Rolling Music Theory Thread

Actually now I can recall a few years ago asking one of those jazz guitarists about whether he played a Locrian natural 9 over a half-diminished chord and him reply angrily "a Locrian scale has a flat nine" and around the same time watching a video of one of the other jazz guitarists saying he did play the Locrian natural 9 although "some people play the flat nine." If only I had thought to make them confront each other to see who was right.

Perhaps this is a subject in which you can never win trying to discuss it. As soon as you open your mouth you are fair game to be sonned by a Canadian Conservatory kid on a music theory beef.

So yeah, I agree that the melody for "Dreams" is a "sort of" Aeolian melody, but in my opinion it is more accurate and interesting to describe it as a major-key melody in a song that never arrives at the I-chord.

My problem with this is that there is zero pull to the I chord in this song. None. So, why is it even relevant to consider the I chord?

I mean, to me, the song has as little to do with the key of C major as it does with the Lydian mode. It seems, on the other hand, to have a lot to do with A minor pentatonic melodicism over a home F major seventh chord but I know I already said that.

The B held over in the melody of the Beck song makes the flat two an augmented chord. I'm not sure how you explain the Bb chord other than as a chord you would play after F or F augmented, but I don't think it functions in any way relative to E major.

My problem with this is that there is zero pull to the I chord in this song. None. So, why is it even relevant to consider the I chord?

Because the melody clearly cadences on the I. I dunno what to say. "Call Me Maybe" does the exact same thing in its choruses, so does "Teenage Dream". Your take on this is very singular, "Dreams" iirc is always cited as an effective use of an implied-major. But then again, there are people (incl. the song's authors, apparently, and hilariously) who want to say "Sweet Home Alabama" is V-IV-I instead of I-bVII-IV, when that song is written about as being a textbook example of "Mixolydian", vive le difference

Re: Beck, what is that moment in Holst I am thinking of where he do that I-bII movement and suspends the dominant? "Saturn"? Anyway, I hear that B in the Beck as a suspension, not as a strict augmented chord. He resolves it, don't he? I will relisten when I get back to internetland

Re: "Dreams" ambiguity, what do you hear when you hear "Hyperballad"? Assuming root C, you've got C C/B C/A in the verses with a melody that hangs on the G and trails off (gloriously) on the F. Then, chorus arrives, and just as the melody rises up to a C, the chords change to F G a G F G a bdim. Same deal as "Dreams", no C-chord in the chorus, though the melody outlines a C-major chord and cadences deceptively to IV on "though all this" and "happier". This song plays even more closely on Tim's team because it clearly ends on the a-minor chord. But is it in a-minor (Aeolean)? or C-major? or does it modulate?

"Call Me Maybe" does the exact same thing in its choruses

Yeah, but that melody really outlines the notes of the tonic triad.

The Katy Perry one is really cool. I think the two-note guitar riff dupes you into thinking it's going to be a I-V progression, but it's that IV chord with an implied major seventh again! Nevertheless, the melody feels more rooted in the tonic to me than "Dreams" does. A lot of emphasis on the suspended tonic note over the V chord that contributes to that as well.

OK, found a guy who was cool about answering a question without giving a lot of 'tude

Vincent Persichetti was a 20th-century American composer/theorist. I was referring specifically to his 1961 book Twentieth-Century Harmony: Creative Aspects and Practice. I see that Michael Morangelli has provided a summary of the whole book here: http://www.thereelscore.com/PortfolioStuff/PDFFiles/PersichettiNotes.pdf . Ch 2 under 'The First Half of the 20th Century' is what I was thinking of. The summary begins on p 15 of the linked pdf. Basically, he described modern diatonic music as modal when it does not follow CPP rules of harmony and voice-leading (in the strict sense, i.e. usually), regardless of whether it worked like early pre-tonal modal music at all ("resemblance in construction, NOT usage"). He still analysed and wrote triadic harmonies and harmonic progressions in modern modal music, including the use of 'dominant equivalents' (maj or min triads that include the 'mode-defining note', e.g. bII in the Phrygian mode). He also discussed modal modulation (sticking with the same mode but shifting pitch centres, e.g. going from E Dorian -> A Dorian -> F# Dorian) and modal interchange (sticking with the same pitch centre but shifting the collection, e.g. E Dorian -> E Locrian -> E Lydian).

Persichetti's ideas can be a bit idiosyncratic and I don't think they're useful for all modern tonal/centric music but I do feel that they have some use.

(I've been occupied with a few things that have made it hard to analyse the Beck song with an instrument or even while listening closely.)

That little summary you just provided was plenty useful, thanks.

I'm gone!

From thread? From borad? Why?

Is it cutting people completely out of your life

Feel bad if it was me giving grief about Canada Conservatory because I was only kidding and after I typed it the last time realized it was getting old and was going to try not to do it anymore.

Besides I was meaning Sund4r anyway.

j/k really

Sund4r, that summary you linked to was good too. Although it eemed to me that he went right from the seven modes of the Ionian Scale onto more exotic scales like the Biharmonic Major or Melodic Major, skipping over Harmonic Minor and Melodic Minor modes. Guess he did mention overtone scale somewhere. Maybe I missed something.

Hm, just came across another scale to use over half-diminished 7th chord, Dorian b5, second mode of Melodic Major. Let me try it out. See you later.

From thread? From borad? Why?

Am also confused by fgti's comment.

He'll be back

Here's some stuff I think about.

Generating fingerings for bass and guitar:
Consider breaking scale into groups of three. For modes of (Ionian) major scale there are only three of these- major third, minor third half step first, minor third half step second. Furthermore the same patterns always repeat before changing to the next pattern. For example, if you start a Mixolydian scale, you get three major thirds, followed by two minor thirds half-step first, followed by two minor thirds half-step second. Why is this? Because in each group you are playing a third, next pattern starts a fourth away, you are going around the circle of fifths in the reverse direction,

How can you use this? Well a two octave scale has 7+7+1 =15 beats, which can be broken up into five groups of three.

Maybe I should say circle of fifths. You are moving by fourths within a given key, but a scale starting a fourth away in the same mode is the same except for one accidental.

You could think of the modes of the major scale as one giant loop, with the half-steps coming every fourth or fifth. You always get at least one repeat until it mutates. Whereas for modes of the melodic minor, in which the half-steps are next to each other, meaning separated by a single whole step, you basically get an alteration of major third and minor third patterns except for the point where the two minor third patterns are back to back- the beginning of the sixth mode.

First started thinking about this a while back in terms of four note groupings, tetrachords, in which case you are moving around by fifths and there are four patterns that repeat as follows: two major, two Dorian, two Phrygian and one Lydian.

Sorry, this is just the way my mind works, even if turns out to be only a case of "looking where the light is." Feel free to take it or leave it. I'll spare you my comments on drop-2 voicings for now.

Although it eemed to me that he went right from the seven modes of the Ionian Scale onto more exotic scales like the Biharmonic Major or Melodic Major, skipping over Harmonic Minor and Melodic Minor modes.

I think that he is assuming that the reader is already familiar with common practice theory, where the harmonic and melodic minor scales are standard.

Oh! You are talking about rotating the harmonic and melodic minor scales! Are there many 20th century compositions that do that? (Disregard the previous comment.)

In jazz almost all of the modes of melodic minor are used and a few of the modes of harmonic minor are used as well, mainly the fifth mode.

can anyone name examples of songs in the Lydian mode that don't resolve to (or hint at resolving to) Ionian/Aeolian/Mixolydian?

Found a paper on my phone I must have downloaded during an earlier discussion that may or may not answer this question.
http://trace.tennessee.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1081&context=gamut

Which cites this interestingly titled paper: http://www.theory.esm.rochester.edu/temperley/papers/temperley-pm07.pdf

That being: "The Melodic-Harmonic 'Divorce' in Rock," by David Temperley.

Oh, fascinating. The disconnect between melody and harmony in pop/rock is something I've been thinking about a lot over the past while.

That Butler quote led me to the following interesting and relevant paper, which also cites it, on Schoenberg and the Church Modes. http://symposium.music.org/index.php?option=com_k2&view=item&id=2103:schoenberg-on-the-modes-characteristics-substitutes-and-tonal-orientation&Itemid=124

PS The author is a Canadian academic, full professor at the University of Ottawa.

Thanks for the link btw. I'll let Murray know we were talking about his paper the next time I see him!

Sure, when will that be?

Looking at some of the examples in the Temperley paper. The "Taking Care of Business" one is interesting. The notes over the Bb5 really don't have anything to do with that chord.

I don't agree with the "Sunday Blood Sunday" one. I think the notes have a lot to do with the chords up until that F#, but that's just creating a sense of major seventh harmony with the G chord (and the A before it is a passing tone).

And, yeah, wow at the "Drive My Car" one, especially that tone cluster over the A chord. I think the F there gives it a little bit of the character of an augmented chord.

Diminished chords:classic or dud?

Couldn't sleep, started strumming some minor key thing and The Hollies' "Bus Stop" came out. It's Aeolian or I'll eat my hat. Also the melody starts with broken thirds, but syncopated so it sounds like a song and not scale practice. Oh, yeah came across another book, by one of the usual suspects.

"Bus Stop" - a top ten hit where the chorus sounds like a bridge.

It does tonicize E minor in that part.

Haven't read the whole thing yet but this looks like it might be of interest to people here: http://www.mtosmt.org/issues/mto.14.20.2/mto.14.20.2.biamonte.php

Noticed before but didn't read, thanks. Wondering if I should try to count out "Just What I Needed" before peeking at the solution.

Def

Weird thing is because I was trying to count it out this time, I didn't get faked out at all. But a few months ago even when I relistened to it a few times I still would get faked out.

Think moral of story is
1) when getting faked out by intro for your initial attempt assume first beat your hear is one and see if it works out.
2) if the intro is reprised later on the song, just count your way into it starting in the (hopefully) metrically simpler and more intuitive section preceding it.

This kind of thing happens all the time in Latin music. Still need to read paper

Your hear = you hear

Is "Just What I Needed" more of a fakeout than "Be My Baby", which also accents beat 4?

Moral 2) is OTM but moral 1) seems too trial-and-error imo. I would rather suggest working backwards from the point where the downbeat is obvious.

B-b-but how does one count backwards?

"Be My Baby" has a strong downbeat from the get-go, no fakeout. Closest thing to a fakeout is signature Hal Blaine quarter note triples on the fadeout.

I guess the agogic accent in "Be My Baby" makes the downbeat more obvious right away.

xpost

Well, I just meant that in this case, once the drums enter and you can hear the 1 clearly, you can go back and count the number of beats between the accented chord and the 1 and then extrapolate. (It's easy here since it comes exactly one beat before the 1.) If a song is obviously in 4, you could just use trial and error too, of course. (I guess I did just count starting on 1 when I listened to this today tbh. I just wasn't sure it was good as a general principle.)

Yeah, it is trail and error, but I just found it useful to concentrate, to plant a claim stake in the timeline if you will. Maybe will try using letters, A,B,C, D or "subtracting" as you seem to be suggesting.