Reveal Your Uncool Conservative Beliefs Here

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-6dje_kMZZJc/Vk3v8TsBJlI/AAAAAAABBps/3X6psYJn4Uw/s400/vikingkittens.JPG

v few ppl really take part in capitalism in a way which cld be assessed, unless you count that itself as being bad at capitalism, which is imo unsound

I aM bAd at cApiTaliSM

I prefer being bad at basketball to being bad at capitalism cos then all that happens is I miss wide open jumpers instead of winding up bankrupt

b-b-b-but what about yr jump shot!?!?!

I'll just be an enforcer and foul Durant 6 times a game

cool, here's 3.7 mill per year for you

that's it? fuck it I'm going into hedge funds

into hedge funds vs into geodes

I hate the word empathy. Especially when it is used by social justice oriented k-12 educators, as in, “schools should teach kids empathy,” as if this alone would be enough to teach them moral reasoning. Empathy is a totally subjective and even narcissistic basis for morality. The idea is that you should care about someone because you also can understand and feel their pain, not because they just are a person with equal rights and dignity.

The general principle of trying to see things from other people’s perspectives is A+ classic, but the term “empathy” has taken on a weird sanctimoniousness. I also think it shouldn’t be conflated with morality because it doesn’t necedsarily lead one to make better decisions.

Also rightly or wrongly I associate the term with teachers who idly speculate that disruptive students are sociopaths.

This made me remember that I had a teacher in HS that gave us 5 extra points on any test as long as we wrong the definition of empathy at the bottom of it. He was big into the empathy.

it's weird how quickly empathy for people who annoy us evaporates

Yeah it appeals to a certain kind of soft authoritarian teacher. It’s not enough for the kids to do the right things; they have to feel the right way about it.

n.b. I couldn’t cut it as an educator in a high needs school and left the profession so my ideas on this topic shouldn’t be yaken too seriously.

xp Jeffrey

ha I would go the other way and say morality is the more troubling sanctimonious term and empathy is all you need, but I get what you're saying & writing ppl off as sociopaths is ofc not all that empathetic

imho people should be taught morality and empathy as concepts in the same way they are taught logic and the water cycle. the social contract, government and economics, and basic games stem from that, history is the evidence base, and by age 19 people should be able to explain in multiple ways why mutually assured destruction didn’t come to pass

tbf have u ever truly have an h.o.? i say this as someone who similarly never has so no judgement.

h.o.?

why is teaching morality and empathy an uncool conservative opinion?

those are good things to teach children

Toms had lots of h.oes iirv

Iirc

if I rephrase vulgarly

U say tom@hoes

luv2tom8hoes

Empathy is a totally subjective and even narcissistic basis for morality. The idea is that you should care about someone because you also can understand and feel their pain, not because they just are a person with equal rights and dignity.

― treeship 2, Friday, December 29, 2017 8:29 AM (three hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

sorry but this is so fucking dumb i can't even

or maybe you just need a dictionary

wow that's extremely harsh that someone has a slightly different opinion from your superficial ad hoc social media mediated opinions on life

like he's just arguing deontology there over intimate affective association but i guess he needs a dictionary bc clearly he's a moron

Conflating sympathy with empathy is sloppy.

Wanting others not to suffer is part of basic decency and kindness. Feeling concerned or sad about another's suffering is sympathy (feeling for, as opposed to feeling with).

Empathy means to suffer along with them, to literally feel their pain.

i'm seeing a guy about my deontology next week, gotta get a cavity filled

pause

I share treeship’s discomfort with the notion of teaching empathy. Not because it’s not valuable but because I’m not sure it can be taught. The move in education toward teaching it seems ill-grounded to me.

I don’t know any teachers who believe it is important to teach empathy who idly speculate that their disruptive students are sociopaths. I don’t think I recognize the kind of teacher you’re talking about there, treeship.

imo one way people learn empathy is through art

wow that's extremely harsh that someone has a slightly different opinion from your superficial ad hoc social media mediated opinions on life

― Mordy, Friday, December 29, 2017 11:49 AM (one hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

you're talking to treeship2 here, right?

and duh it was meant to be extremely harsh

lol @ social media mediated, though, not sure what that's about

i don't know what deontology means, i mean obviously i'm completely full of crap here dude c'mon now..

empathy is a key part of restorative justice

if you believe in restorative justice as an educational practice you need to train kids to have empathy

in twelve years of teaching i have had literally hundreds of conversations that go like this

“Tell me what you did” / “how do you think that made your classmate feel”

“Do you want to make other people feel like that?” / “how can you make it better” / “what will you do differently going forward”

maybe i don't know what empathy is. i guess i don't see a meaningful distinct between acknowledging that others experience pain vs. acknowledged/accepting that certain kind of pain exist. treeship seems to be saying that empathy is subjective or something.. i don't know. fuck everybody.

i don't know what it means either

In moral philosophy, deontological ethics or deontology (from Greek δέον, deon, "obligation, duty") is the normative ethical position that judges the morality of an action based on rules. It is sometimes described as "duty-" or "obligation-" or "rule-" based ethics, because rules "bind you to your duty".

Empathy means to suffer along with them, to literally feel their pain.

no...

People often confuse the words empathy and sympathy. Empathy means ‘the ability to understand and share the feelings of another’ (as in both authors have the skill to make you feel empathy with their heroines), whereas sympathy means ‘feelings of pity and sorrow for someone else's misfortune’ (as in they had great sympathy for the flood victims)

who the fuck cares, please kill me, etc

i think BUS UNCLE described the spirit of empathy perfectly, seriously

Empathy is a totally subjective and even narcissistic basis for morality. The idea is that you should care about someone because you also can understand and feel their pain, not because they just are a person with equal rights and dignity.

empathy is narcissistic is a v good challop

is 'i would delight in this person's suffering, but *sigh* they are a person with equal rights and dignity' really less narcissitic than 'do unto others'? seems harder to teach kids, for sure. what even is the basis for 'equal rights and dignity' if not some form of empathy?

Late great is totally right. Empathy is teachable both in the pro-social practices described above, and as “perspective taking” which is an essential component of humanities education. Challop, I’d imagine, but part of the reason I think there are so many greedy MBA jerkwads is because they have shorted the liberal arts / humanities component of their education.

paul bloom's "Against Empathy" is worth reading; here's a short version: http://bostonreview.net/forum/paul-bloom-against-empathy

flopson is correct imo, I think what treeship was trying to express is that human beings deserve to be treated fairly by us whether or not we empathize with them; the problem is, it's hard to imagine getting people to agree to do this without appealing to empathy on some level

contra the definition given above, btw, here is m-w's definition of empathy:

: the action of understanding, being aware of, being sensitive to, and vicariously experiencing the feelings, thoughts, and experience of another of either the past or present without having the feelings, thoughts, and experience fully communicated in an objectively explicit manner; also : the capacity for this

I am not familiar with the pedagogical research on this topic, but if it is true that the field is moving toward "teaching" empathy I would imagine there is some evidence that suggests it is effective. it also seems like there is little downside to this