Fiery Furnaces

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (316 of them)
I still haven't managed to listen beyond track 5 on their album.

jel -- (jel), Thursday, 19 February 2004 17:50 (twenty years ago) link

the video is quite cute. i like them much better on record than live, but the show i saw was at north six in brooklyn - an irritating venue with a very unfriendly stage so perhaps it was unrepresentative.

lauren (laurenp), Thursday, 19 February 2004 17:53 (twenty years ago) link

lauren check yr email

amateur!st (amateurist), Thursday, 19 February 2004 17:54 (twenty years ago) link

RJG - go, I implore you. I have been listening to their lp to the exclusion of almost everything else for a few weeks now.

Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Thursday, 19 February 2004 19:10 (twenty years ago) link

If anyone has the new Tropical Ice-Land single on slsk, please let me know! I ordered it online, but I'm not expecting it for another week or two, and I really really really want to hear it because I love the live arrangement of the song.

Matthew Perpetua (Matthew Perpetua), Thursday, 19 February 2004 21:37 (twenty years ago) link

There's a clip of the video here.

The new version is sooooo great!

Matthew Perpetua (Matthew Perpetua), Thursday, 19 February 2004 21:39 (twenty years ago) link

What's different about the new version? Because the album version was my favorite track on that album; I think I will be resistant to any changes.

Scott, Thursday, 19 February 2004 21:44 (twenty years ago) link

It's a new arrangement. It's more up-tempo, and extremely cheerful-sounding. It's not radically different, just the same song in a different mood. It's fast, but not rocking or hard.

Matthew Perpetua (Matthew Perpetua), Thursday, 19 February 2004 21:55 (twenty years ago) link

The new version is sooooo great!

UGH IT'S AWFUL WHY DID THEY DO THAT??

jody (Jody Beth Rosen), Thursday, 19 February 2004 22:20 (twenty years ago) link

Don't go see them live, then. They play almost everything with different arrangements. I remember the live version of "Tropical Iceland" as being even faster than the single version.

Matthew Perpetua (Matthew Perpetua), Thursday, 19 February 2004 22:44 (twenty years ago) link

I have seen them live, but that was well before the album came out. I missed their last NYC show.

jody (Jody Beth Rosen), Thursday, 19 February 2004 23:18 (twenty years ago) link

RJG - go, I implore you.

OK!!

RJG (RJG), Friday, 20 February 2004 01:25 (twenty years ago) link

i might be there on tuesday!

prima fassy (mwah), Friday, 20 February 2004 20:53 (twenty years ago) link

come to glasgow, once.

cozen (Cozen), Friday, 20 February 2004 21:37 (twenty years ago) link

are you going to this, RJG?

cozen (Cozen), Saturday, 21 February 2004 14:30 (twenty years ago) link

I went!!!!!

here's what I said:

fiery furnaces were great, btw. they played 'coffee + TV' and 'baby elephant walk' and everything.
-- RJG (r_gillander...), February 22nd, 2004 1:39 AM. (RJG) (later)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

and the girl is hawt.
-- RJG (r_gillander...), February 22nd, 2004 1:40 AM. (RJG) (later)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

and the guy looks like a cross between my flatmate's boyf and a friend of mine's boyf.
-- RJG (r_gillander...), February 22nd, 2004 1:40 AM. (RJG) (later)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I write better tunes, though.
-- RJG (r_gillander...), February 22nd, 2004 1:40 AM. (RJG) (later)

RJG (RJG), Sunday, 22 February 2004 02:20 (twenty years ago) link

It's funny that this thread started with drummer talk because I really felt they could use somebody who'd just pound away, Black-Eyed Snakes-style. Maybe they don't wanna rock, who knows...

Pete Scholtes, Sunday, 22 February 2004 06:51 (twenty years ago) link

the girl is hawt

the guy looks like xander

prima fassy (mwah), Sunday, 22 February 2004 07:26 (twenty years ago) link

So he's hawt, too.

Arthur (Arthur), Sunday, 22 February 2004 07:37 (twenty years ago) link

I saw a video by them last week. the girl is 'hawt'. the music wasn't bad but I can't remember much abt it right now.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Sunday, 22 February 2004 09:26 (twenty years ago) link

the girl is hawt. thirded innit.

cozen (Cozen), Sunday, 22 February 2004 12:00 (twenty years ago) link

I am going to stick up for conventional beauty and say she is not hawt and ur all indie.

N. (nickdastoor), Sunday, 22 February 2004 14:48 (twenty years ago) link

'conventional beauty' => N are you one of those people who 'read' The sun?

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Sunday, 22 February 2004 14:54 (twenty years ago) link

Yes, yes I am.

N. (nickdastoor), Sunday, 22 February 2004 14:55 (twenty years ago) link

n. thinks nicole kidman is hawt so he is not to be trusted

jeremy jordan (cruisy), Sunday, 22 February 2004 15:05 (twenty years ago) link

I think N. just wanted her to look more like Euros Childs.

Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Sunday, 22 February 2004 15:06 (twenty years ago) link

If someone will post a picture of her then, in due course, I will give you a definitive answer.

the firefox, Sunday, 22 February 2004 15:09 (twenty years ago) link

Yes surely it is time for a picture

Silly Sailor (Andrew Thames), Sunday, 22 February 2004 15:11 (twenty years ago) link

See http://www.splendidezine.com/features/fiery/fieryhead.jpg

He looks better than that photo suggests, and she looks worse.

N. (nickdastoor), Sunday, 22 February 2004 15:14 (twenty years ago) link

They look entirely ordinary, I like that

Silly Sailor (Andrew Thames), Sunday, 22 February 2004 15:15 (twenty years ago) link

Flaming heck.

They're ugly!

the firefox, Sunday, 22 February 2004 15:18 (twenty years ago) link

that wasn't a good pic. it was too indie.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Sunday, 22 February 2004 15:20 (twenty years ago) link

Your lack of dodgy indie aesthetics when it comes to women is one of the things I most admire about you, pinefox.

N. (nickdastoor), Sunday, 22 February 2004 15:20 (twenty years ago) link

She's a woman w/a bulgy oldstyle hairdo, let's rock

Silly Sailor (Andrew Thames), Sunday, 22 February 2004 15:21 (twenty years ago) link

I am being unfair though, she is an impressive, vaguely sexual stage performer. Halfway between Cat Power and Patti Smith.

N. (nickdastoor), Sunday, 22 February 2004 15:22 (twenty years ago) link

what is this indie piss?

RJG (RJG), Sunday, 22 February 2004 15:23 (twenty years ago) link

She's called Eleanor, which I like, though the 'Friedberger' bit isn't so good. Or maybe it is, I don't know anymore.

There's another, enormous, picture here.

N. (nickdastoor), Sunday, 22 February 2004 15:27 (twenty years ago) link

She looks like someone's mom. Yawn.

anode (anode), Sunday, 22 February 2004 15:33 (twenty years ago) link

This thread has taken a VERY distressing turn.

Matthew Perpetua (Matthew Perpetua), Sunday, 22 February 2004 19:38 (twenty years ago) link

i was just about to say... the inevitable "hot or not."

lauren (laurenp), Sunday, 22 February 2004 19:58 (twenty years ago) link

It's important how bands look!

Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Sunday, 22 February 2004 20:00 (twenty years ago) link

yeah, hence the endless threads devoted to how cute/not cute basement jaxx are.

lauren (laurenp), Sunday, 22 February 2004 20:04 (twenty years ago) link

Apparently it's only really important how female musicians look, Jerry.

Matthew Perpetua (Matthew Perpetua), Sunday, 22 February 2004 20:05 (twenty years ago) link

I could swear people were talking about the surly brother.

I remember who she reminded me of. emily perkins! the little sister from 'ginger snaps'. I love that movie. more now.

cozen (Cozen), Sunday, 22 February 2004 20:08 (twenty years ago) link

we can talk about the brother's orange telecaster too! *drool*

cozen (Cozen), Sunday, 22 February 2004 20:09 (twenty years ago) link

How bands look is all part of the 'frame' of pop - the interviews, the videos, the clothes, the sleeves, the haircuts etc etc - it's all the stuff that encourages you to engage more adventurously in the imaginative world of the music.

To downplay or ignore this frame, to claim that it's all about the music, man, is one/my definition of rockism. (the fact that Basement Jaxists on ILM are so exclusively, post-Reynoldsianly, focused on the 'text' is one reason I think of them as slightly rockist [or at least nerdy] themselves.)

Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Sunday, 22 February 2004 20:10 (twenty years ago) link

A good example - I love the way that people on the Morrissey thread are very excited about the new promo photo.

Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Sunday, 22 February 2004 20:11 (twenty years ago) link

(But I guess I wasn't taking the upthread comments as sexist because I know the people involved arent sexist, and are just as likely to get worked up talking about 'who are the most beautiful soccer players?')

Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Sunday, 22 February 2004 20:13 (twenty years ago) link

What if you like both Moz and Basement Jaxx?

Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 22 February 2004 20:13 (twenty years ago) link

How bands look is all part of the 'frame' of pop - the interviews, the videos, the clothes, the sleeves, the haircuts etc etc - it's all the stuff that encourages you to engage more adventurously in the imaginative world of the music.

i'm not arguing that. it's of supreme importance. but i just find it depressing that where women in bands are concerned, the level of discussion sinks to "oog, she's purty!" or "ick, i'd never touch that!" very quickly. how exactly does this help me engage with the world of the fiery furnaces?

lauren (laurenp), Sunday, 22 February 2004 20:14 (twenty years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.