Barry Bonds is the DEVIL!!!

Message Bookmarked

Bookmark Removed

Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (688 of them)

yeah, i'm glad you brought it up and all i just really really don't think it deserves the same kind of attention ichiro's getting for a handful of reasons (and it looks like i correctily guessed that was your insinuation)

sure a mention would be nice but i can never get my head around these "per out" stats...it's just not very natural, ya know?

― John (jdahlem), Thursday, 30 September 2004 20:55 (twenty-one years ago)

I dunno, it seems not making outs is the key to offense, and Bonds is excelling this year like no one ever has.

― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Friday, 1 October 2004 14:02 (twenty-one years ago)

five months pass...

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/B0006GSJCE/sr=1-16/qid=1110320096/

― gygax! (gygax!), Tuesday, 8 March 2005 22:20 (twenty-one years ago)

$80 is the DEVIL!

― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 8 March 2005 23:58 (twenty-one years ago)

ten months pass...

Alou seriously considers batting Bonds in the #2 spot.

http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/chronicle/archive/2006/01/20/SPGECGQDM71.DTL

― Steve Shasta (Steve Shasta), Friday, 20 January 2006 19:03 (twenty years ago)

Looking good:

http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/players/3918/photos

― Steve Shasta (Steve Shasta), Monday, 23 January 2006 20:42 (twenty years ago)

he pulled out of the wbc.

― maura (maura), Tuesday, 24 January 2006 14:39 (twenty years ago)

so does anyone have a predicted "line" for BB this year, stats-wise?

― gear (gear), Wednesday, 25 January 2006 03:25 (twenty years ago)

he didn't really look like he shrunk that much did he? esp consider he spent the past year blogging. anyhow my guess - he hits around 40 homers, yr bayliss's and cowherd's think this 'proves' something or other.

― j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 25 January 2006 05:04 (twenty years ago)

I don't think he'll play enough to get to 40.

― Thermo Thinwall (Thermo Thinwall), Wednesday, 25 January 2006 19:16 (twenty years ago)

I think his 1999 line is not a stretch:

102 games of .262/.389/.617, 34 HRs, 73BB:62K

no comment on the 15 SBs.

― Steve Shasta (Steve Shasta), Wednesday, 25 January 2006 20:47 (twenty years ago)

34's around 40!

― j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 25 January 2006 23:08 (twenty years ago)

three weeks pass...

http://mlb.imageg.net/graphics/product_images/pMLB2-1991767reg.jpg

― c(''c) (Leee), Wednesday, 15 February 2006 22:44 (twenty years ago)

well well well

― j blount (papa la bas), Monday, 20 February 2006 01:25 (twenty years ago)

lookit what we got here

― gear (gear), Monday, 20 February 2006 01:36 (twenty years ago)

llew llew llew

― j blount (papa la bas), Monday, 20 February 2006 09:12 (twenty years ago)

llew llew llew
I've got some apples
llew llew llew
You have some too

― David R. (popshots75`), Monday, 20 February 2006 15:00 (twenty years ago)

Barry bein Barry.

― c(''c) (Leee), Monday, 20 February 2006 19:23 (twenty years ago)

LEW LEW LEW

http://media.lawrence.com/img/photos/2005/03/30/action1968LewAlcindor_t600.jpg

― jaymc (jaymc), Monday, 20 February 2006 19:53 (twenty years ago)

Holy shit that pic is AWESOME!

― David R. (popshots75`), Monday, 20 February 2006 20:54 (twenty years ago)

It really is. I shrunk it b/c it was 600x600 -- you should look at the original size if you haven't already.

― jaymc (jaymc), Monday, 20 February 2006 20:59 (twenty years ago)

Leee OTM.

― Steve Shasta (Steve Shasta), Tuesday, 21 February 2006 17:13 (twenty years ago)

That this is bigger news than Clemens perpetual diva-act is telling.

― Steve Shasta (Steve Shasta), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 01:05 (twenty years ago)

"We'll tackle that bridge when it happens."

Telltale signs of Roid Rage -- mixed metaphors!!!

― c(''c) (Leee), Thursday, 23 February 2006 02:42 (twenty years ago)

http://www.sfgate.com/c/pictures/2006/03/01/sp_baseball_azbm106.jpg

― c(''c) (Leee), Tuesday, 28 February 2006 20:15 (twenty years ago)

More.

― c(''c) (Leee), Tuesday, 28 February 2006 22:40 (twenty years ago)

...

― gear (gear), Wednesday, 1 March 2006 01:48 (twenty years ago)

I'd hit it.

― Steve Shasta (Steve Shasta), Wednesday, 1 March 2006 01:52 (twenty years ago)

i think i saw him down on santa monica blvd last night

― gear (gear), Wednesday, 1 March 2006 02:00 (twenty years ago)

Barry Bonds is The Devil... In DISGUISE!

― Jimmy Mod: The Prettiest Flower In The Pond (The Famous Jimmy Mod), Wednesday, 1 March 2006 03:46 (twenty years ago)

Great rack!

*thumbs up*

― David R. (popshots75`), Wednesday, 1 March 2006 04:34 (twenty years ago)

Does HGH give you bitch-tits?

― Erick Dampier is better than Shaq (miloaukerman), Wednesday, 1 March 2006 05:57 (twenty years ago)

Who is being "hazed" in that situation again?

― Allyzay Rofflesberger (allyzay), Wednesday, 1 March 2006 19:05 (twenty years ago)

We the viewers.

― c(''c) (Leee), Wednesday, 1 March 2006 20:00 (twenty years ago)

Paula Abdul

― NoTimeBeforeTime (Barry Bruner), Wednesday, 1 March 2006 20:19 (twenty years ago)

My eyes.

― Thermo Thinwall (Thermo Thinwall), Thursday, 2 March 2006 11:42 (twenty years ago)

Day got worse.

― c(''c) (Leee), Friday, 3 March 2006 21:01 (twenty years ago)

Make that "Day 2."

― c(''c) (Leee), Friday, 3 March 2006 21:04 (twenty years ago)

NEW YORK (SI.com) -- Beginning in 1998 with injections in his buttocks of Winstrol, a powerful steroid, Barry Bonds took a wide array of performance-enhancing drugs over at least five seasons in a massive doping regimen that grew more sophisticated as the years went on, according to Game of Shadows, a book written by two San Francisco Chronicle reporters at the forefront of reporting on the BALCO steroid distribution scandal.

(An excerpt of Game of Shadows that details Bonds' steroid use appears exclusively in the March 13 issue of Sports Illustrated, which is available on newsstands beginning on Wednesday. The book's publication date is March 27.)

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2006/baseball/mlb/03/06/news.excerpt/index.html?cnn=yes

― maura (maura), Tuesday, 7 March 2006 19:32 (twenty years ago)

i just finished reading that article. nothing shocking to me.

― otto midnight (otto midnight), Tuesday, 7 March 2006 19:49 (twenty years ago)

at this point i'm just going on the assumption that the only player not using 'roids is juan pierre

― gear (gear), Tuesday, 7 March 2006 20:11 (twenty years ago)

I wonder what proof they have. I mean, this is rather specific.

― polyphonic (polyphonic), Tuesday, 7 March 2006 20:30 (twenty years ago)

Well, if everyone's on roids, then it's a level playing field, so there's no problem! Wheeeeeeeeee!

― David R. (popshots75`), Tuesday, 7 March 2006 20:41 (twenty years ago)

Proof? You don't need proof when you've got "THE TRUTH".

― Steve Shasta (Steve Shasta), Tuesday, 7 March 2006 20:44 (twenty years ago)

I wonder what proof they have. I mean, this is rather specific

i believe a lot of the specifics come from the recently unsealed court documents. there was a link regarding the notation/documentation that i didn't bother to follow.

― otto midnight (otto midnight), Tuesday, 7 March 2006 20:50 (twenty years ago)

The article flatly states that all of their evidence consists of leaked grand jury testimony, supposedly confidential documents + affidavits, etc. I still don't understand how nobody's been charged with any wrongdoing there.

― NoTimeBeforeTime (Barry Bruner), Tuesday, 7 March 2006 20:55 (twenty years ago)

I believe Nick Sylvester was involved.

― Steve Shasta (Steve Shasta), Tuesday, 7 March 2006 20:56 (twenty years ago)

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2006/magazine/03/06/growth.doc0313/

at least as interesting as the article, to me.

― otto midnight (otto midnight), Tuesday, 7 March 2006 21:03 (twenty years ago)

Still, the article seems to rely on evidence that wont be backed up by anyone involved or statements by the "girlfriend." Most of this has been leaked already and reported in their paper. If any of this has validity (the girlfriends testimony about tax evasion, the lying to the grand jury) where are the charges? Anyway, they've been gunning for him from day one and they'll keep it up long after he's retired and I have a feeling he'll still be having the last laugh.

― dan. (dan.), Tuesday, 7 March 2006 21:54 (twenty years ago)

Anderson's calenders/diaries seem pretty conclusive to me without much more evidence. I can't see a non-steroid explanation for their existence.

― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 7 March 2006 21:59 (twenty years ago)

Skipping 588 messages at this point... Click here if you want to load them all.

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.