― Snappy (sexyDancer), Thursday, 27 January 2005 21:47 (nineteen years ago) link
― amanda lear (Jody Beth Rosen), Thursday, 27 January 2005 21:52 (nineteen years ago) link
― Felonious Drunk (Felcher), Thursday, 27 January 2005 21:54 (nineteen years ago) link
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 27 January 2005 22:03 (nineteen years ago) link
― Momus (Momus), Thursday, 27 January 2005 22:46 (nineteen years ago) link
― Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Thursday, 27 January 2005 23:26 (nineteen years ago) link
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Thursday, 27 January 2005 23:40 (nineteen years ago) link
The best thing about this thread is how you know there's going to be a revive later saying 'ah, wait, I got it!'.
― Ferg, Ah (Ferg), Thursday, 27 January 2005 23:41 (nineteen years ago) link
― jed_ (jed), Thursday, 27 January 2005 23:42 (nineteen years ago) link
Can someone invent a word for this?
― Ferg, Ah (Ferg), Friday, 28 January 2005 00:09 (nineteen years ago) link
― Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Friday, 28 January 2005 00:20 (nineteen years ago) link
Btw, can anyone think of a best-of that puts its subject in a better possible light than 50,000 Fall fans?
― M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Friday, 28 January 2005 00:24 (nineteen years ago) link
― Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Friday, 28 January 2005 00:26 (nineteen years ago) link
Live at the Witch TrialsDragnetGrotesqueHex Enduction HourPerverted by LanguageThe Wonderful and Frightening World of the FallThis Nation's Saving GraceBend SinisterThe Frenz ExperimentI Am Kurious, OranjExtricateShift WorkCode: SelfishThe Infotainment ScanMiddle Class RevoltCererbral CausticThe Light User Syndrome
That takes us up through the end of the Scanlon/Hanley/Brix/etc. eras, at least.
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 28 January 2005 00:32 (nineteen years ago) link
― Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Friday, 28 January 2005 00:37 (nineteen years ago) link
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 28 January 2005 00:45 (nineteen years ago) link
― noodle vague (noodle vague), Friday, 28 January 2005 00:47 (nineteen years ago) link
I would happily shell out for a Fall boxset of Peel Sessions from then to now.
-- Ned Raggett (ne...), June 17th, 2003.
How nice that my prediction is coming true.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 28 January 2005 01:06 (nineteen years ago) link
― Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Friday, 28 January 2005 01:06 (nineteen years ago) link
That makes for a curious x-post. "How nice for the Fall box!" "I TREMBLE IN MOCK TERROR!"
― Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Friday, 28 January 2005 01:07 (nineteen years ago) link
"OH I'M SCARED NOW LONGHAIR SHOEGAZE FREAK!"
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 28 January 2005 01:11 (nineteen years ago) link
― Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Friday, 28 January 2005 01:11 (nineteen years ago) link
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 28 January 2005 01:17 (nineteen years ago) link
-- M@tt He1geson (matt@game[remove]informer.com), January 28th, 2005.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
not many. ChangesOneBowie and Star Time are the immediate ones that come to mind--taking really good catalogues and trimming them down to blindsiding ones. I think JB and Bowie and the Fall are all terrific but there's lots of fat on all of them. (The Bowie is qualified by its coming out in 1976) -- Matos-Webster Dictionary (michaelangelomato...), January 28th, 2005.
― Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Friday, 28 January 2005 01:18 (nineteen years ago) link
-- Tim Ellison (timejeanne...), January 28th, 2005.
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 28 January 2005 01:20 (nineteen years ago) link
― Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Friday, 28 January 2005 01:21 (nineteen years ago) link
― Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Friday, 28 January 2005 01:22 (nineteen years ago) link
― Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Friday, 28 January 2005 01:24 (nineteen years ago) link
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 28 January 2005 01:25 (nineteen years ago) link
― Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Friday, 28 January 2005 01:26 (nineteen years ago) link
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 28 January 2005 01:28 (nineteen years ago) link
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 28 January 2005 01:34 (nineteen years ago) link
― Nic de Teardrop (Nicholas), Friday, 28 January 2005 01:45 (nineteen years ago) link
― polyphonic (polyphonic), Friday, 28 January 2005 02:22 (nineteen years ago) link
Oh, I like the music; it's just that voice. For precisely the same reason, I can't listen to LCD Soundsystem, despite liking the music. Oh, and they're definitely overrated.
― davidsim (davidsim), Friday, 28 January 2005 03:15 (nineteen years ago) link
― scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 28 January 2005 03:47 (nineteen years ago) link
― hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 28 January 2005 04:04 (nineteen years ago) link
― Stormy Davis (diamond), Friday, 28 January 2005 04:06 (nineteen years ago) link
― hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 28 January 2005 04:13 (nineteen years ago) link
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 28 January 2005 04:51 (nineteen years ago) link
― hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 28 January 2005 04:52 (nineteen years ago) link
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 28 January 2005 04:56 (nineteen years ago) link
― mark grout (mark grout), Friday, 28 January 2005 09:12 (nineteen years ago) link
― o. nate (onate), Friday, 28 January 2005 16:08 (nineteen years ago) link
-- M@tt He1geson (matt@game[remove]informer.com), January 28th, 2005.------------------------------------------------------------------------
not many. ChangesOneBowie and Star Time are the immediate ones that come to mind--taking really good catalogues and trimming them down to blindsiding ones. I think JB and Bowie and the Fall are all terrific but there's lots of fat on all of them. (The Bowie is qualified by its coming out in 1976)
-- Matos-Webster Dictionary (michaelangelomato...), January 28th, 2005.
Those are good picks and I just thought of another one, which will probably not be popular on a Fall thread but still it's TRUE!!:
The 2-disc Chronicles Rush best-of that came out in the early 90s. Fucking great job of making them seem flawless!
― M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Friday, 28 January 2005 16:45 (nineteen years ago) link
― Snappy (sexyDancer), Friday, 28 January 2005 16:47 (nineteen years ago) link
'Because they sound like absolute shit on pot.' by Kris
and my comment is... exactly! That's what makes this one of my favorite bands, they're out there to annoy the fuck out of people, they have no tolerance, and they don't give a shit about what you think! I've seen them live only once, and it was one of the shittiest, most slack off live shows I'd ever seen, which is precisely why I'm going back.
― Jena (JenaP), Friday, 28 January 2005 16:49 (nineteen years ago) link
― Reviewer: Sir Potomus (Washington, DC) - See all my reviews (ex machina), Friday, 28 January 2005 16:53 (nineteen years ago) link