Can 1 exist without 2?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed

You can’t have idleness without inidleness.... everything without nothing.

Which leads me to “can 1 exist without 2”?

And what came first: thought or the physical manifestation of life?

____________________________

Crosspost from ‘Ask a stoner’ board

Woon... Doopee Time (FlopsyDuck), Thursday, 22 February 2018 23:32 (one year ago) Permalink

1 = loneliest number
2 = can be as bad as 1

bald butte (∞), Thursday, 22 February 2018 23:38 (one year ago) Permalink

Maybe neither came first. That would be sad

Woon... Doopee Time (FlopsyDuck), Thursday, 22 February 2018 23:39 (one year ago) Permalink

Can 2 girls exist without 1 cup?

Probably.

Le Bateau Ivre, Thursday, 22 February 2018 23:44 (one year ago) Permalink

1 lonely cup
2 bad girls

bald butte (∞), Thursday, 22 February 2018 23:45 (one year ago) Permalink

;_;

Le Bateau Ivre, Thursday, 22 February 2018 23:46 (one year ago) Permalink

I’m starting to believe time is not a dimension let alone the 4th dimension.

Woon... Doopee Time (FlopsyDuck), Friday, 23 February 2018 00:36 (one year ago) Permalink

Asking what happened first in the grand scheme of all things might be an entirely, irrelevant question.

Woon... Doopee Time (FlopsyDuck), Friday, 23 February 2018 00:40 (one year ago) Permalink

Chances of one drink existing without a second are low

calstars, Friday, 23 February 2018 01:28 (one year ago) Permalink

You can have 1 without 2

If you have 1 and 2 though you have every number.

direct to consumer online mattress brand (silby), Friday, 23 February 2018 01:51 (one year ago) Permalink

Unless you’re like a non-infinitarian intuitionist mathematician and maintain that incomputably large numbers do not actually exist

direct to consumer online mattress brand (silby), Friday, 23 February 2018 01:52 (one year ago) Permalink

If infinity is a loop... wouldn’t the mathematical negative infinity loop back around to positive infinity :?

Woon... Doopee Time (FlopsyDuck), Friday, 23 February 2018 02:30 (one year ago) Permalink

I’ve heard of circular time but I’m not sure I believe in circular number count (of whatever the math term for the complete sequence of numbers is)

Woon... Doopee Time (FlopsyDuck), Friday, 23 February 2018 02:35 (one year ago) Permalink

Circular time is further proof that time is not a dimension

Woon... Doopee Time (FlopsyDuck), Friday, 23 February 2018 02:37 (one year ago) Permalink

time is a flat sphere, i.e. a circle

Dat Login was the dname u doofus (Sufjan Grafton), Friday, 23 February 2018 03:24 (one year ago) Permalink


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.