origins of fear/hatred of disco

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (343 of them)
Women like it. Gay men like it. Black people like it.

The first one may be partly true (except it doesn't fit with 90s indie electronica) The other two are BULLSHIT and there is absolutely no truth in any of them!

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Friday, 8 April 2005 18:06 (nineteen years ago) link

Absolutely none? And you know this how?

Rick Massimo (Rick Massimo), Friday, 8 April 2005 18:27 (nineteen years ago) link

And while we're at it:

This thread is on day 4, and taking the thread title and mentally substituting a comma for the slash still makes me smile. Which is my problem, I guess.

Rick Massimo (Rick Massimo), Friday, 8 April 2005 18:36 (nineteen years ago) link

Geir, dude . . .

To say that there is "no truth" in the claim that gay men like disco is, um, ridiculous. I have been dancing and or DJing in gay bars in San Francisco for the last sixteen years. If the DJ puts on a disco song, people dance, end of story. So . . . . cool it. You're making yourself look silly by denying the obvious. Duh, not ALL gay men like disco and, Duh, plenty of straight people like disco (in fact I'd say it's the square office party music of choice). But neither point negates the fact that gay men be loving on some disco, ok?

Drew Daniel (Drew Daniel), Friday, 8 April 2005 18:43 (nineteen years ago) link

Drew, congrats. I think you're the first person to actually anger Geir. MECHADREW vs. MECHAGEIR. BATTLE FIGHT!

donut debonair (donut), Friday, 8 April 2005 18:54 (nineteen years ago) link

I am enjoying this discussion but I must say I don't intend any of it personally- I would prefer to be saying "claim X is ridiculous" rather than "person X is ridiculous". I've never met Geir and bear him no ill will, I just kind of balked at the proclamation that there is "no" truth in the generality that gay men like disco *as a statistical observation*- hardline completeness claims of the "it's 100% false that . . . " variety are very easy to refute- just find a counterexample and they fall right over.

Drew Daniel (Drew Daniel), Friday, 8 April 2005 19:48 (nineteen years ago) link

Amazing thread! Unfortunately, I don't think I have an electronic copy of my thesis anymore. I'm going to have to get it from the history dept at my school and retype it, which will probably be a good thing as I'll update it.

Spencer Chow in Rio, Friday, 8 April 2005 19:49 (nineteen years ago) link

Also, in my experience in the US, any vaguely 4/4 disco/house/or techno music is automatically coded as being "gay-er" than rock, hip-hop, country etc. This is an absolute fact as far as I'm concerned.

Spencer Chow in Rio, Friday, 8 April 2005 19:52 (nineteen years ago) link

spencer! you were at cal, right? just out of curiosity, who was your thesis advisor?

vahid (vahid), Friday, 8 April 2005 20:20 (nineteen years ago) link

To say that there is "no truth" in the claim that gay men like disco is, um, ridiculous.

What is absolutely untruthful is to imply that people disliking disco had anything at all to do with homophobia OR rascism.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Friday, 8 April 2005 20:41 (nineteen years ago) link

Yes Geir, the homophobia and racism were completely coincidental.

Ferlin Husky (noodle vague), Friday, 8 April 2005 20:43 (nineteen years ago) link

It seems ridiculous to dismiss the possibility of an undercurrent of bigotry in the anti-disco mentality [as GH does above] in light of the record burning(s?) in Chicago. I mean were the perpetrators of this at all conscious of how much this made them look like Nazis destroying "degenerate art"?

These Robust Cookies (Robust Cookies), Friday, 8 April 2005 20:56 (nineteen years ago) link

Also, describing it as "faggot music" is a slight giveaway.

Ferlin Husky (noodle vague), Friday, 8 April 2005 21:03 (nineteen years ago) link

Okay, maybe we are getting somewhere here. I don't think anyone is making the claim "if you dislike disco, then you are *necessarily* disliking it for racist and homophobic reasons" or "*all* people who dislike disco are racist homophobes". At least I don't think anybody was asserting that "dislikes disco" = "hates gays and blacks" tout court. I think it was more of a slippery historical claim that "some of the people who didn't like disco didn't like it because it triggered their anxiety/fear about homosexuality"etc- it was weaker claim and thus harder to refute categorically.

But . . . .

If you are looking for direct evidence of the overlap between hatred of disco, love of rock music, and homophobia, I would direct you to the cartoon illustration on the cover of the 60s garage punk reissue compilation "Back From the Grave Vol 2"- a gay man in an effeminate outfit is being spitroasted by male and female Frankenstein/Vampira ghouls, who are also burning disco albums and copies of the Village Voice- this illustration conflates gayness/new york/disco into a "all things we HATE" mixture and openly expresses the desire to torture and kill NYC disco homos, though it's unclear whether their crime is A) their bad taste, B) their gayness, or C) the circular rondelay in which sexuality and aesthetics reinforce each other. I can't find a link that has the artwork in a large enough size so you'll just have to trust me on this one. I recall flipping through records and seeing this image at 16 as a punk rock closet case teen and seeing my fears confirmed- disco was for fags, I liked punk, so I had better stay in the closet as i would rather party with the punk rock ghouls than get down with people with mustaches wearing tight white pants. Homophobia is real, and punk/rockist snobbery about disco is real, and sometimes (gasp) they even overlap. But this doesn't mean that all people who don't like disco therefore ARE homophobic. OK?

Drew Daniel (Drew Daniel), Friday, 8 April 2005 21:04 (nineteen years ago) link

yeah, I have to disagree with Geir, strongly--I've been at parties where there were gay men and straights, a mixed bag, and the disco/dance comes on and some of the less enlightened of the straight guys start muttering about that "fag shit" and all that rot, I've seen this happen. It don't happen when someone plays "Black Dog." In fact, the guy whose party I'm thinking of was the first openly gay person I was ever friends with, and he just died of AIDS up in Kentucky a little while ago ("that's what you get for doing that kind of thing," my old-fashioned parents opined when I visited them recently and told them, they don't know any better), so I'm a little sensitized to this whole thing.

edd s hurt (ddduncan), Friday, 8 April 2005 21:05 (nineteen years ago) link

To digress a little and go back upthread...

Just to refute a claim above by Xhuck.. surely, people in the midwest LOVED working on machines and technology, no doubt. But people working with machines, and people liking music that sounds machine-made isn't a one-follows-the-other type of thing, necessarily. Obviously it was with the few folks who helped get Chicago and Detroit electronic dance music off the ground, but I stress "few".

I've worked and been to many, many software programming and computer hardware companies for the last decade, and I can tell you that many of the people working there completely ABHORED any form of dance, funk, or mostly electronic music. They were all about Steve Miller, Led Zeppelin, Grateful Dead, and the holy grail, Pink Floyd. It was a common stereotype for programmers (at least in the L.A. area) to have long dark hair, have zits, and wear very large black Pink Floyd t-shirts. Rush was as "techno" as those guys got. Yet, these guys could give you full dissertations about the Fourier series, DFTs and FFTs, and any algorithms used in generating digital sound synthesis.

I think this is a city-to-city phenomenon though. To refute myself, i think about a third of the people at the Dizzee Rascal show I saw last weekend were Microsoft or Amazon employees. In fact, from first hand experience, many people at Microsoft like ELECTRONIC music, not even electronic POP music. It's pretty funny. (Then again, my first ever boss at MS turned me onto Erykah Badu.. so it depends really.)

I guess my point is.. the "Disco Sucks" dynamic and (not really detrimental, just a taste issue) the dynamic of people hating on electronic dance music differed/differs from region to region in the U.S.. L.A. certainly reacts differently than the way the folks in Detroit do, and in a different way than in NYC, etc.

donut debonair (donut), Friday, 8 April 2005 21:08 (nineteen years ago) link

Of course homophobia and racism played a part. And I wrote about that *Back From the Grave* album cover in my metal book (unfortunately, maybe, it's actually a pretty great garage-punk comp.) But I don't understand this logic: "It seems ridiculous to dismiss the possibility of an undercurrent of bigotry in the anti-disco mentality [as GH does above] in light of the record burning(s?) in Chicago. I mean were the perpetrators of this at all conscious of how much this made them look like Nazis destroying "degenerate art"?" Well, they may or may not have been aware that they'd remind people of Nazis (Dahl used to enjoy wearing little Army helmets, for whatever that's worth - he kinda looked like Radar O'Riley on *M*A*S*H* I think), but sorry, not everybody who reminds somebody of a Nazi is racist or homophobic by definition. I mean, Steve Dahl may have been racist and homophobic, and he may not have been, but I'd like to see an actual racist or homophobic slur by him before I decided for sure. Burning disco records is not *in and of itself* racist or homophobic; it's just stupid, and indicative of shitty taste -- and, as we've said before, in this case, probably a class statement. If the format of the radio station you worked for changed its format, and you lost your job because of it (which Dahl may or may not have -- I'm kinda curious, actually), you'd be pissed off too, no matter what your musical tastes. Though you probably won't build a bonfire at a baseball game over it. (Which leads to another question -- I wonder how closely they checked the LPs people brought with them to burn? By all rights, there should have been some gatekeeper saying "Isley Brothers? Nope, not disco enough" or "Okay, yeah, that Rod Stewart album has 'Do Ya Think I'm Sexy' on it; it'll do. But not that one over there with 'Maggie May' on it." I doubt that happened, though.)

xhuxk, Friday, 8 April 2005 21:19 (nineteen years ago) link

>people working with machines, and people liking music that sounds machine-made isn't a one-follows-the-other type of thing, necessarily<

Never said it was. But disco and techno are not the only musics that sound like machines! The Stooges and Black Sabbath TOTALLY sounded like machines (or at least everybody writing about them in 1969 and 1970 seemed to think they did), and the fact that they came from major industrial factory cities probably had something to do with it. Pink Floyd very *consciously* sound machine like, I think. (And of course it's all relative -- as Edd suggested, lots of disco doesn't sound like a machine at all. Lots of it just sounds like soul music.) (Or funk music, of salsa music, or flamenco music, or....rock music!)

xhuxk, Friday, 8 April 2005 21:24 (nineteen years ago) link

Really, though, disco's machine rhythm probably originates not so much from soul (well, ok, *Shaft* and *Hot Buttered Soul* and Bohannon I guess) as from the Velvet Underground and maybe the Doors (via Kraftwerk, etc), which latter are the same places the Stooges probably picked up their rhythm from. (And the Velvets got it from Bo Diddley or whatever, and Bo got it from Latin music and shave and a haircut two bits; it didn't come out of thin air, in other words.)

xhuxk, Friday, 8 April 2005 21:30 (nineteen years ago) link

Yes Geir, the homophobia and racism were completely coincidental.

There may have been some sort of confusion regarding gender roles etc, but that doesn't necessarily have to do with homphobia. I mean, I consider the idea that gay people does necessarily have to be more feminine-acting than most males a quite homophobic idea in itself.

As I said, the fact that females disliked disco probably had something to do with it. Ever since the days of Bobby Vinton and Brian Hyland, males have hated acts that have typically been popular among females. Disco was much liked by girls, and that in itself would lead a lot of males to hate it. That doesn't have anything to do with homophobia though, in fact, I think most of those who disliked disco strongly didn't even know, in the late 70s, that gay people were more likely to enjoy disco than others were.

Still, most of all I react towards the idea that resistance against disco was rascist. First of all, disco wasn't really black music. It may have been based on black music (rock'n'roll originally was too), but most of the songwriters/producers behind disco were indeed just as white as most rock acts. Plus musical taste usually doesn't have anything to do with skin colour anyway.
The closest thing to rascist that the resistance against disco may have been is the fact that a lot of people would be very sceptic towards any kind of popular music that didn't originate from English speaking countries, and when people hated disco (European disco in particular), it may have been some kind of "rascism" against people from Germany, Netherlands, Spain or other typical disco-producing countries (Baccara's lousy English pronounciation was obviously a popular target in itself)

Still, most of all, the hatred against disco had to do with music, and you could say the entire hatred towards the increasing commercialism within the recording industry was particularly aimed at disco. The same people would usually aslo hate other "corporate" acts such as Peter Frampton, The Eagles and Fleetwood Mac though, only they weren't disco, so they didn't fit in with the anti-disco movement.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Friday, 8 April 2005 21:53 (nineteen years ago) link

XP chuck:

1) In Ben Hamper's Rivethead, he mentioned specifically that the problem with a local bar starting disco/New Wave nights (this was in the early '80s) is that nobody wanted to dance because they'd just spent an entire shift on their feet hauling truck parts and hoisting rivet guns and assembly line apparati in a noisy, clangy, factory environment -- they were just too beat to shit to dance.

2) First seeing those Back From the Grave covers in the mid '90s made me madder than anything I can remember, music-wise.

Stupornaut (natepatrin), Friday, 8 April 2005 21:54 (nineteen years ago) link

xpost
I actually wasn't making that direct a claim. I don't know if Steve Dahl was racist or homophobic or whatever, and I wasn't trying to accuse him of it. I was just saying that symbolically annihilating an entire genre of music--one that, as it was perceived, had its own culture--is the kind of gesture that makes one suspicious of what else was lurking behind it. What is that other that is being vilified and destroyed? It seems like the kind of mass spectacle that begs for that kind of analysis, and I do think that the book burnings of the 30s, while obviously not being exactly the same thing, present an important precedent and point of comparison.

These Robust Cookies (Robust Cookies), Friday, 8 April 2005 22:07 (nineteen years ago) link

I remember being embarassed that I liked some disco 'dance' songs as a little kid 'cause it was a little campy and dressed up and overtly sexual for me to be able to have it relate to any of my Sierran foothill redneck neighbors. When I moved to the Bay Area, however, the dominance of classic rock (I had been raised in a cave of sorts listening to 60's pop and rock, jazz and folk/blues) was intolerable to me. I didn't learn to like Led Zeppelin or AC/DC 'til I was almost 20. I remember going to parties in the city with my Dad and whoever was his girlfriend at the time that were very late 70's/early 80's disco and where there was an embarassing (to me) profusion of quite open homosexuals, who as I recall were all very sweet and did nothing more sinful than smoke pot in my presence. I remember being slightly annoyed 'cause I wasn't a great dancer and 'cause after a couple of years, late 70's disco was starting to feel stale, like they were doing it by the numbers. My ex-wife once remarked to me that while she was listening to punk/new wave in the late 70's/early 80's (or at least her crowd), American radio had been blaring disco/dance music so that as we got older the French were grooving on what they had missed and the Americans were going back to discover the roots of punk. I think the rockers in my junior high school were trying very hard to figure out how to be 'men' and felt very threatened by the kind of sexual openness they associated with 'the fags in the City' and their music. What's funny looking back at this was not just how black and white rock vs. disco felt to me in, say, '77 but how radio programming was very much like that then but how, as was pointed out above, once 'rock' acts made 'inauthentic' disco, or disco-flavored albums (Blondie/Stones/Queen etc...), little white suburban kids could listen to it too.

M. White (Miguelito), Friday, 8 April 2005 22:09 (nineteen years ago) link

xp Geir.

To re-hash tired old points. Only an idiot would claim that dislike for disco was exclusively motivated by sexual/racial prejudice. But only an idiot would argue that dislike for disco was never twisted up with those things. The fact that these prejudices are riddled with logical inconsistencies doesn't mean that they don't exist.

By "increasing commercialism" of the recording industry I assume you mean a perception, not a reality. Because there was this place called Tin Pan Alley and I'm pretty sure that lots of those old composer blokes wrote music purely on a commission basis so it's hard to imagine how the level of commercialism in the industry could increase.

I don't buy that the hatred had to do with music, at least if by that you mean objective formal qualities in some types of music as opposed to others. At bottom, prejudices are ideological, even if they're started from something as material and banal as losing your job. People hate disco because of what they believe it represents, not what it is.

Ferlin Husky (noodle vague), Friday, 8 April 2005 22:10 (nineteen years ago) link

By "increasing commercialism" of the recording industry I assume you mean a perception, not a reality. Because there was this place called Tin Pan Alley and I'm pretty sure that lots of those old composer blokes wrote music purely on a commission basis so it's hard to imagine how the level of commercialism in the industry could increase.

There was before The Beatles and there was after The Beatles. They brought the idea that the artist should write his own songs, have as much creative control as possibly, and try to make "art" in addition. Sure, this wasn't around during Tin Pan Alley or Brill Building, but that way of thinking was very much alive in the late 60s and early 70s. Disco was a rehash of the way things used to be in the early 60s, which provoked a lot of people.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Friday, 8 April 2005 22:15 (nineteen years ago) link

all this talk about machines, factories, class/gender/sex etc., and nobody's mentioned 'Flashdance'

dave q (listerine), Friday, 8 April 2005 22:15 (nineteen years ago) link

The Beatles didn't invent those ideas, they're Romanticism arriving in rock and roll. Like all Romantic movements, they're erroneous/deceptive. Cutting off the word art from its roots in artisanship creates a false art/craft opposition that was already outmoded in other kinds of cultural production by the time rock and roll discovered it. Mystifying the writing process, pretending that the material conditions necessary to produce and shift records is non-existent or unimportant is a wrong turn as far as aesthetics is concerned. (Not that I think the Beatles really did all those things all the time, or were solely responsible for advancing them as ideological truths.)

Anyway, if the Beatles did effect this change in the nature of the music industry (and y'know, we keep coming back to that word industry. Could use business if you prefer) they did it by being hugely commercially successful. I'm sure Art for Art's Sake exists. People only find out about it through Commerce.

Ferlin Husky (noodle vague), Friday, 8 April 2005 22:26 (nineteen years ago) link

Anyway, if the Beatles did effect this change in the nature of the music industry (and y'know, we keep coming back to that word industry. Could use business if you prefer) they did it by being hugely commercially successful. I'm sure Art for Art's Sake exists. People only find out about it through Commerce.

Well, personally, I feel like the best you can possibly achieve as an artist is if you are able to be both commercially successful and have artistic value in the same breath. From Mozart to The Beatles, the biggest acts are the ones who have managed to combine those two seemingly opposites.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Friday, 8 April 2005 22:31 (nineteen years ago) link

Why do they seem to be opposites?

Ferlin Husky (noodle vague), Friday, 8 April 2005 22:38 (nineteen years ago) link

I listen to Dahl fairly often, and my mom listened to him a lot when I was little so I did too. I don't know the man personally, and have no knowledge if he was any different in the late 70s, but I highly doubt he is homophobic or had any other, more sinister motives besides wanting to promote himself and do something crazy. yanno, what nearly every radio dj does.

()ops (()()ps), Friday, 8 April 2005 22:39 (nineteen years ago) link

Why do they seem to be opposites?

Because most hits, particularly these days, don't have artistic value.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Friday, 8 April 2005 22:45 (nineteen years ago) link

The circles are starting to hurt my head now.

Ferlin Husky (noodle vague), Friday, 8 April 2005 22:48 (nineteen years ago) link

To tie this into techno and house, dancing is seen as an activity that "real", blue collar men just don't do. If they do ever, you can be sure they don't actually want to. The south side of Chicago (where Disco Demolition took place) is comprised virtually solely of blue collar lower/lower-middle class peeps.

()ops (()()ps), Friday, 8 April 2005 22:50 (nineteen years ago) link

Yeah, and this is where the Europe/America divide is really pronounced- techno and raving (and on into garage and 2step and grime) have a distinctly working class audience and rep. The idea that working class young men "don't dance" makes total sense to an American- but in Holland or Germany or England it's another story. In fact, the dutch gabber scene was pronounced in its working class masculinity . . .

Drew Daniel (Drew Daniel), Friday, 8 April 2005 23:00 (nineteen years ago) link

There are probably small pockets in the U.S., too -- Bensonhurst, maybe, where young Italian-American post-post-Travoltas have their own gabba? Parts of Jersey? I dunno. And of course working class males often dance to country or even rock (or mosh to metal or punk). And they dance at wedding receptions to old Kool and the Gang songs. (And working class black and Hispanic males dance too, now and then!)

xhuxk, Friday, 8 April 2005 23:12 (nineteen years ago) link

yeah I have seen evidence of that type of Jersey/Bensenhurst, but doesn't it all center around going to clubs and getting laid? I mean they don't go for a guys night out of dancing. The dancing, the wearing tight shirts, the quaffed hair, it's all in order to meet women.

()ops (()()ps), Friday, 8 April 2005 23:20 (nineteen years ago) link

i don't buy the "american working class young men don't dance" line one bit. because i was one of them (from the south side of chicago, natch) and i wasn't the only one. i'm gay, but a lot of my friends are straight and we all used to go out and dance together. i think this is generational thing because techno and house were pretty huge amongst my peers. with disco it may have been another story.

freaky bitches (disco stu), Friday, 8 April 2005 23:27 (nineteen years ago) link

er....so? Dancing is less dancing when it turns into a mating ritual? Might be wrong, but I would assume that might also negate a gay disco or two. And I'm guessing Travolta probably wanted to get laid, at least at the beginning of the movie (or did he have a girlfriend? I forget.) Actually, I have no idea to what extent dancing in south Brooklyn is a means of getting laid. Some of that heavy metal gabba stuff sounds pretty fucking macho; do girls even go to those clubs?

xp

xhuxk, Friday, 8 April 2005 23:28 (nineteen years ago) link

Nothing to do with the current conversation, but...
It's funny that there's some mention of George Clinton upthread; his polemic against disco on "P-Funk (Wants to Get Funked Up)" acted as an effective disco deterrent for me for over six years. Really, Clinton stopped me from looking any further than Funk. These days, I'm out soulseeking for Abba, but y'know... I was impressionable.

Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Friday, 8 April 2005 23:31 (nineteen years ago) link

do girls even go to those clubs?

they sure do.

freaky bitches (disco stu), Friday, 8 April 2005 23:32 (nineteen years ago) link

It wasn't dancing for the sake of dancing is what I meant.
I agree that it is a generational thing, though. I'm only going on my own experience with working class guys I've known.
But don't you think the dancing styles that accompany rave/gabba are a lot more aggressive and macho than disco's?

()ops (()()ps), Friday, 8 April 2005 23:34 (nineteen years ago) link

for me, chic are one of the groups that really turn all of this "fear of disco" stuff on its head. the whole band were such consummate and tight musicians yet they got lumped in with disco (not without some strategy on their own part). my point is that they walk the rock/disco line so well. they are an example of the typical values that both rock and disco fans like in their music - to oversimplify, chops and danceability respectively - but because of the hype around disco, they pretty much sunk when it did. this says to me that the "average music fan" isn't a very discerning listener. (and yes, that sounds incredibly snobby)

xpost, no way, not when you're on ecstasy.

freaky bitches (disco stu), Friday, 8 April 2005 23:41 (nineteen years ago) link

The received wisdom is that The Disco Era was the Dawn of the Yuppies and the Reagan Era was the Victory of the Yuppies.

Replace "Yuppie" with "Religious Right."

j.lu (j.lu), Saturday, 9 April 2005 00:33 (nineteen years ago) link

And for "disco sucks" texts, does anyone know of any articles about the record burnings themselves? Presumably such articles would quote participants. Presumably they wouldn't all say brief variations on "it sucks."

j.lu (j.lu), Saturday, 9 April 2005 00:36 (nineteen years ago) link

I have heard from Chicagoans that the full chant was "Chicago rocks! Disco sucks!"

These Robust Cookies (Robust Cookies), Saturday, 9 April 2005 04:18 (nineteen years ago) link

Freaky Bitches speaks the gospel here, Chic is like gliding over a chandelier or a glass table, smooth as glass. How did they do it?

If people judge Sister Sledge by We Are Family, is it my fault they are so mistaken? Frankly I dreaded the idea of even owning that song, but there's other stuff they did with the Chic guys that is 20 times better and goes unheard and uncared about, while Donna Summer gets all the accolades. A crime!

As a child I never realized that there was a "disco sucks" phenomenon. I only knew that people seemed to be saying it was a fad, that it would not last. Maybe it was my dad that said that. I begged to differ.

This is all I plan to say on the subject of disco for quite awhile.

The Silent Disco of Glastonbury (Bimble...), Saturday, 9 April 2005 04:42 (nineteen years ago) link

I just remembered something that might be of interest.
The next time you hear Charlie Daniels Band's "The Devil Went Down to Georgia" pay close attention to whats going in the background as "The Devil" plays his part. Notice how he stops playing for a second and theres an obvious "disco-stylee" bass riff and backing very prominent in the mix for ~4 seconds. Then "johnny" starts playing and its all Country and Western Appalachian Boogie.

Lord Custos Omicron (Lord Custos Omicron), Sunday, 10 April 2005 23:03 (nineteen years ago) link

one year passes...
First of all, before you talk about what you know exactly nothing about you should do some research. The only semi intellegent post (and i do use that term loosely) i read in this whole blog was a refrence to the book by Tim Lawrence "Love Saves the Day" which is a speck in the grand sceme of things since the birth of dance and music in general but a very true story of the real and relevant movement in NYC in the decade of the 70's. Its obvious that most of the people posting on this blog are very uneducated when it comes to music in general. It seems to me with 99% of the posts on this subject were insignificant to disco and music in general. 1 fact in this whole incoherent babble was when they changed the "disco" deparpent to the "dance" department was really the most intellegent thing to do but for all of the wrong reasons. It was all dance music in the beginning and your generlizations about the culture must be because you lived in the middle of the woods or the desert (not insulting you) I love the woods and the desert. but it is more than donna summer and funkytown. I wish i had more time to explain but i I could write a 7000 page manuscript on it. Open your minds disco was founded on acceptance and love for all types of people and music

light and love

http://www.myspace.com/chr_stopher

art grant, Thursday, 11 May 2006 18:41 (seventeen years ago) link

and that's completely the best part of "devil went down to georgia," too

(almost typed "devil went down to georgio," someone do that remix plz)

xpost

bangelo (bangelo), Thursday, 11 May 2006 18:58 (seventeen years ago) link

1 fact in this whole incoherent babble

Strangely enough, your post is actually less coherent and more babbling than many posts in this thread.

Chris Bee (Cee Bee), Thursday, 11 May 2006 19:29 (seventeen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.