I just read 'Replay' by Ken Grimwood - man dies at age 43, wakes up as himself at age 18, tries to live his life right this time, dies age 43, wakes up at 18, realises he's lost all the good he achieved last time, starts losing it, dies at age 43, wakes up at 18...
So it's fantasy, but not of the dragons/swords/chainmail bikinis type.
Very good stuff.
― James Morrison, Thursday, 24 January 2008 21:44 (eighteen years ago)
So I finished the new Patrick Rothfuss –– anyone else?
― they call him (remy bean), Tuesday, 22 March 2011 20:53 (fifteen years ago)
there was a fair bit of discussion on the ile fantasy thread - I love the fantasy genre, lots, and I want it to stop sucking (OR: recommend me fantasy stuff that does not suck)
― r u levelled up? (Lamp), Tuesday, 22 March 2011 22:17 (fifteen years ago)
is there a good thread in this generation of fantasy, or a poll even? pre erikson/martin hegemony but post seventies american dri-fi, that high fantasy landfill indie era that jordan probably straddles quite neatly
@ned thisll do i reckon seems to be plenty of discussion of the big 80/90's hitters and their forebears upthread
― tuah dé danann (darraghmac), Friday, 30 August 2024 21:15 (one year ago)
god it all runs together in my head now, there was one bookshop two hours bus ride away so getting a new book in 1995/6 meant planning a saturday around it and just turning up and seeing what was there so theres some real beggars cant be choosers memories of slogging through stuff that i dont think id manage a chapter of today, before jordan swept all before him (for me, anyway)
after eddings and gemmell grabbed my completionist attn i went through a few runs of half finishing feist, shannara, a few l.e. modessitt jrs, terry goodkind, tad williams (memory sorry and thorn not otherland)
after i actually moved into town and joined the library id have to take a punt at the meagre fantasy section there, often this involved starting in book two or having to skip book seven, unideal stuff
library did provide first robin hobb book tbf so not all bad
if the topic is post eddings high fantasy boom, up to Jordan/martin/Erikson superboom, is that well enough understood and defined to pick through what might be worth choosing and attempting as a comfort read exercise?
― tuah dé danann (darraghmac), Friday, 30 August 2024 21:30 (one year ago)
mickey zucker reichert's renshai books had a killer premise and seemed appealingly less cartoonish than a lot of the rest at the time, i wonder how theyd read now
― tuah dé danann (darraghmac), Friday, 30 August 2024 21:32 (one year ago)
My interest was at its peak around age 12-13 and I'm not sure I'd trust that person for book recommendations. Some things I half-remember as not quite the same as the others:
- The Empire Trilogy: spin-off from Magician but much more interesting iirc...fantasy-Japan setting...lots of plots and politics...plus alien insect civilisation?- Duncton Wood: super dark super long books about moles going on quests and having religious schisms- Death Gate Cycle: from the makers of Dragonlance...a bunch of different worlds connected through some plot device...it had airships?
― tortillas for the divorce party (seandalai), Saturday, 31 August 2024 01:33 (one year ago)
Empire Trilogy was excellent I thought, even if the second book is basically Fantasy Shogun. Feel like it was really more Wurts than Feist.
The Duncton books too, though I remember finding them traumatically sad
― Tim F, Saturday, 31 August 2024 01:54 (one year ago)
moles! i might have to remember those...
― scott seward, Saturday, 31 August 2024 02:39 (one year ago)
So I have this class and I have to pick one fantasy novel to read for the week after next. There are tons of stuff I would love to read, but, as would be expected, most of it is ludicrously long, and usually part of a series too. So any ideas on what's a great, short fantasy novel to read? We're already reading A Wizard of Earthsea, so it can't be that.
― askance johnson, Friday, January 18, 2008 9:49 AM (sixteen years ago) bookmarkflaglink
Nine Princes in Amber
― default damager (lukas), Saturday, 31 August 2024 02:48 (one year ago)
re the meta-ness of fantasy how that can matter:
To better explain what he meant by the story being about death, Tolkien reached into his jacket pocket and pulled out his wallet, which contained a newspaper clipping. He then read aloud from that article, which quoted from Simone de Beauvoir's A Very Easy Death, her moving 1964 account of her mother's desire to cling to life during her dying days."There is no such thing as a natural death," he read. "Nothing that happens to a man is ever natural, since his presence calls the world into question. All men must die: but for every man his death is an accident and, even if he knows it and consents to it, an unjustifiable violation." "Well, you may agree with the words or not," he said. "But those are the key-spring of The Lord of the Rings."...While Tolkien's wartime experiences may have added depth and authenticity to the mythological world he created, the author himself always maintained that he did not write The Lord of the Rings as an allegory for WW1, or indeed any other specific event from history."People do not fully understand the difference between an allegory and an application," he told the BBC in 1968."You can go to a Shakespeare play and you can apply it to things in your mind, if you like, but they are not allegories... I mean many people apply the Ring to the nuclear bomb and think that was in my mind, and the whole thing is an allegory of it. Well, it isn't."
"There is no such thing as a natural death," he read. "Nothing that happens to a man is ever natural, since his presence calls the world into question. All men must die: but for every man his death is an accident and, even if he knows it and consents to it, an unjustifiable violation." "Well, you may agree with the words or not," he said. "But those are the key-spring of The Lord of the Rings."
...While Tolkien's wartime experiences may have added depth and authenticity to the mythological world he created, the author himself always maintained that he did not write The Lord of the Rings as an allegory for WW1, or indeed any other specific event from history.
"People do not fully understand the difference between an allegory and an application," he told the BBC in 1968."You can go to a Shakespeare play and you can apply it to things in your mind, if you like, but they are not allegories... I mean many people apply the Ring to the nuclear bomb and think that was in my mind, and the whole thing is an allegory of it. Well, it isn't."
― dow, Saturday, 31 August 2024 04:13 (one year ago)
got into fantasy backwards because i thought the hobbit was corny and therefore never read LOTR until after i'd read several things that shamelessly ripped it off
utterly shameless LOTR ripoffs: shanarra (brooks), the iron tower (mckiernan)
let's get celtic: deryni (kurtz), prydain* (alexander), the dark is rising *(cooper), merlin* (stewart)
oh no: i thought the first three apprentice adept (anthony) books were fine
technically science fiction: pern (mccaffrey), pliocene exile* (may), new sun/long sun* (wolfe)
madeleine l'engle: meant a lot to me but never went past 'a ring of endless light'
fritz leiber: literally only ever heard of this because fafhrd and grey mouser were in a D&D book. also leiber is for some reason pronounced 'lie-ber'
moorcock: don't understand why people stan him, what a letdown
leguin (earthsea): obvs
mckillip (riddlemaster*): rules; haven't read much of her others tho
donaldson (thomas covenant): i will ride for the first two series*; the third is garbage
eddings: belgariad (good), mallorean (awful), cannot speak to the rest
king (the dark tower): v. enjoyable if you can get past the racism
foster (spellsinger): music nerds need fantasy too
pratchett (discworld): fine, whatever
cook (the black company): military porn
kay (fionavar*): great; other standalones probably are as well
card (alvin maker): only read the first two; recall liking them
wells (raksura*): good stuff from the 2010s; see also murderbot, etc.
dunno: kirstein (the steerswoman), park (stonebridge), crowley (aegypt), kerr (devery)
(* means recommended)
― mookieproof, Saturday, 31 August 2024 06:30 (one year ago)
started malazon once but it seemed like military porn? not interested in having to know the numbers assigned to army units
― mookieproof, Saturday, 31 August 2024 06:54 (one year ago)
it is, and worse besides, you realise about eight books in its just a long form narrative about a card game they made up in college
― tuah dé danann (darraghmac), Saturday, 31 August 2024 07:23 (one year ago)
we have segued into more current stuff this is not a complaint
ive not stuck with them but joe abercrombie is a better writer than most in the genre and the angle is a good one
― tuah dé danann (darraghmac), Saturday, 31 August 2024 07:24 (one year ago)
duncton moles books absolute magic, and heavier than anything mentioned
― tuah dé danann (darraghmac), Saturday, 31 August 2024 07:25 (one year ago)
r scott bakker stuff is truly original, utterly depraved, guy has significant talent but id imagine is quite insane.
― tuah dé danann (darraghmac), Saturday, 31 August 2024 07:28 (one year ago)
in lighter vein rothfuss builds a great world and characters but quite clearly has no idea how to finish the books so i cant recommend
Yeah, enjoyed the Rothfuss and Lynch series but have zero expectations of ever getting the final book from either of them. Where would you start with Tad Williams? As it was implied in the other thread he was a precursor to GRRM rather than just another Tolkien clone
― groovypanda, Saturday, 31 August 2024 14:36 (one year ago)
I tried reading Ann Leckie's The Raven Tower recently, but unfortunately found it completely undreadable
If Duncton Wood counts, I'd probably add REDWALL and THE DARK PORTAL to the list
Also curious about Tad Williams
― Chuck_Tatum, Saturday, 31 August 2024 16:43 (one year ago)
ive only read Memory, Sorrow & Thorn and not sure I'd recommend that ahead of starting robin hobb's farseer trilogy for a series of that type tbph
― tuah dé danann (darraghmac), Saturday, 31 August 2024 17:35 (one year ago)
melenkurion abatha lads
― mookieproof, Tuesday, 3 September 2024 05:48 (one year ago)
A decent standalone Tad Williams is The War of the Flowers if you just want to get a sense of the writing style. It's not high fantasy, more of a portal. It's not as good as Memory, Sorrow and Thorn but also it's nowhere as near slow to get going
― treefell, Tuesday, 3 September 2024 09:17 (one year ago)
More good standalones: Patricia A. McKillip's Winter Rose, Naomi Novik's Uprooted, both have teen heroines, managing in deep woods-farm-village-outpost-ov-empire, then disturbing male traveler appears. There must be journeys, changes, challenges, rich imagery and energy.
― dow, Tuesday, 3 September 2024 22:38 (one year ago)
Yeah The Dragonbone Chair (first Tad Williams MST book) really does take forever to get going, with an absolutely astonishing amount of mopey internal monologues - though then it becomes quite zippy and action-packed. It’s like Robert Jordan in reverse order.
― Tim F, Tuesday, 3 September 2024 22:55 (one year ago)
i thought there was a Broken Earth Series thread. there should be. i loved those books. some day i'm gonna read them again. i feel like everything else she does is going to suffer by comparison. i tried to read the Inheritance Trilogy and only got through one book. it was okay but i missed the Broken Earth. i could have lived in that world for ten books.
every time you guys mention Robert Jordan i think back to when i used to read that thread for fun knowing i would never read the books. it was very entertaining. this feeling that people liked something so much that also kinda drove them crazy.
― scott seward, Wednesday, 4 September 2024 01:20 (one year ago)
wait, did people here read the Jemisin books? i would start a thread but its been so long since i read them.
― scott seward, Wednesday, 4 September 2024 17:51 (one year ago)
started the war of the flowers last night. it's fine but a) not sure i need sad-sack post-breakup unemployed vaguely alcoholic dudes with dead parents in my fantasy right now, and b) not sure i can take 700 pages of tinkerbell's brogue
yeah the broken earth series was great. didn't like jemisin's new york city one that much but damn she really hates staten island
― mookieproof, Wednesday, 4 September 2024 21:04 (one year ago)
yeah i didn't want to read the city one. that seemed like a mieville kinda thing.
― scott seward, Wednesday, 4 September 2024 22:05 (one year ago)
this guy says brandon sanderson is the top of the gloomy mountain.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z95GJbromsI
― scott seward, Wednesday, 18 September 2024 14:31 (one year ago)
oohhhh mookieproof you are reading the absolute best of the genre imo, what an utterly amazing list. If you run out of things to do, I recommend going with the GGKay "Tigana" next, that one will never leave me.
Second all the Naomi Novik recs but espesh Uprooted and Spinning Silver.
McKillip: The next move here is The Forgotten Beasts of Eld. All the other fairy tale one-offs are varying degrees of fine to good but they are not TFBoE.
oh no: i thought the first three apprentice adept (anthony) books were finelooooooool
L'Engle: Do the traditional A Wrinkle in Time / A Wind in the Door / A Swiftly Tilting Planet. They won't take long and they'll reward you with truths that will form kernels inside you and stay there forever. I know it sounds painful and it's not entirely comfortable tbh but MLE gave me the cosmos.
― Ima Gardener (in orbit), Wednesday, 18 September 2024 14:40 (one year ago)
Broken Earth really left me confused and cold, Idk. I loved everything Jemisin up until then. Maybe I've gotten too unfamiliar with weirdness. I should spend this winter getting much, much weirder.
― Ima Gardener (in orbit), Wednesday, 18 September 2024 14:44 (one year ago)
I'll second Tigana. It's one of my all-time favourite fantasy novels
― treefell, Wednesday, 18 September 2024 15:05 (one year ago)
Patricia McKillip is a pretty astounding writer, she just has this effortless, poetic style, and Winter Rose is a great one for sure. I just bought a book which compiled her Riddle Master trilogy too.
https://icollectible.thriftbooks.com/cimage/1235929318/1.jpg
― omar little, Wednesday, 18 September 2024 16:47 (one year ago)
kirstein (the steerswoman) (trilogy, I think?)
I read these. They're good. Really great in parts about their analysis of the world and of people, and having a certain kind of perspective on both. I don't want to give things away but there's a particular plot arc that these kind of take which isn't my favorite but it's common in works of a certain era. I was actually in the middle of re-reading the whole trilogy(?) but they had just gotten mentioned somewhere and the hold wait time was insane.
― Ima Gardener (in orbit), Wednesday, 18 September 2024 16:57 (one year ago)
i read tigana last year! and yes it was great -- the curse was a simple but exquisite touch
oh i've read all the early l'engles -- first three time ('trilogy') books, the austins, the ones that are kind of in-between like 'the young unicorns' and 'arm of the starfish'. also saw her speak when i was in college and it was very moving even though i am not religious
― mookieproof, Thursday, 19 September 2024 22:06 (one year ago)
the local auction house here sold l'engle's library at auction a while back and you could buy a shelf full of her book collection for peanuts. they sold everything in lots. also tons of different editions of her own books obviously.
― scott seward, Thursday, 19 September 2024 23:10 (one year ago)
so wait i meant to ask on here on that video i posted the number one series was by brandon sanderson and he is not mentioned on this thread at all. is that series all that or what?
― scott seward, Saturday, 21 September 2024 13:04 (one year ago)
I watched that video, Scott, and I hadn't heard of half of those books? I took a recommendation from the list and am reading a certain trilogy and it's just another A COURT OF THORNS AND ROSES analog where people have sex with non-human beings and save the world with/from magic.
Sanderson is fine, I think? I've read a bunch but I honestly forget what a lot of it was about. My bigger problem with him is that he's a Mormon tbh.
― Ima Gardener (in orbit), Saturday, 21 September 2024 14:17 (one year ago)
MORMON FANTASY. hmmmmm...okay.
― scott seward, Saturday, 21 September 2024 14:21 (one year ago)
i'm still gonna seek out those mole books.
― scott seward, Saturday, 21 September 2024 14:22 (one year ago)
Sean Russell swans’ war series is excellent. River-centric high fantasy. I think he may have stopped writing but these deserved to be a big hit.
― realistic pillow (Jon not Jon), Saturday, 21 September 2024 15:17 (one year ago)
If you want an early 80s gem with the usual trappings elves wizards etc, but taking inspiration from wind and the willows and dickens rather than Tolkien, The Elfin Ship by James P Blaylock. There’s two sequels that aren’t quite as good (he quickly moved on to writing several masterpieces of Southern California magic realism through the 80s and early 90s but is today pigeonholed as the “godfather of steampunk” based on the admittedly wonderful Homunculus and its sequels)
― realistic pillow (Jon not Jon), Saturday, 21 September 2024 15:22 (one year ago)
I’ve been too depressed to list for several months now but somehow this thread has coaxed words out of me
― realistic pillow (Jon not Jon), Saturday, 21 September 2024 15:23 (one year ago)
*post, not list
nice to see you here!
― scott seward, Saturday, 21 September 2024 15:25 (one year ago)
like the olden tymes of yore.
Hi Scott <3
― realistic pillow (Jon not Jon), Saturday, 21 September 2024 15:27 (one year ago)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duncton_Wood
imagine tryin to convince someone how much these books will wreck you
― tuah dé danann (darraghmac), Saturday, 21 September 2024 21:56 (one year ago)
they out of print? trying to find new copies don't see any...
― scott seward, Saturday, 21 September 2024 22:34 (one year ago)