Creedence Clearwater Revival: C or D?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (341 of them)
Fuckin' classic. Sporters of the flannel way prior to anyone in Seattle. "Fortunate Son," "Born on the Bayou," "Run Through the Jungle,"....? C'mon, they farkin' rocked!

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 17:45 (twenty-three years ago)

I especially love how the rather non-patriotic Fortunate Son is routinely used/referenced as a flag-waiving ode to Thomas "B" Jefferson...

christoff (christoff), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 18:24 (twenty-three years ago)

Yes, yes, yes, indeed. The best American group of the 60's,
IMO, and a truly righteous band that deserves homage for it's
achievements. CCR was one of my first bands, actually, and
as I delved into music I realized how much they owed to
their influences. But funny thing is, they're still 100%
original, because NO one sings or picks like John C. Fogerty.
He plays mean sax & organ, too.

Squirlplise, Tuesday, 28 January 2003 19:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Their radio singles are awesome. Some also have the bonus of being easy to play on the guitar. Certain songs in my life turn into a Mad Libs template for phrasing: I want to know, have you ever seen my keys? To come up with such a song, they are super!

Fivvy, Tuesday, 28 January 2003 19:05 (twenty-three years ago)

C! could this be the elusive ILM unanimity we've searched so long and hard for?

Al (sitcom), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 19:07 (twenty-three years ago)

classic! fogerty rules the school. that voice! wow. ccr was my fave band as a kid. i thought they totally rocked, and still do. "lodi" was one of the first songs that ever touched me. it's tacky, but true.

cecilia, Tuesday, 28 January 2003 19:10 (twenty-three years ago)

"C! could this be the elusive ILM unanimity we've searched so long and hard for? "

Wouldn't that be great? Part of me suspects that something about CCR doesn't translate well for the British ILMers tho... someone prove me wrong!

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 28 January 2003 19:21 (twenty-three years ago)

Sporters of the flannel way prior to anyone in Seattle.

Along with half of Canada.

Still CCR are klassik, rockist or not.

Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 19:29 (twenty-three years ago)

I'll certainly give 'em a classic. The thing is, though normally thought of as a singles band, they had so many great and enduring singles (and album tracks in heavy rotation on rock radio) that you might as well buy all their albums. Not really any bum tracks to be heard up until Mardi Gras.

I'm still dreaming of some to-be-discovered bootleg recording of like a 20 minute live freakout jam on "Keep On Chooglin'"....

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 19:29 (twenty-three years ago)

Their albums are a bit light. All very short. Don't really have the depth past the singles.

Ben Williams, Tuesday, 28 January 2003 19:36 (twenty-three years ago)

Yes, but the point is they've got so many damn good songs, you end up with about 6 or 7 songs that you know and one or two that you don't. I wouldn't live without the albums, and without tracks like "Ramble Tamble", "Porterville", "Effigy" and "Keep On Chooglin'" ... Jesus Christ, just reading that list ... depth?! Whatever, I guess I'm just an unreconstructed rockist.

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 19:41 (twenty-three years ago)

I want to hate them on principle but, really, they sound OK when the radio plays them. I used to think they were boring but I don't mind them now. I'm not about to buy a CD or anything but they seem all right.

sundar subramanian (sundar), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 19:42 (twenty-three years ago)

I want to hate them on principle

On principle of what, disliking good music?

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 19:43 (twenty-three years ago)

Total classic. Great songs (often a real and worthy antidote/counterweight to the more soft-headed bourgie impulses of '60s pop/rock), a great singer, and one of the best--and definitely most undersung--rhythm sections in all of rock music. Just cause it sounds simple doesn't mean it's easy.

Lee G (Lee G), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 19:49 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm not saying they're bad albums, I love Creedence too... but you know, comparing to Beggars Banquet and Let It Bleed... I don't think so...

Take Willy and the Poor Boys--Poorboy Shuffle and Side O' the Road are throwaways.

Green River--same goes for Cross Tie Walker, Sinister Purpose, Night Time is the Right Time.

I just remember really really loving the greatest hits when I was a kid. And then buying all the albums, and liking them, but being slightly disappointed that there weren't any real amazing finds beyond the singles.

Ben Williams, Tuesday, 28 January 2003 19:52 (twenty-three years ago)

I have the singles comp and I like it. Rock was pretty good in the 60s.

Tom (Groke), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 19:56 (twenty-three years ago)

"Green River--same goes for Cross Tie Walker, Sinister Purpose, Night Time is the Right Time."

No way, I think all those songs are great, just as strong as the singles. The harmonies on "Night Time" are this really strong, deep thing. "Sinister Purpose" is totally creepy, it's like a prelude to a murder down by the river or something.

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 28 January 2003 19:59 (twenty-three years ago)

Not much more to say than classic.

hstencil, Tuesday, 28 January 2003 20:04 (twenty-three years ago)

Sinister Purpose I don't remember too well, to be honest. The good ones stick in my head ;) For me, Night Time was just too trad, dad. Actually, that's probably my problem with the album stuff in general--they seemed to just be doing straight knock-offs of older forms there in order to prove some kind of country authenticity, whereas the singles were like proper rock 'n' roll and although they had the old time flavor, they were also something different. A fusion, rather than a pastiche... or something.

Ben Williams, Tuesday, 28 January 2003 20:05 (twenty-three years ago)

Take Willy and the Poor Boys--Poorboy Shuffle and Side O' the Road are throwaways

you could say the same of "Factory Girl" and "Dear Doctor," too, though I agree that CCR's albums aren't as good as the Stones'. oh, and the answer is TOTAL CLASSIC.

M Matos (M Matos), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 20:06 (twenty-three years ago)

No, you couldn't say the same!

Ben Williams, Tuesday, 28 January 2003 20:07 (twenty-three years ago)

(Actually you have an easier case with Beggars anyway... try knocking anything off Let It Bleed... now if only they'd put the single version of Honky Tonk Women on there instead of Country Honk)

Ben Williams, Tuesday, 28 January 2003 20:07 (twenty-three years ago)

Classic. Their best cuts: "Lodi," "Wrote a Song for Everyone," "Fortunate Son," "Have You Ever Seen the Rain" and "Effigy."

Yanc3y (ystrickler), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 20:11 (twenty-three years ago)

I hear your point Ben, and I'd agree that there are a couple filler type tracks in the catalog (but not awful ones, i.e. not ones to make you hit the skip button). I just think that the album cuts that are strong, argue for reconsidering them as more of an album band rather than a singles band.

And I was going to make the point about the Stones, but Matos made it for me. Except that I would have mentioned "Country Honk", and that he is TOTALLY wrong about "Factory Girl". That is one of the high points of that lp! It was great when they dug it up for the Steel Wheels tour...

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 20:26 (twenty-three years ago)

Agreed, it's not like I don't like the albums, I just like arguing...

(Also, the thing that makes songs like Dear Doctor et al more interesting to me is that they are not done straight--Jagger always has a distance from the material, and the lyrics themselves are somewhat ambiguous/parodistic, which makes the songs a bit more interesting since you don't know how seriously to take them)

Ben Williams, Tuesday, 28 January 2003 20:38 (twenty-three years ago)

here's an argument: CCR kicks the Stones six ways from Saturday because they took mountain and country music as their stepping-off point AS WELL as Chicago blues - I am Southern and raised on a diet of Hazel Dickens and etc so this goes a long way with me - CCR annealed it all into a singular, totally unmistakable, champion sound. agreed that Jagger was surely one of the most mythological characters in all rock - CCR never had that mystique, if that's the kind of thing you go for - but i mean seriously, the Stones sound like copyists next to them (Brian Jones: "no other group is as close to the Negro sound as us"). particularly good and interesting copyists, sure, "it's what the Stones got WRONG just as much as what they got RIGHT" etc but with CCR it's totally about what they got right, full stop.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 20:47 (twenty-three years ago)

I used to think they were the most boring 60's band ever. Then something changed and now I think they're not bad... who knows why. I like "Have You Ever Seen the Rain?" a lot.

Vinnie (vprabhu), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 20:52 (twenty-three years ago)

good points Tracer.

christoff (christoff), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 20:59 (twenty-three years ago)

I dunno man, I just hear it the other way 'round. I think Fogarty is just as much a copyist as the Stones are--difference is, he's playing one role, country boy, whereas for Jagger that's one mask among others (an approach which admittedly over the course of far too long has gotten really tiresome, but paid serious dividends back in the day). I'm not from the South, but I sure can't take Fogerty seriously when he's howling in that affected voice about riding the ol' riverboat queen, or posing on album covers busking with Willy and the Poor Boys on the side of the street. So I don't find Creedence any more authentic than the Stones, really--difference is that the Stones are honest about their lack of authenticity, and they make use of that as an aesthetic strategy (also, they drew on plenty more sources than just Chicago blues).

Ben Williams, Tuesday, 28 January 2003 21:03 (twenty-three years ago)

Well Brian Jones can make such a declaration as he could supposedly play slide on "Dust My Broom" as well as Elmore James could.

As to yr main point -- I agree that the influx of country and mountain music is more important and successful with CCR than it is the Stones (although the Stones' double country whammy of "Dead Flowers" and "Sweet Virginia" kicks all of CCR's ass halfway to Modesto), but CCR's blues infusion feels kinda weak to me. I'm thinking of the middle bits of Willy & the Poor Boys here, and while Johnny can do a fair sharecropper impression with that yelp of his, it falls flat. It just seems that the Stones wanted to get the Negro strut down more than anything (which Mick still works at but Keith was born with), to get the style and the feel, while CCR went for the sound, but not the emotion. Maybe this is why CCR is so commonly identified as a very "white" band? (I'm thinking of the Big Lebowski and White Men Can't Jump (Snipes hassles Woody for them, doesn't he?) in particular)

Yanc3y (ystrickler), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 21:06 (twenty-three years ago)

(I was going to say, kind of speaking to the same thing, Mick had a great guitarist and drummer behind him... Fogarty is kind of a one-man band, unfortunately.)

Ben Williams, Tuesday, 28 January 2003 21:08 (twenty-three years ago)

On principle of what, disliking good music?

On principle of not relating to rootsy Americana trad-rock boredom, which then gets shoved in your face as real authentic 'good' music. The whole rough-and-ready meat-and-potatoes-ness of it all. Of hating country music like any well-adjusted person. Like I said, though, they don't actually sound that bad. It's all pettiness.

sundar subramanian (sundar), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 21:26 (twenty-three years ago)

They don't do it for me; sorry to break up the consensus. Fogerty's earnest growl grates, and the backing music is dull dull dull. I mean, if you're going to have a backing band that sounds like session hacks, you might as well have 'em play something interesting. There's something else, too. I even like a few of their singles pretty okay, but there's something about the aura that surrounds them that turns me off big-time.

Clarke B., Tuesday, 28 January 2003 21:27 (twenty-three years ago)

Like, I relate to what Vinnie said except I still don't have any specific song I can point to and say that I love it. But they're all not that bad now.

Clarke just butted in but I know what he means about the aura.

sundar subramanian (sundar), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 21:28 (twenty-three years ago)

Oh jesus christ, why even ask. Fucking classic.

mosurock (mosurock), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 21:29 (twenty-three years ago)

I like the songs I singled out, too, as well as the Willy ones Ben pointed out. I just think that each pair filled the same function on each album.

Tracer roxor as always, even if I do think the Stones were ultimately a...not "better" but greater band, if you see what I mean--wider ranging (counts for a lot w/me, Prince was my formative listening) and more chance-taking. CCR's more perfect but the Stones had greater outreach. love 'em both about equally in that way

M Matos (M Matos), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 21:34 (twenty-three years ago)

It's all pettiness

You can't say something like "I dislike them on principle", on this board of all places, and not expect to be called out on the meaninglessness of the statement unless you define your terms.

Of hating country music like any well-adjusted person

Color me ill-adjusted.

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 21:34 (twenty-three years ago)

I meant that my reasons are petty. I said that I want to dislike them not that I actually do.

sundar subramanian (sundar), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 21:37 (twenty-three years ago)

For the purposes of the authenticity debate, I gotta say that CCR is definitely more "authentic" than the Stones. That can be a positive or negative thing depending on what side of the fence you're on, but I don't think there can be any argument that the Stones were actors, pure and simple (very good ones at their peak) - whereas Fogerty and Co. really *were* blue-collar nobodies from the sticks. I can tell you exactly where the market on the Willie and the Poorboys cover is (it's right next to their warehouse studio). California from San Francisco to the Oregon border *does* have a lot of green rivers, even a swamp or two, and country music, etc. The Stones couldn't have been farther removed from American country/black r&b (had Jagger and Richards even *been* to America when they started up their schtick?), whereas Fogerty grew up with it in the Central California Valley. That shit is THERE, it was something they soaked up playing up and down the state for 10 years prior to "making it".

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 28 January 2003 21:39 (twenty-three years ago)

I hate all the authenticity talk that goes on about them too.

sundar subramanian (sundar), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 21:43 (twenty-three years ago)

Was it in Stanley Booth's Stones book that he says that the photos of war-ravaged British children from WW2 could easily have been McCartney or Lennon or Jagger or Richards and this is why they identified so strongly with U.S. blues music?

Yanc3y (ystrickler), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 21:45 (twenty-three years ago)

CCR much more of a SINGLES act than the Stones (or rather, the Stones became much better at making full, complete albs around the same time that CCR first started releasing albs themselves) - their 'Best Of' (or whatever) CD is a pretty flawless nugget of country-pop-rock, but it's prob. all you really 'need' for everyday listening purposes. I can never make up my mind if the long versh of 'I Heard It Through The Grapevine' is godawful or not. I KNOW their versh of 'Suzy Q' isn't a patch on the orig. I like their ballads as much as their rockers, but am notso into their swamp rock side ('Run Through The Jungle', the done-to-death 'Proud Mary'.)

Andrew L (Andrew L), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 21:45 (twenty-three years ago)

Re authenticity: Not so much arguing on class grounds, or that they didn't come from the region they sang about... it just always seemed to me that they were evoking, idealizing and acting as if they were part of, an era that must surely have been mostly gone by the time they came along...

I agree with Andrew L about Grapevine... their ultimate endless boogie track was Back on the Bayou

Ben Williams, Tuesday, 28 January 2003 21:48 (twenty-three years ago)

Classic.

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 23:26 (twenty-three years ago)

Another note in the Stones vs. CCR debate: the J.C Fogerty-led
entity known as Creedence Clearwater Revival only existed for
about four years, 67-71 - who knows what Fogerty could have
continued to achieve if he hadn't been stuck with retarded
bandmates (see Mardi Gras) and a hellish, leech-like record label.
After all, would the Stones be remembered today if they broke
up in 1967?

Also due to the demands of their label, Fogerty released 3
albums in 1969 and two in 1970, ranking from good to excellent.
Imagine what dynamite albums they could have released on a
one-per-year schedule:

Bayou Country
01. Born On The Bayou
02. Good Golly Miss Molly
03. Proud Mary
04. Green River
05. Bad Moon Rising
06. Lodi
07. Wrote A Song For Everyone
08. Don't Look Now
09. Down On The Corner
10. Fortunate Son
11. Midnight Special

Cosmo's Factory
01. Before You Accuse Me
02. Travelin' Band
03. Lookin' Out My Back Door
04. Run Through The Jungle
05. Up Around The Bend
06. Who'll Stop The Rain
07. Long As I Can See The Light
08. Have You Ever Seen The Rain?
09. Hey Tonight
10. Molina

I'll go on the record as saying that these two proposed
tracklists kick every Stones album directly in the ass.

Squirlplise, Tuesday, 28 January 2003 23:41 (twenty-three years ago)

i like em despite the endlessly awful writing and thinking they seem to cause, to this day

strictly speaking they are of course anti-rockist

mark s (mark s), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 23:45 (twenty-three years ago)

"strictly speaking they are of course anti-rockist "

explain.

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 28 January 2003 23:49 (twenty-three years ago)

I'll leave that for mark s (chiz), but let's get this straight: there's 3 levels: 1) where you talk about who's more authentic and why 2) where you go on about how "authenticity" is a rub word to begin with, unless you're talking about counterfeit money or something and 3) where we need to get to, i.e. where we don't talk about it at all.

CCR playing the Stones game: doesn't exist; Stones playing CCR's game: "Midnight Rambler" CASE CLOSED

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 29 January 2003 00:10 (twenty-three years ago)

Stones playing CCR's game: "Midnight Rambler"

I don't get this one.

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Wednesday, 29 January 2003 00:13 (twenty-three years ago)

above all that they cared abt singles rather than LPs, and were definitely counter the big-art-statement faux adult sensibility of the times — the songs were tight and sort of just there, rather than constructed and worked over and part of some brave new post-beatles counterculture world

also i think that the music they minded about was music that ROCK AS IT BECAME AWARE OF ITSELF was trying to put behind it, or get beyond, or something

like in the late 60s, a LOT of music — pop and non-pop — from the 50s and early 60s was widely considered a bit of a primitive yokel joke: and i think they clung to it in quite a lonely, dogged way...

this later (80s etc) became for others a revivalist shtick which played super-well in music mags etc — grrr the clash haha — and part of the general dad-rock cd-rerelease spasm, but these were the years when rock was in its prime and needed no memory, or anyway a sense of its own HISTORY was not yet at all important to its essential identity

(sorry this probably isn't very clear: i think what i'm saying is that the content of "revival" in their name and aesthetic — partly bcz it wz half ironic, in a bitter sort of way — was that it refused to place faith in these huge PLACEMARKER WORKS, dylan/beatles/stones blah blah, which stood in the way of understanding where they themselves as works came from, and provided the glue of the music community all round, the values it shared...)

mark s (mark s), Wednesday, 29 January 2003 00:14 (twenty-three years ago)

After that I treated them to a 2-hour discourse on vinyl mastering which they all listened to in rapt fascination, best night of their lives

Humanitarian Pause (Tracer Hand), Friday, 19 January 2024 22:57 (two years ago)

ok sold

what is the DVD material from?

out-of-print LaserDisc edition (sleeve), Friday, 19 January 2024 23:00 (two years ago)

also lol tracer, that was an xp so I could not properly appreciate your tart self-deprecation

but it's all true, mono 45s rule

out-of-print LaserDisc edition (sleeve), Friday, 19 January 2024 23:01 (two years ago)

I love well made compilations like that. Will be on the lookout.

brimstead, Friday, 19 January 2024 23:01 (two years ago)

is there DVD material? i just have the 45s.

the booklet that comes with it is sadly pretty useless. written like a beginner's potted history. surely anyone enough of a lunatic to buy this is Heavily Into Creedence and wants session notes, oral histories etc

Humanitarian Pause (Tracer Hand), Friday, 19 January 2024 23:22 (two years ago)

ohh ok there is I guess a bonus DVD with the 2xCD set? which is what I got b/c cheap

out-of-print LaserDisc edition (sleeve), Friday, 19 January 2024 23:23 (two years ago)

Lol Tracer. Fwiw I would legit listen if you recorded that as a podcast

Wine not? (Ye Mad Puffin), Friday, 19 January 2024 23:43 (two years ago)

FWIW, Russ Gary (the engineer) once posted on another forum that the Green River singles are true dedicated mixes. The mono single mix for the song "Green River" alone really is amazing. Everything else might be folds though.

birdistheword, Saturday, 20 January 2024 03:24 (two years ago)

what are folds?

Humanitarian Pause (Tracer Hand), Saturday, 20 January 2024 09:46 (two years ago)

Mono mixes that are electronically converted from the original stereo, rather than being mixed specifically to mono, or "dedicated" to mono.

Halfway there but for you, Saturday, 20 January 2024 13:56 (two years ago)

There used to be a button on stereo systems that would do this.

Halfway there but for you, Saturday, 20 January 2024 13:57 (two years ago)

It was right next to the Loudness button iirc

Pictish in the Woods (James Redd and the Blecchs), Saturday, 20 January 2024 14:02 (two years ago)

My Bluetooth headphones sometimes accidentally do those folds sometimes. Really a trip when listening to Olivia Rodrigo or something else clearly not mixed that way.

an icon of a worried-looking, long-haired, bespectacled man (C. Grisso/McCain), Saturday, 20 January 2024 17:39 (two years ago)

Bluetooth sometimes seems to have a mind of its own imho.

Pictish in the Woods (James Redd and the Blecchs), Saturday, 20 January 2024 17:45 (two years ago)

In my experience

Pictish in the Woods (James Redd and the Blecchs), Saturday, 20 January 2024 17:45 (two years ago)

there's a mono setting on android - works pretty neat

corrs unplugged, Sunday, 21 January 2024 11:24 (two years ago)

Gonna listen to "Rude Awakening #2" all day brb

poppers fueled buttsex crescendo (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 21 January 2024 14:58 (two years ago)

This compilation is on Tidal, and yeah, it sounds great. Might have to pick up a physical copy for the living room.

Tahuti Watches L&O:SVU Reruns Without His Ape (unperson), Sunday, 21 January 2024 16:56 (two years ago)

just ordered the mono singles comp, excited to hear it #deathtostereo

Blues Guitar Solo Heatmap (Free Download) (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Sunday, 21 January 2024 18:15 (two years ago)

My Bluetooth headphones sometimes accidentally do those folds sometimes. Really a trip when listening to Olivia Rodrigo or something else clearly not mixed that way.


That’s a feature of the Brian Wilson model

calstars, Sunday, 21 January 2024 18:33 (two years ago)

bluefolded

Humanitarian Pause (Tracer Hand), Sunday, 21 January 2024 18:44 (two years ago)

three months pass...

Late last night
I WEN FO WAH

calstars, Monday, 22 April 2024 19:02 (two years ago)

five months pass...

So is the Hollies “long cool woman in a black dress” the uk’s best attempt at ccr style

calstars, Saturday, 12 October 2024 17:36 (one year ago)

It's definitely the most blatant!

pisspoor bung probe prog (Tom D.), Saturday, 12 October 2024 17:44 (one year ago)

Yeah. Im trying to think of an American band that ripped off the UK in a similar way

calstars, Saturday, 12 October 2024 17:54 (one year ago)

Nick Lowe had an excellent one with "Stick It Where the Sun Don’t Shine," but the Hollies' track probably gets my vote for the best.

birdistheword, Saturday, 12 October 2024 21:09 (one year ago)

That one is so shameless

calstars, Saturday, 12 October 2024 21:39 (one year ago)

Hunk of Burning Love definitely owes a lot to CCR.

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 12 October 2024 22:14 (one year ago)

As far as rips go.

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 12 October 2024 22:16 (one year ago)

Im trying to think of an American band that ripped off the UK in a similar way

Well there was that pop-punk vocal style that was sometimes said to coopt 70s UK poonk, innit

two turntables and a slide trombone (Ye Mad Puffin), Saturday, 12 October 2024 22:51 (one year ago)

Every Nuggets track imitating English accents.

il lavoro mi rovina la giornata (PBKR), Saturday, 12 October 2024 23:45 (one year ago)

I assumed that wasn't a serious comment.

pisspoor bung probe prog (Tom D.), Sunday, 13 October 2024 07:51 (one year ago)

one month passes...

Don’t go ‘round tonight
Well it’s bound to take yo life
There’s a bathroom on the right

calstars, Saturday, 30 November 2024 04:04 (one year ago)

two weeks pass...

I've heard Creedence four times on the radio today, once in what was possibly a block of three or four songs in a row, which threw me off, because everybody knows today is two-for- Tuesday. Had to Google Fogerty to make sure everything was okay.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 17 December 2024 21:01 (one year ago)

So you're saying that your radio station... kept on chooglin'?

Rumspringsteen (Ye Mad Puffin), Tuesday, 17 December 2024 21:40 (one year ago)

Two-for-choogsday

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 17 December 2024 21:52 (one year ago)

Electric Choogaloo

Rumspringsteen (Ye Mad Puffin), Tuesday, 17 December 2024 22:01 (one year ago)

Choogs your own adventure

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 17 December 2024 22:25 (one year ago)

lol

James Carr Thief (James Redd and the Blecchs), Thursday, 19 December 2024 01:35 (one year ago)

three months pass...

Just finished John Lingan's A Song for Everyone. Pretty good--the right side of serviceable, I guess. He had the cooperation of Stu Cook and Doug Clifford but not, surprise, Fogerty. One good thing is that the book gives due diligence to "Ramble Tamble." And the page on The Big Lebowski is good--never cared for it that much, but I may revisit. Think I'll try to track down some solo work from the other three.

The ending is even sadder and messier than I knew. I didn't know that John never visited Tom in the hospital when he died in 1990.

clemenza, Tuesday, 8 April 2025 17:40 (one year ago)

i had an opportunity to talk to doug and stu a couple years ago but my editor wasn't interested unless i could get fogerty too, very bitter about that still smh

some dude, Tuesday, 8 April 2025 19:15 (one year ago)

That's kind of lousy. Doug and Stu were still half of this monumental band...they were there, every step of the way.

clemenza, Tuesday, 8 April 2025 19:19 (one year ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.