Christgau, Chusid, or DeRogatis: Which critic is the most useless?

Message Bookmarked

Bookmark Removed

Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (289 of them)

View Previous Page...

BECAUSE OF YOU

― bernard snowy, Monday, 26 March 2007 21:05 (nineteen years ago)

you never him now, dog

― ghost rider, Monday, 26 March 2007 21:06 (nineteen years ago)

calum got the sack?? didn't know that, rad

― gff, Monday, 26 March 2007 21:11 (nineteen years ago)

oh shit wrong thread. well maybe not

― gff, Monday, 26 March 2007 21:11 (nineteen years ago)

I like the random-talking-amongst-selves direction this thread is taking. Carry on.

― Matos W.K., Monday, 26 March 2007 21:12 (nineteen years ago)

did any of you guys hear that the village voice got bought???

― ghost rider, Monday, 26 March 2007 21:13 (nineteen years ago)

BOUGHT BY YOUR MOM

― Mr. Que, Monday, 26 March 2007 21:15 (nineteen years ago)

Jesus. Poor Louis.

― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Monday, 26 March 2007 21:16 (nineteen years ago)

i can't believe my mom fired xgau ;_;

― ghost rider, Monday, 26 March 2007 21:20 (nineteen years ago)

huh, didn't see that LJ thread until now. apparently his Cambridge education hasn't taught him enough about the classics, because this whole thing is on some greek tragedy shit.

― bernard snowy, Monday, 26 March 2007 21:24 (nineteen years ago)

"thing is, dude was fucking his mom"

― gff, Monday, 26 March 2007 21:25 (nineteen years ago)

(Beat me to it.)

― jaymc, Monday, 26 March 2007 21:27 (nineteen years ago)

Reading LJ thread like getting kicked in the nuts by a horse. Except without the horse. Makes me feel bad for the whole damn universe.

― Pye Poudre, Monday, 26 March 2007 21:37 (nineteen years ago)

"arcade fire? two thumbs up!"

http://www.calvin.edu/news/photos/faculty/herzberg.jpg

― scott seward, Monday, 26 March 2007 21:37 (nineteen years ago)

But, yeah, rock critics. Go figure.

― Pye Poudre, Monday, 26 March 2007 21:37 (nineteen years ago)

I thought that was Gene Wilder at first.

― jaymc, Monday, 26 March 2007 21:38 (nineteen years ago)

"kelly clarkson? surprisingly underrated as a songwriter!"

http://www.calvin.edu/news/photos/faculty/hettinga.jpg

― scott seward, Monday, 26 March 2007 21:39 (nineteen years ago)

"i don't know who the bloc party think they're fooling. not me, that's for sure!"

http://www.calvin.edu/news/photos/faculty/hoekema.jpg

― scott seward, Monday, 26 March 2007 21:41 (nineteen years ago)

yellowteeth OTM

― Mr. Que, Monday, 26 March 2007 21:41 (nineteen years ago)

"marah are sublime."

http://www.calvin.edu/news/photos/faculty/hplant.jpg

― scott seward, Monday, 26 March 2007 21:42 (nineteen years ago)

denim shirt lolz eclipsed by scary face beard

― Pye Poudre, Monday, 26 March 2007 21:44 (nineteen years ago)

"i have heard the arctic monkeys. i guess i just don't "get" it."

http://www.calvin.edu/news/photos/faculty/holstege.jpg

― scott seward, Monday, 26 March 2007 21:44 (nineteen years ago)

"i dunno, is it just me or are the arcade fire like listening to a kidz bop cd...only less fun."

http://www.calvin.edu/news/photos/faculty/lderooy.jpg

― scott seward, Monday, 26 March 2007 21:48 (nineteen years ago)

"what was rjd2 THINKING?"

http://www.calvin.edu/news/photos/faculty/laura_smit.jpg

― scott seward, Monday, 26 March 2007 21:50 (nineteen years ago)

"Reviews that steer more toward synopsizing and less toward editorializing are more my preference, only because I'd rather know the facts than the critical musings of a self-proclaimed authority. This applies to criticism of any medium. But sticking to music for now: if you've ever read the 33 1/3 books, the best ones tend to be those which primarily relate the circumstances which led to the creation of the album (e.g., The Velvet Underground And Nico, Paul's Boutique) and don't devolve into proselytization (e.g., The Stone Roses, OK Computer). Lester Bangs might have produced the occasional tasty bon mot, but his opinions were no more valid than yours or mine."

http://www.calvin.edu/news/photos/faculty/monsma.jpg

― scott seward, Monday, 26 March 2007 21:54 (nineteen years ago)

"Trust me, I'm a vet to a number of other similar boards that have been around just as long, if not longer. I know the general mindset. Doesn't mean it's not worth stating."

http://www.calvin.edu/news/photos/faculty/nyhoff.jpg

― scott seward, Monday, 26 March 2007 21:56 (nineteen years ago)

"think about it" should actually come up after you hit "submit response" like the itunes "you really sure you wanna buy this?"

http://www.calvin.edu/news/photos/faculty/oselles.jpg

― scott seward, Monday, 26 March 2007 21:57 (nineteen years ago)

Having fun?

― souldesqueeze, Monday, 26 March 2007 22:07 (nineteen years ago)

scott's pretty much in his own little world, yeah

― strongohulkington, Monday, 26 March 2007 22:07 (nineteen years ago)

Who are the people pictured?

― souldesqueeze, Monday, 26 March 2007 22:08 (nineteen years ago)

"Having fun?"

http://www.calvin.edu/news/photos/faculty/pauley.jpg

― scott seward, Monday, 26 March 2007 22:09 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.musicobsession.com/Pictures/f/l/flipper46222.jpg

― souldesqueeze, Monday, 26 March 2007 22:12 (nineteen years ago)

They appear to be photographs of Rbt. Christgau, Irwin Chusid and Jim DeRogatis, at various points in their careers.

― Pye Poudre, Monday, 26 March 2007 22:13 (nineteen years ago)

Except for that last one. I don't know who that is.

― Pye Poudre, Monday, 26 March 2007 22:14 (nineteen years ago)

You will also notice that George Bush's point of view is more often discussed and evaluated than that of my Aunt Nina. This is not necessarily because George Bush's point of view is deemed better.

But by saying this, you are actually suggesting that rock critics have a great deal of power and authority, beyond just being people sharing their opinions like anyone else. And I think they do have some influence amongst people who take a serious interest in the music and have played a large role in shaping how people perceive things like popular music history, in shaping how people perceive what's worth talking about and in which terms, in forming a canon.

So I also sometimes wonder why journalistic rock criticism has taken on this cultural position. I might be a snobby academic, and this is kind of a half-formed thought, but I can at least understand why e.g. formally trained music theorists and historians have this role in classical music.

On the other hand, I can see why there's something great about the fact that someone can become a tastemaker without needing any formal music-related qualifications.

― Sundar, Monday, 26 March 2007 22:18 (nineteen years ago)

hah the idea of academics being the alternative cultural gatekeepers makes the current situation seem a bit better doesnt it.

― deej, Monday, 26 March 2007 22:20 (nineteen years ago)

Haha okay Sundar, substitute "Maureen Dowd" in that zing.

― nabisco, Monday, 26 March 2007 22:21 (nineteen years ago)

Well, I'm not saying that would necessarily be better but why do you think it is better that journalists are the cultural gatekeepers?

― Sundar, Monday, 26 March 2007 22:22 (nineteen years ago)

more democratic

― deej, Monday, 26 March 2007 22:22 (nineteen years ago)

i mean i'm certainly not defending the 'state of things' as it is ...

― deej, Monday, 26 March 2007 22:23 (nineteen years ago)

wait, the capitalist workplace is more democratic than academic institutions?

― Tim Ellison, Monday, 26 March 2007 22:24 (nineteen years ago)

Lester Bangs might have produced the occasional tasty bon mot, but his opinions were no more valid than yours or mine.

But he's a better writer about music. Or me. That makes him more valid, o young one.

― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Monday, 26 March 2007 22:36 (nineteen years ago)

*better writer about music than you.

― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Monday, 26 March 2007 22:38 (nineteen years ago)

No, Sundar, I think you're right, and I chose the analogy a little lazily -- a president, once elected, has concrete authority over certain matters, whereas the authority of critics, editorial-writers, and pundits works via audience and persuasive argument and whatnot. That's not necessarily any less powerful a way for influence to work, but obviously a president has a few powers beyond that.

There's certainly stuff to judge there about the function of major critics as gatekeepers (and maybe our desire to make them gatekeep in a certain way, which still seems to be at stake when people get mad at a critic for liking the wrong thing -- people don't just care about the critic's taste, they care that the critic is convincing other people of it, on the record, gasp), but my main point was that there's always a common center of importance that we pay attention to and discuss, not because we deem it somehow authoritative and worth discussion, but just because it's in a position of centrality, and that makes it somehow inherently notable. (E.g., the news will cover Major League Baseball first, but that doesn't mean the minor leagues didn't have a more eventful game that day.)

― nabisco, Monday, 26 March 2007 22:38 (nineteen years ago)

Actually I think what I'm circling around there is the difference between our respect for institutions and our respect for individuals: people who care if there's crap in the Voice music section care because they have a sense that the institution of the section itself should be good. People care about top-rank critics (when they do) in large part because those critics either occupy or ARE institutions that people have some stake in seeing be good.

― nabisco, Monday, 26 March 2007 22:41 (nineteen years ago)

That and "other people are paying attention to this, therefore it has importance whether I want it to or not, and therefore its content is important."

― nabisco, Monday, 26 March 2007 22:42 (nineteen years ago)

a.k.a. "the reasons for you starting this thread are the same reasons that make critics meaningful"

― bernard snowy, Monday, 26 March 2007 22:56 (nineteen years ago)

OMG HI 5Z WE DID IT

― nabisco, Monday, 26 March 2007 23:08 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.levity.com/corduroy/images/doughty1.gif

M. Doughty (1970 - )

Onward to Victory, mule,
with a subatomic glimmer of rage
humming a hot inch below the cheekbones

moving down Water Street like an ox
hound in fleshy lumber, muscles and lumps
pouched up and numb like insect bites

Inside the contours of veins blown up
by mosquitos into tidek balloons,
a single radiowave transmits itself
into loose bits of metal scattered around;
Keys. Beltbuckles. Scissors. Headphones.

Streetlights sizzle like bees being taken to slaughter.

On Water Street, two legs
are the chick of drills
spearing into the blacktop

in the light further down
what you can only hope will be
some Imperial China is actually
the orange noise
at the ends of cigarettes
glowing at your approach

T H E I N C R E D I B L E
M A G N E T I C M A N

Looking for a guy who�s done it? M. Doughty�s the dude. Once, a million years ago (like, in 1994) he was like, ticket-taker at a jazz club, moonlighting as a poet who dared to work with bongo accompaniment, OK?. Now, he leads the hit band Soul Coughing, touring the world and laying out the map for poetry�s Crossover Revitalization Program.

― rps, Monday, 26 March 2007 23:12 (nineteen years ago)

Since learning that I had some favorite records/ groups in common with X'gau I've followed him pretty closely. He has turned me onto more good music than i care to go into. In my meager opinion he generally has great taste, that is, it coincides with my likes (which are radically different than almost everyone i know). And he can say more in fewer words than anybody. A+

― outdoor_miner, Monday, 26 March 2007 23:12 (nineteen years ago)

Skipping 189 messages at this point... Click here if you want to load them all.

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.