"bending hectic" is beautiful imo but yeah, everything else I've heard from the Smile has been zzzz
― Roz, Tuesday, 23 January 2024 04:48 (two years ago)
I feel that this music contains all the same characteristics of my favourite Radiohead tracks— excellent drum recording, fun production addendums, Greenwood’s love of finding the relationships between mediant-related chords and writing the most economic arrangement solutions to the problems that these chords create, the gorgeous timbre of Thom’s voice (and a gentle blind eye turned toward the lyrical content). It has a quotidian quality that exists in opposition to Radiohead’s widescreen canon-aspirations and I like that for me and my ears, I think I’m going to listen to this album a lot.
― flamboyant goon tie included, Tuesday, 23 January 2024 05:57 (two years ago)
Great post
― H.P, Tuesday, 23 January 2024 06:34 (two years ago)
the issue for me is that radiohead used to be able to weave all their interesting ideas into compelling songs and they don't manage that here much.
― ufo, Tuesday, 23 January 2024 11:39 (two years ago)
off topic but imagine being stuck with the name Radiohead when your music is like that
― assert (matttkkkk), Tuesday, 23 January 2024 12:18 (two years ago)
They haven't managed that since Hail to the Thief. I can't remember how a single song on In Rainbows, The King of Limbs or A Moon Shaped Pool goes.
― Tahuti Watches L&O:SVU Reruns Without His Ape (unperson), Tuesday, 23 January 2024 16:08 (two years ago)
Now that's just a mind-bending statement, at least as far as IR and AMSP go
― Jordan s/t (Jordan), Tuesday, 23 January 2024 16:12 (two years ago)
Hell even for TKOL!
Separator (and Staircase) are some of their best tracks of all time.
― ✖✖✖ (Moka), Tuesday, 23 January 2024 21:32 (two years ago)
But yeah not remembering even a single song of In Rainbows sounds to me like there has to be some minerals missing in your diet.
― ✖✖✖ (Moka), Tuesday, 23 January 2024 21:45 (two years ago)
lol moka,
Not to pile on, but in rainbows main deficit imo is how bloody stock-standard and by the numbers everything is! You don’t get the surprises in it that the previous albums had, for better and for worse. Everything is weaved together with such polish, there’s no “wtf, that’s a bit of a change of pace ain’t it Radiohead?” Moments like how the first two tracks of kid A + nearly all of amnesiac/httt hit you with on their first listen. Part of that can be attributed to career trajectory creating expectations that of course 15 steps child choir will be followed by body snatches classic-rock number followed by nudes bassy spacey mood, all finished with videotapes doomy-gloomy-tech-march. But most of it is down to the fact that there’s not a single wasted moment on in rainbows. Amplified by coming from httt, all the tracks on in rainbows are extremely economical in communicating their theme, sound, world.
That might all mean nothing, so to condense: every song on in rainbows is masterfully weaved into a compelling product, almost too polished to be consumed without feeling sick, unless you’re willing to abandon the shame of eating a variety pack of 10 macarons.
― H.P, Wednesday, 24 January 2024 00:04 (two years ago)
in rainbows is polished, concise, and coherent sure, but that doesn't mean anything on it is 'stock-standard and by the numbers' and it definitely doesn't mean there isn't any stylistic variety.
― ufo, Wednesday, 24 January 2024 00:29 (two years ago)
Oh I can totally understand not liking their music or feeling it’s less challenging or impactful than what came before it..Yeah, they mellowed out, and why not? They earned it… they’re almost in their 60s now… I’d argue they kept doing some pretty good music all things considered -but saying you can’t remember a single song HTTT onwards is wild to me.
Of course I’m biased, I remember even their most non-descript b-sides… hey, I’m not big on In Rainbows myself, but it’s filled with some of their “hook-iest” songs. I’ll meet halfways and concede TKOL or AMSP being mostly formless and “vibe-y”…
― ✖✖✖ (Moka), Wednesday, 24 January 2024 00:29 (two years ago)
have to agree; "weird fishes" was instantly memorable for me. on first listen, i couldn't wait to finish the album and go straight back to it. maybe their best song?
― she fell asleep with her hand around my throat (Austin), Wednesday, 24 January 2024 01:18 (two years ago)
It’s Radiohead being Radiohead in their most stock-standard, by the numbers form. As differentiated from Radiohead being a stock-standard by the numbers band on in rainbows (this is not what I’m saying). Not a value-judgement, sometimes that’s exactly what wets my appetite
― H.P, Wednesday, 24 January 2024 03:24 (two years ago)
There’s better descriptive terms for in rainbows though. Stock-standard Radiohead by no means explains the whole album, and yeah maybe it’s a bit too reductive to put it like that.
― H.P, Wednesday, 24 January 2024 03:25 (two years ago)
most of in rainbows is still covering new ground for them so i'm really not sure where the idea that it's 'by numbers' comes from. it's not like they're just rehashing ok computer or something
― ufo, Wednesday, 24 January 2024 03:30 (two years ago)
to me it felt like streamlining everything they had gotten right up until then.
― she fell asleep with her hand around my throat (Austin), Wednesday, 24 January 2024 03:38 (two years ago)
to some extent, but there's this warm, tasteful, soul-influenced vibe throughout the album that was then new for them. like, what sounds like "reckoner" or "house of cards", or "nude" on previous albums?
― ufo, Wednesday, 24 January 2024 03:51 (two years ago)
Yeah Austin putting it more succinctly. It’s by no means a rehash of their previous stuff, but Reckoner and House of Cards are in There There imo, Nude is in a mix of How To Disappear Completely and The Tourist. I just think In rainbows they polished everything up to that point into a beautiful product, without rehashing, and also without losing their identity.
― H.P, Wednesday, 24 January 2024 04:37 (two years ago)
To clarify, I don’t think reckoner is just a redo of There There with a fresh coat of paint, but I do think the elements on in rainbows can be found in their previous discography in a way you couldn’t say of their previous albums. Except maybe hail to the thief, but that has no way near the polish nor quality that in rainbows has
― H.P, Wednesday, 24 January 2024 04:39 (two years ago)
I generally think of Radiohead’s oeuvre as a bunch of dudes leaning back further and further into their relaxing chaise chairs and taking it easier and easier, me
― flamboyant goon tie included, Wednesday, 24 January 2024 05:27 (two years ago)
in rainbows is probably their chillest album though, there's definitely elements of that to tkol and amsp but parts of them are denser and murkier idk
i talk about the soul influence on in rainbows but "reckoner" was actually yorke trying to imitate rhcp iirc
― ufo, Wednesday, 24 January 2024 06:07 (two years ago)
remembering that completely explains how the final "reckoner" somehow emerged out of the early "reckoner" that eventually became "feeling pulled apart by horses"
― ufo, Wednesday, 24 January 2024 06:09 (two years ago)
Yup Teleharmonic rules
― ✖✖✖ (Moka), Friday, 26 January 2024 08:17 (two years ago)
FGTI OTM, and this is why so much of their output from IR onwards doesn't move me much. There's a lack of tension across so much of it. I think this is partially due to their desire to abandon "traditional" song structures in favor of vibier, more hypnotic approaches. But a lot of those jammier, vibier (sorry for using that word twice) tracks feel like they don't go anywhere, and they were *so good* at song structure, using it to build tension and release, and IMO it was the balance between that and their experimentalism that made them magic to my ears.
― feed me with your chips (zchyrs), Friday, 26 January 2024 14:13 (two years ago)
yep
― imago, Friday, 26 January 2024 14:26 (two years ago)
I mean sure, I maintain that their best songs (#1 “Paranoid Android” with a bullet) are from their ambitious prog era, but my own quotidian listening needs have been better met by post-IR material.
― flamboyant goon tie included, Friday, 26 January 2024 14:39 (two years ago)
I generally think of Radiohead’s oeuvre as a bunch of dudes leaning back further and further into their relaxing chaise chairs and taking it easier and easier, me― flamboyant goon tie included
― flamboyant goon tie included
Just some chill dudes. At ease. Eating well.
Irony aside, it's become more and more of a fascinating spectacle as I've gotten older. The comfortable artist. Not all cishet white men are comfortable artists, but pretty much all comfortable artists are cishet white men.
The thing that clicks most with me about Radiohead's earlier work is the panic. Just this intense anxiety and panic. I think there's still that impulse present in their work... it's just been channeled in more socially acceptable ways. Like being concerned about Gender Ideology. That's not irrational, blind panic. That's _just asking questions_.
These days I relate better to Angel Marcloid's work.
― Kate (rushomancy), Friday, 26 January 2024 15:19 (two years ago)
yeah agree about the panic, the anxiety. That’s what made Ok Computer stand out so much at the time to me.
― brimstead, Friday, 26 January 2024 16:45 (two years ago)
26 years of panic and vomit
― maf you one two (maffew12), Friday, 26 January 2024 16:53 (two years ago)
Panic & Vomit: The Curse of the Where's Chorus?
― guanacoyaki (Sufjan Grafton), Friday, 26 January 2024 18:21 (two years ago)
You don't remember
― immodesty blaise (jimbeaux), Friday, 26 January 2024 20:08 (two years ago)
There’s still some of the OKC and Kid A/Amnesiac anxiety and panic though?
Like per example “Burn the Witch” (which I think was sketched back on the Kid A sessions) could comfortably be added to Amnesiac and wouldn’t sound out of place and it would actually be one of the highlights.
Weird Fishes/Arpeggi wouldn’t also feel out of place on Kid A… feels similar to “In Limbo” to me.
“Morning mr magpie” is also from those sessions and “little by little” sounds very paranoid.. those two wouldn’t sound out of place on something like HTTT.
I mean the bite is still definitely there for my ears, but yeah it’s valid criticism since they seem to prefer to do mellow, textural things or stick to a groove and vibe with it.
― ✖✖✖ (Moka), Friday, 26 January 2024 20:09 (two years ago)
This new one is much better than I expected
― Jordan s/t (Jordan), Friday, 26 January 2024 20:58 (two years ago)
Yeah, I was a little worried after reading people online who listened to the leak describing the album as boring but I kind of love it. Sure, more vibe-y than structured but the vibe is exactly what I want from Radiohead in 2024
― ˈʌglɪɪst preɪ, Friday, 26 January 2024 21:19 (two years ago)
does this mean Radiohead is basically kaputt? would imagine so
― frogbs, Friday, 26 January 2024 21:24 (two years ago)
it means Phil was sacked iirc
― guanacoyaki (Sufjan Grafton), Friday, 26 January 2024 21:52 (two years ago)
After seeing the couple "boring" posts on here I went in with tempered expectations and I really enjoyed it on first listen! Almost more immediate for me than the first.
― DT, Saturday, 27 January 2024 04:18 (two years ago)
whenever any of them are asked about radiohead's future in interviews they say they haven't broken up and intend to do something eventually but there aren't any plans yet. i figure it'll happen once thom & jonny run out of momentum with the smile, but that might take a little while, it wouldn't really surprise me if they just jump back in and make the smile lp3 once they're done touring wall of eyes.
― ufo, Saturday, 27 January 2024 05:21 (two years ago)
Other than Bending Hectic, wasn’t really feeling the prerelease tracks. And yet…LOVING the album.
― Davey D, Sunday, 28 January 2024 02:13 (two years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WhivN4GJQCQ
^ this is very pretty! there's some British prog thing going on the bass that I can't seem to nail...
― fpsa, Sunday, 28 January 2024 06:51 (two years ago)
Top youtube comment;
“Kids in the crowd “PLAY CREEP!””
― ✖✖✖ (Moka), Sunday, 28 January 2024 15:29 (two years ago)
there's some British prog thing going on the bass that I can't seem to nail...
The sound is very Van der Graaf Generator/Atomic Rooster.
― Tahuti Watches L&O:SVU Reruns Without His Ape (unperson), Sunday, 28 January 2024 17:34 (two years ago)
This might be my favourite Radiohead-related album since King of Limbs.
― Frederik B, Sunday, 28 January 2024 19:14 (two years ago)
I guess I quite enjoyed what I've heard of this. Yes it is "boring", or at least lacking in high energy flash-bangs, but not unpleasantly so. I can imagine myself putting this on quite a bit when I just need music to listen to and can't decide what.
Still can't quite work out what projects like this are about, as in, where the two most prominent members of a band decide to do a side project that doesn't sound especially different in style and scope to the main project.
I mean, I'd understand if Thom and Jonny had this real urge to explore a specific sound away from Radiohead - post-punk or hip hop or something. But A lot of this really does sound like A Moon Shaped Pool to me.
I understand if this were released as the next Radiohead album there'd probably be a backlash, but what then is The Smile other than a platform for Radiohead "B-songs" done in a slightly more stripped back style?
― ...eh you get the gist of it (dog latin), Sunday, 28 January 2024 20:43 (two years ago)
It sounds less fussed-over, more "first thought, best thought" to my ears, liberated from the expectations surrounding "the next entry in the Radiohead canon", just musicians doing what comes most-naturally to them, and I like that. The same way I don't think I'd claim that any Beak> album is superior to any Portishead album, and yet I listen to more Beak> than Portishead because it feels like less investment, less emotional weight, but a similar set of sonic rewards
― in an aeroplane under the sea (flamboyant goon tie included), Sunday, 28 January 2024 22:23 (two years ago)
Wasn't The Smile *supposed* to be more of a post-punk thing? I recall reading that somewhere before hearing any music...in any case I never got that vibe from the finished product.
― DT, Monday, 29 January 2024 09:41 (two years ago)
i don't think they were supposed to be more of a post-punk thing explicitly or anything, maybe people just said that's what they sounded like after the first few songs they premiered or something
the reason the smile exists is just that thom & jonny wanted to make music during the pandemic but the others were unavailable. that seems to have been a very creatively productive time for them - they said they still have more smile material they're working on, mostly dating back to back to that big creative burst during the pandemic, but they've been writing more on tour too. they're just feeling creatively energised at the moment
― ufo, Monday, 29 January 2024 12:07 (two years ago)
there are a number of reasons i do not really want to listen to radiohead or associated projects anymore, but i really like this new record. i mean, i knew i would from the moment everyone decided it was boring and lacked compelling songs. the mistier and harder-to-pin-down the compositions are in the better imo, the main reason moon shaped pool and king of limbs are my fave radiohead releases these days
― ivy., Tuesday, 30 January 2024 15:30 (two years ago)
Lol yeah I actually liked this more than I thought I would. I really like the production too… I feel like Godrich is good but sometimes a slight change is good.
TKOL is easily a top 3 RH album for me - probably top 2 if Staircase and Supercollider were part of it - idk why so many Radiohead fans seem to rank it next to Pablo Honey.
― ✖✖✖ (Moka), Wednesday, 31 January 2024 22:05 (two years ago)