2004 I Love Baseball All Star Thread: Cast Your Votes

TS: All Star Voting Rationale: Homerism vs. Season To Date Stats vs. Last 2-3 Year's Performance vs. ?????

AL East:
Boston - Manny, Ortiz, Schilling
NY - A-Rod, Mariano
Baltimore - Tejada, Melvin
Tampa Bay - Rocco?
Toronto - Catalanotto

AL Central:
KC - Ken Harvey, Beltran
Chicago - Magglio, Hurt
Minnesota - Lewwwwwwwwwww
Indians - V. Martinez, Hafner, C. Lee?
Detroit - I-Rod, Rondell, Guillen

AL West:
Oakland - Mulder
Anaheim - Vlad, K-Rod
Texas - Blalock, M. Young, Soriano
Seattle - Alvin Davis (Moyer?)

NL East:
NY Mess - Glavine, Piazza
Montreal - Youppi (Livan?)
Florida - Lowell, Penny, Benitez
Philly - Burrell, Abreu, Thome?
Atlanta - Estrada

NL Central:
Cincy - Casey, Dunn, Graves, P. Wilson
Chicago - Alou, Zambrano
Houston - Clemens, Berkman
St. Louis - Rolen
Pitts - Mackowiak, Wilson, O. Perez
Beer - Overbay, Sheets

NL West:
San Fran - Bonds
LA - Beltre, Gagne, O. Perez
Colorado - Burnitz, Castilla
Arizona - Unit

Adam Everett

I truly don't understand how that happens. Does anybody outside of Houston know who this guy is? Maybe Boston fans just because he was once in their farm system.

The best barometer of how seriously to take this shit is that Nomar and Jeter-McCarver are #1 and 2 at AL SS.

A little while later, catcher Brad Ausmus, who had just shaved his goatee off except for the mustache, waved to Jeff Kent as the second baseman headed toward the clubhouse door. The Astros often tease Kent about his mustache, and Ausmus mimicked him perfectly as his teammates roared. Kent barked a reply, but he too, was laughing.

From: http://houston.astros.mlb.com/NASApp/mlb/mlb/news/mlb_perspectives.jsp?ymd=20040602&content_id=759585&vkey=perspectives&fext=.jsp

You know who I won't be voting for? Sosa. He's not one of the top 3 OFs anymore.

And I like voting for one REAL centerfielder.

AL
1b F.Thomas (Giambi)
2b Boone
ss Tejada
3b A-Rod (Mora)
of Ramirez
of Guerrero
cf Beltran (V.Wells)
c Pudge (Posada)

NL
1b Pujols
2b Kent (Loretta)
ss Renteria (Kaz)
3b Lowell (Rolen)
of Bonds
of Berkman
cf Edmonds
c Piazza

Since I'll likely multi-vote, I may cast a few for the guys in parens.

i dont really blame you for not voting for soriano, his ops away from mini-coors is .596 and he's not fielding all that well. to be honest objectively i think bellhorn's the only choice, but is he even on the ballot? i'm not voting for him either way obviously. (belliard or soriano would prob be my choice at the moment)

Bellhorn, don't make me laugh. He's not even going to be a regular in 2 weeks (tho that's unfair). And Finley (always a fave of mine) just ISN'T better than Edmonds, who will have his usual numbers at year's end.

You guys are still paying too much heed to April/May.

The next 3 NL outfielders: Abreu, Giles, Finley.

i hate your reasoning on pudge over posada unless he's a personal fave of yours.

finley plays in a hitter's park so he probably really hasn't been more valuable than edmonds overall.

Pudge is better. He's statistically close to Posada the last year and a half, and is a greater lifetime player. Even when Joe Sheehan (a Yankee fan) of BP gave his ballot last week, he said of his Posada choice, "This feels like a homer pick." And if you went solely by 2003-4, Posada should be second to Javy Lopez.

2004 VORP

Finley 21.0
Edmonds 19.0

wtf??? posada's recently gone into a slump, but he'd been one of the top 3 offensive players in the league as a catcher. he's still top 5 in OBP and SLG. pudge is, i dunno, somewhere in the 20s. it's recently gotten a lot closer, but it's still not close.

"pudge is better."

do you honestly believe that? he hasn't had a better season for 4 years now. i bet he won't have a better season this year either.

Equiv Avg Equiv Runs VORP CS% Range

Posada .331 34.8 21.8 .353 6.57
Pudge .317 38.4 25.7 .385 7.30

it's still not close enough to warrant selecting pudge over posada on an objective basis - and you're picking those numbers after a major hot streak by pudge and a major slump by posada.

pudge's eqr is higher because he's played in more games, but you made that pick a week ago when the diff in eqa must've been 20-30 points. posada was at something like .295/.440/.605 not long ago. he's still hitting for considerably more power and getting on base considerably more - we'll see, but i don't think he's playing much over his head right now. pudge has never batted .349 over a season, not even in arlington - and he's not hitting for much power or walking, either. if his BA slips to a career average .306 and his walk and power rates still the same, he'll be sitting at .306/.345/.469. posada's a much better bet to sustain his success to date.

i don't quite understand how the eqa diff isn't a lot higher, not that 14 points isn't significant. as long as both guys are playing regularly i don't think "playing time" metrics (like eqr or vorp) should be given much heed for all-star selections, although it's obviously important for the MVP award.

so pick pudge if you want, but pls admit your particular biases are coloring that selection. jorge's better.

You do concede, at this moment, Pudge is a HOFer and Jorge is likely not? Similarly, there are too many good candidates ahead of Griffey in NL OF, but I can understand why his apparent renaissance has gotten him votes.

as for javy: i'd think you'd make an exception for this "last year and a half" thing in the case of obvious fluke seasons, if rewarding actual talent levels is the idea.

Guillen is putting up numbers unlike he ever has (Comerica-inflated, yes?). Baseball history really begins in April 2004 for you?

home: .722 OPS
away: 1.172 OPS

april: .840 OPS
may: 1.015 OPS
june to date: .948 OPS

tejada

home: .897 OPS
away: .772 OPS

april: .827 OPS
may: .896 OPS
june2d: .607 OPS

in addition, tejada has a pathetic .600 OPS w/ RISP.

fielding is a wash.

does anyone have park factors for camden yards and comerica? seems like neither of them are hitter's parks based on this: http://www.battersbox.ca/archives/00001050.shtml

guillen isn't likely to get many votes, and nearly all of them will be performance-related, while tejada will get some based on name only. and guillen has consistently outperformed tejada so far in 2004, and it's the 2004 all-star game we're voting for, so i can't see how voting guillen over tejada is a crime.

doc, i agree that judging whether or not a guy is playing over his head is important, and guillen undoubtedly is, but he's also trouncing everyone else in the AL right now, and i feel sorry for him cuz no one really cares. let me put it this way, i don't think i'd be doing anyone a disservice by voting for him. and if by some miracle he wins, it'll most likely be the sole all-star game of his career, while tejada's had at least one and will presumably have more. (now that i think about it though, tejada's probably been underrepresented himself due to stiff AL competition and his penchant for slumping first halfs and second half tears. so maybe i'll throw in one or two for miggie as well)

NL

1B J. Bagwell
2B j. Kent
SS A. Everett
3B S. Rolen
OF L. Berkman
OF C. Biggio
OF S. Finley

AL

1B C. Delgado
2B A. Soriano
SS M. Young
3B M. Mora
OF V. Guerrero
OF C. Beltran
OF M. Ramirez

NL B. Ausmus
AL I. Rodriguez

Home 33 119 20 27 4 1 6 19 15 15 5 1 .227 .307 .429 .735
Away 27 110 22 34 12 1 6 24 15 22 7 2 .309 .402 .600 1.002

i'm just saying it's more impressive, and by end of the season the difference will probably be quite a bit larger. 20-30 steals, if the past means anything. i agree that 12/3 isn't worth marvelling at in and of itself but baserunnning is a big part of carlos's game, while for wells it's practically a non-factor. they just happen to be flukishly close right now.

for some reason filling out these ballots is a major pain in the ass for me. i have to get motivation from reading and disagreeing with other people's.

Vernon Wells' vote total isn't even being reported, not in the top 15. Trot Nixon and Kevin Mench are ahead of him.

Sheffield is a respectable starter, fuckingmother Jeter isn't.

Playing rotisserie is for peepuls on whom real baseball is wasted.

JD, Jeter hits .300 or so in an average month of his career, so what's so impressive? And why's a "hot" June better than a hot April?

i don't get that you're saying about jeter hitting .300 in an average month of his career. he does, and that's why he's an all-star!

I Love Baseball: answering the question "what do you get when you cross the record nerd with the stat geek?" since 2003.

Battin gaverage basically sucks, but Nomah has hit 8 points higher than Jeetz with lots more power, and he can, y'know, field.

for some reason i always thought you had to pass some really hard test to gain membership (which would be cool) but it turns out all you need do is give them money: http://store.sabr.org/sabrstore.cfm?page=list.cfm&cat=0&man=&mem_ID=30478&afid=&criteria=1001&action=list&startrow=1&maxrows=10&. oh well.

(nomar is a more talented player, and i'm a yankees fan)(though he was worse last year, offensively)

Figuring out "how to win ballgames" is kind of a waste of time to me. I'm not a player, coach or in any way involved with a professional baseball team at a decision-making level. I don't think anyone else at ILB is either.

My only problem with the whole SABR-nerd phenomenon remains the aura of elitism about it, as you've illustrated. "My way of enjoying the game is the right way, the One True Path, yours sucks."

(Oh, and my seat-of-the-pants/"When It Was A Game"-fucking-rules response to SABR-disciple superiority would be: "You've turned an occasionally beautiful, poetic, mythological and mystical game into a calculus class, fuck a bunch of that.")

I'd just like to say, for the record, that I can swing & miss with the best of 'em (amateurs). Unfortunately, my pops thought that being big-boned from the waist down = nascent power hitter, when what it really meant = I NEED PLEATS.

I'd also like to note the subtext in Milo's "how to win ballgames" comments - that is, "only professionals shd be concerned with how to win ballgames", which is the same sort of (IN MY OPINION) floofy hoohah that taints all "why do you music critics bother to write about music?" discussions on ILM.

But, as noted before, there's plenty of room for stat whores and fuddy-duddy luddites here, and there ain't no need to fuck washing hats over it.

I don't even know anymore. http://i.imdb.com/Photos/CMSIcons/emoticons/basic2/sigh.gif

Of course there's room for both - I took a potshot at one segment because a potshot was taken at another. (also: I'm in second place in a league that will pay ~$1200 for first, this is inherently less of a waste of time for me than calculating win shares.)

I respect the concept of the new(er) stats and way of looking at them, but I'll never consider them to be the most important factor in how I look at baseball. There are too many variables that no mathematical formula can ever account for.

ILM analogy time again, and this is just random thoughts - sometimes stat-geekery reminds me of people claim there's a specific formula or necessary quality to 'good' music, singer has to have a great voice, three power chords aren't enough, etc.. That focuses on one aspect, which can be great and enlightening and fun, but excludes all the other things that people love about music. I'll take the solo from "Boredom" over the guy who knows all his scales any day of the week, y'know?

I AM a member; I said I'm not a sabermetrician -- unless being a consumer of the info counts. I touched no math in college, and was happy.

Again, there are arguments on meaningful issues all the time *within* SABR. And a huge portion of the membership, me included, blanch at the mention of a regression analysis.

And of course I'm not thinking about VORP all the time.

as i've said before, my intro to baseball more or less WAS statistics (sad as it is to say), so they are and always have been the most important factor in how i look at the game. but it's not just that: as a fan, the most important thing my team can do for me is win games - in general, i don't care how - and that's the case with most fans, so that's what these 100M dollar franchises are built to do. that's what the players are paid to do: you can talk about entertainment value and all that, but the bottom line is they're out there to win, because that's what people want and that's what makes people come. so understanding the hows and the whys of winning, and valuing it very highly, as it's ultimately the goal of (excuse me as i generalize) everyone involved - players, teams, and fans alike - is vastly important. and that, of course, is what sabermetrics is all about.

[spoken like a true yankee fan etc]

(correct me if i'm wrong milo, but you don't follow any specific team, right? that might explain the difference in perception here)

I'd take him this year
over all your fancy boys,
breaking out like zits

Winning is low on my list of reasons (never a very competitive person when it came to things I wasn't directly involved in).

My introduction to baseball was half historical - playing dice-based games of my own making, reading the old Baseball Encyclopedias, Field of Dreams, etc. - and playing rotisserie.

NL
1B T. Helton, COL
2B J. Kent, HOU
3B S. Rolen, STL
SS J. Wilson, PIT
C J. Kendall, PIT
OF L. Berkman, HOU
OF B. Bonds, SF
OF C. Wilson, PIT

*Stop Jeter (with Nomar)

*Stop Adam Everett (with Renteria)

I really can't quibble with Sheffield, God knows he's a better starting OF choice than Damon.

Godzilla and Ichiro vault over Sheffield ... late precincts from overseas.

Oh, don't worry. I just voted and Everett should be back on top.

If Renteria did win by 6, it would literally be the only election I've ever personally decided.