rolling fantasy, science fiction, speculative fiction &c. thread

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (3131 of them)

Ha, didn't Christopher Priest write a book about why the last Dangerous Visions would never come out?

MIke Love Battery (James Redd and the Blecchs), Friday, 6 April 2012 01:34 (fourteen years ago)

Yeah -- I have a copy around here somewhere. Ellison threatened to sue him but never followed through.

improvised explosive advice (WmC), Friday, 6 April 2012 01:36 (fourteen years ago)

I think it is not readily available because of that threat.

MIke Love Battery (James Redd and the Blecchs), Friday, 6 April 2012 01:38 (fourteen years ago)

Huh...I wonder if existing copies go for big bucks.

improvised explosive advice (WmC), Friday, 6 April 2012 01:41 (fourteen years ago)

Twenty-five bucks at the low end although somebody wants one seventy

MIke Love Battery (James Redd and the Blecchs), Friday, 6 April 2012 01:57 (fourteen years ago)

Considering it's just a cranky rant of the sort that was perfected later by Everyone On The Internet, I'd gladly give mine up for $35-40.

improvised explosive advice (WmC), Friday, 6 April 2012 02:00 (fourteen years ago)

HA

MIke Love Battery (James Redd and the Blecchs), Friday, 6 April 2012 03:04 (fourteen years ago)

"..about why it would never come out.Ellison threatend to sue but never followed through." Zing! Truth is the best punchline. He wrote a whole book about it? Wotta Priest!

dow, Friday, 6 April 2012 03:40 (fourteen years ago)

But I wasn't thinking of Ellison re passively publishing any ol' thing with a big name attached, more like the last Dozois-edited Best of I read, from two-three years back, put me any subsequent volumes. About half of it was up to his usual (slightly damp) standards, then suddenly veered, even Robert Reed with an endless story about watching his doggie waste away--could possible have been good, but it was all sniffle sniffle sniffle sniffle sniffle. I like DG Hartwell's anthologies when he's on his own, but the Year's Best SF series co-edited with Cramer aren't so dependable.

dow, Friday, 6 April 2012 03:48 (fourteen years ago)

Also, what's some good New Wave science fiction?

dow, Friday, 6 April 2012 19:42 (fourteen years ago)

philip jose farmer's short stories

the late great, Friday, 6 April 2012 19:43 (fourteen years ago)

j.g. ballard

the late great, Friday, 6 April 2012 19:43 (fourteen years ago)

Never seen a collection of Farmer's short stories, rarely see the novels anymore (The Lovers was his early noteworthy, right?) Ballard's Of The Sun was vivid but somehow made less impact than I'd expected, maybe too autobiographical for his usual conceptual momentum? Not that I've read much else, which of his should I look for?

dow, Friday, 6 April 2012 19:50 (fourteen years ago)

Empire of The Sun, sorry.

dow, Friday, 6 April 2012 19:50 (fourteen years ago)

i think the awesome PJF is an early short story collection called "strange relations"

the late great, Friday, 6 April 2012 19:53 (fourteen years ago)

Also, what's some good New Wave science fiction?

Start at ground zero...

http://www.sfsite.com/gra/0502/nwlg.jpg

Reality Check Cashing Services (Elvis Telecom), Friday, 6 April 2012 20:37 (fourteen years ago)

octavia butler's xenogenesis series is fantastic

the late great, Friday, 6 April 2012 21:01 (fourteen years ago)

Farmer's full bibliography doesn't really fit neatly in the New Wave, but he was prolific enough that a lot of his stuff was New Wave-esque, especially the work that dealt with sexual themes. "Riders of the Purple Wage" was very NewWaveish, but it's kind of a choppy mess -- it was so long and had to be cut so severely for Dangerous Visions that the outtakes were assembled into another story, "The Oogenesis of Bird City." One of my favorites of his is "The Jungle Rot Kid on the Nod," a dumb/hilarious answer to the question "what if William Burroughs, not Edgar Rice Burroughs, wrote the Tarzan stories?"

Selling my Farmer collection (nearly complete when I sold it in 1986) is one of the most boneheaded things I ever did.

improvised explosive advice (WmC), Saturday, 7 April 2012 01:35 (fourteen years ago)

Another vote for "The Jungle Rot Kid."
A litle while back I overheard a guy in a bar saying Vonnegut wrote Venus on the Half Shell. When I corrected him he looked at me like I was nuts

MIke Love Battery (James Redd and the Blecchs), Saturday, 7 April 2012 01:54 (fourteen years ago)

"The Jungle Rot Kid On The Nod" sounds very promising, thanks. Somebody should do it as a song. Shifting gears, any other Stephen Baxter worth checking out? How are his collaborations w Arthur C. Clarke?

dow, Saturday, 7 April 2012 03:15 (fourteen years ago)

what is actually in that new worlds anthology?

new wave stuff i think of as vaguely canonic: pamela zoline's stories 'the heat death of the universe' and 'a holland of the mind'; jerry cornelius stuff, but don't ask which; thomas disch, 'camp concentration' and '334'

brian aldiss's 'report and probability a' and 'barefoot in the head' worth looking at in a bookshop to see what kind of responses people were having who were trying to keep up? not really v good though

j.g. ballard, i guess 'the drowned world' & those other early novels? & the story 'the assassination of john fitzgerald kennedy considered as a downhill motor race'

thomp, Saturday, 7 April 2012 05:59 (fourteen years ago)

ha, that anthology samples most all of that

thomp, Saturday, 7 April 2012 06:03 (fourteen years ago)

Yeah, a lot of stuff was in that mag. Here's Gollancz crowing about and linking their titles on recent Locus Rec Reading List
http://www.gollancz.co.uk/2012/02/gollancz-titles-on-the-locus-recommended-reading-list/

dow, Saturday, 7 April 2012 14:54 (fourteen years ago)

they sure have a whole bunch of sequels

thomp, Saturday, 7 April 2012 15:24 (fourteen years ago)

i can NEVER find disch stuff in used book stores anymore. used to see it everywhere, and now that i want it all....nada.

scott seward, Saturday, 7 April 2012 19:46 (fourteen years ago)

I apparently told yall wrong about Lindner's book study of psychopaths: he's foregrounding one person, and though I could swear I've seen it as the original work titled Rebel Without A Cause, pre-dating the movie, I found it this afternoon as Without A Cause. Also Theodore Sturgeon's collection, Sturgeon is Alive And Well, from 1971. I'd heard he had writer's blcok, and he confirms this right away in the prologue. Living way under a rock til a redheaded woman got his mojo rising (sorry, I was just reading about Greil Marcus' Doors book on the What Are You Reading thread). So he wrote all these stories (and a novel) in the previous year, 1970, not one of the more springs-eternal years otherwise. All but one, the first story, a novelette from the early 50s, perfect lead-off, re agents of the muse, in this case seeking out a blocked painter who may also be a blocked knight of olde. Easy to see where this is going, but appropriate novelties keep appearing at just the right moments, spinning around the throughline. A little too neat (yet not quite adding up) toward end, but not too much considering the requirements even for hipper magazine SF in early 50s, or later. On the way home, I sat down in the park and read this long and sometimes dense (forsooth, that knight) yarn from beginning to end. This never happens. When I raised my head, still plenty of dark green cool daytime, at 7 p.m.

dow, Sunday, 8 April 2012 01:45 (fourteen years ago)

http://covers.openlibrary.org/w/id/6705129-L.jpg

dow, Sunday, 8 April 2012 01:52 (fourteen years ago)

at home for easter weekend i have turned up copies of two collections: 'the dreaming jewels' and the more troublingly titled 'e pluribus unicorn'

thomp, Sunday, 8 April 2012 15:28 (fourteen years ago)

Ha. Think I owned one or both of those back in the day but I remember nothing but the titles

MIke Love Battery (James Redd and the Blecchs), Sunday, 8 April 2012 16:50 (fourteen years ago)

Yeah, I've got reservations about unicorns, but at least it's not angels or elves, in the book's title anyway. James, cover of The Dreaming Jewels is posted a little ways upthread, may jog yr memory.

dow, Sunday, 8 April 2012 18:23 (fourteen years ago)

that title approaching piers anthony level of awfulness

the late great, Sunday, 8 April 2012 19:33 (fourteen years ago)

http://covers.openlibrary.org/b/id/6619835-L.jpg

dow, Sunday, 8 April 2012 21:23 (fourteen years ago)

yeah, that's the one i have

thomp, Sunday, 8 April 2012 21:25 (fourteen years ago)

reading After Doomsday by Poul Anderson right now. meat & potatoes early 60's sci-fi. like going to a diner you like that is totally predicatable in all the right ways. the coffee and pie and burgers are always fine. sometimes i do feel like the old people who just want to read the same agatha christies and crime and mystery plots over and over again.

scott seward, Sunday, 8 April 2012 21:26 (fourteen years ago)

hey if you are gonna have unicorn in your title you could do worse than that cover. its pretty rad.

scott seward, Sunday, 8 April 2012 21:27 (fourteen years ago)

The others are dismally predictable, but this so-called match is kinda cool

http://lh4.ggpht.com/_hVOW2U7K4-M/SR-RiT8_y3I/AAAAAAAArtY/sR_xVsTjEG8/4356yurtutyjgh.jpg

dow, Sunday, 8 April 2012 21:30 (fourteen years ago)

Old interview with Chris Priest with some funny stuff about Ellison book http://www.ansible.co.uk/writing/cpriest.html Also lots of stuff about The Prestige which I avoided since I haven't read that one yet

zing left unguarded, the j/k palace in flames (James Redd and the Blecchs), Monday, 9 April 2012 04:50 (fourteen years ago)

despite the title 'e pluribus unicorn' is an absolutely killer collection. it has a story involving an evil teddy bear that scared the hell out of me when i read it (and i suspect still would).

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Monday, 9 April 2012 06:03 (fourteen years ago)

sturgeon's a little too lurid and purple and pulpy for my tastes. as for new wave sf, i got all the original new worlds anthologies a little while ago, and new wave sf can fuck off and die imo.

ledge, Monday, 9 April 2012 21:15 (fourteen years ago)

it was, you know, of its moment

thomp, Monday, 9 April 2012 21:17 (fourteen years ago)

all that's left are echoes of a scene furiously celebrating itself.

ledge, Monday, 9 April 2012 21:18 (fourteen years ago)

i love 'report on probability a' that you mentioned upthread but that's a lot more considered than most of the stuff in those new worlds.

ledge, Monday, 9 April 2012 21:19 (fourteen years ago)

Then play on!
http://www.johncoulthart.com/feuilleton/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/eng.jpg

dow, Monday, 9 April 2012 21:28 (fourteen years ago)

lots more by same artist, k*ll*an Eng
http://www.behance.net/gallery/Various-work-05/1134721

dow, Monday, 9 April 2012 21:32 (fourteen years ago)

k*ll*an Eng, that is.

dow, Monday, 9 April 2012 21:33 (fourteen years ago)

eh? oh well you'll see.

dow, Monday, 9 April 2012 21:33 (fourteen years ago)

fwiw - the anthologies, if you mean the sphere books things, were after even moorcock was running out of patience with the whole thing, and various lines about what 'new wave sf' was or could be had basically been decided on. that is, if you were reading these:

http://www.isfdb.org/wiki/images/8/83/NWWRTRLYBC1971.jpg

they were being published by sphere as a paperback after the money ran out for the magazine after (i think) they lost their arts council funding and were dropped from w.h. smith (biggest booksellers and newsagents in the country then and possibly still) (haha wait are you british? hang on). etc etc etc. anyway the reason the whole thing was meant to be exciting was that moorcock had taken over a magazine that looked like this

http://www.sfcovers.net/Magazines/NW/NW_0146.jpg

and turned it into one that looked like this

http://www.sfcovers.net/Magazines/NW/NW_0179.jpg

thomp, Monday, 9 April 2012 21:34 (fourteen years ago)

(xposts, oops - but, yeah, 'echoes of a scene furiously celebrating itself' does kind of sum up the state things were in by the sphere books stuff. but! moorcock had been editor on and off for like seven years then, so what the hey)

thomp, Monday, 9 April 2012 21:35 (fourteen years ago)

Looks very tasty, that last cover--what do you think of the New Worlds anthology rec'd to me upthread? Read part of a story from it on Amazon's Look Inside, pretty entertaining so far

dow, Monday, 9 April 2012 21:38 (fourteen years ago)

it sort of does the job -- there's no anthology that gives a real sense of it as a publication, i think, but that gives as good a sense of it as a received idea as any other does. the langdon jones 'the new sf' (amazon copies from £0.01, i'm sure) from 70-ish is maybe a touch better

i think the high-60s covers have dated horribly in some respects tbh

http://www.sfcovers.net/Magazines/NW/NW_0188.jpg

thomp, Monday, 9 April 2012 21:44 (fourteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.