ILM Top 100 2000-2004: ALBUMS

Message Bookmarked

Bookmark Removed

Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1085 of them)

View Previous Page...

yikes - killiam vs. ewing really is a 'now vs. then' isn't it

― cinniblount (James Blount), Friday, 27 August 2004 16:23 (nineteen years ago) link

seriously, someone can we just auto-excelsior jess' reaction to this when the time comes?

― cinniblount (James Blount), Friday, 27 August 2004 16:25 (nineteen years ago) link

HAHAAHAHAHAHAHA! DAFT PUNK SUCKS!

(and Kid A aint much better)

― jed_ (jed), Friday, 27 August 2004 16:28 (nineteen years ago) link

(You're right, amateurist, I'm the only one to make a few negative comments on this thread, and of course I've said nothing positive on it anywhere at all. Obviously I've been so awful on this thread that it was necessary to call me out for these things.)

― Rockist_Scientist (rockist_scientist), Friday, 27 August 2004 16:32 (nineteen years ago) link

I still put forth my request to do the 90s poll, but if you want to do it, let me just suggest that we have open voting but be able to vote for more than 15 albums. And that we change 'tracks' to 'singles' and have open voting for that as well.

― The Good Dr. Bill (Andrew Unterberger), Friday, 27 August 2004 16:33 (nineteen years ago) link

Stevem's 2000-4 poll instilled the kind of hope in us white college kids that John Kerry wishes he could instill now.

― Alba (Alba), Friday, 27 August 2004 16:35 (nineteen years ago) link

omg i hadnt bothered to read the rhead comments before now!!

― artiste (artiste), Friday, 27 August 2004 16:37 (nineteen years ago) link

Who is Richard Killiam?

― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Friday, 27 August 2004 16:37 (nineteen years ago) link

Problem with doing a 90's poll : we already know what will win #1 album. Perhaps we should hand the top spot to Loveless and just vote on #2-#100.

― Barry Bruner (Barry Bruner), Friday, 27 August 2004 16:38 (nineteen years ago) link

Are you implying that it's Loveless that's a shoe-in for #1?

uh...

― The Good Dr. Bill (Andrew Unterberger), Friday, 27 August 2004 16:41 (nineteen years ago) link

I would say "Remember that this is ILM" but LOOK AT THE 00 POLL HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

― VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 27 August 2004 16:42 (nineteen years ago) link

open voting in the 90s = pop vote scatters a million directions, indie vote rallies round touchstones

― artiste (artiste), Friday, 27 August 2004 16:43 (nineteen years ago) link

xp boy bands?

― bakers (thoia), Friday, 27 August 2004 16:44 (nineteen years ago) link

What else would it be?
(xpost OK Computer is no match for Loveless, except on PFM, but their points tabulation system was fucked anyway)

― Barry Bruner (Barry Bruner), Friday, 27 August 2004 16:44 (nineteen years ago) link

Loveless won the ILM poll of best record of all time, but that was a while ago.

― Alba (Alba), Friday, 27 August 2004 16:46 (nineteen years ago) link

Even beat out Britney. And I didn't vote in that one either!

― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 27 August 2004 16:47 (nineteen years ago) link

Also, after this poll people would probably not vote for it in a "Oh I don't want to be predictable in THAT way" reaction.

― VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 27 August 2004 16:53 (nineteen years ago) link

Which means that Violator goes number one and the world is made right once again!

― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 27 August 2004 16:54 (nineteen years ago) link

b..b..b..b..but to this day, writing a bad word about Loveless on ILM will get you banned for life. It's the equivalent of a hate crime in our little musical society!

― Barry Bruner (Barry Bruner), Friday, 27 August 2004 16:54 (nineteen years ago) link

I fear it would be even worse. Achtung Baby!

― Alba (Alba), Friday, 27 August 2004 16:55 (nineteen years ago) link

(xpost)
Doesn't Ned employ a gang of thugs to hunt people down in such instances?

― Barry Bruner (Barry Bruner), Friday, 27 August 2004 16:56 (nineteen years ago) link

Indeed, what constituttes an "ILM person," when many are just 'lurkers' which could be any number of people that we never see posting. So, if someone has only lurked once or twice, what are they? I say let's give those 'swing voters' a chance. If Justin Timberlake shows up too much, though, we may regret it...

-- Richard K (billycorga...), July 30th, 2004. (Richard K)

― artiste (artiste), Friday, 27 August 2004 16:56 (nineteen years ago) link

It'd still have pretty good odds, though. Definitely top five, probably top two, possibly #1.

At least there's no totally obvious #1 single...right?

― The Good Dr. Bill (Andrew Unterberger), Friday, 27 August 2004 16:57 (nineteen years ago) link

Dr. Bill, load up on guns, and bring your friends.

― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 27 August 2004 16:58 (nineteen years ago) link

Because when the light's out...

― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 27 August 2004 16:59 (nineteen years ago) link

No way.

Here?

― The Good Dr. Bill (Andrew Unterberger), Friday, 27 August 2004 16:59 (nineteen years ago) link

if ned recorded a cover of smells like teen spirit i might vote for that

― artiste (artiste), Friday, 27 August 2004 17:00 (nineteen years ago) link

Ned Raggett Reads ILM Poll Songs

― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 27 August 2004 17:01 (nineteen years ago) link

I'd like to point out the obvious point that picking the obvious critical consensus song/album as #1 is not only not a bad thing but is actually not all that surprising.

― VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 27 August 2004 17:02 (nineteen years ago) link

I'd guess "common people" would be the no. 1 single - or is this me thinking with my heart rather than my head?

― scott pl. (scott pl.), Friday, 27 August 2004 17:05 (nineteen years ago) link

STEVEM DO NOT DO THE 90S IT WILL RUIN YOUR LIFE AND EVERYONE WILL ONLY EXPLODE WITH RAGE WHEN OK COMPUTER INEVITABLY WINS AND THERE ARE FIFTEEN WILL OLDHAM ALBUMS IN THE TOP 100. OK THX BYE.

― Matt DC (Matt DC), Friday, 27 August 2004 17:06 (nineteen years ago) link

Argh, someone shoot my my crimes against the English language.

― VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 27 August 2004 17:12 (nineteen years ago) link

Attack of The The Dan Perrys

― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 27 August 2004 17:13 (nineteen years ago) link

(hee)

― VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 27 August 2004 17:15 (nineteen years ago) link

'Discovery' was my #2, 'Kid A' was my number nothing.

― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 27 August 2004 17:18 (nineteen years ago) link

Spencer, I'm hearing you say that in a French accent.

― jaymc (jaymc), Friday, 27 August 2004 17:32 (nineteen years ago) link

"Back when the biggest threat to the world seemed to be boy bands"

oh good grief . . .

― chris herrington (chris herrington), Friday, 27 August 2004 17:34 (nineteen years ago) link

WHO IS RICHARD KILLIAM?

― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Friday, 27 August 2004 17:36 (nineteen years ago) link

RICHARD KILLIAM FOR PRESIDENT (of Kickedinthecrotchia)

― VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 27 August 2004 17:37 (nineteen years ago) link

He's the new Keyser Soze.

(He's posted a few times and is a Smashing Pumpkins fan like myself. Ergo, a good egg!)

― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 27 August 2004 17:38 (nineteen years ago) link

A good egg slightly scrambled.

― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Friday, 27 August 2004 17:39 (nineteen years ago) link

I don't think he's been reading ILX for a few weeks now, but he'll be :)ed to see this thread I reckon

― comme personne (common_person), Friday, 27 August 2004 17:40 (nineteen years ago) link

Not after we get through raking him over the coals for 'oh brother' lines like that...

― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 27 August 2004 17:41 (nineteen years ago) link

I can only imagine how stupid his children will think he is when they google his name 15 years from now and find his moronic comments on Kid A. Actually the thought of that is making me feel better.

― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Friday, 27 August 2004 17:43 (nineteen years ago) link

I think his children might be too busy laughing at us for overreacting to his writing to laugh at him (also they will be saying "_Kid A_? What album is that?" because no one will remember it five years from now let alone 15 and I say that as someone who loves it).

― VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 27 August 2004 17:44 (nineteen years ago) link

TEH 'HEAD is influntial anmd GREBT and IMAGENE if you can a BAND that wuold be BETTER because I CANOT Geer!

― Gear! (Gear!), Friday, 27 August 2004 17:45 (nineteen years ago) link

I think his children might be too busy laughing at us for overreacting to his writing to laugh at him

There is much wisdom here.

― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 27 August 2004 17:46 (nineteen years ago) link

OMG, I just read that whole paragraph - it really is awful.

― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 27 August 2004 17:48 (nineteen years ago) link

I think his and Jess's comments on OPM are the only ones I actually finished reading (no offense)

― comme personne (common_person), Friday, 27 August 2004 17:48 (nineteen years ago) link

What else could (almost) everyone agree on from the past 4 years? Radiohead practically gets the crown by default, simply because nothing else remotely iconic was released.

You've gotta be kidding me.

― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 27 August 2004 17:49 (nineteen years ago) link

Skipping 985 messages at this point... Click here if you want to load them all.

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.