proto-Fleet Foxes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZtVORaI-f0s
― papal hotwife (milo z), Sunday, 9 October 2022 07:13 (one year ago) link
Their 90’s house list is agreeable for the most part.
― ✖✖✖ (Moka), Thursday, 13 October 2022 18:33 (one year ago) link
The music doesn’t begin so much as surface, as if “Around the World” arises from some great depth, that lowpass filter cutting out the high-end without obscuring the “fundamental” signal. And then the song fully emerges, the bass suddenly going like something stolen out from under Bernard Edwards’ fingertips, the hi-hat doing that bright, open chhh business on the offbeat. The up-from-underground stuff turns out to have been sort of poignantly appropriate. “Around the World” was an exhumation, disco as reworked in post-industrial Chicago and Detroit, then adapted anew by two blessed weirdos from Montmartre, Thomas Bangalter and Guy-Manuel de Homem-Christo.
Who says dance music isn't exciting?
― hi hole im dad (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 13 October 2022 19:25 (one year ago) link
damn another classic by that guy
― flamenco drop (BradNelson), Thursday, 13 October 2022 19:33 (one year ago) link
i've said it before and i'll say it again–"da funk" destroys "around the world" any day of the week
― comedy khadafi (voodoo chili), Thursday, 13 October 2022 19:46 (one year ago) link
agree 1000%
― lets hear some blues on those synths (brimstead), Thursday, 13 October 2022 20:02 (one year ago) link
1000000000000%
― Toshirō Nofune (The Seventh ILXorai), Thursday, 13 October 2022 20:14 (one year ago) link
what if they are both good songs?
― Muad'Doob (Moodles), Thursday, 13 October 2022 20:56 (one year ago) link
they only picked one
― comedy khadafi (voodoo chili), Thursday, 13 October 2022 20:59 (one year ago) link
My only complaint about this list is that they picked a bunch of songs that they already wrote up blurbs about in the top 250 songs list.
― MarkoP, Thursday, 13 October 2022 21:32 (one year ago) link
missing:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=no1vf854aUc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HSwda46cNMg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yNSpLqmY6K0
― fpsa, Thursday, 13 October 2022 21:45 (one year ago) link
Hard pass on the David Morales and there are much much better AVH productions. The Bucketheads was pretty much peak Kenny Gonzalez though true.
― recovering internet addict/shitposter (viborg), Thursday, 13 October 2022 22:02 (one year ago) link
oh yeah, didn't even realize "the bomb" wasn't on there! damn
― comedy khadafi (voodoo chili), Thursday, 13 October 2022 23:08 (one year ago) link
Fly Life in its Brix Mix is a top 10 record of the 90s
― you can see me from westbury white horse, Thursday, 13 October 2022 23:10 (one year ago) link
and the Extra mix is a stunning catwalk of bass and freeform white noise
― you can see me from westbury white horse, Thursday, 13 October 2022 23:12 (one year ago) link
Pitchfork doesn’t really have any authority to run such a list, afaic— why would I pay attention to it?
― broccoli rabe thomas (the table is the table), Friday, 14 October 2022 11:09 (one year ago) link
What does authority have to do with it? It's just some people's opinions about music.
― jaymc, Friday, 14 October 2022 13:06 (one year ago) link
Pitchfork let their music opinion license lapse.
― “uhh”—like, this is an insane oatmeal raisin cookie “uhh” (President Keyes), Friday, 14 October 2022 13:22 (one year ago) link
What does authority have to do with it?
well they call it "The 30 Best House Tracks of the ’90s" so you might think they were experts on the genre
don't imagine people who care deeply abt 90s house look to p4k for coverage
enjoyed the list
― corrs unplugged, Friday, 14 October 2022 15:55 (one year ago) link
are there reasons to assert Sherburne and Cardew aren't experts here? I'm no expert, so I genuinely don't know
― rob, Friday, 14 October 2022 16:06 (one year ago) link
I meant merely what corrs understood— P4k is not a site that has much to do with the genre, and p4k wasn’t even around during much of that decade. Sherburne is a fine writer and a nice person, from mymemories, but it just seems like a primer that has been done before by publications that come from the culture. Yeah, it’s a boring ‘authenticity’ argument, but oh well— that’s what a site is subject to when it is a clearinghouse for criticism of every genre of music.
― broccoli rabe thomas (the table is the table), Friday, 14 October 2022 19:58 (one year ago) link
Yeah, that's fair; I feel similarly when they turn their attention to Jamaican music. Plus there is something undeniably opportunistic or just trend-chasing about big-upping house in particular right now
(my q was based on the fact that Sherburne is the primary reason I read their reviews these days, but I hear you)
― rob, Friday, 14 October 2022 20:30 (one year ago) link
I really enjoyed Rich Juzwiak on Janet Jackson's The Velvet Rope today.
― boxedjoy, Saturday, 15 October 2022 15:06 (one year ago) link
I’m pretty sure Pitchfork is a business, not a… idk individual person or whatever. I don’t think the business is trying to be hip or authentic or something with a list of house records I think they’re just trying to get clicks. And I agree that’s wrong.
― lets hear some blues on those synths (brimstead), Saturday, 15 October 2022 16:13 (one year ago) link
There are other ways to get clicks, you know. I hear tell of this Kanye guy.
― “uhh”—like, this is an insane oatmeal raisin cookie “uhh” (President Keyes), Saturday, 15 October 2022 16:41 (one year ago) link
Well I've been saying for years Pitchfork should open an unaccredited academy
― Vinnie, Saturday, 15 October 2022 23:45 (one year ago) link
finally got around to this onehttps://pitchfork.com/features/lists-and-guides/great-records-you-may-have-missed-spring-summer-2022/
so much good stuff in there, weird that it's kind of hidden away
― corrs unplugged, Friday, 21 October 2022 08:35 (one year ago) link
not sure what the point of having a rating system is if every album gets a 7.8
― na (NA), Tuesday, 25 October 2022 14:02 (one year ago) link
oh cool, a new Sloan album.
― jmm, Tuesday, 25 October 2022 14:06 (one year ago) link
oh yes i was looking forward to another dose of "Ferguson's power-pop wimpiness" lol... yeah ok pretty much
― maf you one two (maffew12), Tuesday, 25 October 2022 14:15 (one year ago) link
― na (NA), Tuesday, October 25, 2022 9:02 AM (thirty-two minutes ago) bookmarkflaglink
― jmm,
lol, before i checked, i thought "but doesn't Sloan always score in the 6.8 to 7.2 range?
― Karl Malone, Tuesday, 25 October 2022 14:35 (one year ago) link
i guess they've ranged across the 7s before
― Karl Malone, Tuesday, 25 October 2022 14:37 (one year ago) link
my post wasn't about a specific album, it was about how any time i actually open a review on their site it's always a 7.8
― na (NA), Tuesday, 25 October 2022 14:49 (one year ago) link
Probably because 7.8 is low enough they don't have to think about tagging it "Best New Music" but also high enough that they don't have to deal with the rabid, angry fanbases that see anything less than a 7.6 as a career destroying pan.
― a superficial sheeb of intelligence (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Tuesday, 25 October 2022 14:55 (one year ago) link
the rabid, super angry Sloan fans
― insane oatmeal raisin cookie posse (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 25 October 2022 14:56 (one year ago) link
if they they think they can safely avoid the ire of the dry cleaning stan army, they’ve got another thing coming
― comedy khadafi (voodoo chili), Tuesday, 25 October 2022 14:56 (one year ago) link
7.8 basically means 'yeah it's great but it doesn't really fit our current editorial profile for BNM content', disregard and move on, we don't need these cynical cowards
― imago, Tuesday, 25 October 2022 15:06 (one year ago) link
that do, vc?
― imago, Tuesday, 25 October 2022 15:07 (one year ago) link
like rolling stone's 3 1/2 star
― Evan, Tuesday, 25 October 2022 15:23 (one year ago) link
scores have been lower even for bnm's this year, pitchfork is finally getting sick of music
― comedy khadafi (voodoo chili), Tuesday, 25 October 2022 15:28 (one year ago) link
Every time there's a BNM I guess 8.3 or 8.4 and so often I am right
― you can see me from westbury white horse, Tuesday, 25 October 2022 15:29 (one year ago) link
Like I'm not sure how many there have been relative to higher scores but it's become my stock guess
― you can see me from westbury white horse, Tuesday, 25 October 2022 15:30 (one year ago) link
pitchfork should should do a focus group where they ask their readers to rate their ratings.
how does a 6.5 rating make you feel? ...about a...seven. a 7.2ok, how about a 7.4 rating5 point.....five.8.2?8.4.8.4?8.2.how about a 10?9.2.
― Karl Malone, Tuesday, 25 October 2022 15:44 (one year ago) link
yankee...10 hotel...9.2 foxtrot...which is a 6.4 for me
― Karl Malone, Tuesday, 25 October 2022 15:45 (one year ago) link
haven't even looked at the selections yet, but the bpms charted at the top seem to be completely wrong
https://pitchfork.com/features/interactives/1990s-readers-poll-results/
"heart-shaped box" at 203? wonderwall at 175? what?
― comedy khadafi (voodoo chili), Tuesday, 25 October 2022 16:00 (one year ago) link
LOL
https://i.imgur.com/iZPI93A.jpg
― Reese's Pisces Iscariot (morrisp), Tuesday, 25 October 2022 16:07 (one year ago) link
idaho is feeling very sinister
― comedy khadafi (voodoo chili), Tuesday, 25 October 2022 16:08 (one year ago) link
they don't have to deal with the rabid, angry fanbases that see anything less than a 7.6 as a career destroying pan.
such fanbases almost definitely overstating pfork's influence in the year of our lord 2022
― Paul Ponzi, Tuesday, 25 October 2022 16:08 (one year ago) link
xxpost The BPMs are accurate if you read them in double-time, though I don't know why anyone would
― insane oatmeal raisin cookie posse (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 25 October 2022 16:09 (one year ago) link
the new sloan is v good
― a (waterface), Tuesday, 25 October 2022 16:10 (one year ago) link