World Series 2022 -- Houston Astros vs Philadelphia Phillies

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (232 of them)

It’s like someone finally got the memo to throw the Phillies only fastballs instead of breaking balls, but it shouldn’t work *this* well

Michael F Gill, Thursday, 3 November 2022 03:04 (one year ago) link

Jesus. Three outs to go

FRAUDULENT STEAKS (The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall), Thursday, 3 November 2022 03:06 (one year ago) link

2

frogbs, Thursday, 3 November 2022 03:23 (one year ago) link

1

frogbs, Thursday, 3 November 2022 03:29 (one year ago) link

No way

Bee OK, Thursday, 3 November 2022 03:29 (one year ago) link

Fun

Bee OK, Thursday, 3 November 2022 03:29 (one year ago) link

Best of three

Bee OK, Thursday, 3 November 2022 03:30 (one year ago) link

only the 2nd in WS history? neat

frogbs, Thursday, 3 November 2022 03:30 (one year ago) link

Glad I saw most of it, but I just can't get excited about combined no-hitters. And I'm not at all saying they should have left Vázquez in--100 pitches, not even a question. It just doesn't mean anything to me.

clemenza, Thursday, 3 November 2022 03:31 (one year ago) link

I dunno. That was pretty crazy

FRAUDULENT STEAKS (The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall), Thursday, 3 November 2022 03:33 (one year ago) link

If it goes 7, and Vázquez is rested (I know there's one day off in there), he's probably your starter.

clemenza, Thursday, 3 November 2022 03:33 (one year ago) link

blanking a team by committee that banged dingers a world series game prior is pretty impressive to me

sknybrg, Thursday, 3 November 2022 03:37 (one year ago) link

how is it not impressive that a world series team got no hits (in its own ballpark no less)

god knows i don't want to tell you what exactly to be excited about, but . . . it's a rare feat. and you seem to be shitting on it for purely petulant reasons

mookieproof, Thursday, 3 November 2022 03:39 (one year ago) link

Here we go again...I'm saying I personally don't find it that exciting unless it's accomplished by one pitcher. The Phillies hitting all those home runs last night was impressive, but one guy hitting four would be more exciting and more impressive. And if everyone was so enthralled by tonight's game, I didn't see many posts. I'm going to take a wild guess that one guy taking a no-hitter into the ninth might have generated a few more.

clemenza, Thursday, 3 November 2022 03:42 (one year ago) link

Clemenza is just dreading the MLB.com headline tomorrow that says “Ohtani becomes first two-way player to watch a no-hitter in the World Series”

Michael F Gill, Thursday, 3 November 2022 03:42 (one year ago) link

Nice!

Don Larsen is part of baseball lore; will they be talking about the Javier/Montero/Pressly no-hitter in 2035, much less 2088? (I know, end of the world, etc.)

clemenza, Thursday, 3 November 2022 03:46 (one year ago) link

okay

i guess i just have no idea what about baseball even interests you, considering that no starters have thrown 400 innings in decades

mookieproof, Thursday, 3 November 2022 03:49 (one year ago) link

why are you caring/watching at all?

mookieproof, Thursday, 3 November 2022 03:50 (one year ago) link

Yes; caricature's the way to go.

Reggie hitting 3 HR in one game is possibly the greatest thing I've ever seen. Have teams combined for more than 3 HR in one WS game since then? Probably--who knows, and who cares.

clemenza, Thursday, 3 November 2022 03:51 (one year ago) link

You want me to agree with every last change in the game, with every bit of conventional wisdom as it exists in 2022, and if I don't, I'm Old Hoss Radbourn.

clemenza, Thursday, 3 November 2022 03:52 (one year ago) link

evidently you should just watch reggie on youtube, as nothing will ever measure up to it

jeez

mookieproof, Thursday, 3 November 2022 03:54 (one year ago) link

nah I think Clem is right, no-hitters are a weird statistical anomaly and when they happen it's fun it's more fun for the player himself than the team. I mean you forever get to be the answer to some trivia question which is kinda the whole point of baseball. that said this was definitely cool to watch especially since non-combined no-hitters may not actually happen again

frogbs, Thursday, 3 November 2022 03:55 (one year ago) link

fwiw i don't want you to agree with every bit of conventional wisdom in 2022! but also i don't want you to be all like 'this particular circumstance, however rare, is inadequate'

you could have just been 'well, whatever' but instead you chose to challenge everyone else's idea of noteworthiness

mookieproof, Thursday, 3 November 2022 03:58 (one year ago) link

as nothing will ever measure up to it

Right--it's not like I got caught up in Judge going for 62 or anything.

I think my first post after the game was exactly "well, whatever," and expressed very subjectively. I have no idea what you're talking about.

clemenza, Thursday, 3 November 2022 03:59 (one year ago) link

"Glad I saw most of it, but I just can't get excited about combined no-hitters. And I'm not at all saying they should have left Vázquez in--100 pitches, not even a question. It just doesn't mean anything to me."

Please explain to me how that post is challenging "everyone else's idea of noteworthiness."

clemenza, Thursday, 3 November 2022 04:00 (one year ago) link

idk why having an opinion like "no-hitter by one pitcher > no-hitter by pitching staff" is controversial.

Western® with Bacon Flavor, Thursday, 3 November 2022 04:00 (one year ago) link

anyway the astros won and dusty is a genius so this is all beside the point

until he starts mccullers in game seven

mookieproof, Thursday, 3 November 2022 04:00 (one year ago) link

xp how many no-hitters, of any kind, have happened in the world series

why, upon one of the latter happening, would one immediately feel the need to denigrate it as 'uninteresting'

mookieproof, Thursday, 3 November 2022 04:03 (one year ago) link

Do you understand the difference between expressing a personal opinion--"I just can't get excited," "It just doesn't mean anything to me"--and some blanket statement you seem to think I made and didn't about the game being "uninteresting"?

clemenza, Thursday, 3 November 2022 04:06 (one year ago) link

I mean, Jesus fuck, my first six words were "Glad I saw most of it..."

clemenza, Thursday, 3 November 2022 04:07 (one year ago) link

no hitters were already a team effort anyway

ciderpress, Thursday, 3 November 2022 04:10 (one year ago) link

just ask pedro martinez who pitched 9 perfect innings and yet has not been credited for one

ciderpress, Thursday, 3 November 2022 04:11 (one year ago) link

in this day of advanced metrics, # times through a lineup, reasonable bullpen management, etc. a combined no-hitter just doesn't have that shock to me. i think the narrative of the phillies belting 5 homers off a starting pitcher and then getting their asses handed to them the next game is a better story.

Western® with Bacon Flavor, Thursday, 3 November 2022 04:12 (one year ago) link

obviously because you were waiting for a marginal hit to be called an error (j/k)

mookieproof, Thursday, 3 November 2022 04:12 (one year ago) link

mmm tell me more about 'that shock' and 'better stories'

mookieproof, Thursday, 3 November 2022 04:14 (one year ago) link

fuckin shams-level shit

mookieproof, Thursday, 3 November 2022 04:15 (one year ago) link

i sincerely like clemenza; i just think he's wrong

gtfo with that bacon-flavored pap

mookieproof, Thursday, 3 November 2022 04:29 (one year ago) link

To me, this isn't all that complicated. CG no hitters are cool and awesome -- as we all know, it's happened only twice in the playoffs and once in the WS. Is a combined no hitter just as cool and awesome? Obviously not ... but it's still pretty great! Unlike three combined team HR's, a combined no-hitter in the WS is rare and historic! Is it as historic as Don Larsen's perfect game? No way -- but's it's still historic!

NoTimeBeforeTime, Thursday, 3 November 2022 08:18 (one year ago) link

in a way it’s really christian vasquez’ no

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 3 November 2022 10:31 (one year ago) link

whoops hit send too soon

it’s vasquez’s no-hitter - he was the constant

it’s historic and amazing. slightly more likely in an era of max effort one-inning guys? of course. but on the biggest stage, throwing fastballs for six innings to a team that absolutely launches the ball? hey it’s no AL regular season home run record - what could be, really - but extremely, extremely impressive nonetheless. wish i could have stayed awake! (here in the UK it was 1:30am in the 5th when i finally conked out)

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 3 November 2022 10:36 (one year ago) link

We're making the same mistake! I called him Vázquez because (I think) I've got Javier Vázquez on the brain. You're calling him Christian Vázquez. It's Christian Javier.

clemenza, Thursday, 3 November 2022 11:33 (one year ago) link

i’m talking about Houston’s catcher :)

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 3 November 2022 12:27 (one year ago) link

Ah, yeah, "the constant"--that's how fouled up I am. (That might have been the cause of my initial confusion.)

clemenza, Thursday, 3 November 2022 13:10 (one year ago) link

There is, I think, a pretty nuanced look by Posnanski at two ways to view last night's game. It's not shareable, and I'm glad--I'd be enmeshed in another two-day back-and-forth. One part did make laugh, though, and might make mookieproof laugh too (he's describing a friend who tweeted him last night)

"He was actually in the crowd the night that Reggie Jackson hit three home runs in a World Series game. It remains one of his most cherished sports memories."

Evidently a few us are still stuck back there.

clemenza, Thursday, 3 November 2022 18:36 (one year ago) link

Sheehan:

It’s fair to hold combined no-hitters apart a bit, as no-hitters are more individual accomplishments than team ones. When that combined no-hitter happens with a team down 2-1 in the World Series, though, it’s possible to be too jaded. It was a no-hitter in the World Series! That’s happened exactly once, 66 years ago. It was a no-hitter in the postseason! That’s happened one other time, 12 years ago. I don’t care if the Astros used all 38 pitchers they’re carrying and the Phillies went up there with souvenir bats, that’s a big moment, that’s an incredible accomplishment.

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 3 November 2022 19:39 (one year ago) link

That the Phillies are tied 2-2 in this Series is remarkable when you consider that everyone figured their path to a victory was through the right arms of Aaron Nola and Zack Wheeler. Through four games, the two of them have allowed 13 of the 15 runs the Phillies have conceded, they have an 8.10 ERA in 13 2/3 innings, and neither has seen the sixth inning.

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 3 November 2022 19:40 (one year ago) link

The ugly reality of the expanded-playoffs era is that to history, October matters more than the six months that precede it. All-time greats have had their career accomplishments ignored in favor of a listing of playoff failures. Others we remember as legends because they got the big hit, the big strikeout, the big double play. Barry Bonds over here, David Ortiz over there. Alex Rodriguez over here, Derek Jeter over there. No stats, just vibes.

Tonight, Justin Verlander’s career gets sorted, for good, into one of those groups.

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 3 November 2022 19:42 (one year ago) link

I don't know if Bonds is exactly over there: some struggles with the Pirates, historic Series with the Giants, marred by the finish. Mixed bag.

"Too jaded"--I could counter that with some of Posnanski's column today, but I'm trying hard not to.

clemenza, Thursday, 3 November 2022 20:20 (one year ago) link

(Sheehan's exclamation marks are not working their magic on me.)

clemenza, Thursday, 3 November 2022 20:21 (one year ago) link

Lifetime postseason OPS:

Derek Jeter: .838
Alex Rodriguez: .822

Who is here and who is there exactly?

NoTimeBeforeTime, Thursday, 3 November 2022 20:34 (one year ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.