yes! all about the guaranteed losses between those 3. better for texas to go ahead.
i attribute the win to the TORONTO script all-grey kits. I feel more like an old man every day, but I really think the away team should have their city on the jersey, and Jays hardly ever do. the greys look so great, why mess around and put them powders on all the time?
― francisF, Saturday, 23 September 2023 13:06 (two years ago)
Hopefully that'll all be forgotten soon; if not, it'll be remembered alongside the Texas series as the disaster that killed the season. Mystifying: four times--in the bullpen and on the mound--the camera catches Romano looking at his finger like there's an issue, but both he and Schneider are content to go ahead like there's nothing wrong.
― clemenza, Saturday, 23 September 2023 23:23 (two years ago)
The Jays continue to get way more help than they deserve. Mariners and Astros both just lost, so right now it's:
TEX - 86-68TOR - 86-69HOU - 85-70SEA - 84-70
All of Seattle's games are against Houston and Texas, so if they went on a 7-1 run or something, that knocks back the other two, and Toronto needs maybe three wins to hold one of them off; it Seattle doesn't, it'll probably be them who misses out.
(Include the Rays among the teams trying hard to hand this to Toronto: three errors and a blown 4-0 lead and the Jays still couldn't win.)
― clemenza, Sunday, 24 September 2023 02:05 (two years ago)
They had their chances with the runners LOB in the first few innings. In the ninth they barely missed turning the DP and the winning hit was fair by a foot. The Rays have plenty to play for, I hoped for a competitive series and we're getting it.
― NoTimeBeforeTime, Sunday, 24 September 2023 05:34 (two years ago)
Despite the loss to the Rays, think their playoff odds increased because of Houston and Seattle both losing.
― NoTimeBeforeTime, Sunday, 24 September 2023 06:28 (two years ago)
I think ...
― NoTimeBeforeTime, Sunday, 24 September 2023 06:29 (two years ago)
Not bringing in Mayza for Lowe was one of most obvious John Schneider 9th inning gaffs
― francisF, Sunday, 24 September 2023 15:00 (two years ago)
Definitely. And I'd add pitching Romano past a batter--or even at all--when he was clearly dealing with some finger issue. Fangraphs has them at 91% right now, so yesterday helped. But it'd be nice to see them win their way in instead of backing in.
― clemenza, Sunday, 24 September 2023 15:28 (two years ago)
https://jaysjournal.com/posts/dreadful-in-game-decisions-by-john-schneider-once-again-cost-blue-jays-a-win
― clemenza, Sunday, 24 September 2023 15:56 (two years ago)
Glad they got Kikuchi out of there. 9 hits in 4 innings, Jesus.
― clemenza, Sunday, 24 September 2023 18:27 (two years ago)
They really need another run or two. The odds of them holding on to a one-run lead, not good. (The odds of them holding on to a three-run lead weren't much better.)
― clemenza, Sunday, 24 September 2023 19:20 (two years ago)
Wow--don't think anybody saw that coming, least of all doomsayers like me.
― clemenza, Sunday, 24 September 2023 20:11 (two years ago)
Texas again beating Seattle, and--amazing--KC up on Houston in the 8th.
― clemenza, Sunday, 24 September 2023 20:13 (two years ago)
Vladdy heating up for the Post-season? I think so! how about those 5 2-out runs capped with a Springer 3-run in-the-park Dinger?
― francisF, Sunday, 24 September 2023 20:25 (two years ago)
It's been so long where he felt like a threat; that would charge up the whole offense considerably.
― clemenza, Sunday, 24 September 2023 20:30 (two years ago)
I'll be at Saturday's game with a friend and his two young sons. He said he hopes the Jays clinch when we're down there. As much as I'd like that too--never been to a clinching game--with this team, I want them to lock things up a.s.a.p. Anyone who remembers 1987 isn't going to be particular about how, just if (and the 2023 Jays aren't nearly as good as the '87 team).
― clemenza, Tuesday, 26 September 2023 21:54 (two years ago)
Do the other three Jays fans on here have any confidence in Romano right now? Even when he's saving games, it's never easy.
Earlier in the game--I was bowling but following--I couldn't believe the two strikes Vlad stood and looked at with the bases loaded.
― clemenza, Wednesday, 27 September 2023 01:42 (two years ago)
Romano needs to be in a save situation to activate Maniac Mode. but seriously, I enjoy the ride with him and he pulls it off much more often than not
I need the Jays to get to Cole tonight. Getting owned by King was no fun
― francisF, Wednesday, 27 September 2023 23:31 (two years ago)
Did not quite get to Cole...My guess: they figure out a way to win tomorrow, win one out three from the Rays, and back in. I'd sit down and figure out different scenarios if these last two games--zero runs at home in 17 innings as I type (great pitchers, I know)--weren't so dispiriting.
― clemenza, Thursday, 28 September 2023 01:18 (two years ago)
Ha--watching the TV crew's post-mortem and heard the '87 Jays mentioned for the first time...
― clemenza, Thursday, 28 September 2023 01:27 (two years ago)
Posnanski evidently knows a little bit about our history:
The Blue Jays are still in good shape for a wild-card spot; they’re a half-game up on Houston for the second wild card and two games up on Seattle for the third. But they’re the Blue Jays, and history has been pretty cruel, and they might want to win some games and not put their playoff lives in the hands of fate.
Hopefully having a team meeting this afternoon about whether they might want to win some games.
― clemenza, Thursday, 28 September 2023 17:36 (two years ago)
apparently they still have more than half a chance to get in if they lose all their remaining games! Will they put us through that? 😫
― francisF, Thursday, 28 September 2023 20:33 (two years ago)
That's what they said on the radio yesterday: 0-6 = 55% chance. That's wild, considering how bunched together they all are.
"Will they put us through that?" They just might. One of the lessons of this season for me is "Be careful what you wish for, you just might get it." In the spring, I was one of those people clamoring for them to switch the emphasis to pitching and defense, assuming that there'd still be enough hitting for a 2015-type Royals offense. Never again. A team that hits home runs is at least always entertaining. Even when they're four or five runs down, you're still fully engaged.
― clemenza, Thursday, 28 September 2023 20:55 (two years ago)
playoff odds up to 75% even if TB sweeps (who i guess we'd probably face Round 1). It's very important that they don't burn Gaus in game 162, so cinch it up tonight or tomorrow, pls.
― francisF, Friday, 29 September 2023 15:12 (two years ago)
Even though I'm there tomorrow, tonight please!
Good for Bassitt on the 200 IP--he was great last night--but it is weird for an old guy like me to see a pitcher ceremoniously removed mid-inning so he can get a standing ovation for his 200th IP. He'll probably be one of only four pitchers to get there this year.
Also weird: the Jays became only the fourth team in history--the fourth--to have four pitchers with 175+ strikeouts. I would have thought that's the kind of thing that would have been done many times.
― clemenza, Friday, 29 September 2023 15:36 (two years ago)
Three is probably common enough, four less so. I wondered if the early 2010s Giants did, but this was the nearest I could see:https://www.baseball-reference.com/teams/SFG/2012.shtmlThey came within 17ks (Vogelsong) of doing so in 2012.Really surprised that afaict the Braves rotation led by Maddux-Glavine-Smoltz never managed it.
― I’m going to get fined for being right, again (gyac), Friday, 29 September 2023 15:58 (two years ago)
They didn't? That is a surprise. Smoltz was a gimme, I think. Maddux struck out more batters than people remember; hit 200 once (just barely), and there were consecutive seasons of 198/199/197. Glavine wasn't a strikeout guy, but I would have guessed 175 regularly...nope. Then you had guys like Avery and Millwood filling out the rotation.
― clemenza, Friday, 29 September 2023 17:55 (two years ago)
It's looking good, francisF.
― clemenza, Saturday, 30 September 2023 00:23 (two years ago)
Getting way ahead of myself here, but...Schneider shuffled the order last night in a way that drew attention: moved Belt to #2, Bichette to clean-up, and Chapman all the way down to eighth. They hit three HR last night, and another three tonight (including Belt and Chapman). It'd be great if this is the kind of small thing that fires up the offense for long enough to make a playoff run. Lineup order has been pretty conclusively proven to not matter a great deal. So even if it's just psychological, that'd be fine.
― clemenza, Saturday, 30 September 2023 00:39 (two years ago)
^^Jesus, shut up.
― clemenza, Saturday, 30 September 2023 00:46 (two years ago)
8-0 turns into...8-2, bases loaded, nobody out.
― clemenza, Saturday, 30 September 2023 00:55 (two years ago)
Got out of the inning with an 8-4 lead...take it easy, clemenza, it's the Jays.
― clemenza, Saturday, 30 September 2023 01:03 (two years ago)
Ducked out for a coffee and quick walk--was extremely nervous when I got home and turned on the TV. Disaster has not yet struck.
― clemenza, Saturday, 30 September 2023 01:46 (two years ago)
Great game. Painful loss though. Rogers Centre went SILENT after Walls' hit.
For TB, this was mission accomplished in a huge way, especially if the Jays need to burn Gausman tomorrow.
― NoTimeBeforeTime, Saturday, 30 September 2023 22:17 (two years ago)
Very painful--I was down there. I thought they'd won it off Biggio's bat in the 9th. (Our seats weren't ideal in judging such things.) I don't question the flip-flop of Romano/Hicks at all.
― clemenza, Saturday, 30 September 2023 23:52 (two years ago)
Dreading having it go down to tomorrow, don't want to have to use Gausman on top of that. I'm eating dinner right now, two-hour drive home right after, so will have to follow the Mariners/Rangers on the radio as best I can.
― clemenza, Saturday, 30 September 2023 23:57 (two years ago)
My faith in the Rangers is just slightly less shaky than my faith in the Jays--even though they turned themselves into the '27 Yankees for those four games last week.
― clemenza, Sunday, 1 October 2023 00:13 (two years ago)
Thank god for that. And they don't have to burn Gausman now.
― clemenza, Sunday, 1 October 2023 02:36 (two years ago)
Am I right that tomorrow still matters as to who the Jays face in the playoffs? They're tied with Houston right now, and both are a game behind Texas. If all three end up with 90 wins, what happens?
― clemenza, Sunday, 1 October 2023 03:47 (two years ago)
Yes, if Texas and Houston are tied then Houston wins the West and is the 2-seed. If the Rangers and Jays tie then the Rangers hold the tiebreaker and would "get" to face the 4-seed, Tampa Bay, while the Jays have to face the 3-seed, Minnesota.
The Rays were in the WS three years ago and are clearly better than the Jays on paper.
The Twins haven't won a playoff game in about 20 years.
― NoTimeBeforeTime, Sunday, 1 October 2023 05:55 (two years ago)
I've been semi-fooling myself into thinking I'd rather play Tampa--the Jays have played them about even this year, while the Twins might be bolstered by the absence of the Yankees--but the truth is I'd much rather draw the Twins. So if the Jays lose tomorrow, great. My suggestion is Davis Schneider as tomorrow's starting pitcher.
― clemenza, Sunday, 1 October 2023 06:23 (two years ago)
Can't remember who the guest was, but someone on the radio brought up Matt Chapman in connection with Brooks Robinson. Except for a stretch in the mid-'60s--which includes his MVP year--Robinson wasn't much of a hitter; his OPS+ for his career was 105. That's adjusted...because he played most of his career when pitchers dominated, his unadjusted numbers are not great: .267/.322/.401. Anyway, per 162 games, here's a comparison:
Robinson: 2.7 oWAR, 2.2 dWARChapman: 4.1 oWAR, 2.2 dWAR
I'm definitely not saying Chapman is his equal, or headed to the HOF, or making any claim whatsoever. He's maddening--he was Mike Schmidt in April, and he's been Ken Reitz the rest of the year. But that comparison underscores that I and other Jays fans probably give him too hard a time.
― clemenza, Sunday, 1 October 2023 13:39 (two years ago)
Jays are starting Wes Parsons today, Gram's long-lost nephew. 31, hasn't pitched in the majors since 2019. Nice story, but I get the feeling they're content to lose and get the Twins.
― clemenza, Sunday, 1 October 2023 19:03 (two years ago)
Wes Parsons getting shellacked out there...Worst of all possible scenarios (if possible): Jays get killed, have to burn a bullpen arm or three, and end up having to play the Rays anyway.
Sorry for anyone who's down there and thought, when they bought their tickets weeks ago, they'd maybe be seeing a season-deciding game. Instead they've got the Buffalo Bisons and an 8-0 game after two innings.
― clemenza, Sunday, 1 October 2023 19:45 (two years ago)
All right--Houston up 8-0, Jays losing 12-6, if nothing changes we get the Twins.
― clemenza, Sunday, 1 October 2023 21:16 (two years ago)
Rangers have lost, so Twins fans can relax. The 19(?) game playoff losing streak will definitely end (there's no way this Jays team is sweeping anyone in a postseason series).
― NoTimeBeforeTime, Sunday, 1 October 2023 21:50 (two years ago)
Hey--your equanimity is supposed to balance my doomsaying on this thread.
― clemenza, Sunday, 1 October 2023 21:52 (two years ago)
I want to win the $50,000 (mlb.com), so I made sure not to let emotion get involved.
https://i.postimg.cc/Z592cLjH/bracket.jpg
― clemenza, Monday, 2 October 2023 02:34 (two years ago)
i'm with you . . . except for the brewers
― mookieproof, Monday, 2 October 2023 02:39 (two years ago)
Every guest on Blair and Barker, all I hear is Brewers-Brewers-Brewers.
― clemenza, Monday, 2 October 2023 02:49 (two years ago)