Both of these sound awful.
― Alex in SF, Saturday, 27 June 2009 02:44 (sixteen years ago)
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/dodgerthoughts/2009/07/moneyball-movie-is-back-on.html
― Stacey Pollen (Andy K), Thursday, 9 July 2009 23:21 (sixteen years ago)
so now the movie will be LAME
― Batsman (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Friday, 10 July 2009 12:49 (sixteen years ago)
che was so fucken wack. with sorkin on board all they need to do now is ditch soderBOREgh and pitt and that's the movie right there.
― FREE DOM AND ETHAN (special guest stars mark bronson), Friday, 10 July 2009 12:53 (sixteen years ago)
Making Moneyball into a movie has got to be one of the worst ideas of all time.
― Mr. Snrub, Monday, 13 July 2009 00:28 (sixteen years ago)
Team 2009 payrollNew York Yankees $201,449,189New York Mets $149,373,987Chicago Cubs $134,809,000Boston Red Sox $121,745,999Detroit Tigers $115,085,145Los Angeles Angels $113,709,00Philadelphia Phillies $113,004,046Houston Astros $102,996,414Los Angeles Dodgers $100,414,592Seattle Mariners $98,904,166Atlanta Braves $96,726,166Chicago White Sox $96,068,500San Francisco Giants $82,616,450Cleveland Indians $81,579,166Toronto Blue Jays $80,538,300Milwaukee Brewers $80,182,502St. Louis Cardinals $77,605,109Colorado Rockies $75,201,000 Cincinnati Reds $73,558,500Arizona Diamondbacks $73,516,666Kansas City Royals $70,519,333Texas Rangers $68,178,798Baltimore Orioles $67,101,666Minnesota Twins $65,299,266Tampa Bay Rays $63,313,034Oakland Athletics $62,310,000Washington Nationals $60,328,000Pittsburgh Pirates $48,693,000San Diego Padres $43,734,200Florida Marlins $36,834,000
― Change Display Name: (Steve Shasta), Thursday, 1 October 2009 17:19 (sixteen years ago)
Moneyball II should be about the Marlins.
― Your heartbeat soun like sasquatch feet (polyphonic), Thursday, 1 October 2009 17:29 (sixteen years ago)
Astros holy shit. Drayton McLane needs a refund on his money.
― mayor jingleberries, Thursday, 1 October 2009 17:34 (sixteen years ago)
imagine how much Dan will hate the A's next year, when they're good again.
― A Patch on Blazing Saddles (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 1 October 2009 17:39 (sixteen years ago)
shit got heated
― velko, Thursday, 1 October 2009 17:40 (sixteen years ago)
I don't want to speak for Dan but you really think the A's are gonna have a good year next year?
Here is how Moneyball fits into the A's decadeOakland A's win/loss/%/notes2000 91W-70L .565 ALW Pennant - ALDS loss2001 102W-60L .630 ALWC - ALDS loss2002 103W-59L .636 ALW Pennant - ALDS loss2003 96W-66L .593 ALW Pennant - ALDS loss*** MONEY BALL PUBLISHED ***2004 91W-71L .562 2nd in ALW 2005 88W- 74L .543 2nd in ALW 2006 93W-69L .574 ALW Pennant - ALCS loss2007 76W- 86L .469 3rd in ALW 2008 75W- 86L .466 3rd in ALW2009 75W-83L .475 4th in ALW
― Change Display Name: (Steve Shasta), Thursday, 1 October 2009 18:37 (sixteen years ago)
I think they'll have a good year next year, sure.
― Alex in SF, Thursday, 1 October 2009 18:51 (sixteen years ago)
by good, do you mean better/improved (ie, 80-85 wins?)
or do you mean like, good/contending (90-95 wins?)
just curious... I mean Rajai Davis is their best player right?
― Change Display Name: (Steve Shasta), Thursday, 1 October 2009 19:04 (sixteen years ago)
they're about 2 or 3 good hitters away from that i'd say
chris carter could be one of them
― extremely demanding on the hardware (ciderpress), Thursday, 1 October 2009 19:19 (sixteen years ago)
"or do you mean like, good/contending (90-95 wins?)"
It's entirely possible. They've got a lot of good offensive young talent. Pretty sure the teams immediately prior 1999 weren't much worse than A's were this year and they managed to turn it around pretty quickly.
― Alex in SF, Thursday, 1 October 2009 19:54 (sixteen years ago)
It's not like their R/RA was that bad this year actually. Their Pythag W/L was about .500.
― Alex in SF, Thursday, 1 October 2009 20:00 (sixteen years ago)
"Shasta" expects the Marlins to win 102
― A Patch on Blazing Saddles (Dr Morbius), Friday, 2 October 2009 07:40 (sixteen years ago)
Drunk posting again Morbs?
tbf, I see a hell of a lot more young talent on the Marlins than I do on the A's.
The A's have had six years of promising young, offensive talent that has been frankly, pretty fucking offensive. What was the last trade that went "right" for the A's? Jack Cust?
― ♪♫(●̲̲̅̅̅̅=̲̲̅̅̅̅●̲̅̅)♪♫ (Steve Shasta), Friday, 2 October 2009 14:23 (sixteen years ago)
Uh the Haren trade still looks pretty good right now. As does the Swisher deal.
― Alex in SF, Friday, 2 October 2009 16:04 (sixteen years ago)
"The A's have had six years of promising young, offensive talent that has been frankly, pretty fucking offensive."
It's not been a good run, I'll admit.
― Alex in SF, Friday, 2 October 2009 16:05 (sixteen years ago)
When your best homegrown position has been Nick Swisher or Kurt Suzuki you def need a lot of help and the A's haven't gotten it.
― Alex in SF, Friday, 2 October 2009 16:06 (sixteen years ago)
"position prospect"
I dunno, Carlos Gonzalez and Andre Ethier are pretty good.
― Your heartbeat soun like sasquatch feet (polyphonic), Friday, 2 October 2009 20:56 (sixteen years ago)
Well technically Carlos Gonzalez was a Diamondbacks homegrown position player (also being good in Colorado or for that matter Los Angeles isn't the same as being good in the AL).
― Alex in SF, Friday, 2 October 2009 21:15 (sixteen years ago)
(god i hope the NL wins the WS again)
― ♪♫(●̲̲̅̅̅̅=̲̲̅̅̅̅●̲̅̅)♪♫ (Steve Shasta), Friday, 2 October 2009 21:23 (sixteen years ago)
Me too. Fuck the Yankees/Red Sox/Angels.
― Alex in SF, Friday, 2 October 2009 21:32 (sixteen years ago)
http://www.sandiego6.com/entertainment/story/Pitts-Moneyball-back-on/BO51bMaalEWJWFG-rZXSyw.cspx
― Feingold/Kaptur 2012 (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 8 December 2009 12:22 (sixteen years ago)
Will they make Jeremy Brown a black guy who gets raised by an adorable southern white lady who leads him to the major leagues?
― mayor jingleberries, Tuesday, 8 December 2009 18:16 (sixteen years ago)
Iiiiiii LIKE IT!
― Feingold/Kaptur 2012 (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 8 December 2009 23:12 (sixteen years ago)
I'm reading this right now but it's disappointing knowing how many of these picks turned out to be busts
also, can Michael Lewis ever write a book/article without making a bond trader analogy? ever?
― 囧 (dyao), Monday, 14 December 2009 03:26 (sixteen years ago)
What are you talking about? Barry Bonds was never traded, he was a free agent who... oh.
― Leee, Monday, 14 December 2009 04:07 (sixteen years ago)
Sometimes I think Liar's Poker is his best book though dyao...
― quiet and secretively we will always be together (Steve Shasta), Monday, 14 December 2009 04:59 (sixteen years ago)
oh no doubt SS - but after reading that you realize how he sees pretty much everything in terms of his time on Wall Street, all these 'inefficiencies' and his analyses of what stats really mean/refer to/measure... it's hard for me to think of Lewis as anything other than "bond trader analyzes sports"
I should go back and reread Liar's Poker, the first time I just read it for aggro hairy chested men lols (and I need to separate it in my mind from the Rise and Fall of LTCM which I read at roughly the same time)
― 囧 (dyao), Monday, 14 December 2009 06:57 (sixteen years ago)
I'm reading this right now but it's disappointing knowing how many of these picks turned out to be busts.
why you got to do Ricciardi like that?
― sanskrit, Monday, 14 December 2009 13:55 (sixteen years ago)
ha hahaha
― The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall, Monday, 14 December 2009 14:40 (sixteen years ago)
So that fat fuck Jonah Hill is playing DePodesta.
― kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 05:13 (sixteen years ago)
this is happening?
― J0rdan S., Tuesday, 13 April 2010 05:14 (sixteen years ago)
hill would have to lose about... oh 250 pounds to accurately play that role?
― J0rdan S., Tuesday, 13 April 2010 05:15 (sixteen years ago)
Because adaptations about market inefficiencies in sports are so popular now. Just look at the Blind Side. Same shit.
― mayor jingleberries, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 05:16 (sixteen years ago)
who is gonna play jeremy brown's mom?
― J0rdan S., Tuesday, 13 April 2010 05:16 (sixteen years ago)
pretty much the only way I would watch this is if sandra bullock was playing billy beane
― iatee, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 05:17 (sixteen years ago)
actual rofls
― J0rdan S., Tuesday, 13 April 2010 05:19 (sixteen years ago)
http://moviesblog.mtv.com/2010/03/14/jonah-hill-talks-moneyball/
http://www.nbcnewyork.com/blogs/popcornbiz/Seamhead-Rob-Neyer-Says-Jonah-Hill-to-Star-in-Moneyball-86907987.html
― kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 11:42 (sixteen years ago)
"Every guy who is in their twenties and making movies was after that part"
REALLY?
― Andy K, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 12:43 (sixteen years ago)
Aziz Ansari as Ron Washington
― Andy K, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 12:45 (sixteen years ago)
Jonah Hill as Jeremy Brown― NoTimeBeforeTime, Friday, October 17, 2008 2:27 PM (6 months ago) Bookmark
― NoTimeBeforeTime, Friday, October 17, 2008 2:27 PM (6 months ago) Bookmark
― Andy K, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 12:47 (sixteen years ago)
Zach Galifianakis as Kevin Youkilis
― sanskrit, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 18:37 (sixteen years ago)
all the ex-players (Strawberry, Justice, Dykstra) are out of the cast btw
― kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 18:54 (sixteen years ago)
http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/11/2010/07/340x_custom_1279833676647_jonahhill.jpg
IS
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_T12bXUlFaoU/SFvjk76mwEI/AAAAAAAAAWM/icL6rxXcDo8/s400/Depodesta+Suit.jpg
MONEYBALL: THE MOVIE
― mayor jingleberries, Thursday, 22 July 2010 21:51 (fifteen years ago)
The idea that Philip Seymour Hoffman will be playing Art Howe is just as weird.
Also, I gave a woman in my department the day off so she could be an extra in the crowd scenes they shot yesterday.
― no turkey unless it's a club sandwich (polyphonic), Thursday, 29 July 2010 18:17 (fifteen years ago)