"xxxo" is abrasive?
― J0rdan S., Tuesday, 11 May 2010 02:48 (fourteen years ago) link
yeah - harsh tones, angular construction, awkward vocals. it abuts my ears.
― contenderizer, Tuesday, 11 May 2010 02:49 (fourteen years ago) link
get that it's being all smooth & poppy w/in the framework of her sound
not getting how "sounds like annie" and "abrasive" come into play together... other than maybe at the OG "sounds like lady gaga"
― jagger edge (The Reverend), Tuesday, 11 May 2010 02:50 (fourteen years ago) link
who is, of course, all the fuck over US pop radio
― jagger edge (The Reverend), Tuesday, 11 May 2010 02:51 (fourteen years ago) link
i was just listening thru my laptop speakers but it didn't sound that abrasive, will listen on headphones when the cdq leaks
― J0rdan S., Tuesday, 11 May 2010 02:53 (fourteen years ago) link
production is pretty abrasive. like, frantically cluttered to the point of abrasion.
― samosa gibreel, Tuesday, 11 May 2010 02:55 (fourteen years ago) link
yeah, i guess it's not much more abrasive than gaga, but gaga does a better job of making the harshness part of the pop. here the jaggedy bits stick out as obstacles. not criticizing or saying i don't like it - the more i listen the more i do. but i would place no money on this being as big as paper planes. not that i'm any kind of pop psychic.
― contenderizer, Tuesday, 11 May 2010 02:56 (fourteen years ago) link
I can't really get into anything beyond Paper Planes... she had some ultrafuckinggreat-creative-spark and then subsequently lost in on everything she made thereafter.
― kelpolaris, Tuesday, 11 May 2010 03:14 (fourteen years ago) link
this isn't really that abrasive... i mean maybe the drums? but i mean, american radio still plays new beats by swizz beatz, so idk
― J0rdan S., Tuesday, 11 May 2010 03:21 (fourteen years ago) link
there are like a gazillion pretty distorted synth lines going off every half-second
― samosa gibreel, Tuesday, 11 May 2010 03:34 (fourteen years ago) link
is it really more abrasive than david guetta beats?
― J0rdan S., Tuesday, 11 May 2010 03:57 (fourteen years ago) link
i'd say so. i don't know, what popular abrasive david guetta beats are you thinking of?
― samosa gibreel, Tuesday, 11 May 2010 04:07 (fourteen years ago) link
every single one -- i find "sexy bitch" to be incredibly loud & off putting
― J0rdan S., Tuesday, 11 May 2010 04:09 (fourteen years ago) link
i've often compared listening to david guetta to getting beat in the head w/ a sledgehammer
― J0rdan S., Tuesday, 11 May 2010 04:10 (fourteen years ago) link
so xxxo is kind of a jam in spite of her
― call all destroyer, Tuesday, 11 May 2010 04:11 (fourteen years ago) link
sexy bitch's chorus has that kinda distorted pinball synth but it's cooled by the minimal arrangement. xxxo is bursting at the seams with different sounds, drums switch up in a lot of jagged, fractured ways. it's not harsh blog house but definitely less palatable than dg. maybe not that much less, though, and i would be thrilled for it to be a hit.
― samosa gibreel, Tuesday, 11 May 2010 04:15 (fourteen years ago) link
it is pretty bloghouse
― J0rdan S., Tuesday, 11 May 2010 04:21 (fourteen years ago) link
don't really get the david guetta comparison. "sexy bitch" is loud, but in a way that's more propulsive & tense than actually abrasive. and i guess there's something harsh about the clanging synth in "i gotta feeling", but it doesn't get in the way of the pop, and there's still plenty of room in the mix. in comparison, "xxxo" is nearly noize. angsty static beats, samples of what sounds like breaking glass, a shrill edge to every element.
― contenderizer, Tuesday, 11 May 2010 04:26 (fourteen years ago) link
i'm not comparing it to "xxxo" -- just saying that i think there are things that i classify as "abrasive" that get played on american radio
― J0rdan S., Tuesday, 11 May 2010 04:28 (fourteen years ago) link
i.e. swizz beatz
― J0rdan S., Tuesday, 11 May 2010 04:29 (fourteen years ago) link
damn, I forgot about "Hit That". such a banger!
^^^^^ "tap-tap-tap that bed to the wall"!
i had no idea that "paper planes" interpolated anything, clash or wreckx-n-effect, until this thread!
― لوووووووووووووووووووول (lex pretend), Tuesday, 11 May 2010 07:10 (fourteen years ago) link
how have you never heard "Rump Shaker"?!
― jagger edge (The Reverend), Tuesday, 11 May 2010 07:12 (fourteen years ago) link
^^^
― Tape Store, Tuesday, 11 May 2010 07:13 (fourteen years ago) link
i have heard "rump shaker", i just never clocked that it was an interpolation!
i haven't heard whatever clash song it is though (neither do i have an interest in doing so)
― لوووووووووووووووووووول (lex pretend), Tuesday, 11 May 2010 07:20 (fourteen years ago) link
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ymfE1MOTXDk
― teledyldonix, Tuesday, 11 May 2010 08:55 (fourteen years ago) link
that is barely a wrecks n effect reference. "all i wanna do is" is a reference?
no one claimed ppl were RECOGNIZING the clash sample, quite the opposite; its just a super catchy track
― Gifted Unlimited Display Names Universal (deej), Monday, May 10, 2010 10:25 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
haha dude christ. Daniel already typed both choruses out, it's not like the words "all i wanna do" are the only thing they share in common, it's practically the same chorus with a couple words/sounds swapped out.
― cozen frustard (some dude), Tuesday, 11 May 2010 09:29 (fourteen years ago) link
"xxxo" is ok on first listen
why the fuck was this thread chosen for the m.i.a. revive anyway? it's pissing me off - there are a million m.i.a. threads, let mia have her space.
― لوووووووووووووووووووول (lex pretend), Tuesday, 11 May 2010 09:38 (fourteen years ago) link
blame it on the forks
― J0rdan S., Tuesday, 11 May 2010 09:39 (fourteen years ago) link
haha it was annoying me too
― just sayin, Tuesday, 11 May 2010 09:42 (fourteen years ago) link
I had completely missed the rump shaker reference until some earlier ilm thread. Man, that song is nowhere near as ubiquitous as it was in 199x.
― kkvgz, Tuesday, 11 May 2010 10:01 (fourteen years ago) link
Although I bet more people glommed onto that ref than the Clash sample.
― kkvgz, Tuesday, 11 May 2010 10:05 (fourteen years ago) link
http://www.amazon.com/Xxxo/dp/B003K3YRY4/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=dmusic&qid=1273548665&sr=8-1
This is out there in high quality.
― Davek (davek_00), Tuesday, 11 May 2010 11:08 (fourteen years ago) link
'rump shaker' was never ubiq where mia grew up
why is it a big deal that mia uses samples btw? especially when 'rump shaker' is based on two massive effing well-known hooks already for god's sake
― Greatest contributor: (history mayne), Tuesday, 11 May 2010 11:15 (fourteen years ago) link
I bet Joe Strummer would have been totally cool with MIA using Clash samples, considering how the Clash basically sampled the original New York punk rock of the Ramones to come up with their style.
― kkvgz, Tuesday, 11 May 2010 11:55 (fourteen years ago) link
er no
― Greatest contributor: (history mayne), Tuesday, 11 May 2010 12:01 (fourteen years ago) link
i mean yeah he would have been cool with her sampling him but otherwise nuh-uh
― Greatest contributor: (history mayne), Tuesday, 11 May 2010 12:02 (fourteen years ago) link
He would have been all like "Go ahead, it's yours, innit? After all, we nicked our sound from those long-haired yanks..."
― kkvgz, Tuesday, 11 May 2010 12:06 (fourteen years ago) link
"we nicked our sound from those long-haired yanks"
nah
― Greatest contributor: (history mayne), Tuesday, 11 May 2010 12:54 (fourteen years ago) link
its not a big deal that MIA samples, its just stupid that a bunch of ppl give her credit for something (still not really sure what - 'personality'??) when imo the only reason she had a hit was because of a one-track jack of an obscure song. the idea that her referencing rump shaker so obscurely that half the ppl didnt realize it was rump shaker in this thread suggests that nah it wasnt that big a deal
ive made this point already tho not sure whats so complicated about it. its a catchy-ass beat because of the music it rips from the clash
― Gifted Unlimited Display Names Universal (deej), Tuesday, 11 May 2010 13:20 (fourteen years ago) link
you're conflating two different things here: people 'give her credit' for having two albums that are critical favorites. That her sole pop hit happens to have a prominent sampled hook doesn't make her much different from a LOT of rappers.
― da croupier, Tuesday, 11 May 2010 13:43 (fourteen years ago) link
i don't get why people are always talking about run-dmc when their only top ten hit was all about fucking aerosmith
― da croupier, Tuesday, 11 May 2010 13:49 (fourteen years ago) link
Every US poster who was actively listening to the radio in 1992-1993 who didn't immediately catch the "Rump Shaker" reference needs to pay more attention to, like, EVERYTHING.
― it means "EMOTIONAL"! (HI DERE), Tuesday, 11 May 2010 14:15 (fourteen years ago) link
Um, as it was pointed out, it was BARELY A REFERENCE. Glancing, at best.
― he's always been a bit of an anti-climb Max (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Tuesday, 11 May 2010 14:17 (fourteen years ago) link
^^ really hope that's just a deej parody
― cozen frustard (some dude), Tuesday, 11 May 2010 14:18 (fourteen years ago) link
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3l3A3ALppN8
― it means "EMOTIONAL"! (HI DERE), Tuesday, 11 May 2010 14:24 (fourteen years ago) link
you're right, barely a reference
indeed. in fact, i've scrubbed the wrecks n effect line from my memory entirely.
― Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 11 May 2010 14:26 (fourteen years ago) link
now all i hear is the clash. clash, clash, clash.
Realllllly don't get the "abrasive" line on "xxxo." I'm not sure it's hit material, just hooks-wise or whatever (I also don't think she really gives a shit) but sonically it's not more jarring or irritating than half the stuff on the radio right now.
also the Rump Shaker thing is way more than "all I wanna do is," it's "all I wanna do is VERB VERB VERB and a VERB VERB! blah VERB your VERB!"
― Doctor Casino, Tuesday, 11 May 2010 14:34 (fourteen years ago) link