Paul Morley 'Words And Music' – brilliant or just trying hard?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
It's a great book, but writing that Sugarhill Gang's 'Rapper's Delight' was published in 1982. kinda fucks up the whole credibility of time line (we all know that exact year was 1979).
so, have you found any other factual mistakes in the book?

IPhantom, Friday, 22 August 2003 12:55 (twenty years ago) link

That's a bit too pedantic for me to care about.

Larcole (Nicole), Friday, 22 August 2003 13:05 (twenty years ago) link

Depends what he's trynta argue with its 1982-ness, '82 being post-'Wheels of Steel', post-disco (and 'Rapper's Delight' would've been seen as kind of novelty disco for those not in the know).

Enrique (Enrique), Friday, 22 August 2003 13:43 (twenty years ago) link

so, have you found any other factual mistakes in the book?

It is littered with spelling mistakes. However, I can't think of any examples right at this minute, and don't care enough to check.

clive (Clive), Friday, 22 August 2003 13:50 (twenty years ago) link

I assumed he was messing about with the dates for his own purposes (he does flag this rather blatantly with the White Stripes bit in 1963, does he not?).

Tim (Tim), Friday, 22 August 2003 13:51 (twenty years ago) link

I think I'm right in saying he refers to Madonna's Sex book and says it was called Erotic.

David Merryweather (DavidM), Friday, 22 August 2003 15:20 (twenty years ago) link

Perhaps he is playing with the idea of 'brilliant'.

N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 22 August 2003 15:26 (twenty years ago) link

Is this what the people who don't like sports but still want a hobby where they get to memorize stats do?

Larcole (Nicole), Friday, 22 August 2003 15:30 (twenty years ago) link

it's also interesting that sampling is art unless moby is doing it. in that case it's called stealing...

and I don't think that rapper's delight can be compared with the white sripes' little 'time trick'. it looks as a factual mistake, nothing more...

steve o, Friday, 22 August 2003 16:07 (twenty years ago) link

Talent borrows, corny indie fuxxx steal.

Larcole (Nicole), Friday, 22 August 2003 16:16 (twenty years ago) link

four months pass...
Definitive judgement:

In a Cyril Connolly way, Paul Morley is the link between Jean-Luc Godard and Richard X.

Enrique (Enrique), Monday, 5 January 2004 14:35 (twenty years ago) link

Despite his mistakes and wanking over himself wanking, he namechecks ILM, Freaky Trigger and NYPLM.

Jim Robinson (Original Miscreant), Monday, 5 January 2004 17:47 (twenty years ago) link

I have taken the book to another country and still not really read it.

Every time I accidentally dip into it it tantalizes and teases me with attractions.

the popfox, Tuesday, 6 January 2004 12:56 (twenty years ago) link

http://images.amazon.com/images/P/B00006BCPA.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg

Someone please explain how Morley can be taken seriously anymore.

Chris Ott (Chris Ott), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 15:25 (twenty years ago) link

That was a little difficult to watch.

Andy K (Andy K), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 15:29 (twenty years ago) link

'splain, please? (I recently got the Frankie Goes to Hollywood video compilation which apparently has much Morley talk on it.)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 15:32 (twenty years ago) link

(Mr.Pine-Pop-Cup, wd u call yer next record Tant'ed & Teased, phleeeese? ;)

t\'\'t (t\'\'t), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 15:33 (twenty years ago) link

I've never taken him seriously. Which is why I've enjoyed his writing/broadcasting career so much.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 15:34 (twenty years ago) link

Michael I can appreciate a modicum of put-on but the footage of him running around on stage with a hammer crosses all art/pop-art/anti-art lines into pure, childish ridiculousness.

Chris Ott (Chris Ott), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 15:40 (twenty years ago) link

Did he ever smash a watermelon?

Admittedly I didn't make it through the whole thing.

Andy K (Andy K), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 15:42 (twenty years ago) link

Michael I can appreciate a modicum of put-on but the footage of him running around on stage with a hammer crosses all art/pop-art/anti-art lines into pure, childish ridiculousness.

I've never seen this. It sounds fantastic.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 15:49 (twenty years ago) link

I saw it for 2 quid in Fopp Edinburgh. I wish I'd bought it now.

Enrique (Enrique), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 15:52 (twenty years ago) link

Fopp are doing very cheap DVDs of 80s videos with Morley commentaries.

Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 15:52 (twenty years ago) link

The hammer thing does sound good.

How about some footage of him... in a car?

Another thing about Morley is that on Worst Pop Records Ever (New Year's Day) he seemed to have expanded outwards considerably. Perhaps he had a very heavy xmas 2003?

the popfox, Tuesday, 6 January 2004 15:57 (twenty years ago) link

Fopp are doing very cheap DVDs of 80s videos with Morley commentaries.

And also (a no doubt much more expensive) one from the 70s. I've yet to watch the Morley portion, pf. I thought I'd save it for Rorty Night.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 16:07 (twenty years ago) link

I caught distant and distracted sight of that video playing in Glasgow too - but there was no sign of Morley!! I started to wonder if I'd merely foisted a load of Stranglers and Squeeze on you, criminally... decontextualized.

the popfox, Tuesday, 6 January 2004 16:14 (twenty years ago) link

I got this for Christmas, but I've found I've had the same problem as the Pinefox; I'm fascinated for three paragraphs or so and then my attention wanders, so I haven't really read it yet either.

Is the Ewing thanked in the 'End Credits' our Ewing?

Anna (Anna), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 16:37 (twenty years ago) link

As far as I know he is.

Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 16:38 (twenty years ago) link

Anna, Pine and me all confused santa then. i haven't read more than a little bit at a time, but that's probably quite postmodern or something. I did get bored of the endless 'between' constructions.

But no-one's picked up on my genius simile damnit!

Enrique (Enrique), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 16:41 (twenty years ago) link

No, no! that is not my 'problem' with it. I am not reading it not because it confuses or annoys me but because I think of it as too good to read just yet, or all at once, or too quickly, or not slowly enough, or possibly ever, until it's too late and I realize that I have 3 hours to live and while an hour is a long time even 3 of them are not going to be long enough to read this book.

But I think I can see why my earlier post may have made it look like I Couldn't Get On With It.

Probably I won't get on with some of it, because I think Morley, like Reynolds, likes too much music, and he is liable to wax and polish about things I don't won't or didn't like. But I imagine that it is still half a work of guenessis, as enough reliable informants (3?) have said so.

the slowfox, Tuesday, 6 January 2004 16:55 (twenty years ago) link

Ach, I dunno if Morley does like music, though. I was unconvinced by this line about 'the sci-fi hip-hop producers Dre, Timbaland, and the Neptunes' -- i don't think he listens to any of these producers, basically. It doesn't ring true. And the choice of things for this lists was slapdash -- the films anyway. And the copyediting is beyond bad.

Enrique (Enrique), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 16:57 (twenty years ago) link

*checks, half heartedly, dikshonari for 'guenessis'*

t\'\'t (t\'\'t), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 17:00 (twenty years ago) link

He misspelled 'Markus Guentner' but I still love him.

Andy K (Andy K), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 17:06 (twenty years ago) link

Dublin-based Phil Collins tribute act. Avoid.

Enrique (Enrique), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 17:06 (twenty years ago) link

...Y-y-yet Morley writes about 'em??

t\'\'t (t\'\'t), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 17:10 (twenty years ago) link

Fopp are doing very cheap DVDs of 80s videos with Morley commentaries.

!

This sounds fantastic.

El Diablo Robotico (Nicole), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 17:43 (twenty years ago) link

The commentaries are a separate thing rather than a commentary track but they're still good and only £3 a pop.

Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 17:47 (twenty years ago) link

So send them to me.

Andy K (Andy K), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 17:48 (twenty years ago) link

send them to him.

david. (Cozen), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 18:07 (twenty years ago) link

And a letter in your writing doesn't mean you're not dead.

Enrique (Enrique), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 18:11 (twenty years ago) link

Send them to all of us!

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 18:27 (twenty years ago) link

I would reimburse whoever bought them. With money, even.

El Diablo Robotico (Nicole), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 18:32 (twenty years ago) link

Couldn't help thinking that all that po-mo, Baudrillard, Derrida stuff is a sham, he seems far too wrapped up in oddly old fashioned 'modernist' things: technology will save us/is exciting in itself; the chapter titles; the endless rambling 'look at me manipulating language, I'm a bit like James Joyce if you really think about it' thing etc etc.

As I keep saying anytime anyone listens, Kraftwerk had been releasing records for a decade when I was born and all that New Pop/Morley Pop stuff was released before I could even have it as a memory.

The whole exercise seems more like a justification of his own love of and involvement in eighties pop and/or the eighties in general, as opposed to a genuine delve into recorded music.

But of course the book is more about the inside of his head than anything else, so all this works. To a certain degree. Even if it is a little (self-)deluded. It is also pretty great in parts and all the way through I get a sense of overwhelming excitement when I realise that this is a book to disagree with, rather than just say quitely 'you are wrong'.

And another vote for bad fact-checking etc.

Jim Robinson (Original Miscreant), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 23:34 (twenty years ago) link

Is ZTT still going?

Ian SPACK (Ian SPACK), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 00:30 (twenty years ago) link

seven months pass...
I'm selling my copy of this on ebay ( couldn't be bothered reading it) and its likely to go for a mere £3, quick, bid now! ..


http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&rd=1&item=6917888030&ssPageName=STRK:MESE:IT

jk____, Sunday, 15 August 2004 10:06 (nineteen years ago) link

It's a very good book. and not one to "disagree with" either, some people may actually find alot of his assertions to be quite valid, that's not beyond the realms of possibility.

He argues the popist case excellently.

Ronan (Ronan), Sunday, 15 August 2004 19:52 (nineteen years ago) link

He and Reynolds are incredible fucking twits. End of story, next thread please!

nanoR, Sunday, 15 August 2004 19:59 (nineteen years ago) link

are you my evil inverse twin

Ronan (Ronan), Sunday, 15 August 2004 20:02 (nineteen years ago) link

I really love this bk even when his like for something may not be 'convincing' but I don't think its that; more to do with a kaleidoscope of names he wants to get in, one after the other, so actually spending time on one or another thing - to convince the reader that he likes it- is difficult.

My single fave bit was the 'interview' with jarvis. I'm not a lists person -- but some of those were fanstatic. Above all I like it how the walls between avant-gd and pop break down.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Monday, 16 August 2004 09:54 (nineteen years ago) link

Morley is a twit, Reynolds a wit.

metalmickey, Monday, 16 August 2004 11:03 (nineteen years ago) link

"Simon Reynolds, who politely knows about everything" - brilliantly and concisely summed up.

Marcello Carlin, Monday, 16 August 2004 11:09 (nineteen years ago) link

"fanstatic" - brilliantly and concisely summed up

prima fassy (mwah), Monday, 16 August 2004 11:30 (nineteen years ago) link

thanks :)

(btw, I'm not sure that wall I'm talking abt really does break down but I'll kid myself)

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Monday, 16 August 2004 11:37 (nineteen years ago) link

i've only just noticed the outline of kylie on the front cover. that's cool!

pete b. (pete b.), Thursday, 19 August 2004 13:37 (nineteen years ago) link

just bought it this morning, shall give full verdict when i finish it. i rather hope it is a good read a i care not what songs are actually called, but i know what they are and what they're on. (you get older than 35 and the memory plays up on you with song titles. i like to refer them to the one that goes...(poor imitation) or sounds a bit like so and so. i like mr morley's work. i look forward to reading this. mind you, i enjoyed this is uncool - and remember what you all said on here about it.

frenchbloke (frenchbloke), Thursday, 19 August 2004 13:48 (nineteen years ago) link

I don't see how Reynolds is a wit if Morley ain't.

Possibly both are.

They both like too much music, or the wrong music, yet they are both important in my head.

I am still reading the Morley book. I may be about halfway through. Possibly I will finish it, one day.

the bellefox, Thursday, 19 August 2004 15:45 (nineteen years ago) link

two weeks pass...
This book is terrible.

shookout (shookout), Tuesday, 7 September 2004 18:19 (nineteen years ago) link

I finished it yesterday. I tried hard, though not brilliantly.

Mixed feelings, as usual on this subject.

But some very negative ones among them. After a while I had to accept the fact that PM was promoting and celebrating things that I deplore, and denigrating or mocking things that I like when he had anything to say about them. I came to feel that the book was a crime against pop, or beauty, and that Morley should be placed in the stocks and have rotten fruit flung at him.

Yet, in the last 30pp or so, it actually improved. The lists near the end mentioned some nice things as well as the rubbish that he had been going on about for the previous 300pp.

The final chapter was partially convincing - it makes me think: maybe PM is better as an analyst of the internet or of technology than of pop.

But it is odd how his vision is so utopian, not at all dystopian. I fear that this may be foolish, or complacent.

the chimefox, Thursday, 9 September 2004 13:47 (nineteen years ago) link

Why odd/foolish/complacent?

the neurotic awakening of s (blueski), Thursday, 9 September 2004 13:56 (nineteen years ago) link

Because the technologically enhanced future, which PM seems to be describing, could well be dangerous, destructive, frightening, cruel, painful, oppressive, and so on.

Celebrating it in his uncritical way thus feels weirdly callow.

the chimefox, Thursday, 9 September 2004 14:00 (nineteen years ago) link

"Weirdly Callow" - sounds like one of those new American acoustic folk balladeers

Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 9 September 2004 14:02 (nineteen years ago) link

I wonder about things like harpischords...when they stopped being used, or when their usage was lessened, by the arrival of the piano (I think that's the historical line but i maybe misremembering it), whether there were people who were making the exact same complaints as you are pf.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Thursday, 9 September 2004 20:29 (nineteen years ago) link

three months pass...
The copy I read was so full of typos & mistakes I thought they must be deliberate for some reason (eg '1984' by Robert Orwell)

bham, Tuesday, 4 January 2005 10:13 (nineteen years ago) link

seven months pass...
>so, have you found any other factual mistakes in the book?

"God Speed You Black Empire"...

k1, Saturday, 20 August 2005 20:01 (eighteen years ago) link

that's WAY better than the real name!

Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Saturday, 20 August 2005 20:27 (eighteen years ago) link

two years pass...

One thing I liked about this book is the way he contrives challenges or alternative contexts for himself as an excuse to go completely off the hook for several pages about something. Like the way he establishes (in his own mind) that the true test of a music writer is how they write about Metal Machine Music. Or when he decides to explain why Kraftwerk were the all time greatest, more or less as a way of persuading robot-Kylie to allow him to write her biography. It creates a much more interesting context for these rather cliched subjects than just writing about them in order to inform the reader, and gives him a huge amount of slack to indulge his exhaustive/exhausting critical fantasies. Much of which is totally ridiculous, occassionally hilarious but certainly the best music writing I've read in ages.

The Kylie in the car stuff left me cold though. Not living in a Kylie loving country I don't even know that song he keeps going on about and I skipped over most of that but I did like it when Kraftwerk appeared in their ultra sleek car. I thought that whole section was brilliantly written.

everything, Friday, 15 August 2008 17:48 (fifteen years ago) link

All those lists are a waste of space though.

everything, Friday, 15 August 2008 17:51 (fifteen years ago) link

Not living in a Kylie loving country I don't even know that song he keeps going on about

You should check it out.

energy flash gordon, Saturday, 16 August 2008 10:19 (fifteen years ago) link

weird, I had a big conversation about this book last night and searched to find it only to see someone posted seven hours ago!

The bit with Merzbow will always be my favourite bit, the way they both seem strangely dead yet weirdly alive to each other is electric, also Tortoise Millions now living, Get Ur Freak On, and yeah, kraftwerk

I know, right?, Saturday, 16 August 2008 18:00 (fifteen years ago) link

Thing is, the lists are the point of the book, they're the epicentre into which the book disappears because of the concept of city as grids and streets and everyone has their own, just as we all have our own lists and so forth. I don't know how well these lists stand up now but am pretty certain even Morley hasn't LISTened to everything on them.

Dingbod Kesterson, Monday, 18 August 2008 08:09 (fifteen years ago) link

Lists just make my eyes glaze over and my brain shrink. But maybe you are correct that the lists are the point of the book. It's hard for me agree or disagree me to say as the "point" of the book certainly eluded me. However, I skipped at least a quarter of the text and most of the lists, which makes the whole thing seem more like a mish-mash of writings - some fantastic, some (to me) unreadable such as 5 or 6 pages of similes about Welshness.

everything, Monday, 18 August 2008 19:32 (fifteen years ago) link

Oh, and to answer the original question about the editing/spelling - "Circus Soleil"?

everything, Monday, 18 August 2008 19:33 (fifteen years ago) link

one year passes...

I'm trying to read this again, but it seems so self-indulgent that I kind of want to throw my hands up at least once per page.

o. nate, Thursday, 11 February 2010 20:43 (fourteen years ago) link

Paul Morley very much in character

you live in a space battle homo cave (sic), Thursday, 11 February 2010 23:16 (fourteen years ago) link

As much as I think PM phones it in sometimes (when interviewing Bono or doing Joy Division box set notes), he is a copper bottomed genius on a good day and it doesn't seem credible that he ever would have got George Orwell's name wrong accidentally.

Doran, Friday, 12 February 2010 01:56 (fourteen years ago) link

this book is awesome if ur prepared to just skim past the extensive bits that are just retardedly obviously there to fill out wordcount or something

plaxico (I know, right?), Friday, 12 February 2010 02:16 (fourteen years ago) link

He's no bigger dick than Tony Wilson, and like wilson, he didn't care, which is his saving grace. Both him and wilson actually did something for music, rather than just reporting on it. Sometimes his writing is style over substance, but at least he's interesting as a critic. The apex of his self-indulgence was that tv prog he did on learning to be a classical composer.

Dr X O'Skeleton, Friday, 12 February 2010 12:00 (fourteen years ago) link

like wilson, he didn't care, which is his saving grace

what?

V-E-R-Y (history mayne), Friday, 12 February 2010 12:03 (fourteen years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gX4yapWJidM

Andy K, Friday, 12 February 2010 12:11 (fourteen years ago) link

PATRICK WOLF

HE. by Paul Morley

Things you can know about Patrick Wolf from reading about him on his giddy, moderately helpful Wikipedia site: his middle name is Dennis, his parents were artists and musicians, he’s 26 on June 30th 2009, he made a theremin when he was eleven, he was born in south London, he started recording songs when he was twelve, he plays a lot of instruments, he is classically trained, he’s modelled for Burberry, at 14 he joined the Leigh Bowery sourced inflammatory art pop unit Minty, at 16 he left home and school and formed a pop group dedicated to fusing white noise, dance rhythm and the pop song, he has written and performed pop music ever since, and his music is described in various ways as though it can be described by using a word, a classifying genre name, when in fact words used to name and represent his music do not need to end with “tronica” or anything like that. If there was a way to use the word “pop” and also communicate that within that word is the meaning transmitted by words like ‘dislocated’, ‘intense’, ‘convulsive’, ‘discreet’, ‘mesmeric’, ‘blow’. ‘delirium’, ‘questions’, ‘little by little suddenly’, ‘indiscreet’, ‘answers’ then he is a pop singer. He questions the relevance of traditional aesthetic categories. Watch as.

He falls in love with exactly who he wants to fall in love with.
He falls in love. With love, and then what happens, and then who knows.
He falls in.
He falls.
He.

Watch him work, play and etc in a video you might come across. He.

Permits you to watch. He. Studies himself. He. Is assembling himself right in front of you. He. Smashes his way through limited judgements of taste. He. Is detached from everything including detachment. He. Is in rude health. He. Is looking in a mirror. He. Is looking out of a mirror. He. Studies you. He. Is constantly touring. He. Screams lust and heartache into listeners ears. He. May yet shock the masses. He. Has not been brought to your attention by accident.

His tumultuous, eager, naïve, spunky, audacious, gifted, lustrous 2003 debut album was Lycanthropy. His angelic, devilish, deeply felt, defiantly different second album released in 2005 was Wind in the Wires. The third spirited, determined, sparky, album in 2007 was called The Magic Position. You might detect a trend and expect his fourth album to be released in 2009 – and The Bachelor is to be released in 2009, but the fifth album will be released in 2010, already planned, breaking the pattern, because one thing that is consistent in the way Wolf works, and the way he moves through himself to get to his destination, is that patterns are glorious, and patterns are there to be broken. He. Senses movement. He. Has toured the world more times than makes sense and felt himself spinning out of control/world weary/alarmed/sad/angry/determined/. He. Comes back to exotic English earth and makes sense of where he has been by looking for his home, his family, his music, himself, his friends, the history of everything that has made him who he is today. He. Turns this into a record, two records, and truth, beautifully, clashes with, fantastically, illusion, and he comes closer to finding the perfect savage/sensitive sonic method of announcing himself. He. Is sure of his purpose, and his fourth album is full of cosmically angled Anglo-centric purpose, and will appeal to those who love Purcell, Webern, Mingus, Joni, Barratt, Psychic TV, Morrissey, Robert Smith, Panda Bear and Mars Volta. He.

Pays microscopic attention to the texture of individual experience. He.

Has a feeling for the destroyed and for destruction itself, and in many ways such alliances, with forms of junk, and with various seductive drifters, are part of what it is he is and does, as he turns his sensitivity towards a desperate plight and transforms corrupted nature into song. He.

Has flirted with making provocative public gestures. He.
Has made a name for himself and a fool of himself and expressed concern about his usefulness and attracted enough fans to make him think its all worthwhile and decided he is serving a purpose and wandered around in a circle and worried that he was wasting his life and developed a strong will to put things right and is always anxious that the pride of improvement and liberation ends in waste and destruction.

He.

Then has to restore his balance, return to art, or himself, or a combination of the two, something serious, less trashy, fleshy and flashy, so that his life becomes a story of survivals, a series of recoveries, the coming out of conflict, the search for some kind of dignity, for some sort of sense of who he is, not because he wants the whole world to know and care who he is, but because he must know for himself.

Think of that 11 year old building a theremin and that 12 year old writing songs, when he was good he was very good, and when he was bad he was horrid, already thinking about what he is going to do with his life, and home is so sad, the sources of evil are in the house and in the family, and he starts to take joyous shots at how things ought to be. He.

Is buying his first guitar from Argos and treating it as much a sacred object as a musical instrument. He. Works out the relationship between noise and consciousness. He. Estimates the relationship between singing songs and the secret chambers of his mind. He. Is precious to himself. He.

Is 11 years old in front of a mirror playing a moog with a table lamp as a spotlight, playing at fame, famous in his own mind before he is a teenager. He.

Is picked on for playing the violin and having red hair and a choir boy voice. He.

Finds what he is looking for and then loses what he is looking for. He.

Is 13 and miming to Yoko One songs on stage with Lady Bunny and making a fanzine writing about the Pixies, the Breeders and Wendy Carols, selling “about 3 copies” but finding a purpose. He.

Is disappointed, confused, over-excited, tirelessly eclectic, writing through music his autobiography, and he is not yet 17. He.

Is provoked by the response to his hair and songs and his resolve increases. The hair is white. The make up is loud. He hangs out with performance artists. They’re unlimited. They bend and stretch and turn themselves into other beings and life is to be faced and lived and they rename themselves they appear to disappear in front of your eyes they have a temper they’re gentle and depserate they find a new position and they want your attention. He. Notices this. He’s serious. He’s sombre. He’s having the time of his life. He. Wants more. He. Falls for the danger of rhythm’s enigma. He.

Needs to be driven into the margins where he thinks he will find what he wants, where he will find clues about his personality and its needs. He.

Becomes someone something else time and time again. He.
Swerves. He. Slips. Between. Gaps. In. The. Road.

Read between the Wikipedia lines. He has been the experimental child star, emotional runaway, self-centred tearaway, generous hedonist, extreme heartbreaker, regularly heartbroken, lost and found, stricken angel, dissenting romantic, damned son, dedicated worker, tearful dreamer, planning action, celebrated artist, necessarily abstract, lysergic sage, fierce thinker, lost little boy, this charming man, shamed deserter, restless traveller, inventive composer, endlessly stressed, shadow dancer, wounded loner, wise child, occasional hermit, the cause and subject of passion . He.

Is accompanying Nan Goldin’s savagely evocative visual diary slide show The Ballad of Sexual Dependency at the Tate Modern, and his ecstatic, mystical Englishness collided/connected with and regenerated her degenerate, exposed New York-ness, the abstract relationship between his tribe, and hers, between those travelling through a certain intense, occult Lower East Side and those finding themselves in a secret night time London as if the two nervy cities are next door to each other in time and space. He. Uses music to capture the density and flavour of life, the colour, smell, sound and physical presence, in the way she uses photography. He. Is as much a documentarian as a teller of fables. He. Sees finds the truth embedded in fiction. He. Is singing on his new album with Eliza Carthy. He. And she. Create a visceral anglo-ghostly version of the Nancy Sinatra/Lee Hazlewood boy girl pop couple. He. Loves the full moon. He.

Has so much he wants to say, about what happened because of who he was and why that turned into where he ended up, and he takes refuge in song, and joins his heroes in the company of music, where he wants to be adored, and understood, and understand how art rears its head, and speak its mind. He heads, frenetically, in the direction of love, and hate, and he sings about death, and mad saints, and he is not yet 18, and no one believe that he can do this. He.
Is on his own, and he loves and hates the feeling. He. Must not die in vain. He.

Knows that he needs a new name, because pop stars always have new names, as part of the way they invent themselves, and they leave behind a banal old life they eventually realise, to their horror and/or fascination, they can never really escape. He thinks about Madonna, one name, this is me, Patrick, and he realises it’s not a great pop star name, more David than Jobriath. He. chooses Wolf. He. Is given the name by a spirit medium. He. Reads Angela Carter and he was exploring English mythology because he wasn’t interested in becoming an American creature he was English born and bred and Carter and folklore was leading him to wolves. He. Finds the name in the air around him. The skinny 17 year old told his artist friends that he was now Patrick Wolf. They laughed, “You’re more Patrick Lamb,” they said. He. Puts on a continuous show. He.

Is actually very tall indeed, too tall to hide, to slip into the margins, too tall to be the shrinking violent, and it is easy to understand why his favourite animal is a giraffe. He.

Becomes Patrick Wolf, someone else, an other, two minds inside one body, two bodies inside one mind, doubled, douibleness, which makes sense to him, because when he was six, or twelve, he felt split, between one person and one other, or maybe a few others, and now, there’s one him that buys milk and speaks to the accountant, and then there’s Patrick Wolf, the singer with third person detachment on good terms with making noise and singing about, say, sin and disturbance. He. Was making his first album as this twisted, ambitious 18 year old representing his tender, candid innocence and changing points of view through the eyes of an older, stranger, wiser person. The star struck pop fan stepped back into diseased mythical thinking, so here is this fan of Britney, and yet also Kate Bush, who responds to the seething poetic power of mythology and who has studied the music of Philip Glass, Steve Reich and Meredith Monk and loves mediaeval religious music. He.

Is a little bit Kylie and a little bit Throbbing Gristle, he’s dressed up in leather and glass, steel and membrane, skin and bone for furtive play, and thinking a little deeply about war and decay. He’s part simple glamour and meanwhile deranging his senses with the potential of sensation. He.

Loves the vivid embrace of pop stars but remembers his grandfather talking about ghouls and banshees and the grim reaper. He.

Remembers fighting, digging, yearning to find a stranger, odder, murkier Englishness that was beyond his aunties giving him tea and visiting the garden centre and watching Antiques Roadshow. That was outside Britpop and union jack guitars. Finding Thomas Hardy and Derek Jarman. He.
Stands out against the uniform grain of the Oasis age. He.

Wants to be a pop star but without losing his sense of outrage. A pop star that rattles the cage. He.

Is whether he knows it or not Adam Ant and John Donne at the same time, Madonna and Robert Louis Stevenson, MIA and Fairport Convention. Infernally fabricated Patrick in the charts and in wonderland, in tights and in ecstasy, chic and psychic, light and dark, oblique and fabulous. He.

Video: Patrick Wolf 'Vulture'

Isn’t as careful as he might be in organising this marvellous collection of possibilities.

The pop world likes the make up and hair and glittery goggles but not the dangerous obsession with forbidden passions, savages and gunpowder, the songs that are as likely to confound through form and content as comfort and console. The indie side likes the debauched fascination with madness and rhythm but not his arrival at the edges of Heat magazine. He.

Signs a deal with Universal Records, the glamour and security he’s been craving since he was a young teenager. He.
Thinks it will be a great adventure. He.
Thinks it is a sign he has been accepted. He.
Thinks he’s making an album of demented Japanese Motown pop – from the fan of Suicide/Front 242 and Sugababes/Girls Aloud – but they think he’s this years/months/weeks new thing, packaged shock, diluted mischief, perfect for the Charlotte Church Show, perfectly glamorous, a pop star they can package. He. Is, to confirm, made up of carousing pop, and dance, and the attack of a spider from mars, or a slider, or a banshee, or a tricky character, but. He is also made up of the bloodthirsty, the blasphemous, the irrational, the diabolical. He. Is energetic show business. But he. Is not always wanting to jump for joy. He. Is a showman. But he. Is dedicated to the creation of a new beauty. He.
Ends up at loggerheads with his new label. He.
Wants to experiment, to produce himself, and stay in control of his destiny, and Universal want the conventional commercial producer makeover. He.
Loses heart. He.

Would rather be poor – he surprises himself with the intensity of his response to the stalemate between label looking for the commercial obviousness and artist wanting artistic control – and homeless than give up the one thing he has that in the end he can call his own. He.
Is horrified that they try and change him. He.
Is labelled a trouble maker by the label. He decides that he will take this as a compliment as the people who think he is impossible to work with and far too precious are the kind of people who get excited about the next Kate Mehlua album. He.

Accepts that he would rather make an album he is proud of that reaches a small audience that make a single he had little to do with that is a success. He.

Leaves, or is left in the cold, by Universal, and part of the relief he feels fuels the energy, range and content of his latest album, The Bachelor, the kind of intensely personal, abrasively intimate album he could not have made as a provisional pop star on a corporate label. He. Names the label where he will release The Bachelor – and it’s conceptual and sonic partner The Conqueror – Bloody Chambers after an Angela Carter story, a darkly erotic reworking of Bluebeards Castle. The Bachelor is an album about someone recovering from a dream that became a nightmare. Wolf, nothing to hide and everything to share, sings songs about the dark, dangerous adventures he has suffered and enjoyed and resigned himself to as he crawled closer to becoming a subversive pop star, and the dawning realisation that the risks he takes to become a pop star threaten to destroy the love he has for music, and family, and friends. He.

Hasn’t the discipline to become the obedient celebrity. He.
Is doomed to think and feel and confess too much. He.
Has lived to tell the tale, but only just. He.
Is master of his own destiny, for better or worse, once more. He.
Started making the album feeling miserable and exhausted, and Tilda Swinton, as the voice of hope, as his mother, as his conscience, as his creative spirit, scolds him for being so defeatist, and he ends up, perhaps, where he began. He.
Is hopeful.

He.

Is setting out on a new journey, and everything is possible. He. Has been punished and driven to the edge of sanity, the star breakdown, the narcissistic anxiety, but has found ways to mend himself – through love and song and the love song. He.

Is once more the hyperactive 16 year old – feeling the strength and enthusiasm of when he was 16 going on 17, the tenderness and candour, brimming with wonder,the clamour inside , pleasing himself before he even thinks of an audience, distraction and stimulation closely linked in his nervous system - who writes songs to save his mortal soul and dreams of becoming a surreal pop star. The kind of gloriously persuasive surreal pop star packed with colourful complexity and musical ingenuity there isn’t much room, time or space for any more. He. Cannot stop. He.
Has no choice. He.
Has a future. He.
Will see you tomorrow. He.
Has never quite lost the feeling.
He.
Is what he is.

Paul Morely, 2009.

Main photo by entitled 'Vulture' is by Nick Thornton jones and Warren du Preez. The above live photos from Patrick's recent show at Koko by Burak Cingi, see more here.

Patrick Wolf releases The Bachelor on June 1st. Full tracklisting is as follows:

1. Kriegsspiel (Wargames)
2. Hard Times
3. Oblivion
4. The Bachelor
5. Damaris
6. Thickets
7. Count Of Casualty
8. Who Will?
9. Vulture
10. Blackdown
11. The Sun Is Often Out
12. Theseus
13. Battle
14. The Messenger

Jamie_ATP, Friday, 12 February 2010 12:15 (fourteen years ago) link

When I read the book I was so bothered by all the typos and mistakes that I started making a list of them (ironic, huh?). At the end I had a five-page list which I sent to the publishers with a copy to Morley. Never heard back from either of them but when the second edition came out they had all been corrected and there was a "thank you" to me in the acknowledgements.

anagram, Friday, 12 February 2010 12:30 (fourteen years ago) link

!!

V-E-R-Y (history mayne), Friday, 12 February 2010 12:30 (fourteen years ago) link

Snakes on a plane!

― The stickman from the hilarious "xkcd" comics, Friday, 15 August 2008 16:02 (1 year ago) Bookmark

r|t|c, Friday, 12 February 2010 12:32 (fourteen years ago) link

He.
Is taking the piss there. He.
Has made me never want to hear that album.

gotanynewsstory? (Dorianlynskey), Friday, 12 February 2010 12:36 (fourteen years ago) link

HE

Jamie_ATP, Friday, 12 February 2010 12:38 (fourteen years ago) link

He he he

gotanynewsstory? (Dorianlynskey), Friday, 12 February 2010 12:42 (fourteen years ago) link

Paul Morely, 2009.

Andy K, Friday, 12 February 2010 14:23 (fourteen years ago) link

he's also recently written sleevenotes/pr for lonelady & frankmusik. does he like the acts he writes about or is it just done for the $? something about it bothers me when he mentions the same acts in his OMM columns, or wherever else he writes for these days, like it's a new sneaky form of payola

s.rose, Tuesday, 16 February 2010 15:36 (fourteen years ago) link

lol new

Mark G, Tuesday, 16 February 2010 16:46 (fourteen years ago) link

Didn't realise PW was in Minty. That's nice.

We should have called Suzie and Bobby (NickB), Tuesday, 16 February 2010 16:50 (fourteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.