???
1. All. 2. No. 3. Yes, but I prefer either sockless or knee-highs for one less visual interruption. 4. I'm partial to fishnet knee-highs, for instance, for some interest without nec being wild colors but wild colors are good too.
― lets just remember to blame the patriarchy for (in orbit), Friday, 29 March 2013 16:35 (thirteen years ago)
thanks. I tried black socks with rolled up jeans this morning, and blue Oxfords, and it just didn't work for me. I might try to get some of those really short socks that aren't visible under, say, Oxfords. Fishnets are a good idea too!
― ljubljana, Friday, 29 March 2013 16:46 (thirteen years ago)
I knew it would be you who would come to my rescue on this question, btw.
http://packershoes.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/nb998rr_nbm1300er-4.jpg
― the late great, Friday, 29 March 2013 16:53 (thirteen years ago)
If not, in what circumstances is it ok for socks to be visible?
rolling up your jeans is all about freedom, let those ankles be free and sockless!
― the late great, Friday, 29 March 2013 16:55 (thirteen years ago)
Maybe in a couple of weeks and a few degrees higher!
― ljubljana, Friday, 29 March 2013 17:08 (thirteen years ago)
i bought these from the vans outlet todayi am in love with them so plz no one tell me they're illadvised or ugly like the little tiny voice in the back of my head
http://exoshop.com/files/products/0/1/0/5/7/6/1/vans-prairie-boot-nubuck-brown-1.jpg
― set the controls for the heart of the sun (VegemiteGrrl), Wednesday, 10 April 2013 02:22 (thirteen years ago)
nah those are cool
― the late great, Wednesday, 10 April 2013 02:23 (thirteen years ago)
tbh I was kinda hoping for yr stamp of approval on these, u have p good taste in kicks imo :)
― set the controls for the heart of the sun (VegemiteGrrl), Wednesday, 10 April 2013 02:30 (thirteen years ago)
so YAY
https://fbcdn-sphotos-h-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/936107_169302719897552_512838401_n.jpg
― Jersey Al (Albert R. Broccoli), Thursday, 23 May 2013 14:37 (thirteen years ago)
Shut up I hate you.
― lets just remember to blame the patriarchy for (in orbit), Thursday, 23 May 2013 15:08 (thirteen years ago)
Looked at my closet today and made the mistake of getting on zappos to look for shoes under $50. Unfortunately 4 pairs of shoes under $50 still equal $200.
http://a2.zassets.com/images/z/1/3/5/2/0/7/1352073-p-MULTIVIEW.jpg
Let's see if this works.
― lets just remember to blame the patriarchy for (in orbit), Thursday, 23 May 2013 15:14 (thirteen years ago)
Woo! Here are my other candidates for purchase:
http://a3.zassets.com/images/z/1/8/1/0/4/5/1810457-p-MULTIVIEW.jpg
http://l4.zassets.com/images/z/2/2/0/8/5/9/2208593-p-MULTIVIEW.jpg
http://l3.zassets.com/images/z/2/3/6/1/1/9/2361193-p-MULTIVIEW.jpg
― lets just remember to blame the patriarchy for (in orbit), Thursday, 23 May 2013 15:16 (thirteen years ago)
First pair second post omo
― the late great, Thursday, 23 May 2013 16:51 (thirteen years ago)
imo
Hm yes those are definite.
http://a3.zassets.com/images/z/2/2/1/2/5/0/2212505-p-MULTIVIEW.jpg
― lets just remember to blame the patriarchy for (in orbit), Thursday, 23 May 2013 17:01 (thirteen years ago)
um orbit those suede boots are to die for
― set the controls for the heart of the sun (VegemiteGrrl), Thursday, 23 May 2013 17:19 (thirteen years ago)
I'm still freaking out about the leather frogfeet shoes
god
Having trouble deciding between those and these:
http://a3.zassets.com/images/z/2/0/4/6/6/4/2046647-p-MULTIVIEW.jpg
― lets just remember to blame the patriarchy for (in orbit), Thursday, 23 May 2013 17:23 (thirteen years ago)
hmm. the detailing on those is interesting. but also a touch more 'western' maybe? the first ones seem a little more classic.
― set the controls for the heart of the sun (VegemiteGrrl), Thursday, 23 May 2013 17:29 (thirteen years ago)
I know but the first ones aren't made of suede, they're fabric. And wider/slouchier. :( I liked them too but almost the same price for fake suede is nagl.
― lets just remember to blame the patriarchy for (in orbit), Thursday, 23 May 2013 17:31 (thirteen years ago)
oh well then #2 definitely.
― set the controls for the heart of the sun (VegemiteGrrl), Thursday, 23 May 2013 17:33 (thirteen years ago)
http://a2.zassets.com/images/z/2/1/8/3/4/1/2183413-p-MULTIVIEW.jpg
????
― lets just remember to blame the patriarchy for (in orbit), Thursday, 23 May 2013 17:48 (thirteen years ago)
Ugggghhh I took the books off my list, almost certainly won't need them by the time they arrive what with it either being summer or rainy, neither of which says "suede!"
― lets just remember to blame the patriarchy for (in orbit), Thursday, 23 May 2013 17:54 (thirteen years ago)
Erm, BOOTS.
ooh those sandals are cuuuute orbit
― set the controls for the heart of the sun (VegemiteGrrl), Thursday, 23 May 2013 17:56 (thirteen years ago)
I'm trying to buy summer shoes that aren't expensive but don't look cheap. It's difficult. If I were willing to spend $150 a pair it would be so easy.
― lets just remember to blame the patriarchy for (in orbit), Thursday, 23 May 2013 18:04 (thirteen years ago)
an eternal problem! they all look cheap because they're just straps on soles -- this is what i don't like about summer shoes! i guess i don't like minimalist shoes.
― free your spirit pig (La Lechera), Thursday, 23 May 2013 18:05 (thirteen years ago)
i think that last pair are expensive-looking
― set the controls for the heart of the sun (VegemiteGrrl), Thursday, 23 May 2013 18:09 (thirteen years ago)
Sigh. Now I'm like, what if I just bought the Crocs sandals (the cheapest) for cheaping around in, and spent the same amt I was going to spend anyway on one pair of spectator oxfords? This decision-making is ridiculous.
― lets just remember to blame the patriarchy for (in orbit), Thursday, 23 May 2013 18:11 (thirteen years ago)
re boots, I thought you were anti-beige? (I'm not).
― ljubljana, Thursday, 23 May 2013 18:12 (thirteen years ago)
http://l3.zassets.com/images/z/2/2/1/1/4/9/2211490-p-MULTIVIEW.jpg
Because drool.
― lets just remember to blame the patriarchy for (in orbit), Thursday, 23 May 2013 18:12 (thirteen years ago)
that's why i slob around in various old sneakers all summeri have one or two pairs of fancy summer shoes that i wear if i am getting dressed up and for all other occasions, slob city
i am not even allowed to look at shoes for a long long time, which is unfortch b/c drooooool
― free your spirit pig (La Lechera), Thursday, 23 May 2013 18:13 (thirteen years ago)
summer shoe-shopping sucks. I bought two pairs of these cheap-ass flimsy things last year and they lasted through the summer. I've glued buttons onto them now.
http://i.imgur.com/93KqcaA.jpgbut they're not really real shoes and I need some!
― kinder, Thursday, 23 May 2013 18:16 (thirteen years ago)
I'm not really a sandals person either, so what happens is every year I think, maybe THIS will be the year that I learn to love sandals! So I buy some but the straps cut my feet or give me blisters, and when it rains my wet feet slide around the slippery footbeds, and you have to keep up your pedicure, and your feet are always filthy. I should embrace the perforated oxfords 4lyfe.
― lets just remember to blame the patriarchy for (in orbit), Thursday, 23 May 2013 18:18 (thirteen years ago)
Consider the Worishofer. Very comfy, can walk for mile in 'em, pretty cheap.
― kate78, Thursday, 23 May 2013 18:18 (thirteen years ago)
downside: you absolutely cannot wear them in Europe, for there they are old lady and waitress shoes. You will be mocked by Germans.
― kate78, Thursday, 23 May 2013 18:19 (thirteen years ago)
... was gonna say tbh
― kinder, Thursday, 23 May 2013 18:20 (thirteen years ago)
Oh. Shit.
http://a2.zassets.com/images/z/2/2/3/6/4/8/2236485-p-MULTIVIEW.jpg
― lets just remember to blame the patriarchy for (in orbit), Thursday, 23 May 2013 18:20 (thirteen years ago)
yeah i was gonna say those look like hella old lady shoes except the 711 maybe!!
oxfords are always goodsometimes i feel that in summer the foot needs to breathe a little though, like with a light sneaker (keds or w/e)
― free your spirit pig (La Lechera), Thursday, 23 May 2013 18:26 (thirteen years ago)
I need shoes that go with dresses, though.
http://l4.zassets.com/images/z/2/2/1/2/5/8/2212584-p-MULTIVIEW.jpg
― lets just remember to blame the patriarchy for (in orbit), Thursday, 23 May 2013 18:27 (thirteen years ago)
I love old lady shoes and I love the Worishofers but they were already adopted by every Brooklyn girl of any means like...4 years ago? Also $75-100 isn't "pretty cheap" to me, alas.
Maybe I'll crumble and try them this year anyway.
― lets just remember to blame the patriarchy for (in orbit), Thursday, 23 May 2013 18:29 (thirteen years ago)
That last pair looks pretty sweet imo.
― sword of (seandalai), Thursday, 23 May 2013 18:31 (thirteen years ago)
I wear sneakers with dresses :-/That's what I meant about slobbin'.
Those white ones are delicate and cute.
― free your spirit pig (La Lechera), Thursday, 23 May 2013 18:33 (thirteen years ago)
An alternate view of the cap-toe ones: http://is4.revolveclothing.com/images/p/n/d/MATS-WZ50_V1.jpg
Leaning toward these I think!
― lets just remember to blame the patriarchy for (in orbit), Thursday, 23 May 2013 18:42 (thirteen years ago)
I kinda like aerosoles - they have mostly ugly stuff but then the occassional decent thing, and they are super comfy. I got red and white striped espadrilles for $50 and these cute white with black animal print no-lace sneaks fur $40
― just1n3, Thursday, 23 May 2013 19:13 (thirteen years ago)
http://stockroom.inventorymagazine.com/collections/inventory-items/products/one-star-antique-white
WANT
― the late great, Thursday, 23 May 2013 19:21 (thirteen years ago)
but oh, the anxiety of wearing converse
― the late great, Thursday, 23 May 2013 19:22 (thirteen years ago)