prompted by a recent perusal of the statistics of active leaders in WAR, in which 19 and 20 stood out:
1. Alex Rodriguez (34) 101.50 R2. Albert Pujols (30) 81.40 R3. Chipper Jones (38) 80.00 B4. Ken Griffey (40) 78.40 L5. Derek Jeter (36) 70.00 R6. Jim Thome (39) 69.00 L7. Jim Edmonds (40) 68.00 L8. Manny Ramirez (38) 67.30 R Ivan Rodriguez (38) 67.30 R10. Scott Rolen (35) 65.70 R11. Andruw Jones (33) 59.10 R12. Vladimir Guerrero (35) 58.40 R13. Bobby Abreu (36) 57.70 L14. Todd Helton (36) 57.50 L15. Carlos Beltran (33) 55.40 B16. Ichiro Suzuki (36) 53.10 L17. Jason Giambi (39) 52.90 L18. Johnny Damon (36) 48.10 L19. Mike Cameron (37) 47.40 R20. J.D. Drew (34) 46.80 L
also pondering a guy like Paul Konerko, who has been hiding away on the south side of chicago for a decade+ now and whose stats are definitely not on the same level w/other guys of his era, but who probably doesn't deserve to be forgotten come HOF voting time (by "not forgotten" i mean he deserves to stick around on the ballot for away before dropping away.)
favorite all time underrated/illest batting stance: mickey tettleton
― ('_') (omar little), Wednesday, 18 August 2010 23:22 (eight years ago) Permalink
Dang, Alex has a big lead on Pujols there.
― no gut busting joke can change history (polyphonic), Wednesday, 18 August 2010 23:23 (eight years ago) Permalink
if you consider that a-rod has had 15 full seasons at the end of '10 to pujols' 10 full seasons, it's a surmountable one imo
― ('_') (omar little), Wednesday, 18 August 2010 23:25 (eight years ago) Permalink
Is WAR a cumulative stat?
― no gut busting joke can change history (polyphonic), Wednesday, 18 August 2010 23:25 (eight years ago) Permalink
i think Griffey can come off that list - which would leave Posada at 20.
― oreo speed wiggum (The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall), Wednesday, 18 August 2010 23:26 (eight years ago) Permalink
oops, he sure can
also, leaders in adjusted OPS+, which has a-rod at #4 just behind jim tho-
― ('_') (omar little), Wednesday, 18 August 2010 23:30 (eight years ago) Permalink
50. Matt Stairs (42)
― oreo speed wiggum (The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall), Wednesday, 18 August 2010 23:32 (eight years ago) Permalink
Well, if you take WAR as gospel, the two guys who jump out at me are Scott Rolen and Andruw Jones. Jones was a big deal five years ago, but you don't hear much about him anymore; Rolen bounces around from team to team. Yet they're right there with a bunch of Hall of Famers, and ahead of much more publicized players like Helton, Beltran, Damon, etc.
― clemenza, Thursday, 19 August 2010 02:34 (eight years ago) Permalink
My favourite underrated player ever is Tom Henke. He was as good year-in and year-out as other relievers who got far more attention.
― clemenza, Thursday, 19 August 2010 02:38 (eight years ago) Permalink
hey speaking of WAR, i read a blog entry today that noted that dante bichette's career WAR was a robust 2.0 because of his horrendous fielding.
― ('_') (omar little), Thursday, 19 August 2010 21:13 (eight years ago) Permalink
there was a blog post on baseball reference a couple of weeks ago about how is WAR was, i believe, -0.2 in the year that he finished second in MVP voting, because of his horrendous fielding
― be my anchor baby (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 19 August 2010 21:17 (eight years ago) Permalink
we read the very same entry in that case. i love the comments on that w/people rhapsodizing about his epic offensive numbers that year. people still don't quite get the whole notion of how such offensive contributions can be wiped out in other areas of the same player's game.
― ('_') (omar little), Thursday, 19 August 2010 21:19 (eight years ago) Permalink
almost 12k per 9 innings for his career and has a shot at getting his career WHIP below 1.00 by the end of his season (supposedly his final one)
― ('_') (omar little), Friday, 20 August 2010 00:15 (eight years ago) Permalink
i realize he's not really underrated by those who know what he's done but i feel like he doesn't get enough credit for his career sometimes.
― ('_') (omar little), Friday, 20 August 2010 00:16 (eight years ago) Permalink
special credit for:
Wagner was a natural-born right-handed person, but after breaking his right arm twice in accidents, he taught himself to throw baseballs using his left arm by throwing thousands of balls against the wall of a barn, and then fielding the rebounds, and repeating.
― ('_') (omar little), Friday, 20 August 2010 00:17 (eight years ago) Permalink
he's on both my fantasy teams for a reason!
― oreo speed wiggum (The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall), Friday, 20 August 2010 00:20 (eight years ago) Permalink
I was just looking at Wagner's career stats yesterday and thinking, "Wow--he's a serious HOF candidate." One bad year (2000), and good-to-great-to-brilliant the whole rest of the way. The career batting average against him is 0.188. You never know where the HOF line is with relievers, but he's got to be third in line after Rivera and Hoffman, and you probably wouldn't have to work too hard to make a case that he's a better pitcher than Hoffman. (Only real negative is that he's been awful in postseason, which based on 11 innings is hardly a big deal.)
― clemenza, Friday, 20 August 2010 01:42 (eight years ago) Permalink
Wagner is 100+ IP short to qualify for this:
Look at Pedro!
― Andy K, Friday, 20 August 2010 10:43 (eight years ago) Permalink
All-time WHIP leader Addie Joss' K/9 was 3.6.
― Andy K, Friday, 20 August 2010 10:47 (eight years ago) Permalink
Holy $***! I had no idea.
Wagner is definitely underrated -- I remember it being a really big deal when he imploded in 2000 and he never seemed to regain his aura after that (I mean, 124 K's in 74 IP in 1999? That's insane) even though he was still a great pitcher. A huge strike against his HOF case is that he never played for a "winner". Are there any closers in the HOF who weren't considered cornerstone players on WS-winning teams? (besides Bruce Sutter, who's mainly in because he got the credit for inventing a pitch)
He not only didn't win, but he closed for a bunch of teams who are perceived as underachievers and chokers -- the B&B Astros, mid-2000's Phillies, late-2000's Mets. And he was a disaster in the postseason when his teams did manage to make the playoffs.
― NoTimeBeforeTime, Friday, 20 August 2010 11:12 (eight years ago) Permalink
And BTW, I think it's U&K to rely on postseason numbers to make a HOF case for a closer. A closer's job is a lot more important in the postseason (not just the importance of the games, but the fact that closers need to pitch a higher %age of their team's innings compared with the regular season).
― NoTimeBeforeTime, Friday, 20 August 2010 11:23 (eight years ago) Permalink
most underrated '70s/80s player: Bobby Grich
― kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Friday, 20 August 2010 11:24 (eight years ago) Permalink
Ken Singleton's also name gets mentioned for the same time period
― NoTimeBeforeTime, Friday, 20 August 2010 13:00 (eight years ago) Permalink
I agree that a closer's role is magnified in the postseason (everyone's is, to a degree), but I just have a hard time giving great weight to an 11-inning sample in a guy's HOF resume. I made the same point with regards to Dawson on another thread. And with Wagner, it comes down to about half of those 11.2 innings; in 5.2 of them, he gave up 11 runs. So you're looking at 5.2 innings in a 16-year career.
― clemenza, Friday, 20 August 2010 13:16 (eight years ago) Permalink
Let me put it another way: I'm a lot more in favour of using a great post-season career to make a case for somebody (again, based on a decent sample) than I am the reverse.
― clemenza, Friday, 20 August 2010 13:19 (eight years ago) Permalink
both these guys played all-time-great defense at their positions, especially jones, which is why their numbers are so high
― ciderpress, Friday, 20 August 2010 13:23 (eight years ago) Permalink
Brian Roberts seemed hugely underrated for a long time
― kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Friday, 20 August 2010 13:34 (eight years ago) Permalink
That's what happens when you're competing with David Eckstein!
― Andy K, Friday, 20 August 2010 13:48 (eight years ago) Permalink
In the age of WAR and VORP and all that stuff, I wonder if the whole idea of an underrated baseball player is becoming antiquated. I can't see players flying under the radar anymore to the degree they might have 30 years ago. I suppose "underpublicized" will always be a fact of life, depending upon where you play, but underrated, I'm not so sure.
― clemenza, Friday, 20 August 2010 13:54 (eight years ago) Permalink
I agree that a closer's role is magnified in the postseason (everyone's is, to a degree)
Not really though ... I think the average closer pitches about 5% of his team's innings in the regular season. In the playoffs it's 10-11%. No other type of player gets twice as much PT in the playoffs.
For the most part I agree, but the outcome of a season hinges a lot more on what the closer does. The team is hurt a lot more by a blown save than by a star hitter going 0-4. And your math on Wagner's career is seriously shady ... he was brutal in more than half of his postseason appearances, that's a huge failure rate for a closer. You can't just focus on the other appearances when he didn't suck, any more than you can say that, I don't know, if you eliminate Ryan Howard's strikeouts then he'd be a .420 hitter.
― NoTimeBeforeTime, Friday, 20 August 2010 14:14 (eight years ago) Permalink
Well, we disagree. I don't think I'm misrepresenting his numbers, though. In 5.2 of his 11.1 postseason innings--exactly half--Wagner gave up 4 hits, 0 walks, 2 earned runs, struck out 8, saved 3, and had an E.R.A. of 3.18. Not spectactular, but pretty solid. In the other 5.2 innings, he was an absolute nightmare: 16 hits, 2 walks, 5 strikeouts, 11 earned runs, no saves, and an E.R.A. of 17.47. It's not an exact parallel, because there's no postseason in the education business, but when I retire in about 12 years, I hope I'm not judged by my five worst days as a teacher--I'd have been out of a job long ago.
― clemenza, Friday, 20 August 2010 14:34 (eight years ago) Permalink
in terms of quantified, context-neutral baseball value you might be right, but there's plenty of other ways to 'rate' a player imo
― ciderpress, Friday, 20 August 2010 14:50 (eight years ago) Permalink
xpost it's not just his five worst days, it's *half* of his postseason record. You can't pick and choose the half that happens to support your case, the bad half counted just as much.
And ten appearances aren't a huge sample size, but it's spread over a number of years. He had a bad year every year!
― NoTimeBeforeTime, Friday, 20 August 2010 15:20 (eight years ago) Permalink
Ciderpress: We're probably coming from the same place here. I'm not especially hung up on WAR/VORP; I'm a stats guy, but more traditional OBP/SA stuff. (Hah--now OBP and SA are "traditional.") And I hope you're right; not being able to argue about over/underrated players would be a big loss to what it means to be a fan. But I think it's much more unlikely that a Bobby Grich would happen today. Anyone who keeps reasonably well informed would know all about him; Neyer and Posnanski and Baseball Prospectus would make sure of that. More casual fans would miss him, so maybe you're right--maybe things haven't changed that much after all. (I've gotta be honest: I'm looking at Grich's lifetime stats, and Bill James and Morbius notwithstanding, I'm not clear on why Bobby Grich was so underrated. He was excellent in '79 and '81. The rest of time, agreeing that he drew a lot of walks for a second baseman, I'm not seeing what makes him so noteworthy--not as a hitter, anyway.)
NoTime: I've conceded that Wagner was brutal for half his postseason innings. No argument whatsoever. I just don't see that that's reason to keep him out of the Hall of Fame--not if you believe he deserves to be there based on his in-season play. (If you don't, then sure, the postseason becomes one more argument against him.) When Winfield was up for induction, I don't think the voters gave much weight to his postseason performance, which basically amounted to one huge hit in the '92 Series and not a whole lot else.
― clemenza, Friday, 20 August 2010 15:35 (eight years ago) Permalink
i don't see any reason to keep wagner out of the hall of fame based on 11 innings out of almost 900 pitched. whether his entire peformance record is good enough is a separate question, but that's the one that should be discussed.
― ciderpress, Friday, 20 August 2010 15:48 (eight years ago) Permalink
Just to be totally honest, and argue against myself, one of the reasons Wagner's IP total is so low for the postseason is that half the time, he couldn't get anybody out. You've got to get some people out to pile up innings. Apparently, they just kept running guys up to the plate who'd hit safely.
― clemenza, Friday, 20 August 2010 15:52 (eight years ago) Permalink
First, I'll reiterate that Wagner probably doesn't have much chance of getting voted in because he didn't pitch for "winning" teams (fairly or unfairly). In the three-tiered playoff system, guys play a lot more postseason games than they used to, so postseason performance is going to figure more strongly into HOF voting (which to me seems fair). Also, nobody really has any idea what the HOF standard is for closers because their role is constantly changing. But it's safe to say that everyone from this era will measured against Rivera and Hoffman, and Wagner looks set to be the Tim Raines to their Rickey Henderson.
I also think that there will always be underrated players ... Neyer and Posnanski and BP are a really small piece of the pie. Chase Utley hit five homers in last year's WS and was STILL underrated -- everyone talked about ARod becoming a "true Yankee" and the "Yankee Four" and Pedro and by the last game, Matsui.
― NoTimeBeforeTime, Friday, 20 August 2010 16:06 (eight years ago) Permalink
Cart way before horse: a Braves WS win this year would cinch Wagner for the HoF, y/n?
― My totem animal is a hamburger. (WmC), Friday, 20 August 2010 16:09 (eight years ago) Permalink
The fate of bordlerline cases like Wagner may be affected by how the whole steroids issue resolves itself with regards to the HOF. If, as seems to be the case right now, PED-associated players are locked out, then I think the Wagners and Damons and Smoltzes will inevitably benefit. Enough to push some of them over the line, I don't know.
― clemenza, Friday, 20 August 2010 16:30 (eight years ago) Permalink
not necessarily, at all
― kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Friday, 20 August 2010 16:31 (eight years ago) Permalink
Not necessarily, no. As a practical matter, though, I think that keeping PEDs out will do two things: one, it will free up space, and I think the voters will instinctively want to fill that space; and two, psychologically, "clean" players may start to be over-valued. You've indicated this yourself, right, in connection to the deification of Griffey?
― clemenza, Friday, 20 August 2010 16:41 (eight years ago) Permalink
Oops--you were responding to WmC!
― clemenza, Friday, 20 August 2010 16:43 (eight years ago) Permalink
can't wait until the 2012 HoF voting when the writers inevitably lock out the 2nd best hitter of all time and the 2nd best pitcher of all time by WAR
― ciderpress, Friday, 20 August 2010 16:46 (eight years ago) Permalink
the upcoming ballots are pretty loaded though so unless they start letting in more than 2-3 guys a year i think a lot of the borderline cases are gonna slip away
― ciderpress, Friday, 20 August 2010 16:48 (eight years ago) Permalink
for '13 you've got biggio, bonds, clemens, piazza, and sosa. two of them will get in right away, right? or maybe only one?
― ('_') (omar little), Friday, 20 August 2010 16:50 (eight years ago) Permalink
I think there'll be four tiers: 1) the Bonds/Clemens/A-Rod tier, where the writers (grudgingly) decide they were HOF-clear pre-PED and put them in; 2) the McGwire/Palmeiro/Ramirez tier, the guys who are punished; 3) the Bagwell/I-Rod/Thome tier, players who've never been named and who never failed a test but who seem suspicious anyway (this is a tier completely of my own making; I have doubts about all three)--not sure what happens with them; 4) everybody else.
― clemenza, Friday, 20 August 2010 16:53 (eight years ago) Permalink
i think Wagner's HOF case will be made in the coming years. if he can move up on the all time saves list (he's - um, 6th right now?) he could make it in as long as he stays productive for a few more years. the only person ahead of him still pitching well is Rivera (as Hoff seems to have lost it this year).
― oreo speed wiggum (The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall), Friday, 20 August 2010 16:54 (eight years ago) Permalink
somebody wrote a column abt this today, will link later
― kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Friday, 20 August 2010 17:01 (eight years ago) Permalink
back to the thread topic, i think the prototype 'underrated players' in terms of WAR are the guys who are consistently worth 3-5 WAR each year but aren't flashy enough to build a reputation as great players
david dejesus and nick markakis are the first two that come to mind
― ciderpress, Friday, 20 August 2010 17:13 (eight years ago) Permalink
I'll put this Posnanski column here, just because it goes over some of the same Adam Dunn/Dave Kingman conversation we had on this thread a few years ago, including the possibility of collusion:
It's kind of a redundant column--things have changed so much since Kingman's time that I don't think there's anybody who seriously thinks Dunn's a HOF candidate. And yes, he will be off the ballot in a year, as Kingman was. But I'll stand by my original point upthread that had Kingman reached 500 HR, in the context of 1992 or 1993, that would have been an awkward situation for the writers. My guess is he would have drawn as much as 20-25% first time around.
― clemenza, Thursday, 7 August 2014 12:19 (four years ago) Permalink
I don't see it as awkward for a sensible writer in any context. Kingman's sole asset was HR power, likely moreso than any player in history to that point. Dunn is multidimensional by comparison.
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 7 August 2014 14:24 (four years ago) Permalink
Multi-dimensional as in two--Dunn hits home runs and he also walks, instead of just hits home runs. Obviously hugely important, but as Posnanski notes, he's just barely ahead of Kingman in career WAR anyway. And the bulk of Dunn's HR were hit during the tail end of the offensive boom, so I think you have to discount them a bit.
I can't prove you wrong--I'm trying to project what might have happened in 1993 had something happened in 1988 that didn't happen; that's about as hypothetical as it gets--but I still think you're looking at it from a 2014 perspective. In 1984, just two years removed from his exit, Kingman finished 13th in MVP voting. He was a 35-year-old DH, his team finished 4th and under .500, and he was disliked by writers (the rat incident hadn't happened yet, but he was already disliked). And he still finished 13th. Why? Because he hit 35 HR, and even more so, because he knocked in 118. He didn't get any votes two years later when he also hit 35, but I'm sure that was because he fell short of 100 RBI (94) and his average had plummeted from an acceptable .268 to a more hideous .210. My point is, I don't think player evaluation by the writers changed that drastically between '84 and '86 (James was getting better and better known, but his influence was still relatively narrow), and I don't think there was all that much change between '86 and '93, when Kingman might have debuted with 500 HR.
Today, it wouldn't matter--one and out, as should be the case. Then, I don't think so.
― clemenza, Thursday, 7 August 2014 15:16 (four years ago) Permalink
Kingman had his best year for the '79 Cubs, leading the NL in HR and slugging; still finished only 11th in MVP that year. The deserving reasons are that he still didn't crack the league's top 10 in bWAR (just 10th in oWAR, behind the likes of Larry Parrish and Lee Mazzilli) and his counting stats were goosed by Wrigley Field; the actual reasons are likely that he played for a noncontender AND the writers hated him.
Assuming those extra 58 HR to get to 500 didn't result in a couple 60-HR seasons, I think he slides off the ballot after one year anyway.
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 7 August 2014 15:49 (four years ago) Permalink
i think even then kingman was regarded as just a "two true outcomes" guy, and it's not like beyond his '79 season he was ever a super-impressive homer guy on a season-by-season basis. when he was playing my childhood memories of his '80s seasons were that he was overshadowed in the HR department not only by the obvious suspects like schmidt and murphy but also such legends as gorman thomas and tony armas. i suspect one and done as well.
― LIKE If you are against racism (omar little), Thursday, 7 August 2014 15:52 (four years ago) Permalink
Actually for the early to mid 80s Kingman was a pretty impressive homer guy. It was not a super homer friendly era.
― One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Thursday, 7 August 2014 18:01 (four years ago) Permalink
Kingman was a more consistent hitter of homers than any of the non-Schmidt/Murphy guys you mentioned too (Greg Luzinski also sprang to mind although he was a bitter all around hitter than Armas/Thomas/Kingman).
― One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Thursday, 7 August 2014 18:03 (four years ago) Permalink
Yeah I mean his HR numbers were always up there and I guess he was fairly consistent. I guess I phrased that poorly, I just think in those seasons there always seemed to be some less famed slugger who would out perform him HR wise or some old rando like Darrell Evans would drop 40 HR like nbd, and I think during that era he was overshadowed in those seasons. Except for '79. But yeah he retired when I was 10 so I'm probably misremembering.
― LIKE If you are against racism (omar little), Thursday, 7 August 2014 18:28 (four years ago) Permalink
he hit lotsa tape-measure bombs in his Mets heyday, but no one cared when he was dealt (well, it was same day as Seaver)
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 7 August 2014 19:05 (four years ago) Permalink
I tried to actually project forward to the appropriate ballot, and you guys are probably right, one and done.
If you give Kingman three more years of overstaying his welcome so he could get to 500, he retires in '89, comes on the ballot in '95. Looking to see who was the best first-year match for him that year--keeping in mind that no one really matched up well with Kingman in those days; he was Adam Dunn/Mark Reynolds 25 years before the fact--George Foster was probably the closest. Not really similar, but in a general sense they were both low-OBP power hitters. (Darrell Evans also came on that year, and he matches up better in terms of HR and BA, but he of course was a really good all-around player.) Foster only had 348 career HR, which is well short of 500, but he had other advantages over Kingman: the 50-HR season (still sort of legendary then, before the deluge), the MVP, the famous team. Foster got 4.1% of the vote and was finished. Baylor, a somewhat closer match, got 2.6% in his second year and was finished.
So even though 500 HR was a much more hallowed number then than now, it probably wouldn't have been enough to keep Kingman on the ballot. I will point out, though, that even coming onto the ballot well short of 500 in '92, he still finished ahead of both Ceser Cedeno and Toby Harrah in their first years, players who were far superior, and he was only behind Grich (also first-year) 11 votes to 3, and he's now recognized as one of the greatest players not in the HOF.
― clemenza, Thursday, 7 August 2014 19:39 (four years ago) Permalink
Jim Rice was a one dimensional player with inflated hitting stats from his home ballpartk and everybody hated him. Somehow he's in the HOF (and he hit fewer HR's than Kingman).
I'm not saying Kingman would have gotten in, but there's no way he's one and done with 500 HR.
― NoTimeBeforeTime, Thursday, 7 August 2014 20:14 (four years ago) Permalink
And yeah, Rice had a couple of monster seasons and won an MVP award, Kingman didn't. I think there's still a comparison to be made though.
― NoTimeBeforeTime, Thursday, 7 August 2014 20:15 (four years ago) Permalink
I'm not happy that Rice made the HOF, but he does have a 47.4 WAR to Kong's 17.3.
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 7 August 2014 20:20 (four years ago) Permalink
Kingman was also a world class dickhead.
― One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Thursday, 7 August 2014 20:21 (four years ago) Permalink
well, so was Ted Williams
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 7 August 2014 20:22 (four years ago) Permalink
i think torii hunter is kinda underrated (despite a -.6 war this yr ¯\(°_o)/¯)
― johnny crunch, Thursday, 7 August 2014 20:32 (four years ago) Permalink
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 20 August 2014 15:23 (four years ago) Permalink
don't know what his top 5 will look like, but I still think Beltre is underrated.
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 20 August 2014 15:28 (four years ago) Permalink
lol @ the cody allen quiz
i'm gonna guess alex gordon for #1
― linda cardellini (zachlyon), Wednesday, 20 August 2014 18:37 (four years ago) Permalink
also i'm curious about this:
He's hitting .297/.335/.406, good for a 105 OPS+. Those are fine numbers, sure, but you have to force yourself to remember it's 2014, which is a lot closer to 1968 than 2000 when it comes to the run-scoring environment. Put him on the 2000 Royals, and you might have a .330 hitter, someone who clearly stands out.
― linda cardellini (zachlyon), Wednesday, 20 August 2014 18:43 (four years ago) Permalink
*pitching was worse
Pitchers are definitely better now, basically every team has two or three relievers throwing 95 and putting up K/9 rates like Billy Wagner or Eric Gagne in their primes. I also think that all of the big tech/stats breakthroughs (pitch f/x, better valuations of defense and defensive positioning) have favoured pitching and defense.
― NoTimeBeforeTime, Wednesday, 20 August 2014 19:32 (four years ago) Permalink
alex gordon is the kind of player who would deserve to get into the HOF if he plays like he has for another ten years.
― LIKE If you are against racism (omar little), Wednesday, 20 August 2014 20:06 (four years ago) Permalink
i'm starting to think Alex Gordon has a slim chance at the MVP, and is def. getting nominated.
― Van Horn Street, Wednesday, 20 August 2014 20:44 (four years ago) Permalink
naaah, we're not there yet
I also don't think he's in Trout's class (no one is)
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 20 August 2014 20:53 (four years ago) Permalink
Brisbee pt 2
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 20 August 2014 20:54 (four years ago) Permalink
another year under the radar i might put Rendon on that list
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 20 August 2014 20:55 (four years ago) Permalink
yeesh i'm not sure anyone's missed the klubes train this year, which is his first full year as a good baseball pitcher
gordon should've been somewhere
― linda cardellini (zachlyon), Wednesday, 20 August 2014 22:06 (four years ago) Permalink
Hiroki Kuroda deserves a prize for being underrated even though he's played with the Yankees and Dodgers for his entire career.
― NoTimeBeforeTime, Wednesday, 20 August 2014 22:35 (four years ago) Permalink
ya, i have no idea how he pulled that off.
― Porto for Pyros (The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall), Thursday, 21 August 2014 01:15 (four years ago) Permalink
Ian Kinsler. I was looking at this career box the other day:
-- his career WAR is 46.7 after his age-33 season (didn't get started till he was 24); his per-season WAR is 4.7, per-650 PA 5.4-- only twice (1.9, 2.4) in 10 seasons has he been under 4.0-- 184 HR, may end up in the 250 range-- 100+ runs five times, between 70-90 RBI seven times-- excellent defense, pretty good speed-- MVP votes four out of 10 seasons-- JAWS has him as the 23rd best second baseman ever
Real longshot, but--coming off WARs of 5.0/5.7/6.0--four or five more seasons like that and he'd be in the HOF gray area. Is he generally regarded as one of the most underrated players in the game? He doesn't show up in this thread.
― clemenza, Thursday, 10 December 2015 01:36 (three years ago) Permalink
^^^ian kinsler is i think turning into the new Beltre, as far as consistency and that creeping possibility of a good HOF case. not sure he can have another four or five seasons like his last few but if he does he'll be approaching a career WAR of 80. that's probably a real stretch, though.
― nomar, Wednesday, 18 January 2017 18:15 (two years ago) Permalink
he'll probably pass jeff 'most homers by a second baseman' kent in WAR this year but i think kinsler will be hurt by a) never getting anywhere near an MVP b) maybe never being the best hitter on his own team
― mookieproof, Wednesday, 18 January 2017 18:31 (two years ago) Permalink
Similar Batters Hanley Ramirez (910)Chase Utley (910)Brandon Phillips (903)Travis Fryman (888)Rich Aurilia (888)Bret Boone (884)Bobby Grich (879)Jhonny Peralta (875)Joe Gordon (875) *Dustin Pedroia (868)
― Andy K, Wednesday, 18 January 2017 19:30 (two years ago) Permalink
As I wrote on some other thread, I think Adrian Gonzalez's home parks (Dodgers and Padres for the bulk of his career) have ensured that he'll never get any HOF consideration. He's basically the opposite of Troy Tulowitzki:
(close to the same number of games)
Home: .280/.354/.459/.813, 127 HR, 513 RBIAway: .300/.369/.524/.893, 181 HR, 633 RBI
If you simply double his road stats, he still falls short. But if you take his road stats and add them onto a favorable home park(s), who knows.
― clemenza, Thursday, 19 January 2017 01:50 (two years ago) Permalink
until writers learn to look beyond unadjusted dinosaur slash stats -- hey, there are already some! it's not 1997! wowza!
― Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 19 January 2017 01:57 (two years ago) Permalink
was surprised to not see Beltre on the above list, but that list wasn't including the 2010. since the beginning of that season, he's accumulated 46.2 WAR and passed everyone on that list except Pujols and A-Rod. also 17 of those guys have retired (except Beltre, Pujols, and Suzuki.) the current active top 20:
1. Albert Pujols (17, 37) 100.2 R2. Adrian Beltre (20, 38) 90.7 R3. Carlos Beltran (20, 40) 70.4 B4. Miguel Cabrera (15, 34) 69.7 R5. Chase Utley (15, 38) 64.8 L6. Robinson Cano (13, 34) 64.3 L7. Ichiro Suzuki (17, 43) 59.2 L8. Ian Kinsler (12, 35) 54.8 R9. Mike Trout (7, 25) 51.9 R10. Joe Mauer (14, 34) 51.1 L11. Dustin Pedroia (12, 33) 51.0 R12. Joey Votto (11, 33) 50.3 L13. David Wright (13, 34) 49.9 R14. Evan Longoria (10, 31) 48.5 R15. Matt Holliday (14, 37) 45.6 R16. Curtis Granderson (14, 36) 45.4 L17. Ryan Braun (11, 33) 44.4 R18. Troy Tulowitzki (12, 32) 43.7 R19. Adrian Gonzalez (14, 35) 43.2 L20. Ben Zobrist (12, 36) 43.1 B
― nomar, Monday, 26 June 2017 16:39 (one year ago) Permalink
oops, Beltran also hasn't retired. anyway, Beltre is also the only one still playing at a high level.
― nomar, Monday, 26 June 2017 16:40 (one year ago) Permalink
i guess from that list, in keeping w/the spirit of this thread, I think Evan Longoria is super underrated. playing in Tampa doesn't help, and maybe neither does the fact that he was a massively hyped prospect who was maybe overshadowed and has simply had a vv quietly outstanding career to date.
― nomar, Monday, 26 June 2017 16:42 (one year ago) Permalink
was a lil surprised that Nellie cruz only has 28.1 career war tho I guess a product of not being a regular til he was 28 yrs old & prob having negative defensive ratings factored in
― johnny crunch, Tuesday, 11 July 2017 16:49 (one year ago) Permalink
nick markakis being a decent two week stretch away from 2,000 career hits is blowing my mind.
― nomar, Tuesday, 11 July 2017 17:01 (one year ago) Permalink
for some reason i often find myself navigating to cruz's stat pages and being surprised by his WAR, as well.
― Karl Malone, Tuesday, 11 July 2017 17:29 (one year ago) Permalink
personally, i always underrate ian kinsler. it's totally arbitrary, but he's 12th in fWAR since 2010
i guess it's just because he's in the AL so i rarely watch him play, and he accumulated a lot of his value through solid defense, which lends itself to underratededereradfdsf
― Karl Malone, Tuesday, 11 July 2017 17:32 (one year ago) Permalink
I was thinking about Cruz the other day, that he might be on a list of highest percentage of career WAR accumulated during a player's 30s.
― clemenza, Tuesday, 11 July 2017 17:41 (one year ago) Permalink
Comparison to three guys I associate with this:
Cruz - 20.5 WAR during 30s/28.1 career WAR = 73%Bautista - 27.7/34.7 = 80%Jeff Kent - 40.6/55.2 = 74%Luis Gonzalez - 32.5/51.5 = 63%
Bautista was 29 when he hit 54 HR, otherwise he'd be up near 100%. I think it's much more common for this to happen with pitchers.
― clemenza, Tuesday, 11 July 2017 18:00 (one year ago) Permalink
also edgar martinez - 49.6 of 68.3 = 73%ozzie smith - 52 of 76.5 = 68%
i should subscribe to the B-R play index so i can see the top ten and past twenty
― Karl Malone, Tuesday, 11 July 2017 18:16 (one year ago) Permalink
The Jays had two of them--Edwin just crossed 60%, and I wouldn't be surprised if he works his way up to 75% by the time he retires.
― clemenza, Tuesday, 11 July 2017 20:19 (one year ago) Permalink
The flip side:
Albert Belle - 68% before he turns 30Juan Gonzalez - 78%Ken Griffey Jr. - 84% Andruw Jones - 92%Nomar Garciaparra - 93%
― clemenza, Tuesday, 11 July 2017 20:59 (one year ago) Permalink
mark fidrych - %100
― mookieproof, Tuesday, 11 July 2017 23:16 (one year ago) Permalink
Elvis Andrus? Crossed 30 WAR last season, most years in the 4.0-4.5 range, off to a great start in 2019. Jays fans will always remember him for his role (two crushing errors) in the bat-flip inning.
― clemenza, Sunday, 14 April 2019 21:53 (one week ago) Permalink