I get up, I get down....
― MaresNest, Friday, 4 September 2015 14:15 (two years ago) Permalink
What is the "v3.0" for?
― Robert Adam Gilmour, Friday, 4 September 2015 14:17 (two years ago) Permalink
I kinda wanted to start a thread (almost certainly doomed) about Prog 3.0 and the monthly Prog magazine that comes out, to see if anybody else scours it to try and extract any good modern progressive/whatever bands. So far, for me, Regal Worm, Kitten Pyramid, Cranium Pie and a few others spring to mind.
I like a lot of Prog and I enjoy reading articles about Caravan and Stackridge, but so much of the new music they cover is poor, the cover mount CDs can be particularly hilarious with amazing sub standard bedroom demo artists.
― MaresNest, Friday, September 4, 2015 8:38 AM (5 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
The announcement of the chart coincides with the annual Progressive Music Awards, at Shakespeare's Globe Theatre in London on Thursday night.Among those being honoured is founder member of Genesis Tony Banks, who will receive the 2015 Prog God Award.lol
― soref, Friday, September 4, 2015 9:55 AM (4 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
last year's winner Peter Gabriel with his Prog God Award:
*PICTUR OF PETER GARBULE*
― soref, Friday, September 4, 2015 9:58 AM (4 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
The absurdity of this chart is to be expected given an overly broad definition and the list being based solely on sales figures.
FWIW I like the new Tim Bowness record well enough although not as much as his earlier recordings, either solo or with No-Man. Top prog for me so far this year include Echolyn's I Heard You Listening and Vespero's Fitful Slumber Until 5AM.
― doug watson, Friday, September 4, 2015 10:26 AM (3 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
2016 Prog God Award - Steve Hackett2017 Prog God Award - Mike Rutherford2018 Prog God Award - Phil Collins2019 Prog God Award - Anthony Phillips2020 Prog God Award - Ray Wilson
― Fields of Fat Henry (Tom D.), Friday, September 4, 2015 10:29 AM (3 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
2021 Prog God Award - Jonathan King
― sʌxihɔːl (Ward Fowler), Friday, September 4, 2015 10:59 AM (3 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
I like a lot of Prog and I enjoy reading articles about Caravan and Stackridge, but so much of the new music they cover is poor, the cover mount CDs can be particularly hilarious with amazing sub standard bedroom demo artists.How much do you have to pay to get a track onto those covermounts anyway? Most bedroom prog guys work in IT I think so they can afford it, however much it is.
― めんどくさかった (Matt #2), Friday, September 4, 2015 11:16 AM (3 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
MaresNest i could get behind a prog 3.0 thread since this revival has been one of the more interesting musical developments over the past few years. you're totally right about how frustrating it is to sift through the new stuff since a lot of it sucks. (feel the same way about punk rock.) those low points (and there are a lot of them) are dreadful, and the high points are rarely noticed outside of place like progressiveears. it takes work to keep discovering good new stuff, and the mainstream press pretends that 'good new prog' doesn't exist, in favor of detailing every nuance of development in indie rock, metal, hip hop, and dance music, no matter how mediocre or fleeting. somehow unlike those other modes of creativity prog is defined by and dismissed because of its worst elements, or like there's a game of musical chairs going on, and prog can never have a seat at the table, or something. and then an album like the new IRON MAIDEN will come out and it's like come on people, there's something happening here!
― reggie (qualmsley), Friday, September 4, 2015 11:33 AM (2 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
I haven't heard any proof that a prog-revival is any good but I haven't been listening. The folk-rock revival that went mainstream a few years ago was sooo bad. There are songs on the radio that I can't picture without the worst hamboning (imagine the shoryuken hand configuration and alternating leg blasts to a beat)
― The Once-ler, Friday, September 4, 2015 12:11 PM (2 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
Reading the magazine is kinda interesting as it simultaneously deals with the 70s stuff, the 80s revival and the more diffuse idea of what's going on now, which takes in a reasonable amount of genres from Freak Folk to Cinematic Goth Metal, what's certain is that it's hard to tell if there is any unified kind of revival or dialogue, or perhaps that's not the point and it's just the magazine's own dialogue that is imposed on a bunch of disparate bands.
― MaresNest, Friday, September 4, 2015 12:32 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
It would be nice to have a breezy, here-check-out-this-band, youtube thread on Prog V3.0, however like punk-rock, there's the endless möbius loop of discussion about what *is* Prog? are they Prog? what does progressive music mean?
― MaresNest, Friday, September 4, 2015 12:41 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
the all-over-the-placeness of 'Prog' is a feature for me, not a bug, as with 'MOJO' and 'The Wire'. but reading 'Prog' is nowhere near the same experience as 'MOJO', 'The Wire', or even 'Uncut' -- the quality of the writing (and editing) doesn't come close to comparing; it's almost more like a lost of press releases strung together . . . but at least someone's finally acknowledging that proggy stuff is being released, and that's there's a lot of good stuff that got overlooked in the past, and collating a lot of this information in one place
i'd be into that thread . . . there've been attempts in the past i'm too busy at the moment to pull up from the archives, but not a dedicated 'rolling prog 20xx' like with psych or tompkins square. i think that would be cool. prog is so stigmatized that acknowledging its existence in and of itself feels like work, so i could very well see that thread facing an early demise of attrition
i think the stigma clouding prog in part fuels the endless mobius loop of discussion of what it *is*. aficionados proceed from a defensive posture because for whatever reason it's one of the few underdog modes of expression it's okay to pile on. just putting together for the sake of discussion a loose canon of neo-prog -- RUINS, MARS VOLTA, MEW, STEVEN WILSON, SIGUR ROS, GUAPO, RADIOHEAD, MOTORPSYCHO, BATTLES, etc. -- is potentially a fraught exercise because even people inclined to listen to prog without prejudice might take offense that a band they feel vicariously cool listening to could be considered 'prog'
― reggie (qualmsley), Friday, September 4, 2015 1:04 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
Van Der Graf Generator did 9/11
― Hammer Smashed Bagels, Friday, September 4, 2015 1:05 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
I think it's coming,All signs are very near, all signs are thatPain shall comeAnd change shall runDown through my heartAnd shake my kneesAnd now it is coming,All around is the hummingOf the World.
Too late, with my balance gone,Dead-eyed doll,I'm falling, fallingBack to where I began...
― Yul Brynner playing table tennis with a deviled kidney (imago), Friday, September 4, 2015 1:08 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
I'd have a few alterations to that neo-prog canon tbh. Generally I despise canons, though, so maybe that is accurate
― Yul Brynner playing table tennis with a deviled kidney (imago), Friday, September 4, 2015 1:09 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
Singer Steven Wilson crowned prog rock king
― anthony braxton diamond geezer (anagram), Friday, September 4, 2015 1:21 PM (55 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
So, based on this list (and especially based on that list of bestselling 21st Century prog albums)...is prog just whatever someone decides to call prog? Because I thought I knew but guess I have no idea what prog is.
― Fancy Fantasies (Old Lunch), Friday, September 4, 2015 1:39 PM (37 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
i'm with you louis, hence the "loose" in the bad pun "loose canon"
steven wilson is a king of rock period, an ENO of the now, with his own stuff, producing OPETH, and remixing reissues of KING CRIMSON, YES, JETHRO TULL, and GENTLE GIANT. i wonder when he can get any sleep
seems like they're (whoever 'they' are) are trying to pry 'prog' away as a designation for just symphonic prog and classic prog rock -- yes, floyd, crimson, supertramp -- and stretch it to fit contemporary bands who are openly emulating those bands or at least owning up to the influence of symphonic prog and classic prog rock
― reggie (qualmsley), Friday, September 4, 2015 1:43 PM (33 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
I'm going to have to post this again, aren't I?
^^^this is prog, Old Lunch. This is prog.
― Yul Brynner playing table tennis with a deviled kidney (imago), Friday, September 4, 2015 1:43 PM (33 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
THAT is prog! dan britton is a genius (birds & buildings is a pretty great band of his, too). guys like this make awesome music and it just sits there, almost totally unnoticed and unheard; there's no frisson or cachet to discovery, like there is say in the psych underground . . . which i love with equal tragic ardor, hearing the two as very much related
― reggie (qualmsley), Friday, September 4, 2015 1:53 PM (23 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
dan britton is definitely at the good-at-composing & forward-thinking end of the prog revival and i will boost him whenever i can. there's a lot of reactionary or unimaginative cheese (or, worse, instrument wank) in the neo-prog canon but if you know where to look there are also brilliant works and stuff that just wasn't being done a while back
but this is limiting ourselves just to prog qua prog - there's all sorts of progressive or modular songwriting going on across the board, whether metal, pop, avant-garde, indie, electronic or all of the above
― Yul Brynner playing table tennis with a deviled kidney (imago), Friday, September 4, 2015 1:57 PM (19 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
Yes, that sounds like what I think of as prog. I think I just may have missed the memo that definition of prog had grown to encompass the likes of Air and Faith No More and Kate Bush.
― Fancy Fantasies (Old Lunch), Friday, September 4, 2015 1:58 PM (18 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
It is kind of hilarious that Black Holes & Revelations is the 'bestselling prog album' of our time when it only has one vaguely prog song on it (tbf, more or less the greatest - and i use that term guardedly - thing that band ever did)
― Yul Brynner playing table tennis with a deviled kidney (imago), Friday, September 4, 2015 2:01 PM (15 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
i've never thought of AIR or KATE BUSH as anything other than prog or 'proggish'. david gilmour discovered kate bush, she sings on peter gabriel's 'so', and she's released 40 minute songs!
and louis you are totally right. what i'm saying is the stigma clouding 'prog' limits apprehension and appreciation of the inter-genre modular songwriting going on. all these people coming out of the prog rock closet (so to speak) helps clear up reception, i think
― reggie (qualmsley), Friday, September 4, 2015 2:03 PM (13 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
never heard Deluge Grander before and am not overly impressed tbh. far from being "forward-thinking", it sounds like it could have been made at any time since the early '70s. that's why I love Wilson, because he's doing something fresh and exciting w/the prog genre. can't hear anything remotely innovative in that clip.
― anthony braxton diamond geezer (anagram), Friday, September 4, 2015 2:05 PM (11 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
I just bought that Deluge Grander album this week along with the Birds And Buildings debut.
Where's Frogbs been? Is Algerian Goalkeeper totally gone?
― Robert Adam Gilmour, Friday, September 4, 2015 2:08 PM (8 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
is prog just whatever someone decides to call prog?
If ILM is anything to go by, yes.
― Fields of Fat Henry (Tom D.), Friday, September 4, 2015 2:09 PM (8 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
Deluge Grander is kind of subtly contemporary. It's like prime-era Canterbury-scene keyboard prog with a hefty dose of metal or indie songwriting. The innovation is in the songwriting rather than the sonics.
― Yul Brynner playing table tennis with a deviled kidney (imago), Friday, September 4, 2015 2:11 PM (6 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
And the outro is...well, if you get that far YOU'RE IN FOR A TREAT
― Yul Brynner playing table tennis with a deviled kidney (imago), Friday, September 4, 2015 2:12 PM (4 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
But you wanted forward-thinking? You wanted postmodern? You wanted completely fucking demented?
You got what you asked for.
― Yul Brynner playing table tennis with a deviled kidney (imago), Friday, September 4, 2015 2:14 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
Prog V3.0 Discussion Thread
We can move over now if we like, can some kind soul cut and paste the last bits of discussion from here? (at work and my attention to the net is spotty)
― MaresNest, Friday, September 4, 2015 2:16 PM (8 seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― Yul Brynner playing table tennis with a deviled kidney (imago), Friday, 4 September 2015 14:18 (two years ago) Permalink
― Robert Adam Gilmour, Friday, September 4, 2015 2:17 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― Yul Brynner playing table tennis with a deviled kidney (imago), Friday, 4 September 2015 14:19 (two years ago) Permalink
because idk ,Neo Prog was used in the Eighties and I can't think of a better term, it's the third act imho
― MaresNest, Friday, 4 September 2015 14:21 (two years ago) Permalink
what bands fall under prog 3.0? i remember listening to a bunch of neo-prog back in the late 90s/early 00s and it mostly sucked in retrospect, was that still part of 2.0? 2.5?
― ciderpress, Friday, 4 September 2015 14:21 (two years ago) Permalink
SYD ARTHUR is prog 3.0, no?
― reggie (qualmsley), Friday, 4 September 2015 14:27 (two years ago) Permalink
Certainly, it's just a thread title though, it doesn't have to be too stringent, it's more a way of saying that the stock is risen again, there's devoted press and which bands newish are in the (possibly) momentarily available spotlight.
― MaresNest, Friday, 4 September 2015 14:33 (two years ago) Permalink
dammit, which *newish* bands
― MaresNest, Friday, 4 September 2015 14:34 (two years ago) Permalink
there's always a bunch of prog on RYM top albums of current year chart but i don't know how much i trust that site's userbase at Prog Liking. its led me astray before
― ciderpress, Friday, 4 September 2015 14:35 (two years ago) Permalink
i think my tastes run to more Psychedelic stuff, but occasionally I'll hear an on-point progressive band that I like.
I really quite liked the Big Big Train record from a couple of years back, but I was totally amazed at the very blatant, wholesale lifting of certain very well known themes by Genesis and nobody in the press or on the net called it, which I thought was weird/interesting.
― MaresNest, Friday, 4 September 2015 14:40 (two years ago) Permalink
i enjoy that Mondo Drag record from this year, it's in just the right spot between psych and prog for my liking
― ciderpress, Friday, 4 September 2015 14:43 (two years ago) Permalink
ugh I'm sort of into this new Dear Hunter album
― the naive cockney chorus (Simon H.), Friday, 4 September 2015 16:16 (two years ago) Permalink
been wanting to check that out
i'm way into the new NATURAL SNOW BUILDINGS double
― reggie (qualmsley), Friday, 4 September 2015 16:21 (two years ago) Permalink
Prog is a hard qualifier for me anymore. In the 70s, "progressive" started out vague, but came to mean the kind of stuff that Yes, King Crimson, Genesis, Gentle Giant, etc were doing. Once that happened, backlash started, because it was obvious "progressive" was a "style" and not a state of mind. If you label stuff "prog" now, it's like you're conceding the point, and just looking for stuff that conforms to some aspect of progressive rock from the 70s. And really, if I can say a record is "psych prog", the likelihood of me actually considering it a "progressive" piece of art is slim.
So what to even call prog 3.0 then? Is it just artful, technically-interesting rock? (or is "technically interesting" merely a backhanded compliment?)
― Dominique, Friday, 4 September 2015 16:23 (two years ago) Permalink
if it doesn't have acts it's not prog
― the naive cockney chorus (Simon H.), Friday, 4 September 2015 16:28 (two years ago) Permalink
― Dominique, Friday, 4 September 2015 16:33 (two years ago) Permalink
Prog doesn't have to be Progressive any more than IDM has to be Intelligent
― MC Whistler (Noodle Vague), Friday, 4 September 2015 16:44 (two years ago) Permalink
conceding the point to whom?
"progressive" is a state of mind, though, just like "blues" and "dance" are. there's an impatience with impatience, a longing for expansiveness and discovery that's every bit as legit as wanting to shake your ass (and isn't necessarily mutually exclusive!) even while there's a respect of practice and technique, an appreciation that dumbing everything down isn't necessarily the best thing to do all the time, a longing to escape and overcome disadvantage, limitation, and doubt instead of making jokes about them or romanticizing them, and a concern about social justice that's no difference from the "punk" and "blues" states of mind
― reggie (qualmsley), Friday, 4 September 2015 16:45 (two years ago) Permalink
Anyone else a fan of the Monks of Doom? It's essentially everyone from Camper Van Beethoven except David Lowery. They existed pretty much at the same time, and when CVB broke up Lowery claimed (and since retracted) that it was because everyone else was into prog and he was into country or something. Which you can certainly hear in the last two CVB records, that push and pull, and definitely in the Monks of Doom, who have some really cool playing in the vein of ... maybe Brit folk-psych-prog is a good comparison? Plus, they recorded the occasional long suite, like this one (based on an Edward Gorey story):
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 4 September 2015 18:57 (two years ago) Permalink
that's awesome, like a missing link between COMUS and USA IS A MONSTER
― reggie (qualmsley), Friday, 4 September 2015 19:05 (two years ago) Permalink
there's an awful lot of love that's gotta make a little difference
― reggie (qualmsley), Friday, 4 September 2015 19:11 (two years ago) Permalink
disagree. This is why a "prog" chart isn't very helpful to me. I already know the Flaming Lips and Muse are popular -- what I'm after is rock music that sounds like it's trying to go places we haven't been before. I do believe this is actually what the original prog bands like Yes and King Crimson were trying to do (however close they may or may not have approached that ideal).
conceding the point to whom?
Conceding the point to people who view music through the narrow lens of "genre" and "style" -- admittedly, this is probably most people. It is *certainly* people who are trying make a lot of money from music like concert promoters and record labels. I don't concede this point.
"progressive" is a state of mind, though, just like "blues" and "dance" are.
I do agree with this, I just don't see it reflected a lot in music that gets labeled "prog". Most of the time I see that label, it's applied to new bands who sound like old ones (and are easily marketed to people who probably just want to hear the old stuff anyway). See also blues or punk for that matter. Who is the biggest "blues" artist of our generation? John Mayer. It's because he really stands for the state of mind that is the blues, right?
― Dominique, Friday, 4 September 2015 20:42 (two years ago) Permalink
good. don't ever concede that point. fuck them
i don't experience john mayer's music as touched by "blues". he's a white dude with cover model looks, unlike 99.9999% of the listening public. the biggest blues artist of our generation as far as i'm concerned is d'angelo
― reggie (qualmsley), Saturday, 5 September 2015 00:12 (two years ago) Permalink
both definitions have their uses
― brimstead, Saturday, 5 September 2015 00:14 (two years ago) Permalink
progressive rock as neverending forward moving continuum vs a style that goes in and out of fashion and gets more codified and formalized with every revivial
― brimstead, Saturday, 5 September 2015 00:17 (two years ago) Permalink
john mayer did several straight up blues albums, didn't he?
― brimstead, Saturday, 5 September 2015 00:20 (two years ago) Permalink
and by blues i mean, the style of electric blues as propagated by t-bone walker, john lee hooker muddy waters blah blah blah
― brimstead, Saturday, 5 September 2015 00:22 (two years ago) Permalink
progressive rock as music made by people who love drugs and guitars and brains and jazz and symphonies and rock music vs a basic three chord style that goes in and out of fashion and gets more codified and formalized with every revival
― reggie (qualmsley), Saturday, 5 September 2015 00:33 (two years ago) Permalink
― brimstead, Saturday, 5 September 2015 01:02 (two years ago) Permalink
sorry, i meant "both definitions of progressive rock have their uses"
― brimstead, Saturday, 5 September 2015 01:03 (two years ago) Permalink
i can't keep up with most so-called "prog" these days because way too much of it sounds like fucking starcastle to me. when i was young i hated neo-prog but god at least with the digital keys they made some token attempt to sound contemporary. yes and genesis weren't even that good in the first place that their music bears infinite retreads. the less said about elp, the better.
there are a couple of oddball groups i liked ok. jack o' the clock's "how are we doing and who will tell us?" was an interesting record. sometimes there are some okay bands at the rio fests (and even at the frank zappa festivals they have in europe)- they're usually a little short on melody, but i do find groups like "ni" and "mirthkon" entertaining. or, let's see, bangladeafy, they're not bad. accordo dei contrari had a decent record with richard sinclair guesting a couple years back. i love alamaailman vasarat, but i haven't heard any of their stuff in years.
the big problem i have with a lot of this stuff is that it seldom has vocals, and when it does have vocals, they're often not very good (i'm looking at you, motorpsycho). i like instrumental music, but there's a thin line between this and jazz fusion, which it seems like cuneiform, which was my favorite label in my '90s proghead days, has gone over to almost exclusively. if you want to do this stuff, you have to be damn good, and most of the bands that dos instrumental music well people don't necessarily think of as prog. the new jaga jazzist record is supposedly "nu jazz", whatever the hell that means. secret chiefs 3's "perichoresis" is either "experimental rock" or "arabic jazz", depending on who you ask.
genre means less than it used to, and to the extent that it does mean something, any remotely talented 21st century band is going to avoid being called "prog" like the plague, which it basically is.
― rushomancy, Saturday, 5 September 2015 09:34 (two years ago) Permalink
both you and dominique are right, basically - people like dan britton are the exceptions when it comes to those making self-conscious prog in that their music is sometimes really exciting
there is an absolute cataract of music i would call 'progressive' or 'modular' or 'unconventionally structured' or 'symphonic' that either avoids the label or combines it with a less damaging signifier (avant-garde, metal, indie, folk etc) and which essentially comprises my entire music taste
i would be very happy to assist you all in a tour of this music. somehow i suspect this thread is more for the stuff that rubber-stamps the four-letter word across its caped back. or the six-letter word now that it's ye olde, reactionary 70's-worship as well as daring plunge into the future
― Yul Brynner playing table tennis with a deviled kidney (imago), Saturday, 5 September 2015 09:56 (two years ago) Permalink
that's the thing, sometimes i feel like my music tastes haven't actually changed at all since my '90s prog-head days. the stuff i listened to used to be called "prog" and now it is called "symphonic black metal" or "nu jazz" or "chamber folk" or "abstract hip-hop" or "microhouse" or one of a thousand different things, but honestly, who the hell do the people who come up with these names think they're fooling? it ain't me.
― rushomancy, Saturday, 5 September 2015 13:06 (two years ago) Permalink
yes and genesis weren't even that good in the first place that their music bears infinite retreads.
wouldn't say the same about genesis but yes at their peak are as good as it gets, and their influence is every bit as grade-a as the beatles, stones, who, velvets, and zeppelin imo
― reggie (qualmsley), Saturday, 5 September 2015 13:34 (two years ago) Permalink
Yes are definitely up with my all-time greats. Wish there was more Art Zoyd fans.
Dominique: disagree. This is why a "prog" chart isn't very helpful to me. I already know the Flaming Lips and Muse are popular -- what I'm after is rock music that sounds like it's trying to go places we haven't been before. I do believe this is actually what the original prog bands like Yes and King Crimson were trying to do (however close they may or may not have approached that ideal).
I haven't heard everything (or even that much at all) that the early prog bands were into but I'm very sceptical when people say "(x) classical composers and (x) jazz gods done all this before". Such evaluations seem very reductive. I doubt listening to all those influences is going to get me something that makes Tormato redundant (fooking love that album).
I tend to look for prog because I like the symphonic structures, complexity, bonkers sounds, lots of odd mixtures/contrasting elements and often imaginative themes that other rock genres are less likely to use. There's a lot you can do with all that. And some of the stuff that isn't particularly ambitious or innovative is just beautifully done. Who can say that everything they like is innovative and brilliant?
Rushomancy: avoid being called "prog" like the plague, which it basically is
Don't know what you mean by this. Most of the bad/mediocre prog music for the core audience doesn't really have any larger impact, it just stays in obscurity.
― Robert Adam Gilmour, Saturday, 5 September 2015 13:36 (two years ago) Permalink
You guys should check out the Doors
― Ma$e-en-scène (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Saturday, 5 September 2015 13:40 (two years ago) Permalink
The early Emperor and Immortal albums definitely hit my prog buttons as hard as anything. Oddly enough Ihsahn said a few years ago he was trying to learn about prog but I thought they were always doing it well enough.
― Robert Adam Gilmour, Saturday, 5 September 2015 13:43 (two years ago) Permalink
"But isn't this ambition and innovation something that all music should ideally do?"
no. i think the fewer bands that have the "ambition" or "innovation" found in bands like the flaming lips and muse, the better.
here's the crux of the problem: at some point, on some level, chart music is going to be about appealing to the lowest common denominator. that's not a criticism of the charts, but "prog" music is, in theory, about the opposite of that (even if we know in practice it is more often, like any other hidebound genre, like hitting all the right cultural signifiers to appeal to a certain subgroup- here's a mellotron patch, here's a section in 7/8, etc., etc.)
that's not to say music has to be original to be good- i do really like anglagard, who on their first album lifted entire passages from schicke fuhrs frohling- or that i insist on music being original- i don't. merely that far too much of the music which proclaims itself to be "prog" these days is neither original _nor_ good.
best case scenario starting a "prog" chart is about as meaningful as when the grammys started awarding a "jazz fusion" grammy in something like 1980. as i recall, they wound up giving pat metheny a dozen grammys or so over the next decade and then quietly packing up shop.
robert: what i mean is that if you make good music, and it is stylistically "prog", you will do anything possible to avoid being labelled that, because the wider cultural assumption, which i'm starting to think is well-earned with moves like "prog" magazine, the "prog" hall of fame, etc., is that "prog" is a bad form of music. it's sort of the confederate flag of music genres.
― rushomancy, Saturday, 5 September 2015 18:21 (two years ago) Permalink
I wasn't referring to the bands in the chart but I agree with the problem of a chart, I just think the "progressive" ethic is a universal thing that can be applied to any creative medium. It's doubtful there's ever going to be the kind of constant flow of good prog like there is with something like metal (although I don't know what state the metal charts are in). Although there's a handful of Flaming Lips tracks I really enjoy.
it's sort of the confederate flag of music genres.
Hardly seems like that anymore. I would have agreed back when "shoegazing" began to stop being a dirty word but the only time I see the stigma is older fans who're still overly defensive about past abuse. Maybe it's one of the genres that gets overly associated by it's worst examples but it's a damn long way from nearly being as disrespected as nu-metal or 00s emo, I'd say even goth still has more stigma. Aside from the odd jokey sneer popping in threads probably mostly by people whose music taste was formed from the late 70s to the late 90s but younger music fans don't care about those prejudices. A lot of the newer fans seem to have come through metal, of course it's always been in metal and they're far less likely to give a shit about being uncool than indie fans.
I understand why some modern ambitious bands wouldn't want to be pigeonholed like that for the reasons they wouldn't want to be stuck with any rock music subgenre tag. Bands like Battles, Mew and Field Music (dunno if you care about these bands but they are fairly successful but not through the core audience to the extent of Steve Wilson) don't seem to mind being stuck with it as long as it doesn't dominate peoples expectations for them (Wilson even said just as much). Newer high quality Rock In Opposition type bands aren't going to resist because that's probably where their fanbase will come from in the first place.
― Robert Adam Gilmour, Saturday, 5 September 2015 19:34 (two years ago) Permalink
this constant refrain of 'of course everyone agrees 'prog' sucks' is wrong and really really stale. 'shoegaze' is a great comparison. there was a time when people considered slowdive a joke which is about as wrong as wrong can be. lots and lots of people 'get into' music in part because they are seeking shelter from the wages of being social underdogs or outcasts. the silver lining of critics turning against prog in the mid-70s and keeping that prejudice up 40 years later still is prog has become a sort of 'refuge genre' (one among many) that people can take comfort in
― reggie (qualmsley), Saturday, 5 September 2015 19:52 (two years ago) Permalink
For me the benefit that Yes (apart from one hit) and a few other big bands were a totally fresh experience for me. It felt like this big blast of energy came out of nowhere or an alternate reality where they a big band. Even though the bands were and still are famous it was near enough like exploring Projekt goth music that you never see in physical shops. Ideally I'd like this music to be very famous for the quality but never played in adverts and only relatively scant radio play. I know there are bands like that but I'm blanking on them.
― Robert Adam Gilmour, Saturday, 5 September 2015 20:27 (two years ago) Permalink
I've got mixed feelings about that Prog magazine. I find Malcolm Dome's tireless enthusiasm kind of fascinating. I like that they give long overdue coverage to lots of great bands and talk about reissues of more obscure 70s bands. But magazine cover/lead feature conservatism that plagues Mojo and Uncut is there (though not as bad as the same 10 or 15 genuine stadium filling megastars over and over again). The newer bands they tend to focus on are just too weak most of the time (and most of them just sound more like overly shiny classic rock revivalists rather than retro-proggers) when they could easily use more space on Ruins, Mew and Battles, who they have covered but it doesn't make sense that they didn't give them even more coverage. The magazine is so damn expensive too but I'm kind of tempted to get the new one now.
The best song by new band I ever heard on those cds was Fierce And The Dead with "On Vhs"http://thefierceandthedead.bandcamp.com/album/on-vhs
I quite liked "Shadow" by Touchstone, kinda poppy gothy power metal. I don't expect many of you would be into it but I thought it was fun.
But hands down the best thing I heard was The Enid, a 70s band but a new song. Amazing.
But anyway, new bands Anyone?
― Robert Adam Gilmour, Saturday, 5 September 2015 21:20 (two years ago) Permalink
Also, I'm not sure what can realistically be expected from those magazine compilations, dunno if it's a complicated thing to secure rights to good music on a regular basis. Terrorizer is a really good magazine but the few cds I heard from them were mostly average c-list extreme metal. I listened to all the Mojo, Uncut and Word compilations for a few years and most of the good music was by firmly established bands or already very successful new bands. All the newbies seemed to be Dylan and Springsteen wannabes. This was one of the compilations!https://rateyourmusic.com/release/comp/various_artists_f2/uncut_presents__fill_your_head_with_prog___11_mind_bending_classics/
― Robert Adam Gilmour, Saturday, 5 September 2015 21:47 (two years ago) Permalink
Just been listening to a few tracks by José Luis Fernández Ledesma Q from Mexico. He's been in a few bands starting in 1995 with Niagra Vallis.
― Robert Adam Gilmour, Sunday, 6 September 2015 12:54 (two years ago) Permalink
As Brian Eno once suggested, the concept of “pretension” is just a hangover from the British class system, with its deep suspicion of anyone attempting to rise above their station. “I’m very happy to have added my little offering to the glowing mountain of things described as pretentious,” Eno wrote. “I’m happy to have made claims on things that I didn’t have any ‘right’ to, and I’m happy to have tried being someone else to see what it felt like.”
sing it miley
― reggie (qualmsley), Sunday, 6 September 2015 15:54 (two years ago) Permalink
MaresNest i could get behind a prog 3.0 thread since this revival has been one of the more interesting musical developments over the past few years. you're totally right about how frustrating it is to sift through the new stuff since a lot of it sucks. (feel the same way about punk rock.) those low points (and there are a lot of them) are dreadful, and the high points are rarely noticed outside of place like progressiveears.
This is really OTM, it's sad that a band like Birds & Buildings gets so little press anywhere else even though they've gotten great reviews across the board. There are so many bands started by dudes who just grew up loving prog and decided to start a band themselves even if they didn't really know how to write or play. Hell some of these bands even wind up being really good after a couple of albums. But Britton feels like a natural talent, both in writing and in playing, he's the sort of guy I worry is just gonna hang it up some day because he struggles to sell 100 copies of an album he worked a thousand hours on.
― frogbs, Tuesday, 8 September 2015 04:00 (two years ago) Permalink
Also I have to point out that I don't see a problem with bands that sound retro or are overly influenced by Yes or Genesis or Rush, as long as they can do it right. So many bands take the genre really seriously and make music that's so long winded and un-fun *cough cough...looking at you Flower Kings* - that's why I don't have an issue with Glass Hammer even though they lift a ton from their influences, their music can really be a blast and you can tell they really have fun making it. Or take this song by a band called Druckfarben that I've previously posted in a Yes thread - I don't care that it so clearly apes Steve Howe's style, it just rules and that's all it really needs to do.
― frogbs, Tuesday, 8 September 2015 04:11 (two years ago) Permalink
damn there are some hot licks there! thanks for posting that
i've been coming around to flower kings, after having a really bad reaction to discovering them immediately post-college, when i was an overt corny indie fuck but secretly, unbeknownst to friends, searching for bands who sounds like YES. part of listening to prog is coping with an imaginary tribunal of robert christgau, lester bangs, and sundry other smug types making fun of you. overcoming that emotional handicap in part involved appreciating glass hammer (especially 'chronometree') which melted away my neurotic misgivings enough to allow time for other old school* revivalists, not just flower kings, but that other 'shameless' roine stolt band, transatlantic, along with wobbler, astra, diagonal, and anglagard
*why is 'old school' "good" in country, hip hop, punk, and jazz, but "bad" in prog? why is prog so often judged by double standards? are people really so shallow they don't realize they're doing it, or is there some weird pleasure (status marker) in sticking it to the prognostic?
― reggie (qualmsley), Tuesday, 8 September 2015 13:20 (two years ago) Permalink
I think "old school" prog is accepted in context, as a product of its time. But I find that contemporary (or at least post-heyday) prog tends toward the cheesy, or often does. Possibly because the focus on musicianship so often manifests itself in solos and long songs, both of which are pretty much out of favor or at least a matter of taste, especially if said solos are silly. I suppose that's why I've always glommed on to the slower, post-Talk Talk sort of indie prog. The arrangements and songs are really interesting, but the temps tend to damper show-offery. I'm thinking of bands like These New Puritans:
Otherwise, the punk/metal side of prog remains pretty compelling, whether Tool or Opeth or other technical stuff, maybe because it's got a discordant edge that I think a lot of prog (flights of fancy and all) can lack. Like that nutzo band Shining, which clearly (see below) leans prog but otherwise doesn't sound indebted to the '70s stuff at all:
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 8 September 2015 13:50 (two years ago) Permalink
anybody heard this new italian group "the winstons" (no relation to "amen brother")? trio making new music in the style of robert wyatt era soft machine. good!
― diana krallice (rushomancy), Monday, 11 April 2016 16:46 (two years ago) Permalink
i will check em out
my own city's Hardcore Crayons are like a good post 90s underground rock type of prog
― rockpalast '82 (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Monday, 11 April 2016 18:59 (two years ago) Permalink
some relative newbies working the masters
― reggie (qualmsley), Monday, 11 April 2016 23:44 (two years ago) Permalink
Hardcore Crayons are pretty good. I bought their CD.
I think these dudes from Louisville are pretty cool.
― earlnash, Tuesday, 12 April 2016 01:32 (two years ago) Permalink
I don't know if this is the right thread, but the latest Three Trapped Tigers album is fantastic. It's on Superball so might be appropriate. They're an IDM-influenced mathrock three piece but it's basically prog.
The title track:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CMr5ZWPBEhM&ab_channel=superballmusictv
― ultros ultros-ghali, Tuesday, 12 April 2016 21:10 (two years ago) Permalink
when i saw them live with liturgy they were a bit dull but it might work much better on record
― And the cry rang out all o'er the town / Good Heavens! Tay is down (imago), Tuesday, 12 April 2016 21:12 (two years ago) Permalink
― reggie (qualmsley), Wednesday, 13 April 2016 04:18 (two years ago) Permalink
Okay, that cover of Terrapin Station is excellent. Hoping this might inspire Daniel Rossen to further explore his prog tendencies.
― doug watson, Wednesday, 13 April 2016 17:55 (two years ago) Permalink
it at least coincides with progressive tendencies, rallying for bernie the other day
― reggie (qualmsley), Thursday, 21 April 2016 16:12 (two years ago) Permalink
rufus is bringing it ~
― reggie (qualmsley), Friday, 22 April 2016 18:21 (two years ago) Permalink
might hit too close to home for too many ~
― reggie (qualmsley), Sunday, 24 April 2016 20:24 (two years ago) Permalink
it is too bad that no new good prog rock has been recorded since punk made it obsolete (cost ineffective) ~
― reggie (qualmsley), Sunday, 24 April 2016 20:53 (two years ago) Permalink
I don't know if this is really prog v.3.0 since it's a follow on to their last album from 1978 but Argentinian legends Bubu released an EP not long ago from out of nowhere:
― ultros ultros-ghali, Tuesday, 3 May 2016 22:05 (two years ago) Permalink
saying that it's a completely different lineup of musicians with the same composer. In any case it's really good.
― ultros ultros-ghali, Tuesday, 3 May 2016 22:16 (two years ago) Permalink
Anyone listen to German band Dark Suns? Their upcoming album Everchild (June 3) seems very promising, continuing their turn from prog metal to psych prog with some jazzy bits along the lines of perhaps Motorpsycho.
― Fastnbulbous, Thursday, 5 May 2016 13:22 (two years ago) Permalink
Listening to Haken - this is unexpectedly nice and weird. I really like their whole early computers aesthetic too.
― It certainly is punk of the Church of England to think that way (tangenttangent), Monday, 16 May 2016 11:23 (two years ago) Permalink
Aaah the massive track in the middle is amazing!
― It certainly is punk of the Church of England to think that way (tangenttangent), Monday, 16 May 2016 11:47 (two years ago) Permalink
I had thought the romantic cover art to Deluge Grander - August In The Urals was ill fitting but actually there is a lot of lushness coming through on further listens. Love the watery flowing piano.
― Robert Adam Gilmour, Sunday, 27 December 2015 13:22 (5 months ago)
Love the first two tracks of this. The first is a monster and the second has these really lovely idyllic ethereal parts. I actually think just these first two would have made a better album than the 5 that stand. The remaining three all have good stuff in them but they get decreasingly interesting. The third is really quite good most of the time though.
How about their other albums?
― Robert Adam Gilmour, Thursday, 16 June 2016 23:13 (one year ago) Permalink
I think it's kind of set up that way - I don't have an issue with the last two tracks ("The Solitude of Miranda" is especially good) but they do feel like bonus tracks in a way.
The Form of the Good is pretty great though it's maybe tougher to get into. It's entirely instrumental (outside of some faint backing vocals) and really dense at times. "The Tree Factory" is pretty cool, kinda Zeuhl-ish, though it goes through a number of cool movements (one definitely sounds Zappa-inspired). The key track is the 20-minute "Aggrandizement" which is totally insane - not like any prog epic I've ever heard, it's just one steadily rising instrumental part that keeps piling on and on and on. It's the sort of thing you have to listen to at ear-bleeding volume.
― frogbs, Friday, 17 June 2016 15:02 (one year ago) Permalink
The last two tracks really dampened my enthusiasm for the album.
― Robert Adam Gilmour, Friday, 17 June 2016 16:42 (one year ago) Permalink
The Mercury Tree are pretty good - new album is kind of lovely. They're like a weirded-out occasionally-microtonal Yank take on Thumpermonkey. Discovered by snooping on ultros' RYM profile, which I'm sure is acceptable behaviour
― imago, Thursday, 18 August 2016 17:13 (one year ago) Permalink
Hey stay out of my stuff, you
Glad you liked it anyway, I probably should have brought it up here but I forget these things. Here it is if anyone else is interested:
― ultros ultros-ghali, Thursday, 18 August 2016 18:54 (one year ago) Permalink
The Quietus and ultros' rym page are p much the only two music sites I read in 2016 (apart from the obvious, of course)
― Drugs A. Money, Saturday, 20 August 2016 00:20 (one year ago) Permalink
new Deluge Grander is up and running. headfirst I go!
― imago, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 13:10 (six months ago) Permalink
― Robert Adam Gilmour, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 13:11 (six months ago) Permalink
I'm going to listen to this only cuz one of them pm'd me and I said I would... the samples seemed decent enough.
Also this may be of interest, it's modern chamber music that's barely prog but it kind of sounds like Univers Zero and it's on AltRock Productions. And it's really quite good.
― ultros ultros-ghali, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 14:51 (six months ago) Permalink
it's...........ok. like, there are good moments. i'll definitely listen to it again. really though (and i know frogbs will come in and yell at me for thinking this) the whole Deluge Grander project existed to make the first track on their first album, and everything since hasn't quite matched that half-hour slab of brilliance
will listen to this though thanks!
― imago, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 15:01 (six months ago) Permalink
me and my 50 socks all FP'd you for this, see you in a month asshole
― frogbs, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 15:56 (six months ago) Permalink
i guess 'aggrandizement' is quite good as well. they should just release albums with two 20+ minute tracks on them
― imago, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 16:00 (six months ago) Permalink
seriously though I can understand that. I think DG's music has gotten more difficult on each album, like it's kind of steered from a fairly recognizable Zeuhl-prog hybrid to something more resembling classical music. that 20-minute track on Form of the Good still sounds like nothing I've heard, it's like he took the massive instrumental finale of a traditional suite and made that the epic. pretty cool. Heliotains completely passed me by the first couple times I listened to it - could not remember a single thing about it until I really sat down and concentrated, after which I realized it's as brilliant as the others, just harder to grasp. I've only heard some samples from the new one (it's not on Bandcamp yet) but it feels like it's kind of the same.
― frogbs, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 16:06 (six months ago) Permalink
Been listening to the Birds And Buildings debut, it's good but it really does just sound like Deluge Grander, I know it only has two members from DG but I think maybe they'd be better off just keeping the DG name and changing the members when they want to be the "other band".
― Robert Adam Gilmour, Friday, 30 March 2018 18:47 (one month ago) Permalink
Cheer-Accident/Polvo vibes + Bob Drake cameo
― obnoxious pun (ultros ultros-ghali), Thursday, 26 April 2018 16:43 (three weeks ago) Permalink
cheer-accident themselves have a new one soon, featuring a couple of former gorilla museum employees (among others)
― imago, Thursday, 26 April 2018 17:02 (three weeks ago) Permalink
this sounds p cool though!
― imago, Thursday, 26 April 2018 17:04 (three weeks ago) Permalink
whoa the Star Period Star is really good
― imago, Thursday, 26 April 2018 17:26 (three weeks ago) Permalink
And I didn't know Cheer-Accident had a new one, that's really exciting! I never liked SGM unfortunately but the bandcamp blurb has got me seriously hyped
― obnoxious pun (ultros ultros-ghali), Thursday, 26 April 2018 17:31 (three weeks ago) Permalink
Actually you knwo what
― obnoxious pun (ultros ultros-ghali), Thursday, 26 April 2018 17:33 (three weeks ago) Permalink
I actually like the Birds And Buildings debut better overall than the Deluge Grander debut. There seems to be a couple of parts from the first track repeated in later tracks but I wasn't sure.
― Robert Adam Gilmour, Friday, 4 May 2018 19:41 (two weeks ago) Permalink
i need to listen to B&B again but my impression was that it was interesting and varied
― imago, Friday, 4 May 2018 20:53 (two weeks ago) Permalink
The last track has clip of Kenneth Clark's Civilization documentary series! I get a feeling that this guy's music is a lot about upheavals throughout history but sometimes the lyrics are hard to grasp.
― Robert Adam Gilmour, Friday, 4 May 2018 21:06 (two weeks ago) Permalink
"Chakra Khan" sounds like a username here.
glad star period star have a new one, good to know bob drake's involved. liked them a lot but it was hard to find any info about them on the internet for a very long time.
― Arch Bacon (rushomancy), Saturday, 5 May 2018 00:43 (two weeks ago) Permalink
ni combined with another band i haven't heard of called poil and they put out this record. it's pretty proggy.
― Arch Bacon (rushomancy), Saturday, 5 May 2018 23:41 (two weeks ago) Permalink
SPS are obscure even by avant-prog standards, I was surprised to learn that they'd been going since the mid-90s.
Piniol looks interesting, added that to my to do list
― obnoxious pun (ultros ultros-ghali), Monday, 7 May 2018 16:52 (two weeks ago) Permalink
yea that first B&B album is an all-timer. the second album is a bit less accessible but it's just as good. lotta curveballs in that one.
still digesting Oceanarium, it's just so damn thick and difficult to parse if you aren't giving full attention. but it's sounding better every time I hear it.
― frogbs, Monday, 7 May 2018 16:57 (two weeks ago) Permalink
Piniol album very nice.
― Robert Adam Gilmour, Saturday, 12 May 2018 13:26 (one week ago) Permalink
koenjihyakkei has a new one coming out next month, i know they've been working on it for a while - i have an earlier digest video from jan 2016
― Arch Bacon (rushomancy), Saturday, 12 May 2018 17:34 (one week ago) Permalink
oh fuck yeah
― obnoxious pun (ultros ultros-ghali), Saturday, 12 May 2018 21:55 (one week ago) Permalink
New The Mercury Program someone just alerted me to:
― obnoxious pun (ultros ultros-ghali), Friday, 18 May 2018 16:11 (four days ago) Permalink
The Mercury Tree I mean, oops
― obnoxious pun (ultros ultros-ghali), Friday, 18 May 2018 16:24 (four days ago) Permalink