rolling fantasy, science fiction, speculative fiction &c. thread

Both Disch and Delany use Frankenstein as a kind of strawman. Although maybe there is more credence to the Delany argument that being the author of a book on Frankenstein is not enough to qualify as an expert on sf.

Forgot the last link before:
http://www.depauw.edu/sfs/review_essays/parrind19.htm

Here is a reasonable review of the book Shakey is reading: http://www.emcit.com/emcit129.php?a=19

Here is Clute's review in which he comments upon his original blurb: ftp://asavage.dyndns.org/Literature/scifi.com/www.scifi.com/sfw/issue79/excess.html. Slow server though.

Lavie Tidhar loves that book btw

Wait that is a different book I think

Reviewed in the first link that is...?

Ah, you are right. That is a later book. I didn't have time to check, figured it was just a different title for the same thing.

Never mind.

Clute is p spot on. The Turner diaries detour is v wtf. Disch is not v good on racial politics in general imo.

And he sure loves him some orson scott card lol o the irony

Not every day do you get to read a gay man rhapsodizing about the narrative skills and moral clarity of a homophobic mormon

Man didnt know about that Endzone blog. That is grim.

interestingly, re: my question above about when/why things changed for the sf market (moving away from magazines etc.) Disch cites the unauthorized reprinting of LOTR by Ace in the mid-60s as the turning point/when fantasy series took over

Never knew about that but: https://www.kirkusreviews.com/features/unauthorized-lord-rings/

yeah I hadn't heard about it before either

"When he called up Professor Tolkien in 1964 and asked if he could publish Lord of the Rings as Ace paperbacks, Tolkien said he would never allow his great works to appear in so ‘degenerate a form’ as the paperback book."

lol

Wonder if any of that guy's other posts worth looking at.

Yeah I knew abt those versions being unauthorized. Thing is I p much love the insane Boschy covers they put on those. I grew up with the slipcase paperback set that had tolkein's water colors on the covers. Hate the ones from after that with the gd photorealistic eagles and shit.

Surprised about Disch being a douche over the years. I did read that he posted some anti-Muslim etc. comments toward the end, before killing himself (his partner died, and other crushing stress). But way before that, he seemed pretty decent in his Nation columns. Don't know that you can say who invented science fiction: the ancient Greeks and who knows who earlier wrote about going to the moon etc. Of course it may depend on what you want to consider/allow as "science."

Clute tweet Sept 10:
Problem with Affect Horror is it thinks its subject matter is abberantional. Wheras Terror is recognition. “Evil” vs. Where We Are Now.

sorry, "abberational" is the term he (correctly) used. Also, I finally saw Her, and his take seems wicked plausible: http://www.sf-encyclopedia.com/entry/her

Surprised about Disch being a douche over the years.

I don't really know if he was a jerk on personal/professional level, but who knows. The Dreams Our Stuff is Made Of was published in 1998 so maybe that was at the beginning of his end-of-life bitchiness? I don't know. His prejudices are not attractive, and his pointless digressions (Caesar's Column? nobody even knows what that is or has been influenced by it) seem to exist merely for him to vent his spleen. Of the major figures attacked he seems to reserve his most bilious opinions for Ursula K. LeGuin, at one point ridiculing her for making simplistic claims (and I'm quoting verbatim here) like "War is bad, and men are to blame for it. Capitalism is bad, and men are to blame for it." etc. The problem is, those claims are not at all ridiculous or ahistorical - war and capitalism ARE bad and they have historically been developed, fomented, and implemented by men. It is not sexist or overly dogmatic to point this out, it is a simple fact. But Disch feels like these positions are somehow patently, obviously false because they are presented by a strident, didactic writer who he does not credit with understanding nuance or ambiguity. He may be write about LeGuin's limitations as a writer (she IS didactic) but he just goes too far.

I get the impression from his criticisms of fascists like Heinlein that Disch does not think war or capitalism are actually good, just that they aren't exclusively the fault of men...? I have no idea.

aaanyway moving on to Carol Emshwiller's "Joy in Our Cause". so far this is a bunch of stuff that is p good, but bears only the most tangential relationship to SF.

Tangential's cool. This thread def has some of that, re the "speculative fiction" part of its title. The Carol E. stories I've found here and there are good, and her hubby Ed's SF illustrations are fondly remembered by lifers (blanking on specific images, but I'm sure his covers lured me and my school lunch money).

Look at any of those Galaxy Project reissue covers.

I like her writing in general and I can see why Moorcock would feel it fit in New Worlds (text intercut with images, non-linear narratives, prose broken up into short chunks). But yeah it isn't really "speculative" either, its mostly her ruminations on being a middle aged woman/mother and po-mo stuff about the nature and mechanics of art and writing.

Find her Carmen Dog short novel, totally amazing US magic realism

Thanks, will check. Ruminations, speculations, magic realism, like life, coolio.

i blame the sword of shannara. or star trek books.

I blame the Thomas Covenant books.

^^^

just got my copy of Sladek's "The Steam-Driven Boy and other stories" in the mail

lookin forward to the parodies

Awesome

don't think I've read any Sladek before, beyond the odd piece in New Worlds/Jerry Cornelius comps. I've thumbed through the Roderick stuff but it's appeal seems... limited

Wikipedia page for this book has weird thing where names of authors parodied are linked but the linked text has vowels missing, as if that is enough to mask their identity.

Anyway, Sladek is one of yr better stylists. That book doesn't have stuff he wrote with Disch does it? No, that's Maps.

the Heinlein, PKD and Cordwainer Smith parodies are all A+. lol @ "Solar Shoe Salesman"

"Solar Shoe Salesman" is awesome.

Just discovered Graham Joyce died recently. Jeez, so many writers in these fields have died in the last two years.

http://www.fright.com/edge/RIPGrahamJoyce.htm

I just finished The Yiddish Policeman's Union, my first Chabon. It's a police procedural set in an alternate time-line (Israel was defeated in '48; Alaska's Sitka Federal District became a provisional Jewish "homeland," with its own timeline running out in the 2000s). As such,The City and the City seems more exotically inventive, more of a crime dog's walk on the *alternate* wild side (mind the bits of look-what-I-can-do poo). But Chabon's serving chicken soup for the open wounds, and sneaky mallets for the topography. Wish he'd hacked the template a bit more toward the end, but overall loving the way he jolts me in passing (he's something of a prose-poet, and he knows it, doesn't let it go to his head).

From London WorldCon, another view scross and into genres, dwellers, etc: https://nplusonemag.com/online-only/online-only/dispatch-from-worldcon/

Latest issue of Ansible, incl (prob my last post re) London WorldCon, w brief, entertaining comments. Also incl.latest award winners (intrigued by Retro Hugos---what SF from the 1930s should I read??)
http://news.ansible.co.uk/a326.html

Search for "the door dilated" brings up some interesting stuff:
http://www.tor.com/blogs/2010/01/sf-reading-protocols
http://www.sfcenter.ku.edu/protocol.htm
http://kimstanleyrobinson.info/

There are look a hundred some odd comments on that first one and most of them are quite good too.

But please feel free to go through and post the ones you don't like here.

“The red sun is high, the blue low”—how it fills in doubled purple shadows on the planet of a binary star.

Doubled green shadows surely. With cyan and yellow fringes.

Think there's a bit of special pleading going on here. I'm sure I could find dozens of "literary" novels on my shelves where it's not clear from the first sentence who is speaking or what they're talking about, I think the thought process of a non-SF fan reading "Friar Sparks sat wedged between the wall and the realizer." is more likely to be "I don't know what a realizer is but I know I'm not going to give a shit when I find out."

Lol, you are correct.

the suggestion that it requires some special skill-set to read sf sort of bugs me - strikes of a certain strain of (largely unfounded) elitism that's always present in fandom and is uniformly unattractive and unjustified. I mean, reading any kind of literature involves grappling with context and interpreting what is/isn't important in the text, sf is not unique in this regard. Much easier to take non-sf readers' criticisms of sf as what they are - prejudicial readings.

or what ledge said

"Science fiction is no more written for scientists than ghost stories are written for ghosts."
Brian W. Aldiss

Always loved that quote but I easily get lost in SF because my knowledge of science is miniscule and there are said to be several great writers who demand more science knowledge of their readers. I've always wanted to read Greg Egan but I've heard his work can be difficult unless you know a bit of science.