Waiting for a new Nirvana?, Productive or Pointless; Redux.

Message Bookmarked

Bookmark Removed

Is it pointless to be waiting for a new Nirvana to take us out of this abyss? I myself is ambivalent about this becuz there's a lot good music out there that is being ignored by lazy people who don't listen to any music outside of what's being offered by Top 40 radio, that's their loss not mine. But at the same time I do believe that bands like Super Furry Animals and Mum should be exposed to a wider audience. Another thing is that Clear Channel's dominance in radio broadcasting makes it impossible for a new Nirvana to appear on the scene.
-- MICHELINE, June 03, 2002

only if the new nirvana can be made of living seawater like tlc
-- ethan, June 03, 2002.

Something will come along, but it won't resemble Nirvana's appearance in 1991. I don't know yet who or what it will be, but the music market's primed for some kind of major upset.
And I don't have any problem with Top 40 radio. Some people just don't care as much about music as others do. Top 40 is for them. They go to a store in the mall and buy their new Celine Dion cd because they honestly don't want to hear anything "challenging".
They just want to relax with something playing in the background. No problem.
Clear Channel's monopoly is another issue altogether, though...which would give me a headache if I started ranting about it.
-- paul, June 03, 2002.

this thread is too perfect
-- ethan

I am waiting for the new Candlebox. (In short: pointless.)
-- cuba libre, June 03, 2002.

I SET THIS THREAD FREE!
-- Dan Perry, June 03, 2002.

I am the Ghost of Threads Past, Ebenezer.

― Lord Custos X, Monday, 3 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

And Lo, the LORD sayeth to the thread, "Awake and come Forth!"

― Lord Custos X, Monday, 3 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Ah, just fuck off.

― RickyT, Monday, 3 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

And while you're waiting for the new Nirvana lookout for the new VU, Doors, Smiths, Joy Division and Chuck Berry too

― Sonicred, Monday, 3 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

The correct answer is "fries"

― Dom Passantino, Monday, 3 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

two years pass...

And while you're waiting for the new Nirvana lookout for the new VU, Doors, Smiths, Joy Division and Chuck Berry too
Sure, bring the new versions of these out.
So who is the new VU, Doors, Smiths, JD and Chuck Berry?

― Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Monday, 11 October 2004 22:10 (nineteen years ago) link

there's tons of exciting new bands. go find em.

― seahorse genius (seahorse genius), Monday, 11 October 2004 22:14 (nineteen years ago) link

I doubt that if there is a "new Nirvana" that they'll sound anything like Nirvana. That's the whole point, isn't? Something fresh and different (even though they weren't). I mean, if ya really wanna invite scorn, you could say that Britney Spears was the "next" Nirvana, being that she spearheaded (pardon the pun) the wave of teen-pop that overtook mainstream airwaves just as boldly as Nirvana did with the alterna.corps. In that instance, it's already happened.

Moreover, the whole evolution of music needn't be cyclical. There doesn't have to be and there isn't necessarily going to be a "new" Beatles or VU or Ramones or Sex Pistols or Gang of Four or whomever. If you wanted to be a real cynic, you could say that in terms of rock'n'roll, it's all been done.

..which is why you should relegate that copy of Nevermind to the coaster tray and buy more Killing Joke albums, you fucking flannel-clad penguins.

― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 11 October 2004 22:28 (nineteen years ago) link

Um, not to be snippy, but your answer is a bit vague.
It's like pointing at the universe and saying "the answer is there."
Please point me in the right direction.
(xpost)

― Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Monday, 11 October 2004 22:31 (nineteen years ago) link

My answer is vague because the question is pointless. If there is going to be a next big phenomenon, chances are that it won't take the shape you expect it to nor appear when you want it to. Moreover, it needn't happen at all.

A watched pot never boils and all that. Go on with your lives. If it happens, chance are that you'll notice.

― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 11 October 2004 22:34 (nineteen years ago) link

Oh, whoops, sorry...didn't see the x-post. My point still stands, though.

― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 11 October 2004 22:34 (nineteen years ago) link

where's that quote from about "the world was waiting for the next sinatra, and they got elvis. waiting for the next elvis, they got the beatles. waiting for the next beatles, they got led zeppelin. waiting for the next zeppelin, they got the sex pistols. waiting for the next pistols, they got run dmc."

― m0stly clean (m0stly clean), Monday, 11 October 2004 22:43 (nineteen years ago) link

OTM.

In other words: it sure ain't gonna be Good Charlotte.

― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 11 October 2004 22:52 (nineteen years ago) link

that's the point i think. you can't reinvent rock with a rock band that sounds like everything before it. that's why nobody really cares about the whole "garage rock revolution".

anyways i agree.

― seahorse genius (seahorse genius), Monday, 11 October 2004 23:01 (nineteen years ago) link

"the world was waiting for the next sinatra, and they got elvis. waiting for the next elvis, they got the beatles. waiting for the next beatles, they got led zeppelin. waiting for the next zeppelin, they got the sex pistols. waiting for the next pistols, they got run dmc."
I'm gonna get that tattooed on my ass.

― Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Monday, 11 October 2004 23:25 (nineteen years ago) link

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.