― ethan, Wednesday, 29 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Andy K, Wednesday, 29 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Tom, Wednesday, 29 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 29 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Sterling Clover, Wednesday, 29 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― fritz, Wednesday, 29 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― mark s, Wednesday, 29 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
How else are the conforming non-conformists going to distance themselves from their identical brethern? In their quest to be different, they end up with the same clothing, the same piercings, the same tattoos, and the same convoluted take on individuality. So as a reaction to that, they need a common enemy, something to despise (because despising Top 40 would mean you care enough about Top 40 to acknowledge its existence when apathy is all the rage, punny enough).
The elitests deplore indie because it's what they know best, it's what they once enjoyed and now find unacceptable because it doesn't meet their fleeting, mercurial expectations. Instead of risking ridicule for being unlike their decidedly biased peers, they decide it's acceptable to trash the genre they once supported because it couldn't possibly be like it was in the good ol' days. But as they continue to disassociate themselves from the actual music in favor of critiquing the entire genre, their opinion becomes increasingly moot.
And anyone under the age of 20 shouldn't be talking about "the kids."
― namdam, Wednesday, 29 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
so, indie would be like your middle school girl or boy friend...while these other tastes are more developed relationships you had as you got older?
not really indie's lack of depth, but your understanding of music/love of a genre as you matured as a music lover?
if that's what you're going on, that's probably the best explanation offered so far, in my humble opinion.
m.
― msp, Wednesday, 29 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Josh, Wednesday, 29 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
I haven't had time to beat any wives lately because I've been so busy throwing away all of my records with the same number of songs on each side.
Cheers.
― jel --, Wednesday, 29 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Clarke B., Wednesday, 29 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
I prefer that the kids not talk about "the kids" because they are, in fact, "the kids." People over 40 can do whatever the hell they want.
― jess, Wednesday, 29 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Jeff, Wednesday, 29 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Sean Carruthers, Wednesday, 29 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Nate Patrin, Wednesday, 29 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Dom Passantino, Wednesday, 29 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― holy shit, i am not making this up., Wednesday, 29 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
guilt: Remorseful awareness of having done something wrong. Self-reproach for supposed inadequacy or wrongdoing.
Why the guilt, ex-indie rockers? new answers please.
― http://gygax.pitas.com, Wednesday, 29 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
b-but why did you buy them in the first place? can't you COUNT!?
If sequencing or song placement is the measure by which you determine the quality of a record, then I am very pleased indeed that we have little in common with regard to taste in music.
I know it must be endlessly rewarding to develop such a carefully calculated theory about "Symmetric Tracks Per Side" (or STPS as "the kids" are calling it), but the records sound so much better when you actually take them out of the sleeves and play them once in a while. I know, then it won't be MINT anymore, but you could always eBay it.
Oh, and I love your answer to the original question. Very direct.
(oh God, I sound stupid when I try to make a sensible point )
case in point: In the 1996 thread, someone mentioned defending any year (with rare exception) with "indie" records was *gasp* "precarious" (interesting how these words are used usually by people who quote dictionary definitions O_o), yet this person is clearly an indie product (as tackily (but necessarily as to make this particular point) referenced above). there is a definite anti-indie backlash in this forum, usually by those who possibly embraced it harder than others. i singled one person out unfairly, but this person is far from being the lone voice of indie guilt on ILM.
i'm looking to answer the question, not attack any online persona... Esp, not any wigga! Some of my best friends are wiggaz. w3rd y0! I think Josh's answer is most OTM so far.
― Dare, Wednesday, 29 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― bnw, Wednesday, 29 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)