*phoneys
― k3vin k., Thursday, 28 November 2013 04:27 (ten years ago) link
fonerz
― lag∞n, Thursday, 28 November 2013 04:28 (ten years ago) link
no need to be a goddamn knowitall about it, jeez
― set the controls for the heart of the sun (VegemiteGrrl), Thursday, 28 November 2013 04:41 (ten years ago) link
don't you think about that story about salinger & the paris review editor guy's wife just all the time
― mustread guy (schlump), Tuesday, 4 February 2014 03:34 (ten years ago) link
https://www.theparisreview.org/blog/2017/04/13/salingers-nightmare/
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Wednesday, 19 April 2017 00:21 (seven years ago) link
Seven years after his death and still not a word about the supposed manuscripts in the vault. I'd have thought some journalist would have followed this up by now, if only to write a story about being stonewalled by the estate. But someone must know something!
― Zelda Zonk, Wednesday, 19 April 2017 01:48 (seven years ago) link
Great story, thanks for the link JD.
And I've wondered that frequently myself Zelda. I don't think we're any further than this rather unreliable talk of a 2015-2020 release time frame.
― On Some Faraday Beach (Le Bateau Ivre), Wednesday, 19 April 2017 09:02 (seven years ago) link
apparently there's a JDS biopic out right now, looks even more appalling than i would've expected
also has what is easily one of the single worst movie titles i've ever seen
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Thursday, 14 September 2017 06:02 (seven years ago) link
Uggh. Rural Juror in the Rye.
― Chuck_Tatum, Thursday, 14 September 2017 14:40 (seven years ago) link
So Where Are the New J.D. Salinger Books We Were Promised?
― Le Bateau Ivre, Wednesday, 25 October 2017 14:33 (six years ago) link
The movie is one of the year's worst atrocities.
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 25 October 2017 14:58 (six years ago) link
really feel like the strong possibility is there is no vault & never was, which makes for a mystery, which I like.
― she carries a torch. two torches, actually (Joan Crawford Loves Chachi), Wednesday, 25 October 2017 15:43 (six years ago) link
That's how I feel! And his son is playing along really nicely.
Alfred, I'll take your word for it and not watch that movie. That bad huh?
― Le Bateau Ivre, Wednesday, 25 October 2017 16:16 (six years ago) link
Given the eyewitness accounts of quite a few people, I think it's very unlikely there's nothing there, although what's there may well be an unpublishable mess. I think it's more likely that his will stipulates that nothing can be published for 50 years or something and also that the literary executors are not allowed to talk about it. Also, given his hatred of Ivy League colleges, his papers are unlikely to go to Harvard or wherever, he's probably given them to some obscure meditation group or something that will zealously restrict access and we'll be talking about the lost Salinger novels for years to come, just like the Kafka papers that have been sitting in a suitcase in someone's flat in Tel Aviv for the last however many decades...
― Zelda Zonk, Thursday, 26 October 2017 02:22 (six years ago) link
imo, Salinger isn't worth the amount of speculation he generates. He's a minor American author. He's a Kenneth Fearing, not a Pound or a Frost.
― A is for (Aimless), Thursday, 26 October 2017 03:01 (six years ago) link
gtfo
― k3vin k., Thursday, 26 October 2017 10:34 (six years ago) link
If something did get published 10 or 25 or 50 years from now, how would it ever be authenticated?
― Lee626, Thursday, 26 October 2017 10:53 (six years ago) link
I agree w/Aimless but have only read Catcher & Nine Stories. He has a definite style that's better than his detractors say it is, but his range is pretty severely limited imo. He does a thing, it's pretty good. He's like the Vader or Manowar of 20th century AmLit. If you love what he does then he's gonna seem like a total badass. If you think what he does is pretty good he's never gonna surprise you by venturing out into places you didn't think he'd go.
― she carries a torch. two torches, actually (Joan Crawford Loves Chachi), Thursday, 26 October 2017 12:55 (six years ago) link
Nine out of 10 times I want to reread writers. Salinger is the one I don't.
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 26 October 2017 13:02 (six years ago) link
the glass stories are on my desert island list. agree he has a style that can be polarizing, but the same can be said about lots of great artists
― k3vin k., Thursday, 26 October 2017 16:54 (six years ago) link
^^ ding ding, same here
― Squeaky Fromage (VegemiteGrrl), Thursday, 26 October 2017 18:23 (six years ago) link
dunno about frost but salinger is certainly better than f'ing pound
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Thursday, 26 October 2017 18:56 (six years ago) link
Admit to being a Salinger non-fan, suspect I very much didn't read him when I was young enough to forgive his flaws
― Mince Pramthwart (James Morrison), Friday, 27 October 2017 01:36 (six years ago) link
(the story I mentioned in this ol' post later leaked to the Net; ditto Three Early Stories)
Also, re unpublished Salinger manuscripts at Princeton ( NPR had also somebody else's account of reading this story, I but can't find it; other guy said he thought "Bowling Balls" was great while he was reading it, but cooled off later)http://nassauweekly.com/articles/1217/ In the 70s, a bootleg collection of unpublished Salinger stories was reviewed in the Voice, with comments on even more unpub, not included in the boot. Reviewer really liked some of these tales (despite many typos, and who knows what other slippage), but said most tended to confirm his suspicion re Salinger's inability/resistance to face getting older (as a motivation for not exposing his stories to further criticism and/or increasingly cult-like fandom)
― dow, Wednesday, July 13, 2011(He also mentioned good stories not incl.) I finally re-read Nine Stories for the first time since high school in the 60s, and liked it as much as and in the same way I did then, basically agreeing with Joan Crawford Loves Chachi's take. May never read any others (got off the bus after Franny and Zooey).
― dow, Friday, 27 October 2017 02:18 (six years ago) link
More from before re-reading the collection:I read Salinger mostly in high school... I don't remember much of Catcher, do remember many bits (especially zingers and other kinds of hooks) from Nine Stories. "I mean, it was nothing you couldn't read while clipping your toenails, but...", zinc oxide on the nose v sunburn, ""Sex Can Be Great---Or Hell" He calls me Miss Spiritual Tramp of 1947", all those other setups and steps and step-ins, all of them unmistakably necessary, as it turns out in "Bananafish"--also, "I guess he's got a sense of humor, he laughs at comic strips"; "He says it's so beautifully written. He can't admit he likes it because it's about two guys who starved to death in an igloo"(note to self: google L. Manning Vines) Who could forget: vomit in the military wastebasket; the remains of a dry chicken sandwich not disposed of, not quite yet; a dead voice, "rudely, almost obscenely quickened for the occasion" (which of course works, as in the King James Bible's "the quick or the dead". whether you bother with "quick" once meaning "alive" or not) "his--his f-a-c-u-l-t-i-e-s"--and the hits just keep coming! sorry.
― dow, Sunday, July 10, 2011 6:23 PM (six years ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
...I think "Zooey" is Salinger trying to achieve some perspective (incl linking the characters from Nine Stories, acknowledging and extending their relatedness--everything, including "Franny" is "pre-Glass"., as Updike says, before this explicit family tree is drawn). Zooey's lecturing, and his flailing around, is Salinger trying to adjust his voice,warning and challenging his followers and himself. (Also, none of Nine Stories was actually narrated by his child characters, right? Unless you count the excellent Daumier-Smith, who was looking back, like Salinger's other narrator/witnesses, to times of blue and gold) The lectures seemed to take over and become self-mesmerized in Raise High/Seymour, though I might try to re-read those, at least.
― dow, Sunday, July 10, 2011
― dow, Friday, 27 October 2017 02:29 (six years ago) link
(Never finished Raise High/Seymour)
― dow, Friday, 27 October 2017 02:31 (six years ago) link
assuming the descriptions of some of the unpublished works from a few years back were accurate, they sounded p different from the books we know -- there was supposed to be a war novel, i think.
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Friday, 27 October 2017 05:54 (six years ago) link