The Field, "From Here We Go To Sublime"

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (294 of them)
It was a little shocking at first (isn't the Field the first Kompakt artist ever to appear on Metacritic?). But, yeah- once you see it's only gotten 8 reviews and most of the other albums have 20 or more, it makes sense.

lou, Monday, 16 April 2007 13:40 (seventeen years ago) link

Bambusbeats is crap in my opinion. I listened once and it did zero for me.

Ronan, Monday, 16 April 2007 13:48 (seventeen years ago) link

not even 'egge' or 'blauer'?! i love the percussion on it...

lex pretend, Monday, 16 April 2007 13:54 (seventeen years ago) link

"And in song-based music outside the mainstream, electronics are only specifically valorized when people figure out how to make guitar anthems with them (Radiohead), neuter them (the new Junior Boys and IDM generally), or make glorious caricatures (Daft Punk)."

yeah this is otm - no coincidence that i hate radiohead, daft punk and idm...

(j boys surely not idm? too many melodies, too much heart)

lex pretend, Monday, 16 April 2007 13:55 (seventeen years ago) link

Powell's observation is a good one, but it also sorta implies that there is correct or at least "better" way to listen to electronic dance music, that you have to be schooled to appreciate the "real" stuff. Hell, maybe that's true, but I'm sure you could make similar claims re metal, r&b, etc.

Field is much closer to ambient or IDM than techno. If you want, you can forget about "dance" completely when you listen to it, unlike, say, Gui Boratto.

Mark Rich@rdson, Monday, 16 April 2007 14:05 (seventeen years ago) link

lex do you like Adam Beyer? Bambusbeats just feels like a light & 'minimal' take on that whole late 90s loop techno thing to me. It's pleasant tho', but it's no "Live @ Weetamix" it actually feels curiously dated somehow, very low concept, very deliberately 'clubby' & not much else.

I feel like techno in general is starting to go backwards anyway, I don't mean for inspiration to go forwards, it just feels like so much stuff is retreading old ground, old ideas without any recognition in itself that it's doing it. And a lot of the kind of spacious pop-minimal (Holden, Fairmont etc) a little bit of that sounds okay... a LOT of it together starts to sound desperately empty.

fandango, Monday, 16 April 2007 14:09 (seventeen years ago) link

How does Powell's observation hold true for the Chemical Brothers/Underworld/Leftfield etc....

Or are we saying that that sort of dance crossover album, ie the one that sounded even a little bit like techno, is gone, for the moment.

Field is much closer to ambient or IDM than techno. If you want, you can forget about "dance" completely when you listen to it, unlike, say, Gui Boratto.

Not so sure about this, most of it sounds like trance music to me, with a noteworthy dollop of Bangalter.

But this thread is kind of drowning in semantics.

Ronan, Monday, 16 April 2007 14:11 (seventeen years ago) link

ah, Junior Boys... another entry on my list of "stuff I have no idea why ILM gets its panties SO twisted up about"

fandango, Monday, 16 April 2007 14:11 (seventeen years ago) link

Or are we saying that that sort of dance crossover album, ie the one that sounded even a little bit like techno, is gone, for the moment.

If it's not Ellen Allien trying to make one of these then I am truly stumped.

fandango, Monday, 16 April 2007 14:12 (seventeen years ago) link

hold on...I'm not sure I follow now.

I actually kind of agree about techno going backwards, not all of it, however I do think the "new deep" thing is a little bit like a lot of Berlin minimal producers just kinda shrugged and thought "what do we do now. clicky minimal is very popular.....hmmm. yeah I guess we make some US house, ok."

I mean the likes of Dixon aren't like trailblazers are they, they've been around for years and now are suddenly hip because the music has regressed to US house revival.

The big caveat here is that I like a lot of the stuff these people are doing.

Ronan, Monday, 16 April 2007 14:15 (seventeen years ago) link

it seems there ought to be more of this (or maybe there shouldn't be...) what with indie people still sorta interested in dance music for the time being. unless blog house is the new big beat!

xpost

artdamages, Monday, 16 April 2007 14:16 (seventeen years ago) link

that sort of BRITISH dance crossover album is pretty much missing, presumed dead for sure.

(haha I originally typed ENGLISH, but had to amend for Mylo)

(also, on preview, I agree w/Ronan)

fandango, Monday, 16 April 2007 14:21 (seventeen years ago) link

http://assets.pitchforkmedia.com/images/image/29137.thefieldfront.jpg?

artdamages, Monday, 16 April 2007 14:26 (seventeen years ago) link

Rich Tea Hawtin

fandango, Monday, 16 April 2007 14:29 (seventeen years ago) link

Repetitive Ambient Works, Part 1

christoff, Monday, 16 April 2007 15:50 (seventeen years ago) link

re: that sort of BRITISH dance crossover album is pretty much missing, presumed dead for sure.

prepare for the resurrection of Underworld

djmartian, Monday, 16 April 2007 15:57 (seventeen years ago) link

fandango i've never heard adam beyer! remember i've only actually been into/paid attention to house & techno for a few years.

lex pretend, Monday, 16 April 2007 16:17 (seventeen years ago) link

I'm still bored rigid by Bambusbeats, even the better stuff feels oddly lacking somehow :/

Matt DC, Monday, 16 April 2007 16:30 (seventeen years ago) link

That said I put the Field on while lying on the grass in the sunshine on Saturday and it worked perfectly. Still can't see myself wanting to go back to it that many times though.

Matt DC, Monday, 16 April 2007 16:31 (seventeen years ago) link

I've only listened to half of this so far, but it strikes me as much more consistent than Chromophobia.

jaymc, Monday, 16 April 2007 16:31 (seventeen years ago) link

More consistent, mellower, less fun. Watch for the Metacritic rating to not change much.

kenan, Monday, 16 April 2007 18:51 (seventeen years ago) link

"consistent" is a euphemism.

this record is good, for sure, but is it offering anything that Orbital didn't? and i have to say that all the tracks sound strikingly similar.

Cameron Octigan, Monday, 16 April 2007 22:25 (seventeen years ago) link

This has v. little to do with "dance" music. I have no idea why people are criticizing it as such.

Chromophobia did little to nothing for me as well. Pantha record is so great, tho

HPSCHD, Monday, 16 April 2007 23:30 (seventeen years ago) link

the lex needs to get a better system

creme1, Monday, 16 April 2007 23:35 (seventeen years ago) link

this seems like the whole thread, but new Apparat is very... mellow!

certainly not Duplex pt.2. kind of feels like it lacks a consistent aesthetic to glue it all together a bit, a few vocal tracks but doesn't really feel vocal driven exactly, but not 'ambient' or overly/excessively IDM/Glitch, kinda has that To Rococo Rot feel... Adult-Orientated Electronica?

I'm not sure I dig it that much (on first impressions) but I'm giving it some more listens, it's 'not bad' y'know?

fandango, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 15:18 (seventeen years ago) link

*the wrong thread

fandango, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 15:18 (seventeen years ago) link

As for the Field, after "Things Keep Falling Down" I was super excited for what would come next (and that Four Tops sample is still my favorite of his slowly revealed samples). After "Sun & Ice" my excitement for the album was at fever pitch for a while, but then at some point in the fall I played "Over the Ice" and was totally disappointed. It just didn't seem to be very dynamic (which I know was never really the case) even within its slightly tweaked repetitiveness. It just seemed to be there doing something pretty (and in the case of "Over the Ice" with some pretty great bass) but to no real effect. And that's, sadly, how the album hits me.

-- matt2, Monday, 26 March 2007 20:07 (3 weeks ago)


Wait, so the Four Tops sample is on a track that's not on this LP right?

ken taylrr, Friday, 20 April 2007 20:09 (seventeen years ago) link

Correct. It's on the track "Thought vs. Action" from the Thing Keep falling down 12". The second half of the track, which is the half that uses the Four Tops sample, is also on Total 6 as "Action."

matt2, Friday, 20 April 2007 20:23 (seventeen years ago) link

thanks!

ken taylrr, Friday, 20 April 2007 21:28 (seventeen years ago) link

one month passes...

Still #1 on Metacritic - huh? (ok it's great and stuff, but aren't we supposed to have Dylan or some unknown Brazilian at #1 usually?)

StanM, Tuesday, 19 June 2007 08:47 (sixteen years ago) link

Aye, the Metacritic score is completely banjaxed; it's cos there are only about seven reviews written about it.

I like it; it's a decent record, perhaps even a really good record, but it's, to me and my girlfriend anyway, essentially just some nice ambient. It's certainly not the perfect artistic behemoth a lot of people are talking it up as.

Scik Mouthy, Tuesday, 19 June 2007 08:58 (sixteen years ago) link

It's very Orbital/Spooky, isn't it? If it didn't remind me of them as much as it does now I think I might enjoy it even more.

StanM, Tuesday, 19 June 2007 09:15 (sixteen years ago) link

It's not (Geirism alert) melodic enough or varied enough in the beat to be too Orbital, but I know what you mean.

Scik Mouthy, Tuesday, 19 June 2007 09:17 (sixteen years ago) link

ok, not everything by Orbital or Spooky, just the general feel of things, I guess.

StanM, Tuesday, 19 June 2007 09:26 (sixteen years ago) link

five months pass...

The #1 spot has been hijacked, and rightly so:
http://www.metacritic.com/music/bests/2007.shtml

stephen, Wednesday, 21 November 2007 18:27 (sixteen years ago) link

Isn't Robert Plant & Alison Kraus #4 on Metacritic this year?
AKA, who cares about Metacritic?

Z S, Wednesday, 21 November 2007 18:30 (sixteen years ago) link

xpost, SCREENSHOT OR IT DIDNT HAPPEN

, Wednesday, 21 November 2007 18:46 (sixteen years ago) link

not saying i care much about this, or any, hierarchy of "best" albums. just pointing out that it's no longer #1 now.

stephen, Wednesday, 21 November 2007 18:47 (sixteen years ago) link

Comments section of the Field review is interesting. It kind of lays out the challenge for writers, in trying to describe why this album is good. Convince the people with the red numbers next to their comments, tell them what is special about this album and why they should care. It ain't easy!

Mark Rich@rdson, Wednesday, 21 November 2007 21:17 (sixteen years ago) link

Maybe I just don't understand it but in my opinion it should defiantly not be #1 let alone the top 10

i feel like this is probably the general feeling of 95% of metacritic's general readership.

J0rdan S., Wednesday, 21 November 2007 21:27 (sixteen years ago) link

one month passes...

iTunes (UK) has the "sound of light" EP for 79p a track right now (they've got it as a "partial album" -- don't think they realise what it is). that's an hour of music for £3.16, which strikes me as the kind of thing they'll bump upwards as soon as they realise.

just saying, like. just saying.

grimly fiendish, Wednesday, 16 January 2008 14:58 (sixteen years ago) link

one of those albums i bought, liked the first track a hell of a lot, couldn't get into the rest. have just put it on again, skipping first track and am enjoying a paw in my face a hell of a lot. think this dude should make an album without beats.

Crackle Box, Wednesday, 16 January 2008 15:09 (sixteen years ago) link

i bought "sound of light" on itunes(us) for $3.95 yesterday. "morning" and "night" are super super nice.

the leglo, Thursday, 17 January 2008 21:52 (sixteen years ago) link

"morning" is awesome; wasn't so sure about "night", actually. like "day" a lot, too.

grimly fiendish, Thursday, 17 January 2008 22:22 (sixteen years ago) link

seven months pass...

iTunes just freaked out playing Chris Brown and it sounded exactly like this album!

I know, right?, Friday, 22 August 2008 11:32 (fifteen years ago) link

haha that sounds incredible

J0rdan S., Friday, 22 August 2008 15:15 (fifteen years ago) link

three months pass...

this album is like the end of a.i., but more fun

:) Mrs Edward Cullen XD (max), Sunday, 30 November 2008 16:02 (fifteen years ago) link

two months pass...

So upon hearing some of his remix work done after 'from here we go sublime' I couldnt help but notice how homogenic and limited his sound palette is. Rumours has it that he'll be making a comeback this year. Is The Field a one-trick pony about to encounter the inevitable backlash? Or will he be able to hold up to the amount of sheer excitement provoked by this album?

Moka, Saturday, 31 January 2009 08:37 (fifteen years ago) link

I still rock this occasionally (good record to fall asleep to, oddly enough, and I mean that in a positive way), but I don't think I'd have much tolerance for more of the same.

The Reverend, Saturday, 31 January 2009 08:48 (fifteen years ago) link

do people still listen to this album? because in my ears this is the type of album that wow-ed you at first listen only to get tiring quickly.

dan138zig (Durrr Durrr Durrrrrr), Saturday, 31 January 2009 08:58 (fifteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.