ideas, Mr. James - I actually have an old copy of Otherwise floating 'round here, somewhere. Any comments on his Aegypt trilogy / series? (I have a couple of those, too.)
I feel bad about not loving Little, Big and will likely give it another shot someday - I read it in bursts and snatches throughout the holiday season and was never able to get into the rhythm of his sentences - bit I did love his use of language.
― MsLaura, Thursday, 24 January 2008 03:29 (ten years ago) Permalink
Sorry, never read the Aegypt books--I think I was waiting for the series to be fully published before starting on it, and then forgot all about it.
― James Morrison, Thursday, 24 January 2008 21:45 (ten years ago) Permalink
Love John Crowley, but if you don't like Little, Big on another try, it might be that the Aegypt books aren't for you - they move more slowly, have really left fantasy behind. They're quite hard to describe, really; a sort of hermetic treatise & double narrative that's always slipping into other meanings - like it's becoming an allegory or emblem book or treatise on astrology or whatever instead stably being a realistic novel. But it's plainer than that on the surface. I've only read a couple, mind, so I should finish up before opining more.
Try James Morrison's recommendations (nice article, btw). Great Work of Time is especially awesome - like he says, it's hard to know how he fits so much into 100 pages. I'd add Engine Summer to the list (in fact I'd switch it for Beasts) - once you're over the language bump, it's probably his most engrossing novel, maybe the neatest structure too.
Anyone read Lord Byron's Daughter? Sitting by my sofa at the moment, keep putting off picking it up. I do love him, think he's as interesting as almost anyone in American fiction, but I'm not always in the mood. Should finish Aegypt first anyway.
― woofwoofwoof, Thursday, 24 January 2008 23:11 (ten years ago) Permalink
Am I correct in thinking that Crowley should be read when one has time to devote to him - that his works don't hold-up well to being read in snatches whilst on the run? (I'm starting to feel guilty that I didn't approach Little, Big in the right mind- and time-set.)
― MsLaura, Friday, 25 January 2008 05:04 (ten years ago) Permalink
I think that's probably spot-on: and why the novella-length ones are good, in that you can polish one off in one sitting if you can find a few spare hours one night/weekend.
― James Morrison, Sunday, 27 January 2008 03:45 (ten years ago) Permalink
Really liked "Little, Big", halfway through the first book of "Aegypt". Read something where he says he's trying for the same effects in prose as the "Little Nemo" strips do in imagery, and it seems to me that he can really deliver on that, if you're able to work with him.
― Soukesian, Saturday, 15 November 2008 00:43 (ten years ago) Permalink
Saw Little, Big on the library shelf today, was intrigued and took it out, but I'll think I have to follow the recommendation and start with one of the shorter ones.
Apparently it is the guy's birthday today.
― O-mar Gaya (James Redd and the Blecchs), Wednesday, 2 December 2009 04:39 (nine years ago) Permalink
Aegypt was the worst waste of reading experience I can ever remember, TBH
― as they say in Finnish: "lihaperäpukamat (remy bean), Wednesday, 2 December 2009 16:06 (nine years ago) Permalink
Little, Big seems to be both Harold Bloom and Ursula K. Le Guin's favorite book. Don't know if that is good or bad.
― O-mar Gaya (James Redd and the Blecchs), Wednesday, 2 December 2009 16:45 (nine years ago) Permalink
Happy Birthday, John!
Finished Aegypt, found it thoroughly absorbing, though the final volume felt a little rushed. WoofX3's "sort of hermetic treatise & double narrative that's always slipping into other meanings" upthread is as good a description as I've seen. Really not for everyone, though!
― Soukesian, Wednesday, 2 December 2009 17:15 (nine years ago) Permalink
just ordered 'little, big.' anyone else have any reaction to it?
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Saturday, 14 July 2012 05:34 (six years ago) Permalink
Loved Great Work of Time, couldn't get into Engine Summer, so wondered if the longer works would be for me - but I just read Little, Big and found it pretty unputdownable and utterly wonderful. Is Aegypt anywhere near as good?
― toby, Thursday, 10 January 2013 16:40 (five years ago) Permalink
Aegypt (the first volume) is my favorite thing I've read by him and probably in my all time top 10 novels. (The other Crowleys I've read being Little, Big and Engine Summer).
I read it when it was called Aegypt, before that became the umbrella title for its series. Not sure if he revised it much for the title change or not.
I've put off continuing on to Love and Sleep for a long time b/c of fear of being let down. I know that's strange.
― ~farben~ (Jon Lewis), Thursday, 10 January 2013 18:07 (five years ago) Permalink
Digging his column in Harper's, especially the most recent.
― Up the Junction Boulevard (James Redd and the Blecchs), Saturday, 14 February 2015 19:37 (three years ago) Permalink
Dammit don't make me go back to harpers!
― a drug by the name of WORLD WITHOUT END (Jon Lewis), Saturday, 14 February 2015 20:13 (three years ago) Permalink
What, you stopped doing the cryptic?
― Up the Junction Boulevard (James Redd and the Blecchs), Saturday, 14 February 2015 20:17 (three years ago) Permalink
Richard Maltby, Jr.weeps.
― Up the Junction Boulevard (James Redd and the Blecchs), Saturday, 14 February 2015 20:18 (three years ago) Permalink
I became really disenchanted with their steez w/r/t politics sometime in the first half of the 2000s. TBH I became really disenchanted with a lot of ppl's steez w/r/t politics sometime in the first half of the 2000s. A lot of writers/talkers seemed to lose their minds and drift too hard right or left, other things like harpers stayed basically the same as they'd been before but started to seem really stupid to me in light of (self-lop) ~the changes~
― a drug by the name of WORLD WITHOUT END (Jon Lewis), Saturday, 14 February 2015 22:00 (three years ago) Permalink
i remember a time when i read harpers...even subscribed!
― scott seward, Saturday, 14 February 2015 22:42 (three years ago) Permalink
i blame the internet. can't even remember the last time i read a new yorker. the atlantic! subscribed to all of them. i think i'm with jon. at some point everything started to bug me.
― scott seward, Saturday, 14 February 2015 22:43 (three years ago) Permalink
I haven't made time for mags in recent months, just books, but really enjoyed the New Yorker's science writing, war correspondance, Emily Nussbaum's TV reviews, even Anthony Lane, who used to be such a windy twit. *Even* a lot of the fiction, in the past couple years (finally): the Science Fiction Issue, lots of Indian and African writers, also Karen Russell and several others I've talked about on the Rolling Science Fiction Fantasy Speculative etc threads, especially the old one. James Woods sometimes makes his points very convincingly, good use of quotes etc in the first few grafs, then has go on for several more pages, but he's led me to some writers I might well have missed, like Elena Ferrante (yay).
― dow, Sunday, 15 February 2015 03:26 (three years ago) Permalink
Oh and agree w James about starting with Crowley's novellas.
― dow, Sunday, 15 February 2015 03:29 (three years ago) Permalink
So far still have only read the first two stories in Novelties & Souvenirs, but looking forward to catching up to the other James and reading more, such as "Snow" and "Great Work of Time."
― Up the Junction Boulevard (James Redd and the Blecchs), Sunday, 15 February 2015 03:34 (three years ago) Permalink
I just searched for this thread because i just finished The Solitudes and am starting on Little, Big, weird to find it's just been revived separately.
Loved The Solitudes, looking forward to working through more of his writing.
― Tim F, Sunday, 15 February 2015 11:00 (three years ago) Permalink
I got into Engine Summer later in 2013 and absolutely loved it. Definitely took some perseverance for the first third or so, but really paid off in the end.
All three Crowleys I've read have been so good that I don't know why I haven't read more - perhaps I will give The Solitudes a go next.
― toby, Sunday, 15 February 2015 12:22 (three years ago) Permalink
OK so Beasts is awesome too. (Also the Aegypt quartet was great in the end although dragged a bit in the middle.)
― toby, Tuesday, 27 September 2016 21:39 (two years ago) Permalink
Yay! I _love_ Beasts.
― I hear from this arsehole again, he's going in the river (James Morrison), Wednesday, 28 September 2016 00:43 (two years ago) Permalink
Little, Big, omfg what a trip. Really captures something of a genuine childhood sense of wonder like nothing else i''ve read as an adult. Dazzling, but plenty of darkness too. And I spotted enough hidden jokes and tricks to suspect many more passed me by.
― brekekekexit collapse collapse (ledge), Friday, 24 February 2017 15:07 (one year ago) Permalink
read Aegypt tout de suite!!!
― his eye is on despair-o (Jon not Jon), Friday, 24 February 2017 16:34 (one year ago) Permalink
my friend told me Crowley has been working on a big novel about intelligent crows for years, btw
― his eye is on despair-o (Jon not Jon), Friday, 24 February 2017 16:35 (one year ago) Permalink
Ok, what? Why is crowley writing a book just for me?
― I hear from this arsehole again, he's going in the river (James Morrison), Saturday, 25 February 2017 00:17 (one year ago) Permalink
That's funny because i thought it was just for me!!!
― Cognition (Remix) (Jon not Jon), Saturday, 25 February 2017 00:29 (one year ago) Permalink
Have started on Aegypt. Just reached a moment, very early on, when things have just twisted slightly, the world of the book has become, perhaps, not quite as close to our world as I thought it was, and there's a delightful giddiness, a confusion that I'm not sure is mine (possibly) or the author's (probably not) or intrinsic to the world itself.
Also a good tip, Jon, to read this right after Little, Big. Have spotted a whole paragraph lifted from it and attributed to an entirely different, fictional, book & author. A more obvious example of the kind of games he's playing.
― brekekekexit collapse collapse (ledge), Thursday, 2 March 2017 21:05 (one year ago) Permalink
The great thing is it's been so long since I've read it that rather than proceed to love and sleep I'm gonna need to reread aegypt first. Yay!
― Cognition (Remix) (Jon not Jon), Thursday, 2 March 2017 21:08 (one year ago) Permalink
Crowley makes some remarks about two of his books in the last few minutes of this.
― alimosina, Monday, 6 March 2017 19:15 (one year ago) Permalink
Syncing problem on that, but otherwise very interesting, thanks.
― Got Your Money Changes Everything (James Redd and the Blecchs), Sunday, 12 March 2017 23:17 (one year ago) Permalink
Finished book 1 of Aegypt. I got it, I thought - all the stuff about there being another history of the world, magic was once real etc, was flim-flam, smokescreen for the real inside-out message - it's not about the world but about the world within, the time when magic was real wasn't a period in history, but childhood. But at the same time I didn't get it, it seemed like reverse alchemy: turning the gold of the promised fantasy into the lead of the real, the normal, the mundane. Then I figured it out: fantasy is fake, fool's gold; the message in the book is the real deal and all the more alluring for it. It made me remember when I was a kid and I really did live in a world where ghosts and ufos and all manner of things were real.
I've actually finished book 2 as well, I don't have as clear an idea of it but the opening section with Pierce's childhood is astonishing.
― brekekekexit collapse collapse (ledge), Saturday, 18 March 2017 18:48 (one year ago) Permalink
argh i need to reread so bad.
Actually, after reading your post, I realized that my original encounter went like this:
buy Love & Sleep at random at some store when it had just come out in hardback, having read Little, Big a few years prior
read first 50 to 75 pages of Love & Sleep and have my mind completely fucking lit up by it
realize it's book 2 of a series, go get Aegypt at used store right away
read Aegypt and have my mind completely fucking lit up by it
go into my weird 'this book is gonna be so good I have to wait til the perfect time to start it' mode wrt Love & Sleep
[20 years pass in which I think about Aegypt constantly but do not restart Love & Sleep]
― chip n dale recuse rangers (Jon not Jon), Friday, 24 March 2017 14:52 (one year ago) Permalink
the passage about The Storm in Engine Summer is one of the most beautiful attempts to mythologize our current age that I've ever read
― Milton Parker, Thursday, 21 December 2017 22:22 (eleven months ago) Permalink
His novel about intelligent crows is finally out. Really looking forward to getting it.
― I would never REALLY sign your death warrant! You're my-- my DOG! (Jon not Jon), Friday, 22 December 2017 17:51 (eleven months ago) Permalink
Exciting. Wish I'd written my sketchy half-baked thoughts about the Aegpyt series while they were fresh. That's right, half baked and fresh. iirc 3 was a bit of a struggle at times, 4 took a left turn away from some of the earlier ideas in favour of a tonal realism and a redemption for Pierce which, to me, felt quite satisfying. Perhaps unlikely i'll read them again but there is more than enough I only half glimpsed or half understood to justify it. Aegpyt is a big place, Mr Shadrach, a man could lose himself in Aegypt. Anyway I will catch up with all his other works at some point.
― Here comes the phantom menace (ledge), Saturday, 23 December 2017 13:06 (eleven months ago) Permalink
Have I really never posted in this? John Crowley is the best writer in SF.
― Guayaquil (eephus!), Saturday, 23 December 2017 16:03 (eleven months ago) Permalink
John Crowley is the best writer in SF
This (obviously) sounds provocative, but I can't think of anyone better.
Yes! I just reread Engine Summer as a holiday treat. I wondered if having read it 5 years ago I remembered too much to enjoy it as much this time around, but if anything I liked it even more knowing some of what was coming.
3 was a bit of a struggle at times, 4 took a left turn away from some of the earlier ideas in favour of a tonal realism and a redemption for Pierce which, to me, felt quite satisfying
That fits my memory; my notes for 3 say " I found this really dragged for quite a while, but then suddenly I ended up reading the last 2/3rds of the book in under 48 hours", while for 4 I wrote "A real pleasure, after the relative slog of the previous volumes - breezed through it in (essentially) a day while ill, just luxuriating in it - a big payoff in enjoyment from the investment in the previous volumes, if not any big revelation in terms of content."
― toby, Saturday, 30 December 2017 17:36 (eleven months ago) Permalink
...the collapsed ruins of a rustic gazebo where once old men had gathered to play cards and checkers and talk about how bad the world had grown.
― Roberto Spiralli, Tuesday, 20 March 2018 18:04 (eight months ago) Permalink
― as the crows around me grows (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 20 March 2018 18:12 (eight months ago) Permalink
Should be ilx description, posted over the gates.I still agree with James B. about starting w novellas; that's still as far as I've gotten.Novelty: Four Stories, from the late 80s, is the one I read, though still want to check this-century Novelties & Souvenirs: Collected Short Fiction.
― dow, Tuesday, 20 March 2018 21:39 (eight months ago) Permalink
Ka is great.
― toby, Monday, 7 May 2018 20:05 (seven months ago) Permalink
Did you see the youtube interview I posted with him in the speculative fiction thread?
― Robert Adam Gilmour, Saturday, 12 May 2018 15:42 (seven months ago) Permalink
Was that the geeks guide to the galaxy podcast? I'd bookmarked that from somewhere on ilx a while back and saved it for after reading the book - in fact I listened to it a couple of days ago. It was pretty interesting although a bit sad that it sounds like his books haven't been selling so well.
― toby, Sunday, 13 May 2018 14:22 (seven months ago) Permalink
That's the one.
― Robert Adam Gilmour, Sunday, 13 May 2018 14:34 (seven months ago) Permalink
Thanks for posting it!
― toby, Sunday, 13 May 2018 16:30 (seven months ago) Permalink