ADMIN LOG WATCH 2

Monday, January 6, 2014 2:54 AM I Love Music Thread: Xiu Xiu fans: Evaluate this (profoundly NWS) picture of Jamie Stewart. deleted.

what and why?

iirc animals can't give consent

wasn't this a super old thread though? why was it deleted now?

ASPCA threatened legal action, had to be done

why was that not in the admin log?

need to protect horse's privacy

still googleable ... for now

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:FjU9MLiEq2wJ:www.ilxor.com/ILX/ThreadSelectedControllerServlet%3Fboardid%3D41%26threadid%3D51802+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

can't believe i didn't think of that. poor horse. All his horsey friends have probably shamed him.

profoundly NWS

misread that as profoundly NWW

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/capital-weather-gang/files/2013/05/nws-logo1.jpg

Xui Xui are "weird" like Myspace

― fandango (fandango), Tuesday, 18 April 2006 20:31 (7 years ago) Permalink

Neigh means neigh

great thread.

rip

Saturday, January 11, 2014 11:28 AM 1 pWN 3v3Ry+h1n G!!!1 Thread: itt put fart in a book title has been locked. s
Saturday, January 11, 2014 11:28 AM 1 pWN 3v3Ry+h1n G!!!1 Thread: itt put fart in a film title has been locked. m
Saturday, January 11, 2014 11:28 AM 1 pWN 3v3Ry+h1n G!!!1 Thread: itt put fart in a song title has been locked. f
Saturday, January 11, 2014 11:28 AM 1 pWN 3v3Ry+h1n G!!!1 Thread: itt put fart in a thread title has been locked. h

https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcS2D1_fIdjemNpETB4zKC5HtBiVzbLVoEt1py0BSYbcYDw84-AWgA

I'm just a teenage dirtbag fartbag

Let's Do It, Let's Fart in Love

Wednesday, January 15, 2014 3:35 PM I Love Music Message edited to :
j4mes bl0unt see fucken googleproofed what's your point

flawless victory

Wednesday, January 22, 2014 6:18 AM I Love Music Message edited to :
40 ROBIN THICKE "Blurred Lines"

Tuesday, February 4, 2014 5:07 PM Site Ramona and Yeezus (Matt P) has been temporarily banned.

get with the times, og thread bumped like hours ago

just now seeing that but the fart thread locks were controversial imo

uh, this ban happened 1 minute before I posted it.

first up is best dressed, father used say

and matt p -- you're my pal, but wishing rape on other posters is awful. you are better than that!

uh, this ban happened 1 minute before I posted it.

oh, i'm talking specifically about the fart thread locks from 3 weeks ago, not anything that just happened.

i was replying to deems

antɪsɪˈpeɪʃ(ə)n

what ahppened

a variety of unfortunate things were said on the woody allen thread and matt p played a trump card

m/l what i supposed

was it morbs he wished rape upon tho

it was morbs and that philosopher of the common man, aimless

ha this message board writes itself

Self clowning borad

dayo can i say i am sincerely enjoying this thing where you wake up in morning your time and catch up on the day's events

i am moving up from death wishes to rape wishes; it's called the New Civility

Aw thanks cad; it's a return to my roots, this is the time zone where I first started

Still need to make my way through a week's worth of ILH posts

dayo dayo where r u

morbz i wish u no ill & hope u recover from ur various ailments but ilx is lightly-modded and ppl are gonna type things. there's a mod system in place and it has vindicated u to a degree in this instance. don't keep it going i implore you

that's a muddled message tbh

Still need to make my way through a week's worth of ILH posts

recap: okc is unbeatable; lol knicks; the heat are old, tired, and sad and the pacers are unstoppable; the warriors are fun to watch; some-overrated-guy shouldn't be traded to ease some-bloated-team's luxury-tax woes; lol jason kidd.

darragh have you checked out my blog

Thanks Daniel! One of my secret joys of the past few months is seeing you resurface on ILH

thanks!

also i wanna put on record that the constant battering of aimless on this board is shit- much more sinned against than sinner imo

xp no, link pls?

My deepest condolences to WmC.

Boring you’re ok

What Hadrian said, all is forgiven.

Timestamp Board Action Reason
Sunday, 30 August 2020 20:48 I Love AFL Thread: Remove One Post From An Almost Perfect Thread has been locked. perfection accomplished
Sunday, 30 August 2020 20:44 I Love AFL User: pass the cur's dossier has been banned from thread: trenchant socal commentary temporarily No SoCal content
Sunday, 30 August 2020 20:15 I Love AFL User Scampo No. 5 (wins) has been Yellow Carded
Hey there Hoss!

490

lol

What hath we wrought???

i also marked a number of threads with disturbing images as non work-safe, so ...?

related to that, i was idly wondering the other day: if the images in a NSFW thread are hidden, does that make the thread SFW again?

like, if i'm contributing to a very serious thread and i want to post https://i.imgur.com/EmqTrSt.jpg, can i just post it and carry on? (you'll have to use your imagination and pretend there's a penis in that pic)

lol, sarahell, I was only joking.

Karl, I think it'd be good form to warn about what's under the hidden text marker, and also consider if your NSFW image is really necessary. Personally I'd prefer an external link to NSFW images with an explanation of what you'll see if you click on it. To answer your actual question, though, I'm not sure if the thread would need a NSFW marker or not if you hide the image, I'd probably keep it there as a content warning but I'm not completely sure it'd be warranted.

makes sense! thanks emil.y

Hidden text isn’t hidden from Google, so it’d be best to mark the threads NSFW if possible

the eyes of Doctor G. O. Ogleburg

i didn't do the de-indexing fyi

... (Left) has been banned permanently.

related to that, i was idly wondering the other day: if the images in a NSFW thread are hidden, does that make the thread SFW again?

― Karl Malone, Tuesday, September 1, 2020 12:56 PM (one week ago) bookmarkflaglink

Karl, I would have to check but I don’t think the loading of the image is dynamic, just the display. So if part of NSFW images is that your employer/whoever logs where images are coming from, then that’ll be logged regardless of whether it’s displayed on your monitor

was Left a sock and whose?

Dont know. Possibly.

Glad to be rid

Wait, what happened?

the right won

lol

xp
I don't know what the triggering post was, but he got 51'd per the log

https://www.whosampled.com/static/track_images_200/lr2825_2011919_45240199326.jpg

lol lj

Yeah, that was a 51. And just before we reset the totals, too. I only ever really saw Left posts that had been flagged and tbh I frequently agreed with the main thrust of them, but jeez that person seemed to be aggressive for no reason.

actually I might have fp'd Left in the past 6 months. For a while my primary FP policy was to flag posts of the "ILX sucks and I hate everyone here" genre, and Left definitely had a streak of those back in the spring. tbh I hadn't really been bothered by him recently

I thought Left was an ideological sock -- a more well-constructed, articulate, and prolific version of such former socks as "bestbuy" and "bestbuy2"

another poster for the #walkawayfromILX campaign

I really appreciated the effort! I wondered if there was a long game ... whether Left would evolve or expand in character development ...

Presumably this is now Centre's time to shine.

Or Center, depending on the type of verisimilitude you're aiming for.

On a New Order thread:

dud

― ... (Left), Tuesday, 8 September 2020 17:27 (three days ago) bookmarkflaglink

I mean, a mistake like that at this level,

Anyway, Left was often Very Angry but many of their posts were quite good and I agreed with them.

frequently agreed with the main thrust of them, but jeez that person seemed to be aggressive for no reason.

lol, yes, this

xp well except for New Order, I can see how that gets you some extra FPs

unleash 👏🏻 the 👏🏻 six 👏🏻

they were kinda responsible for that super capitalist sports anthem though .... I mean, they don't have the bona fides of Crass ...

do they owe us an FP?
of course they fookin' do

tbh I frequently agreed with the main thrust of them, but jeez that person seemed to be aggressive for no reason.

― emil.y, Friday, September 11, 2020 1:03 PM (thirty-six minutes ago) bookmarkflaglink

Fer shure. 'I regularly agree with you but you regularly give me reason to regret having agreed with you' is definitely a thing.

(Have never FP-ed Left, fwiw.)

Never FP-ed Satan's post
You'll know if I had, that shit don't come off

what did Whiney post that got redacted by mods? if it's heinous u need not recreate here, just seemed like people were pissed off about it in the Gawker thread

He was giving examples of "edgelord" tropes without thinking to moderate his language, so basically he was tossing off slurs. There was other stuff to it but the slurs part was what got it redacted.

got it. thanks...glad that was redacted then.

good newsie-wewsies?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ktRb5qsvf_c

you're in a really weird mood

Realizing that Left probably got to 51 because of a post calling Kamala a cop.

New stance: critical support for comrade Left

I support Left

tbh I usually glossed over their posts but they seemed good and angey

If i still post here twenty years from now will there still be whiney controversies

Didn't we just change the rules because it was impossible to get 51'd?

He was the poster I was talking about when I said he was the only one who was anywhere near 51 and he was really trying. His posts were also the sort of thing I was talking about when I said "blunt political challops or widespread condescension of the "I alone see what you idiots all refuse to admit" variety".

It was mostly the "fuck you all and your white supremacist nation" type posts that did it fwiw, posts barking at people rather than talking to them. From IP lookups he doesn't appear to be a sock.