I consider Timberlake a truly ironic joke. His music reeks of sheer deriviative crap, and I wouldn't be arsed to sit through more than 5 minutes of it.
― uh, Monday, 3 May 2004 01:05 (twenty years ago) link
― Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Monday, 3 May 2004 01:06 (twenty years ago) link
― uh, Monday, 3 May 2004 01:07 (twenty years ago) link
"Uh," I'm interested as to why you are afraid to read the article.
― djdee2005, Monday, 3 May 2004 01:07 (twenty years ago) link
― djdee2005, Monday, 3 May 2004 01:09 (twenty years ago) link
― Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Monday, 3 May 2004 01:11 (twenty years ago) link
In any sense, I found the article to be somewhat stupid. It seems to be using one person's critique of Timberlake to represent everybody's, which is just stupid, plus the whole article is rather presumptuous about why people actually bash Timberlake in the media. It's a completely silly, elitist article, that fails to comprehend that just MAYBE the other side has a valid point.
I know I argue "rough" in here, but I would never SERIOUSLY attribute to someone a personal defect because they happened to like an artist I did. Half of my first posts were just for my own amusement.
― uh, Monday, 3 May 2004 01:13 (twenty years ago) link
― uh, Monday, 3 May 2004 01:15 (twenty years ago) link
― Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Monday, 3 May 2004 01:16 (twenty years ago) link
― uh, Monday, 3 May 2004 01:18 (twenty years ago) link
― djdee2005, Monday, 3 May 2004 01:26 (twenty years ago) link
http://www.angelfire.com/band2/slayerrobfl/images/ugly3.jpg
― uh, Monday, 3 May 2004 01:30 (twenty years ago) link
These days its boo-oooo for me.
― Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Monday, 3 May 2004 01:31 (twenty years ago) link
― djdee2005, Monday, 3 May 2004 01:34 (twenty years ago) link
― C0L1N B3CK3TT (Colin Beckett), Monday, 3 May 2004 01:36 (twenty years ago) link
― Al (sitcom), Monday, 3 May 2004 01:49 (twenty years ago) link
― C0L1N B3CK3TT (Colin Beckett), Monday, 3 May 2004 01:50 (twenty years ago) link
― Al (sitcom), Monday, 3 May 2004 01:55 (twenty years ago) link
― djdee2005, Monday, 3 May 2004 01:56 (twenty years ago) link
― Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Monday, 3 May 2004 02:06 (twenty years ago) link
― Al (sitcom), Monday, 3 May 2004 02:07 (twenty years ago) link
I realized recently, mainly because of the weird emotionally manipulative qualities of "Burn" and "Confessions part 2" that Ursher really reminds a lot of a psycho ex-roommate and I think that that's where some of my dislike of Usher is coming from.
― Al (sitcom), Monday, 3 May 2004 05:13 (twenty years ago) link
Surely performance and bringing a feeling to a song is a kind of technique all by itself. Most ppl can't evaluate or even care much for this def of technique you are talking about.
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Monday, 3 May 2004 11:05 (twenty years ago) link
― boldbury (boldbury), Monday, 3 May 2004 13:46 (twenty years ago) link
I am mainly concerned with his hypnotizing moves, though, and can't really seem to recall any of his songs that ever really moved me at the moment.
― roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Monday, 3 May 2004 13:51 (twenty years ago) link
― VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 3 May 2004 14:19 (twenty years ago) link
Also, the copy of Confessions I downloaded had Usher's cover of Phil Collins' "You'll Be In My Heart" from the Tarzan soundtrack hiding in it, which was special.
― Stuart (Stuart), Monday, 3 May 2004 14:24 (twenty years ago) link
― Al (sitcom), Monday, 3 May 2004 14:39 (twenty years ago) link
especially due to how easy it is to fix wrong notes in the studio.
Even by R&B singing standards, he sucks. I'd rather listen to a Lenny Williams or a Philip Bailey or even a Luther anyday.
― uh, Monday, 3 May 2004 15:15 (twenty years ago) link
― roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Monday, 3 May 2004 15:19 (twenty years ago) link
― uh (eetface), Monday, 3 May 2004 15:30 (twenty years ago) link
Of course that's a large piece of being a good vocalist/performer, but in a genre that's so largely focused on the vocalist, it definitely can't be the whole piece of the pie. I don't feel Usher when he sings, either. I'm not saying he's soul-less, but he sounds that way because of his dynamic-depleted singing.
― uh (eetface), Monday, 3 May 2004 15:34 (twenty years ago) link
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Monday, 3 May 2004 16:43 (twenty years ago) link
― VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 3 May 2004 16:47 (twenty years ago) link
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 3 May 2004 16:48 (twenty years ago) link
― VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 3 May 2004 16:54 (twenty years ago) link
We're getting off-topic, though. All I mentioned is that Usher was a flat, dynamicless singer. I mentioned notes being fixed in the studio to show that merely staying on pitch on recording doesn't mean you're on pitch when you sing, since the studio has helped even Anthony Kiedis sound on pitch at times.
Of course I'll get painted like technical geek now, but I don't think character is the whole piece of the pie whatsoever with an R&B performer.
I can be passionate about taking a dump, and really put my heart and soul into it, but the end result is still shit. Some genres do not require as much ability as others, but I'd prefer a more capable vocalist who has both the magic and the ability like a Lenny Williams.
What's with this overanalyzation of Usher, anyways? I could sum him up in very few words: tired, unenthused boredom.
― uh (eetface), Monday, 3 May 2004 16:57 (twenty years ago) link
for the record, I truly enjoy Alicia Keys (though I prefer her first cd.)
― uh (eetface), Monday, 3 May 2004 16:58 (twenty years ago) link
― uh (eetface), Monday, 3 May 2004 17:01 (twenty years ago) link
The direction I was taking was mocking sarcasm at you for completely misrepresenting me, hoping you would pick up on the fact that you had actually gotten my stance completely wrong.
― VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 3 May 2004 17:03 (twenty years ago) link
Christina, on the other hand, I have respect for as a singer, but I just overall dislike her music.
I want to be Alicia Key's loveslave, though.
― uh (eetface), Monday, 3 May 2004 17:06 (twenty years ago) link
― VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 3 May 2004 17:08 (twenty years ago) link
I inferred from that that you actually thought those two virtues meant a damn thing by themselves.
― uh (eetface), Monday, 3 May 2004 17:15 (twenty years ago) link
― djdee2005, Monday, 3 May 2004 17:22 (twenty years ago) link
― uh (eetface), Monday, 3 May 2004 17:26 (twenty years ago) link
On paper, he has everything: looks, voice, dancing, etc. But something about him somehow manages to make all of these qualities dull and uncharismatic. Even with him talking up his new womanizer image, there's never any sense of danger, excitement, or sexuality to his songs.
― El Diablo Robotico (Nicole), Monday, 3 May 2004 18:34 (twenty years ago) link
― VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 3 May 2004 18:46 (twenty years ago) link
― El Diablo Robotico (Nicole), Monday, 3 May 2004 18:48 (twenty years ago) link
― VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 3 May 2004 18:54 (twenty years ago) link