Double predestination versus guaranteed hell for unbaptized infants

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed

Deathmatch of brutal tenets of competing Christian sects

Poll Results

OptionVotes
Double predestination 3
Guaranteed hell for unbaptized infants 2


Euler, Tuesday, 9 December 2008 22:17 (ten years ago) Permalink

double predes

i was raised by snake handlers, what u want

HOOS wearing bitchmade sweaters and steendriving (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Tuesday, 9 December 2008 22:22 (ten years ago) Permalink

Double predestination: God picks ahead of time who's going to be saved, and who damned. So it doesn't matter what you do. Brutal.

Guaranteed hell for unbaptized infants: God condemns to eternal hell all infants who aren't baptized, regardless of the fact that they can't do anything but suck tit and cry. Brutal.

Euler, Tuesday, 9 December 2008 22:22 (ten years ago) Permalink

voting on which is the crueler I will go with double predestination

Euler, Tuesday, 9 December 2008 22:23 (ten years ago) Permalink

predestination cos it's what i grew up around

goole, Tuesday, 9 December 2008 22:24 (ten years ago) Permalink

Automatic thread bump. This poll is closing tomorrow.

System, Friday, 12 December 2008 00:01 (ten years ago) Permalink

Automatic thread bump. This poll's results are now in.

System, Saturday, 13 December 2008 00:01 (nine years ago) Permalink

nice. The Church is an intimate place, it seems.

Euler, Saturday, 13 December 2008 01:39 (nine years ago) Permalink

What is double about predestination?

Maria, Wednesday, 17 December 2008 22:34 (nine years ago) Permalink

Calvinistic predestination is sometimes referred to as "double predestination."[2] This is the view that God chose who would go to heaven, and who to hell, and that his decision is infallibly to come to pass. This point of view simultaneously denies that God is the Author of Evil, but the issue is a very difficult point of the doctrine of predestination. The difference between elect and reprobate is not in themselves, all being equally unworthy, but in God's sovereign decision to show mercy to some, to save some and not others. It is called double predestination because it holds that God chose both whom to save and whom to damn, as opposed to single predestination which contends that though he chose whom to save, he did not choose whom to damn.

joule kilcher (goole), Wednesday, 17 December 2008 22:42 (nine years ago) Permalink

I thought unbaptized infants no longer go to hell?

Mordy, Wednesday, 17 December 2008 22:44 (nine years ago) Permalink

interesting to think of these ideas as flowing "up" from political/ideological battles on the ground rather than being dreamed up whole and handed down.

catholicism: you need the worldly Church = your actions in life determine your salvation = if you don't DO anything (w/ our blessing and say so), you are damned = sorry kids

protestantism: you don't need any horrible Church, only faith = nobody should have any power over anything, except God = wow he must know everything and determine everything, including the future = sorry u reprobates, it's out of our hands (lucky for us elect, huh)

joule kilcher (goole), Wednesday, 17 December 2008 22:47 (nine years ago) Permalink

xp yeah i think the church lightened up on that. no more purgatory either! but the theology is murky to me tbh

joule kilcher (goole), Wednesday, 17 December 2008 22:48 (nine years ago) Permalink

two weeks pass...

I just assume all those lil infants will go to heaven cause they are innocent and incapable of sin. Not that I beliEve that shit haha

GOD, Thursday, 1 January 2009 11:19 (nine years ago) Permalink

o fuck what did I just do forgive me

GOD, Thursday, 1 January 2009 11:19 (nine years ago) Permalink

oh fuck quit that

again forgive me

The Reverend, Thursday, 1 January 2009 11:20 (nine years ago) Permalink

Apparently lots of Catholics think that there's not a guarantee of hell for unbaptized infants anymore, but when I tried to suss this out by working through the Catechism a few years back, it seemed like there was still the guarantee, but "nice" priests would try to tell people otherwise. I thought the Catechism was official but I think this is one of the topics that the church wishes would just kinda fade away and people would stop asking about.

Euler, Saturday, 10 January 2009 18:30 (nine years ago) Permalink

looooooooooooooooooool rev

Goodnight, Mr. Johnson. (country matters), Saturday, 10 January 2009 18:31 (nine years ago) Permalink

the very very reverend

Goodnight, Mr. Johnson. (country matters), Saturday, 10 January 2009 18:31 (nine years ago) Permalink

goole what you're saying about the political stuff is interesting. It's hard to establish causation here, because at some level both doctrines are a matter of trying to understand what Paul meant in Romans, and those battles have been going on since like the 3rd century. So it's like Paul + politics of the time too, not just politics.

Euler, Saturday, 10 January 2009 18:32 (nine years ago) Permalink


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.