Dunno, I'll get back to you when I read it, got some other Kim Stanley Robinson worldgrooming up first. Meanwhile, more newly revealed Science Fact w Science Fiction appeal: "Super-Earths">"Squishy Worlds"--eeeuuuuuwwwhttp://news.discovery.com/space/exoplanet-super-earth-pressure-heat-metal-121122.html
― dow, Saturday, 24 November 2012 16:09 (thirteen years ago)
i've got a big stack of KSRobinson books thanks to you guys but i haven't read any of them yet. they all LOOK really cool.
― scott seward, Saturday, 24 November 2012 20:03 (thirteen years ago)
i'm still reading this and its okay and entertaining but its taking me too long to read it so i must not love it. it shouldn't really take more than a day or two. early simak. and you get the silly early 50's stuff like a world 6000 years in the future where everyone still talks like its the early 50s and acts like they are in a noir novel of the 50's. and the history of everything is so vague. but, like i said, entertaining enough.
http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8435/7823994658_1db376c709.jpg
― scott seward, Saturday, 24 November 2012 21:09 (thirteen years ago)
i like that later farting cover.
― scott seward, Saturday, 24 November 2012 21:10 (thirteen years ago)
any recommendations from this list:
http://www.gutenberg.org/wiki/Astounding_Stories_%28Bookshelf%29
― koogs, Thursday, 29 November 2012 13:26 (thirteen years ago)
Personally would seek anything with "time" in the title, destroy anything called "Brigands of the Moon" or "The Pirate Planet". Guessing the garbage quotient is pretty high though.
― ledge, Thursday, 29 November 2012 14:29 (thirteen years ago)
1930s...
there are other journals on there, with some vonnegut and dick, but i think i need to cherrypick by author rather than just downloading any old tosh. ereader already has 10 years of reading on it and is only 1/4 full...
― koogs, Thursday, 29 November 2012 14:38 (thirteen years ago)
yeah, Williamson, Leinster, Hamilton, Cave should be worth checking, though it's their earlier stuff and for the pulp as fuh market.
― dow, Thursday, 29 November 2012 15:00 (thirteen years ago)
yee gods! Anybody seen the documentary?http://shine.yahoo.com/healthy-living/real-benjamin-buttons-brothers-matthew-michael-clark-aging-193400085.html
― dow, Tuesday, 4 December 2012 18:45 (thirteen years ago)
so what was good this year ilb spec crew?
― the oral history of (strongo hulkington's ghost dad), Saturday, 8 December 2012 15:35 (thirteen years ago)
i need some books to read not by grandmasters or half-forgotten pulp authors.
I'm still working on 2010 & 11 books. I have no clue.
― EZ Snappin, Saturday, 8 December 2012 15:36 (thirteen years ago)
ha yeah i can never keep up. i think i finally read most of the Hot Books of 2006 in like 2010.
― the oral history of (strongo hulkington's ghost dad), Saturday, 8 December 2012 16:11 (thirteen years ago)
I'm liking Jim Munroe currently: Everyone in Silico and Flyboy Action Figure Comes with Gasmask. Both are old though.
― Jaq, Saturday, 8 December 2012 16:16 (thirteen years ago)
I did get the new Sandman Slim book from Audible. first 20 minutes of listening were fun.
― EZ Snappin, Saturday, 8 December 2012 16:19 (thirteen years ago)
Maureen McHugh's 'After the Apocalypse' short story collection was this year, I think: that was great
Reading a new collection edited by Jonathan Strahan, 'The Edge of Infinity', which seems excellent so far: near-future hard SF confined to our solar system, is the basic brief
― ornamental cabbage (James Morrison), Monday, 10 December 2012 02:32 (thirteen years ago)
i cant think of any fantasy novels that were outstanding. ian tergillis' alternate earth fantasy-spy novel 'the coldest war' was the sort of deliriously stupid book that i finished in a single day and then felt vaguely guilty for having enjoyed so much and joe abercrombie's newest is good while kinda proving hes running out of ways to revisit the same ground. 'the winds of khalakovo' was probably one of the best high fantasy novels i read this year but i think how much you like it depends on your ability to read the title 'the winds of khalakovo' w/o rolling your eyes
harkaway's 'angelmaker' is another speculative fiction meets spy novel (which was a thing this year, i guess) thats more self-consciously literary than 'the coldest war' and probably objectively better but grated my nerves p badly. it def deserves a mention in eoy lists but its too much an amalgamation of reddit upvotes and av club style pop culture discernment, like the fever of dream of some bored marketing analyst who spends too much work time making animated gifs of network sitcoms and complaining about hipsters on his facebook.
i havent read '2312' or 'in the mouth of the whale' but both are trad sci-fi novels that have been getting good reviews
and while i havent read much horror this year peter bell's 'strange epiphanies' is really excellent classic horror.
― f (Lamp), Monday, 10 December 2012 06:32 (thirteen years ago)
The Coldest War: details please!
― dow, Monday, 10 December 2012 14:45 (thirteen years ago)
I have to rave about the new(?) KJ Parker, Sharps. I started to write a big thing but I won't. Just read it.
― grossly incorrect register (in orbit), Monday, 10 December 2012 15:29 (thirteen years ago)
Parker's books are so good at being relentlessly about politics without sacrificing the texture or appeal of the characters in the middle. This one has all of that, doubled...and swords. Lots of swords.
― grossly incorrect register (in orbit), Monday, 10 December 2012 15:33 (thirteen years ago)
Tried reading "the other log of Phileas Fog" by Phillip Jose Farmer - it's a clever idea, but quite boring really.
Just got the 1967 ed of Dangerous Visions - good Christmas reading.
― jel --, Monday, 10 December 2012 18:35 (thirteen years ago)
I keep thinking back on Parker's Engineer Trilogy, and have recommended it to a bunch of people who all enjoyed it - thanks much for that, Laurel! Even though I complained, those books have stuck with me - and I just bought Sharps.
― Jaq, Monday, 10 December 2012 18:46 (thirteen years ago)
i would actually love some lists of "essential" 90's and beyond SF from you guys. cuz i'm still stuck in the era of bellbottoms and earlier. not complaining, enjoy the old stuff a ton and its that stuff that has gotten me so excited about the genre, but for later it would be nice to know what to check out. i mean, i have to read snow crash, right? or do i? there are good suggestions on that other scifi thread i started a million years ago on ilb. will look there too. would like to think that i will get to some of the banks culture books. and i have a small shelf of kim stanley robinson now thanks to this thread.
heck, i haven't read ender's game yet and that's the 80's. everyone loves that one, i think...
― scott seward, Monday, 10 December 2012 18:55 (thirteen years ago)
For my money you can skip KSR but that's just me. The others you named are all required reading.
― grossly incorrect register (in orbit), Monday, 10 December 2012 19:09 (thirteen years ago)
Scott:
THE IRON DRAGON'S DAUGHTER, Michael Swanwick, pls read it.
― Tomb Of Spatula (Jon Lewis), Monday, 10 December 2012 19:29 (thirteen years ago)
but people love KSR here! now what do i do? his books look interesting. we shall see.
― scott seward, Monday, 10 December 2012 19:50 (thirteen years ago)
okay, swanwick, got it. well, i don't have it, but i'll remember it.
― scott seward, Monday, 10 December 2012 19:51 (thirteen years ago)
i like KSR. I get a little bit of vertigo while reading him when I think about how much research he must have done. Have not read anything since the Mars books though.
― Tomb Of Spatula (Jon Lewis), Monday, 10 December 2012 20:07 (thirteen years ago)
All I can remember about the Mars books is that there are a lot of Russians in future space.
― grossly incorrect register (in orbit), Monday, 10 December 2012 20:09 (thirteen years ago)
The Years of Rice and Salt is by far my favorite KSR.
― EZ Snappin, Monday, 10 December 2012 20:19 (thirteen years ago)
Another 90s SF recommendation: Bruce Sterling's Holy Fire.
― Brad C., Monday, 10 December 2012 20:23 (thirteen years ago)
xpost that's the one I intend to (eventually) read next.
― the clown's reflection is incorrect (Jon Lewis), Monday, 10 December 2012 20:24 (thirteen years ago)
O mang, we've talked about tons of 80s-90s on here--anyway, to me, Snow Crash is very exuberant and inventive, but Diamond Age is where his deeeper talents, informed intuition and sharpening skills rassle with his dated cyber-libertarian tropes--which actually keeps things more exciting than Snow Crash, far as I'm concerned. I'd start with Gibson's early short story collection, Burning Chrome, before trying Neuromancer. Also James Tiptree Jr., Robert Reed, Maureen McHugh, Ted Chiang (maybe didn't publish til 00s? Anyway he's great), Swanwick when you're stoned (better w times of short attention span; The Iron Dragon's Daughter might provide plenty snap crackle pop) Nancy Kress (at least the early stuff, like novel Brainrose and short stories). Dozois' and Hartwell's competitive/complimentary annual best-ofs are unevern, but both series have led me to tons of great stuff (til Dozois' judgement got wildly erractic a few years ago, and scared me off more recent volumes, but 80s and 90s are pretty good).
― dow, Monday, 10 December 2012 23:27 (thirteen years ago)
no yeah 90's and beyond is what i was looking for. strongo reminded me that i wanted to ask about more recent stuff. the local store here had the chiang collection and i went back and it was gone. i just see newer stuff and i have no idea if its any good or not. cuz the authors are unknown to me. i do have a bunch of 90's year-end best-ofs and they are good for figuring out if i like new names.
― scott seward, Tuesday, 11 December 2012 02:07 (thirteen years ago)
and yeah there is probably lots of stuff on this thread to look up. i'm just lazy. and i have plenty to read. i don't want anyone to hurt themselves. i'm gonna keep my eye out for the swanwick book that jon mentioned.
― scott seward, Tuesday, 11 December 2012 02:16 (thirteen years ago)
i need some books to read not by grandmasters or half-forgotten pulp authors.This reminds of something I really liked on m john harrison's blog recently, but I feel like he is persona non grata around here so I will let you look for it yourself.
― Ginger Geezer's Armada (James Redd and the Blecchs), Tuesday, 11 December 2012 04:12 (thirteen years ago)
Why is he persona non grata? I've never read a word, but that's because I know his name but nothing else about him or his work.
― EZ Snappin, Tuesday, 11 December 2012 04:18 (thirteen years ago)
Maybe that's too strong. I think his biggest fan here was Martin S, who is no longer with us. I am also a fan, but a think some, like ledge and thomp, think he is too curmudgeonly. OK here is the link, http://www.goodreads.com/author_blog_posts/3256529-cat-roofer-mars, but be warned that he may trackback and say rude things about us.
― Ginger Geezer's Armada (James Redd and the Blecchs), Tuesday, 11 December 2012 04:25 (thirteen years ago)
He can chastise me for not getting around to his work.
― EZ Snappin, Tuesday, 11 December 2012 04:30 (thirteen years ago)
I should do that too. Scott, the most recent round-up I've read (still reading, now and then) is Year's Best SF 15 (Hartwell & Cramer, 2010). It's got me wanting to check out more by Vandana Singh, Robert Charles Wilson, Ian Creasey, Peter Watts (who's put most if not all of his short fiction online, free access), and even Bruce Sterling, who I've never gotten to before, but "Black Swan", though tricky-dicky as evah, as me bugging. (I've tried to describe these writers' YBSF15 stories upthread.) Gene Wolfe and Nancy Kress aren't up to their usual standard, a lot of so-whats offered by others, but looking fwd to Geoff Ryman's "Blocked", p. 328, Charles Oberndorf's "Another Life" p. 373 (think I talked about his Sheltered Lives on here before; great contagion-as-normalcy). Most recent novel most relevant to this thread: Colson Whitehead's Zone One, which I also xposted (don't usually care about zombies, but it's got the grand, differently-focused visualization of Frankenstein's 1818 edition. without being anachronistic)
― dow, Tuesday, 11 December 2012 18:15 (thirteen years ago)
x I've got to proofread these posts, sorry.
― dow, Tuesday, 11 December 2012 18:17 (thirteen years ago)
Peter Watts! Yesssssssss. I loved the stand-alone book--the trilogy ones got kind of brutal read in a row but maybe you'll approach them difftly/better.
― grossly incorrect register (in orbit), Tuesday, 11 December 2012 18:20 (thirteen years ago)
post-90s sff: I have heard great things about Kage Baker and wanna investigate soon.
― the clown's reflection is incorrect (Jon Lewis), Tuesday, 11 December 2012 19:08 (thirteen years ago)
just went into the bookstore down the street and they had some interesting 2011/2012 story collections. even a new zombie collection that looked neat. and they DID still have the ted chiang collection but i didn't feel like spending 16 bucks at the moment. it'll be there...
― scott seward, Tuesday, 11 December 2012 19:19 (thirteen years ago)
Paul Krugman: Asimov's Foundation novels grounded my economics
― mookieproof, Tuesday, 11 December 2012 20:51 (thirteen years ago)
sam delany said something in his paris review interview to the effect that a movie or tv mini-series version of foundation would make socialists of every prepubescent nerd in the country.
given the age i read them, i'm wondering if he's not right.
― my dinner of butt (strongo hulkington's ghost dad), Tuesday, 11 December 2012 23:40 (thirteen years ago)
man wouldn't that be a nice counterweight to all the young randians out there
― the clown's reflection is incorrect (Jon Lewis), Wednesday, 12 December 2012 00:01 (thirteen years ago)
i was a young randian!
― scott seward, Wednesday, 12 December 2012 00:21 (thirteen years ago)
i think i read atlas shrugged twice when i was a teen. i just liked the tortured genius part, i didn't care about the politics.
― scott seward, Wednesday, 12 December 2012 00:22 (thirteen years ago)
okay, because i as a person make no sense whatsoever i passed on the 16 dollar chiang collection and later today went to the used (and soiled) book pit where cranky oldsters "debate" our capitalist system from very VERY well-worn chairs and spent 50 bucks on oldster SF. i couldn't help myself for some reason.
― scott seward, Wednesday, 12 December 2012 00:27 (thirteen years ago)