― jed_ (jed), Thursday, 27 July 2006 22:24 (seventeen years ago) link
― jed_ (jed), Thursday, 27 July 2006 22:26 (seventeen years ago) link
Maybe it's a sincere homage to the music/style they love, more likely it's a visual stunt to attract comments along the lines of "well aren't they cute." I don't know if I'd be more concerned about male fans who kinda got off on it, or those that didn't.
It wouldn't even be that bad a song if not for the obnoxious cheerleader-style shouting of the title. Am I supposed to take that any way other than as irony in 2006?
That the Pipettes are doing Shangri-La's impersonations on stage is almost a moot point.
That is an apology. That is what an apology sounds like. Whether it was necessary or not I don't really care, but he clearly wants to gloss over the fact that the Pipettes are pushing their image at least as hard as their songs.
― Sean Braud1s (Sean Braudis), Thursday, 27 July 2006 22:29 (seventeen years ago) link
The disappointing thing about the album is that the fellow from Go! Team is involved in the production. On paper I would really like to hear a bricabracolage skip hop girl group along the lines of the G!T but with, you know, songs and harmonies and stuff. But the way the record turned out is sooooo weedy.
― Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Thursday, 27 July 2006 22:52 (seventeen years ago) link
― youn (youn), Thursday, 27 July 2006 22:56 (seventeen years ago) link
Again, what is ironic about it?
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Thursday, 27 July 2006 22:58 (seventeen years ago) link
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Thursday, 27 July 2006 23:06 (seventeen years ago) link
― Louis Jagger (Haberdager), Thursday, 27 July 2006 23:11 (seventeen years ago) link
― jed_ (jed), Thursday, 27 July 2006 23:14 (seventeen years ago) link
― electric sound of jim [and why not] (electricsound), Thursday, 27 July 2006 23:15 (seventeen years ago) link
I was making a crass rhetorical point, get over it. It's too hot in here...
― Louis Jagger (Haberdager), Thursday, 27 July 2006 23:18 (seventeen years ago) link
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Thursday, 27 July 2006 23:30 (seventeen years ago) link
― keyth (keyth), Friday, 28 July 2006 02:10 (seventeen years ago) link
― electric sound of jim [and why not] (electricsound), Friday, 28 July 2006 02:14 (seventeen years ago) link
― kevin barking (arghargh), Friday, 28 July 2006 02:23 (seventeen years ago) link
― electric sound of jim [and why not] (electricsound), Friday, 28 July 2006 02:28 (seventeen years ago) link
INDIE
a proper pop group would have not got anything wrong. shiny shiny perfect facsimiles all the way
― The Lex (The Lex), Friday, 28 July 2006 07:10 (seventeen years ago) link
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Friday, 28 July 2006 07:16 (seventeen years ago) link
― Roughage Crew (Enrique), Friday, 28 July 2006 07:22 (seventeen years ago) link
― The Lex (The Lex), Friday, 28 July 2006 07:29 (seventeen years ago) link
The Puppini Sisters. Why on earth were you watching ITV3?!
― Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Friday, 28 July 2006 07:43 (seventeen years ago) link
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 28 July 2006 07:45 (seventeen years ago) link
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Friday, 28 July 2006 07:48 (seventeen years ago) link
cracker repeats!
― Roughage Crew (Enrique), Friday, 28 July 2006 07:48 (seventeen years ago) link
― Roughage Crew (Enrique), Friday, 28 July 2006 07:51 (seventeen years ago) link
― -- (688), Friday, 28 July 2006 08:14 (seventeen years ago) link
i dunno tim, when you say "clunky or clumsy" i just think : yes, it is those things. as for their vocals yes, i guess they sound "fine" but they're a vocal group, right? vocal groups should sound great vocally!
(i have only heard two songs - the ones on their site with videos)
― jed_ (jed), Friday, 28 July 2006 08:19 (seventeen years ago) link
― Konal Doddz (blueski), Friday, 28 July 2006 08:51 (seventeen years ago) link
― Roughage Crew (Enrique), Friday, 28 July 2006 08:51 (seventeen years ago) link
What are the perceived imperfections on "Pull Shapes?" I don't really get it. Is it really much more clunky or clumsy than, say, Bananarama?
they're a lot shoutier and 'reaching' more than Bananarama because the song seems to demand it but as they really seem only in the same league as Bananarama as singers it's not totally convincing (but still endearing perhaps).
― Konal Doddz (blueski), Friday, 28 July 2006 08:54 (seventeen years ago) link
Have you been walking around with your eyes closed for the last few months? They're everywhere!
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Friday, 28 July 2006 09:13 (seventeen years ago) link
― Roughage Crew (Enrique), Friday, 28 July 2006 09:15 (seventeen years ago) link
― Konal Doddz (blueski), Friday, 28 July 2006 09:15 (seventeen years ago) link
― Roughage Crew (Enrique), Friday, 28 July 2006 09:16 (seventeen years ago) link
In 2006, when you hear cheerleader-style shout vocals, are they immediate and relevant? Do you take them and enjoy them for what they are with no added weight from musical or cultural history? Or, do you understand them through a lens that creates a distancing effect, as in "oh isn't it funny that pop music sounded like this once and now someone is doing it again." Irony is the gap between apparent meaning and intended meaning. Am I intended to take the Pipettes at face value? Of course not. Their music and image are intended to conjure up all kinds of associations to the past, and lead me to eventually agree that they are just so cute.
― Sean Braud1s (Sean Braudis), Friday, 28 July 2006 10:36 (seventeen years ago) link
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Friday, 28 July 2006 10:48 (seventeen years ago) link
I don't understand what you mean by "immediate." What is something in pop music now that is immediate in a way the Pipettes are not? It is of no concern to me whether those vocals are *relevant*.
Do you take them and enjoy them for what they are with no added weight from musical or cultural history?
Of course not, but the same could be said for any specific style-connoting element in any contemporary cultural object. Am I supposed to find them all ironic? They seem to be more standard course now.
Or, do you understand them through a lens that creates a distancing effect, as in "oh isn't it funny that pop music sounded like this once and now someone is doing it again."
That's the thing - I don't find it funny. Was it funny when Tracey Ullman did it? I suppose the Pipettes are a little more goofy, but I don't see as that this makes them ironic. My response to them is not, "Oh, that's ironic that they are doing something with a little sort of '60s girl group style. Who would have imagined?"
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 28 July 2006 17:12 (seventeen years ago) link
I would dispute that. There are surely plenty of things with gaps between apparent and intended meaning that one would not identify as "ironic."
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 28 July 2006 17:14 (seventeen years ago) link
When I see/hear a longhaired pretty boy hammer a distorted guitar, I automatically think, "This music and image are intended to conjure up all kinds of associations to the past, and lead me to eventually agree that he is just so cool." Right?
'Cuz all musical choices must be read as meta-recursive signifiers pointing to the fact that they're pointing while also pointing to other things. Right?
God, that's exhausting...
― fuckfuckingfuckedfucker (fuckfuckingfuckedfucker), Friday, 28 July 2006 17:20 (seventeen years ago) link
Ba-dump-bump.
How come no one's laughing?
― fuckfuckingfuckedfucker (fuckfuckingfuckedfucker), Friday, 28 July 2006 17:30 (seventeen years ago) link
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 28 July 2006 17:34 (seventeen years ago) link
Retro/gimmick/kitsch novelty or no, their version of "Wuthering Heights" just gave me the biggest smile I've had in days.
― Daniel Peterson (polkaholic), Friday, 28 July 2006 17:34 (seventeen years ago) link
We can only wish the Pipettes had a "They Don't Know" on this album. There's an example of a girl group pastiche that actually works.
Re "Pull Shapes" - I think the "I like to disco/to rock & roll/to hip hop" is a key to what I don't like about this album. It's way too Spice Girls/"Wannabe." It's like they're trying their hardest to get everyone up and dancing, but everyone's just staring blankly.
― mike a (mike a), Friday, 28 July 2006 18:53 (seventeen years ago) link
― tom west (thomp), Friday, 28 July 2006 20:08 (seventeen years ago) link
― kevin barking (arghargh), Friday, 28 July 2006 20:22 (seventeen years ago) link
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 28 July 2006 20:24 (seventeen years ago) link
― kevin barking (arghargh), Friday, 28 July 2006 20:29 (seventeen years ago) link
I'm just saying that it's an approach that doesn't suit this particular project.
― mike a (mike a), Friday, 28 July 2006 20:31 (seventeen years ago) link
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 28 July 2006 20:33 (seventeen years ago) link