― Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Wednesday, 4 May 2005 06:04 (twenty-one years ago)
― Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Wednesday, 4 May 2005 06:07 (twenty-one years ago)
― dog latin (dog latin), Wednesday, 4 May 2005 07:56 (twenty-one years ago)
― Comstock Carabinieri (nostudium), Wednesday, 4 May 2005 08:01 (twenty-one years ago)
Ha, totally agree. Still classic of course.
― Ste (Fuzzy), Wednesday, 4 May 2005 08:34 (twenty-one years ago)
classic.
― mullygrubbr (bulbs), Wednesday, 4 May 2005 08:45 (twenty-one years ago)
― Baaderonixxxorzh (Fabfunk), Wednesday, 4 May 2005 09:25 (twenty-one years ago)
You need a mouth diaper, `cos you talk an awful lot of shit.
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Wednesday, 4 May 2005 10:49 (twenty-one years ago)
― Comstock Carabinieri (nostudium), Wednesday, 4 May 2005 10:53 (twenty-one years ago)
Brilliant.
― Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Wednesday, 4 May 2005 11:06 (twenty-one years ago)
And with one simple comment, Comstock was freed from the tiresome burden of ever having to be taken seriously.
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Wednesday, 4 May 2005 11:20 (twenty-one years ago)
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Wednesday, 4 May 2005 11:28 (twenty-one years ago)
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Wednesday, 4 May 2005 11:29 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Wednesday, 4 May 2005 13:54 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 4 May 2005 13:59 (twenty-one years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Wednesday, 4 May 2005 14:00 (twenty-one years ago)
― lemin (lemin), Wednesday, 4 May 2005 14:44 (twenty-one years ago)
The REO Speedwagon props above were a joke, right? Please tell me that they were a joke...
― John Justen (johnjusten), Wednesday, 4 May 2005 15:08 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Wednesday, 4 May 2005 15:10 (twenty-one years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Wednesday, 4 May 2005 15:12 (twenty-one years ago)
― jed_ (jed), Wednesday, 4 May 2005 17:05 (twenty-one years ago)
― Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Wednesday, 4 May 2005 17:08 (twenty-one years ago)
― jed_ (jed), Wednesday, 4 May 2005 17:10 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Wednesday, 4 May 2005 17:21 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Wednesday, 4 May 2005 17:22 (twenty-one years ago)
― Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Thursday, 5 May 2005 04:45 (twenty-one years ago)
― milton parker (Jon L), Thursday, 5 May 2005 05:00 (twenty-one years ago)
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Thursday, 5 May 2005 06:36 (twenty-one years ago)
― Sundar (sundar), Saturday, 17 September 2005 00:10 (twenty years ago)
But that aside...the concluding part just makes me think ultimately of giant robots, anime gone hyperreal/hypersorrowful. And why not?
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 20 September 2005 04:46 (twenty years ago)
― jergins (jergins), Tuesday, 20 September 2005 04:53 (twenty years ago)
― Curt1s St3ph3ns, Sunday, 20 November 2005 19:36 (twenty years ago)
― Who is Bimble? Your CHAUFFEUR or something? (Bimble...), Sunday, 20 November 2005 19:44 (twenty years ago)
― jed_ (jed), Sunday, 20 November 2005 19:51 (twenty years ago)
― Curt1s St3ph3ns, Sunday, 20 November 2005 22:03 (twenty years ago)
― alex in mainhattan (alex63), Sunday, 20 November 2005 22:13 (twenty years ago)
― Mr. Snrub (Mr. Snrub), Sunday, 20 November 2005 22:51 (twenty years ago)
― Curt1s St3ph3ns, Sunday, 20 November 2005 23:04 (twenty years ago)
Anyone ever taken on the entire United States Live box? I own it but have never been quite willing to set aside the, what, four hours it calls for...
― Doctor Casino, Monday, 21 November 2005 00:28 (twenty years ago)
― I.M. (I.M.), Monday, 21 November 2005 00:31 (twenty years ago)
This is a heartbreaking commentary on sadness -pity some people miss this.
― Brian Naughton, Tuesday, 14 February 2006 18:49 (twenty years ago)
― Steve Shasta (Steve Shasta), Monday, 28 August 2006 06:04 (nineteen years ago)
― Whiney G. Weingarten (whineyg), Monday, 28 August 2006 07:20 (nineteen years ago)
― nicky lo-fi (nicky lo-fi), Monday, 28 August 2006 07:30 (nineteen years ago)
― the art ensemble of chicago house (vahid), Monday, 28 August 2006 08:13 (nineteen years ago)
― the art ensemble of chicago house (vahid), Monday, 28 August 2006 08:14 (nineteen years ago)
― Marmot (marmotwolof), Monday, 28 August 2006 08:23 (nineteen years ago)
I wrote elsewhere here about how i thought the "b-side" was so cool, with no indication of speed on the label, so "walk the dog" was too fast at 45 and too slow at 33. Such a playful song.
as though the a-side is the "serious art", respectful of minimalist tastes and suitably poised, a bit like a requiem or hymn, at home in the concert hall
and the other side, "walk the dog", is the playful, rock'n'roll, extended mix of that unique sound, musings on culture, what's accepted as "music" these days, etc. etc..
So that little 45 provided multiple contexts, a mini anderson show across two sided, a work-out for the new musical ideas...
So i have to take "o'Superman" as a modern double a-side, an art event on 45 that includes _both_ songs as balanced parts, ..
ie "Walk the Dog" should always be considered included in discussions of "O Superman", Laurie Anderson's extraordinary first single.
― george gosset (gegoss), Monday, 28 August 2006 09:01 (nineteen years ago)
― Kv_nol (Kv_nol), Monday, 28 August 2006 09:30 (nineteen years ago)