Throwing Muses: C-o-D

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (540 of them)
TM = Ut for lightweights

mark s, Tuesday, 3 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Agree with comments abour Real Ramona - melody, passion and to hell with the herky-jerky time changes. A Classic.

Don't agree about Red Heaven - side one, possibly best TM ever. Will expand tomorrow.

Another classic - "University" - contains best TM track "Bright yellow gun". That drumming!

Duds - Hunkpapa, Fat Skier, most of debut, side 2 of House Tornado.

Dr. C, Tuesday, 3 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Funny band, this, actually. Some people - intelligent people, and all that - LOVE them. And there's nothing about them that I really dislike. I think I can see some of what their appeal might be - the kooky-woman-poet thing that had Stevie T reciting Emily Dickinson to them doesn't much appeal to me, but must appeal to some. But apart from that record, I find what I've heard rather average rock music. Neither Classic Nor Dud (but Throwing Muses)? I'd quite like to hear why this relatively ignorant view is 'wrong'.

the pinefox, Tuesday, 3 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Tom, you got me into them way back when and I thank you for it even now. I still contend that 'The Real Ramona'is their peak achievement but hey, I like Belly too so what do I know?

Guy Flower, Wednesday, 4 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Oh yes ... TM = Classic, of course!

Guy Flower, Wednesday, 4 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Bizarrely enough, I was also going to ask this question today, as I've been wondering why no one had really brought them up in the 9 months ILM's been going.

Anyhow, absolute classic. Probably my favourite band ever. House Tornado and The Real Ramona are the peaks but I also love the first album, Fat Skier and Chains Changed unreservedly. I reckon they had a bit of a slump after Tanya left, as one of their main attractions for me was the interplay between the two guitars and voices, but University is still a fine album. Hunkpapa is the only serious misstep, with all its filler and mistaken attempts at going pop. Hips and Makers is also great but the last couple of Hersh solo albums have been a bit weak.

Richard Tunnicliffe, Wednesday, 4 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

"Red Heaven" sounds like Tanya has just walked out mid-way through a pre-recording warm-up, and Kristen has said "OK, let's do the album without her -I'll turn up my guitar and David, you've got to hit the drums like fury". The opening trio "Furious", "Firepile" and "Dio" are damn near perfect, and Kristen even manages to rope in Bob Mould, who's working in a nearby studio, for backing vocals.

It's not as *finished* as The Real Ramona or University, but probably the one I'd say best defines what TM are *about*. It's a type of album I like - sort of like a Scooby album, but not quite. Can't think of a neat way to describe it, but these albums are usually seen as a move in a different direction, often a slightly wrong move (not a total disaster though), and polarise opinion like crazy. They're the kind of album I seek out. Other examples : "Brotherhood" , "Monster", "Punch the Clock".

Dr. C, Wednesday, 4 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

So classic it's just not even a debatable issue in my mind.

I'd put them on a classic/sacred cow status equal to that of "The Smiths" (not the Smiths the band necessarily, but The Smiths, the Legend). In fact, for many of the same reasons-

First off, stunning and original guitarwork and musicianship (the hypnotic drums, especially the use of rolls for texture has only ever been matched by Echo & the Bunnymen)

Second, the interplay between two very powerful yet opposed figures (Ver Muses, however, managed to hold fast to their musical ideals even after the figures parted, as evidenced by the quality of the solo work)

Third, because no one has ever managed to quite penetrate and articulate the exact dimensions of the adolescent female mind in quite the same way. ("Delicate Cutters") In fact, probably *all* of the female experience- motherhood, madness, marriage, adulthood- without ever being cloyingly sentimental or insipid, or verving into the other extreme of being overly feminazi. Hersch simply *is* female, and she expresses it perfectly, not as an afterthought or a gimmick.

Standouts for me are:

The self titled album. I can no longer actually listen to this album, because it expressed and encapsulated so perfectly a time in my life that I would rather forget. It's not a fault of the album that I can no longer listen to it, but rather shows the POWER of it.

The Real Ramona. The two sisters at their most balanced, their most equal in power and songwriting ability, and of course, the band could not survive in that form. Also the most pop, and probably the most easily listenable of the albums.

Hips and Makers. Hersch wandering around the big, empty, spooky house of finally being a proper grown-up and wondering what to do with all the space. Never did anything so sparse sound so lush.

masonic boom, Wednesday, 4 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Gotto go with the Doctor, 'Red Heaven' is pretty good, so a bit of a Scooby Doo album. Although I like 'The Real Ramona' and just am not able to buy the first album (maybe because T.M are filed past the Dance section in my favourite recordshops ;). Pretty good live too, Tanya D. not an irritating factor, at all.

Omar, Wednesday, 4 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Classic, especially Real Ramona, which features one of my favourite singles of all time - Not too soon, a joyous mess of a song

cabbage, Wednesday, 4 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I loved University and Hips and Makers when they came out but then filed them away never to be listened to again after about a year...but I do remember enjoying them at the time. I actually saw them live at Reading once...which was nice. In answer...I'm not sure but I think I'll listen to then tonight, so thanks for bringing that back to my attention.

Add, Wednesday, 4 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Masonic Boom is quite eloquent above - but I think her differentiation between the Smiths and "The Smiths" is, in this context, bogus. The question is: is the band good? - or: how much do you like this band and why? - not: let's discuss the mythology that's grown up around the band (interesting though that might be).

The distinction I make here also has a slightly bogus look. I haven't expressed it too well. But I suppose my point is: there is no difference, really - at least *in this particular context* - between the Smiths (the great pop group who changed so many of our lives) and "The Smiths" ("the great pop group who changed so many of our lives").

the pinefox, Wednesday, 4 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

For a few years in the early 90s Throwing Muses were my favourite band in the world. I think they were the first band to affect me in *physical* way - like a punch to the stomach. I think roundabout the same time I was reading Camille Paglia, and they made her proselytising of clinical pagan daemonic art seem beautiful and true (Paglia on Emily Dickinson could almost be a great lost freeform Muses review - right down to the Amherst connection). 'Hate My Way' is the peak, probably: majestic in its crippled, stuttering prowl. But as an album, House Tornado is difficult to beat. Even the title is a perfect distillation of the *uncanny* (all that is un-homely, coming home to roost - in the same way that the group blasted open notions of the domestic, folk or country with blasts of noise, weird martial rhythms, the madwoman in the attic). It's an incredible contraption made from wood, electricity and the broken bones of the heart. I'm going to listen to it again, right now.

stevie t, Wednesday, 4 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

No, Pinefox, my classification of The Smiths (the band) sv. The Smiths (the Legend) is not bogus. Throwing Muses, do, however, compare to both of them.

The Smiths (the band) = either "they saved my angsty teenage life" or "miserable whinging git Morrosey and his Elvis-ripping off henchmen" while The Smiths (the legend) = greatest British band since the Beatles, etc. etc. etc. and all the dissecting of the legend and the personalitys that shaped it and so on.

I was comparing TM to the legend, in terms of their status as giants of music.

masonic boom, Wednesday, 4 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I still think the distinction is bogus. People who think of the Smiths as the greatest British band since the Beatles don't think of that as "legend" - it's simply their honest opinion on the Smiths.

Did I say "their"?

the pinefox, Wednesday, 4 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Stevie: RIGHT NOW?

What you say above is eloquent and admirable. I wonder if one day you will be able to convince me of it. And I wonder what it would take.

the pinefox, Wednesday, 4 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

'Ang on, 'ang on. 'Broken bones of the heart'?

the pinefox, Wednesday, 4 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I refer, of course, to "the heart" the legend, rather than the heart, the cardio-vascular organ.

stevie t, Wednesday, 4 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Oh.

I "heart" you, Stevie.

the pinefox, Wednesday, 4 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Phew - there I was worrying that I'd have to waste vital Henman vs Federer time on this thread, scrambling around for the right phrases and so forth and Stevie T goes and articulates almost *precisely* what I loved about Throwing Muses in the period 1989-91.

The physical - yes. "House Tornado" - yes (it made no sense to me and I ignored the tape for weeks; it made sense somewhere near the perimeter of an MoD firing range on Formby beach, late summer '89, wind whipping sand into my headphones).

The most excited I've ever been at a gig - Muses, Trent Poly, Feb '91. The most excited I've ever been about a forthcoming release - "The Real Ramona", Feb '91. The most disappointed I've ever been by an eagerly-awaited release - "Red Heaven", Aug '92.

Right - come on, Roger...

Michael Jones, Wednesday, 4 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Bloody hell, Mike! He's MURDERING him this set!!

the pinefox, Wednesday, 4 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Other thing: I respect greatly your and Stevie's enthusiasm for the band. I like it more (as you can imagine) than your enthusiasm for All Saints (not that it's any of my business what you want to listen to on the bus). BUT I still don't feel that what is great about the band has been articulated. Good things have been said, even if they were about the broken bones of the legendary "heart" (hey - Only Connect to Lou Reed!). It's like the Sutherlands never happened. (I blame Alan Sunderland, as you know; but that's another [David] storey). BUT no, sorry, what you lads are saying about the band doesn't quite square with the memory of them that I have. Which is, um, metallic guitar sounds (but not much exciting guitar playing, save on the aforementioned classic LP that, oops, you don't like) - loping drums - atonal-type vocal style - cut-up-type lyrics - that kind of thing.

It must seem unreasonable of me to nitpick away at it like this. I'm not trying to say they're a Dud. I just don't quite see the Classic bit, either, on the whole.

the pinefox, Wednesday, 4 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I should probably explain why I have such a distaste for Red Heaven (rather than just calling it a disaster). As others have pointed out, it rocks, and it rocks really hard. From that perspective, it does it really well, and I have no complaints with that. Following hot on the heels of The Real Ramona, though, it couldn't help but be a disappointment. The band had shown that they were capable of some really unique songwriting and playing, and that they didn't have to sacrifice melody. By cranking the amps up so high on Red Heaven, they sounded like they were trying to prove something...notably that they still had energy after Donnelly left. I didn't buy it for one second, especially because I found the songwriting on Red Heaven extremely dull and simple. I should also mention that I absolutely lurved Bob Mould at the time, and thought he was the best guitarist around at the time. Even that wasn't enough to make me like "Dio". In an alternate plane where the Muses hadn't just released the most perfect album of their career, Red Heaven may have been okay, but in context it was a bitter disappointment. To me, anyhow.

Sean Carruthers, Wednesday, 4 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I've just reread Stevie T's marvellous paean above for the umpteenth time, and, no, I still don't see it, I mean, hear it. Rock Music. You make it sound pretty interesting.

the pinefox, Wednesday, 4 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

bob mould's contribution to red heaven is entirely forgettable, sounds like he woke up and stumbled into the recording session but 'red heaven' has several wonderful songs especially 'pearl'. my faves are 'real ramona' and the first record, i don't much like fat skier or the last two which sounded a bit too polished and distant. hips and makers is also amazing, especially 'me and my charms' and 'a loon' which are truly breathtaking. i always get annoyed at people proclaiming sleater-kinney some sort of groundbreaking act of girls with guitars making powerful music when kristin and tanya were doing it years before them. i haven't gotten any of the last three solo records but i do like that appalachian folk thing she released only through the internet.

keith, Wednesday, 4 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Who's the wise-ass up there dropping Ut into this conversation? Mark? Bypass the Raincoats entirely, why don't you? And not one mention of Yoko Ono?

"Not Too Soon" sounds totally out of place on _The Real Ramona_. It sticks out like a polished diamond in a pile of tarnished silver dollars. And it's Tanya's best TM offering, by a wide country hectare.

And it's funny that someone (Sean) thinks that _Hips & Makers_ is a back-to-basics move. I felt the same way, but I think that _University_ was actually recorded BEFORE _Hips & Makers_. I forget where I heard that, but I used that information (& that theory) as the foundation for my breathless praise of _Limbo_ on my site.

David Raposa, Wednesday, 4 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

But Pinefox, I thought you were already convinced that it was pretty much impossible to describe WHY you like something in any way that makes any sense to others. I guess this applies to TM as much as anyone.

I can't remember the thread where this discussion took place.

Dr. C, Thursday, 5 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Dr C: yes. It is always difficult (at best) to convince anyone of anything (unless, I suppose, they want to be convinced), and it is difficult to explain why you like sth, esp. if the answer keeps coming back 'Why?'. So in general, I agree with you (about my own inconsistency).

BUT all I was really looking for from our Scouse friends was a (favourable) description which was a little bit 'closer to the music'. Stevie's stuff about Camille Paglia is great - but it's great cos Stevie is great, not (I submit) because TH are great (and CERTAINLY not cos Camille Paglia is great; heaven forfend).

I appreciate that the desire for a description which is 'closer to the music' might be another chimera - another senseless request which our Scouse friends will find it impossible to fulfil. At the end of the day (Clive), I have a feeling that they are talking as much about themselves as about TM - who (I suspect) were very important to them at a certain time in their lives and have thus made a kind of emotional imprint that they can't really explain. That is not a criticism - it might be the best reason for loving a bit of pop music (I think it's my usual reason). It's just that it's not very 'transferrable'. I can appreciate that TM meant something to little Stevie T when he was a wee boy writing vast dissertations for Christopher Bigsby - but I can't hear that in their records. (Or can I?)

the pinefox, Thursday, 5 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Pinefox, at the risk of debating the Smiths off-topic on the far superior TM's thread...

You have clearly forgotten the early 90s, when every band from Suede to Blur was described as "The Best British Band Since The Smiths". That's legendeering on a scale with the B**tles.

Back on TM again, yesterday afternoon at the HMV mega-sale, I actually went and bought a copy of House Tornado and Fat Skiier on CD to replace vinyl back in storage. Damn ILM for influencing my record buying habits!!! Second time this week!

masonic boom, Thursday, 5 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

>>> You have clearly forgotten the early 90s, when every band from Suede to Blur was described as "The Best British Band Since The Smiths". That's legendeering on a scale with the B**tles.

Wrong again.

I have not forgotten the early 90s. At least, not totally. I wish I could remember them a little more vividly than I do - but really, that's another thread entirely.

Your argument now seems to be that because some media people in the early 90s implied that the Smiths were a great band, they're not really a great band - that was just all Legend stuff. Whereas (you asserted above) talking about 'That Miserable Git Morrissey' is not Legend-peddling, but is simply the rough, unvarnished Truth.

From my POV (which as ever is not anyone else's POV), the Smiths are perhaps the greatest British band after the Beatles. Put it another way: they are perhaps the most important band to me ever. This is not much to do with constructing Legends; it's just the way I feel about this band. (I don't ask anyone else to share this feeling.)

I fear that what this 'debate' comes down to is that you don't like the Smiths much, and I do. Fear not, I have no desire to make you like them more.

the pinefox, Thursday, 5 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Actually I like this distinction. The Beatles: nice listen to White Album on a sunday afternoon. "The Beatles": irritating-as-fuck seperate John-Paul-George-Ringo Mojo covers, going over the same bloody story again and again.

Omar, Thursday, 5 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

You are actually wrong, I love the Smiths.

But that does not stop them from having a "Legend" which has far overtaken either their music or their lasting influence. You are just unable to see them because your devotion outweighs your rationality.

masonic boom, Thursday, 5 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I genuinely don't understand why people can't separate the music from the 'legend'. No doubt someone will argue that the music and the legend are in fact one and the same, but I'd disagree. My enjoyment of The Beatles isn't in any way altered by the fact that Mojo and Uncut both ran wank-pieces on them last month, nor would it change if no-one wrote about them ever again. I have the records, that's all that matters. I also don't see how the 'best band ever' syndrome makes any difference. They obviously weren't, and it's pointless to spend time trying to prove or disprove something as irrelevant as this. I guess it may make other bands ape the styles of the 'best bands ever according to legend' , but that doesn't make them any good, or make me like them.

If some people/lots of people/everyone except me/no-one thinks a particular artist is the best ever it couldn't possibly change the way that I think by itself. (However,weight of opinion might suggest that I have another listen and I COULD have been wrong all along : "Loveless". That's different.)

Dr. C, Thursday, 5 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Dr C: actually I do think Beatles = best band ever. (Have said this before.)

Masonic Boom: disappointed by your resort to cheap abuse. I maintain that you are mistaken and your distinction is, in this instance, utterly BOGUS. BUT you were right about one thing earlier: this is the Muses thread and we ought to be discussing them.

the pinefox, Thursday, 5 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

But what does 'best band ever' MEAN?

Dr. C, Friday, 6 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Dr C: I don't know - or, if I do 'know', I don't really want to get into contentious territory and tangled up in definitions. I'm no great Beatles apologist, I own none of their records, and I hardly ever listen to them. I still think they're the best pop group ever. But other people on ILM (eg Nick D) know far more about them (and probably don't think they're best band ever?). Don't mind discussing this further - but perhaps (again) it should be kept off Throwing Muses thread?

Totally sublime, forgive-them-anything-for-that Throwing Muses moment which Scouse worshippers at shrine of Hersh have not mentioned (perhaps don't like?): TWO STEP.

the pinefox, Friday, 6 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Don't have much to say except C L A S S I C.

Melissa W, Friday, 13 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Not much to say - but you said it with such idiosyncratic panache.

the pinefox, Saturday, 14 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

one year passes...
I'm just listening to Red Heaven for the first time in years... And I couldn't resist responding to a couple of posts:

Sean Carruthers - Yes it rocks, but thats not its why it holds its own. Yes, maybe they did have something to prove and in my mind they did. The Real Ramona was a great album, but a follow-on would've been impossible. With Donelly onboard, it could've easily turned out to be little more than sugar-coated pop dross. Not that I dislike Donelly's post-Muses ventures, its just that I think another Ramona would've involved too many compromises. Tanya and Kristin were obviously going in different directions.

I agree with Dr C. - Red Heaven is a classic album. Its raw and fresh, like one of them just said "well its just me and you now, lets get down to it". Red Heaven really conveys a sense of rapport, especially Rosetta Stone. Kristin seems to hit upon something that transcends the 'bit'iness of some of their previous outings. To me, it appears as if she finally managed to give all her ambivalence a face of its own. Red Heaven has a very rich character, indeed. If they were attempting to reinstate a more personal and intimate sense of identity, then I think they certainly achieved it.

Given the choice between:-

a) a "chilling and slinky" male fantasy involving Kristin Hersh, ice cream and a black negligee.

and

b) the opportunity to ride along with someone blowing out the cobwebs during a transitional phase in their life.

... I would take the latter ;)

Nat, Saturday, 1 February 2003 14:47 (twenty-three years ago)

... The production is spot on, too :D

Nat, Saturday, 1 February 2003 15:00 (twenty-three years ago)

This thread pops up right as we got the "Reunion Record" in the post, along with the new solo acoustic thing which will be released on the same day. I like the reunion record, good to hear Kristin and Tanya doing those crazy harmonies again. I'm not sold on the acoustic stuff, though. More thoughts later when I've listened to the record more...

kate, Saturday, 1 February 2003 15:02 (twenty-three years ago)

all i've heard is the "univerity" album; and i liked it, but not nearly as much as the rest of you folks seem to like the older releases (not a single full-on dud vote in the thread). am i just familiar with their dud album? should i start checking out the older material immediately?

dyson (dyson), Saturday, 1 February 2003 18:44 (twenty-three years ago)

Classic. They're not without moments that feel redundant (if not totally shticky if you don't know the "legend"), but the guitar-bass-drums save the day when Kristin's vocals become too strident.

I definitely wouldn't say that you're only familiar with the "dud album", Dyson. From what I've heard of her discography it sounds like Hersh started with her most apocalyptic (or grating, depending on your tastes) work and then gradually mellowed, while remaining off-kilter and "in touch with her emotions". I'd certainly give the older stuff a try, but it's pretty up in the air what you'll prefer. I'm not sure myself, but my girlfriend would vote for "The Real Ramona" as her fave.

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Saturday, 1 February 2003 18:56 (twenty-three years ago)

Random lines written by Hersh randomly pop into my head almost as frequently as ones written by Howard Devoto. "I'm so glad you could come, now breathe under water"; "I throw your head across the ice"; "I beg your skin, you buy a whore," etc.

Andy K (Andy K), Saturday, 1 February 2003 19:12 (twenty-three years ago)

Hm, those are pretty good.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 1 February 2003 22:14 (twenty-three years ago)

I was absolutely obsessed with Throwing Muses for the second half of the '80s. I'm looking forward to hearing Kristin and Tanya together again...

mike a (mike a), Sunday, 2 February 2003 06:56 (twenty-three years ago)

I'll stand by what I said 18 months ago - _Limbo_ is faboo. Yeah, _University_ is a bit duddish, but then I'm singing that song Andy quoted up there to myself ("I'll climb you as I grow older / By 50 I'll ride on your shoulder"), and there are plenty of non-dud moves ("The Teller" comes to mind). But _Limbo_ is _University_ done up right, and _In a Doghouse_ (collecting the 1st Muses album w/ their demo tape) is even better (albeit different & less user-friendly, which is A-OK), so going there next might be best.

Would someone in the recording industry PLEASE compile all those odd EP / b-side / single tracks onto one accesible compact disc type object? Yo, Ivo! (This is especially urgent & key as I've found a SLSKer w/ the entire TM disco available for D/L - including the new album! - BUT a) they've 600+ people in their queue and b) their D/L speed is 0.8!)

David R. (popshots75`), Sunday, 2 February 2003 17:49 (twenty-three years ago)

Another big-up for Limbo, which is immensely satisfying all the way through (and climaxes with the unlisted track "white bikini sand") but never reaches the dizzy heights of classic early stuff. Criminally overlooked.

Aaron A., Sunday, 2 February 2003 17:59 (twenty-three years ago)

Yeah, _University_ is a bit duddish

David R. is BONKERS.

Andy K (Andy K), Sunday, 2 February 2003 18:16 (twenty-three years ago)

TM (Throwing Muses) = CI (Classic Indie)

Get these and be a better human being:

HOUSE TORNADO + THE FAT SKIER
RED HEAVEN
LIMBO

Then go after all the others. When you're done, start with the Pixies.

JP Almeida (JP Almeida), Sunday, 2 February 2003 19:15 (twenty-three years ago)

Ignore my stupidity, of course University was a trio album as well, but Limbo was much gnarlier and more muscular.

assert (matttkkkk), Wednesday, 1 November 2023 00:41 (two years ago)

def feels like a lost album these days (so does the kind of contemporaneous bob mould self titled album on ryko)

I? not I! He! He! HIM! (akm), Wednesday, 1 November 2023 00:42 (two years ago)

also hi again, sorry for tangent--

if you like the more orchestrated, multi-parted beach boys-esque turns mid song, and more of kristin's wry, yowling narratives and you've never dug into her albums sky motel and sunny border blue, do yourself a favor and visit/revisit. it's almost like an epic spiritual trilogy in hindsight -- that was basically her trajectory from 96-02: limbo-> sky motel-> sunny border blue. each album gets a bit more reflective and rootsy until sunny border blue contains a few songs about her old band and ends with pure catharsis on "listerine." gives me chills just thinking about it. anyway, yeah: those albums maybe don't ROCK as hard, but are definitely part of the same universe as limbo. highly recommended.

"another slice of death, please." (Austin), Wednesday, 1 November 2023 00:56 (two years ago)

jeez she has a new album and I didn't even know

the absence of bikes (f. hazel), Wednesday, 1 November 2023 01:25 (two years ago)

(Clear Pond Road released on May 30th)

the absence of bikes (f. hazel), Wednesday, 1 November 2023 01:25 (two years ago)

eleven months pass...

New Music Announced

The new Throwing Muses record “Moonlight Concessions” is done, teaser single coming soon. Thank you Strange Angel listener supporters for helping us stay musically idealistic in an industry that prefers vanity and product. It’s everything to us. pic.twitter.com/I8x5frTyro

— Throwing Muses (@throwingmuses) October 23, 2024

djmartian, Wednesday, 23 October 2024 22:02 (one year ago)

four months pass...

listening now. it's good and comforting to hear her. "albatross" is great.

Constance Mischievous (Austin), Friday, 14 March 2025 17:11 (one year ago)

this is good but I don't know how this isn't just a Hersh solo album; is David even on it?

I? not I! He! He! HIM! (akm), Sunday, 16 March 2025 02:16 (one year ago)

yeah, it definitely feels like more of her album, but muses are touring so idk if dave is still on board. info is sparse.

but again: regardless of what name she's using, the album is good.

Constance Mischievous (Austin), Monday, 24 March 2025 01:37 (one year ago)

four weeks pass...

Seing them (or is it only her?) in Oslo in two weeks.

The guitar tone in The Field is the greatest ever.

Mule, Wednesday, 23 April 2025 15:51 (one year ago)

three weeks pass...

Per a Reddit thread, the current tour is Hersh, Pete on cello, her son Dylan on bass and Fred Abong on drums. They sound pretty flat in the performances I saw on YouTube. Not sure if I’d want to go tbh.

assert (matttkkkk), Tuesday, 20 May 2025 19:41 (one year ago)

I am so glad you posted this - they're playing in Glasgow tonight and I only found out about 30 mins ago and I was feeling really annoyed I had completely missed any news about it

boxedjoy, Tuesday, 20 May 2025 19:49 (one year ago)

wait David isn't drumming any more?!?

sleeve, Tuesday, 20 May 2025 19:51 (one year ago)

Not on the new album or apparently this tour, at least.

assert (matttkkkk), Tuesday, 20 May 2025 19:54 (one year ago)

gah

sleeve, Tuesday, 20 May 2025 20:03 (one year ago)

I like the new album and very much enjoy her bluesky posting but I LOVE his drumming

sleeve, Tuesday, 20 May 2025 20:03 (one year ago)

am seeing them a week today, hopefully youtube isn't doing them justice

Colonel Poo, Tuesday, 20 May 2025 20:09 (one year ago)

It’s really been bugging me. Dave has been in Throwing Muses since 1983. When there were two of them it was just Dave and Kristin, even Leslie was credited as a guest on Red Heaven. When the Muses coexisted with Fifty Foot Wave the only difference was Dave vs Rob Ahlers. I would never pretend he’s a creative force on par with KH, but god dammit no Dave no Muses. It’s a KH touring band, same as the last TM record is a KH record. I know better than to judge when I don’t know the situation it it feels like it lacks integrity after all these years.

assert (matttkkkk), Friday, 30 May 2025 12:05 (one year ago)

*but it

assert (matttkkkk), Friday, 30 May 2025 12:06 (one year ago)

I think Dave's pretty wrapped up in his graphic design business these days. Last saw him in April after his dad, who was a popular coach and guidance counselor at the high school I went to, passed away.

TO BE A JAZZ SINGER YOU HAVE TO BE ABLE TO SCAT (Jazzbo), Friday, 30 May 2025 12:39 (one year ago)

big sigh. i like dave's style a lot (percussive+graphic). glad i got to see the kristin/dave/barney trio a couple times. i remember kristin posting a lot on her blog around the time of the 2003 4ad album. she would make a lot of seemingly insignificant, but kind of snarky references, to dave. "37 hours" from her sunny border blue album is about him. i've always gotten the impression that he's a fairly private person and, especially in later years, required some coaxing to continue touring.

all of this aside, her songwriting chops have not wavered at all over the years. it's kind of a weird dynamic that the records continue to be good, but the legacy of the band and who's involved in what is getting sticky. unfortunately.

"Don't ask me, I just work here." (Austin), Friday, 30 May 2025 13:03 (one year ago)

do more than 2-3 songs on the new album even have drums?

fluffy tufts university (f. hazel), Friday, 30 May 2025 13:21 (one year ago)

ach, yeah, I should not have said anything when I didn’t know anything

assert (matttkkkk), Friday, 30 May 2025 13:28 (one year ago)

I have a soft spot for Dave because when the Australian label offered phoners to promote University, I got to talk to him for an hour - he blew off the next interview and patiently told me all about the early days. And then when I flew to see them on the tour I spotted him and said hello, whereupon he invited me and my friend backstage and shared the rider. Sorry - I’m sure I have already told this story here.

assert (matttkkkk), Friday, 30 May 2025 13:32 (one year ago)

3 July 2019, as Zing kindly placed my previous telling at the top of the last 100 posts on this thread.

assert (matttkkkk), Friday, 30 May 2025 13:36 (one year ago)

I mean really it isn't Throwing Muses without Tanya Donnelly or Leslie Langston either but that ship has kinda sailed. This is like fourth-era Throwing Muses I guess.

fluffy tufts university (f. hazel), Friday, 30 May 2025 13:40 (one year ago)

I certainly wouldn't NOT see this Muses lineup because there's no David playing, and at least Fred is 'in the family'. The names Hersh decides to put on her projects have become somewhat mysterious to me now; Possible Dust Clouds sounds more like a Muses album than the new one, for instance. there was a point where she said economic conditions kind of dictated this; if an album / tour was a Muses thing, it might make more money but it was also a lot more expensive to tour because she was committed to paying David and whoever played bass more money as well.

I'd still go to this because she will play Bright Yellow Gun while playing a show as Muses, despite who is in the band; but she wont' do that as 50 Ft. Wave or solo (probably).

I? not I! He! He! HIM! (akm), Friday, 30 May 2025 14:42 (one year ago)

two months pass...

I have a soft spot for Dave because when the Australian label offered phoners to promote University, I got to talk to him for an hour - he blew off the next interview and patiently told me all about the early days.

!!!! so jellllllllllll

Stoop Crone (Trayce), Thursday, 21 August 2025 23:42 (nine months ago)

Anyway I came here for the same reason, I was looking up deets of the new tour and was like "wtf is that Doony (her son) on bass? Whats going on where's Dave" and apparently I am not the only one. But then again, I've been aware she plays everything herself for some time now, guitar/bass/drums the lot. So I guess it is sensible. People who had to get f/t careers outside of music cant really just drop everything for a long tour.

I got to see them in 93 - according to Wiki Bernard was the bass player by that point so I guess I never got to see the OG lineup, despite feeling like I recall otherwise. I got a GREAT photo from the 93 gig though, of Kris in that classic "I am not here" stare.

Stoop Crone (Trayce), Thursday, 21 August 2025 23:46 (nine months ago)

Hopefully this'll work
https://i.imgur.com/rcfjhfp.jpeg

Stoop Crone (Trayce), Thursday, 21 August 2025 23:51 (nine months ago)

LOl apparently i'd posted this pic in this thread before (but the links broken so hey)

Stoop Crone (Trayce), Thursday, 21 August 2025 23:57 (nine months ago)

awesome, thanks

sleeve, Friday, 22 August 2025 00:03 (nine months ago)

I remember that stare! I think I saw them at the Corner Hotel on that tour.

assert (matttkkkk), Friday, 22 August 2025 03:16 (nine months ago)

I just found that I have the 11 page transcript of the Dave Narcizo interview sitting in a folder, if anyone was interested - I don't know where one would upload such a thing without shovelling it into an AI slop bucket.

assert (matttkkkk), Friday, 22 August 2025 04:27 (nine months ago)

jeez I'd love to read it, idk just a dropbox link?

sleeve, Friday, 22 August 2025 04:34 (nine months ago)

I squished it down a bit format-wise - will see what I can do.

assert (matttkkkk), Friday, 22 August 2025 04:38 (nine months ago)

No idea how to protect the link from crawlers, but que sera sera I guess. Thanks for the interest! https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/k1t1d5ziioeeb2899s9z5/David-Narcizo-interview-1995.pdf?rlkey=wonc2o113lsx5rwofdszf9ill&st=hudyp3ow&dl=0

assert (matttkkkk), Friday, 22 August 2025 04:42 (nine months ago)

thank u!

sleeve, Friday, 22 August 2025 04:46 (nine months ago)

ditto!
PS yes that photo was taken at the Corner :)

Stoop Crone (Trayce), Friday, 22 August 2025 04:59 (nine months ago)

That was a fab interview Matt, thanks for sharing it x

Stoop Crone (Trayce), Friday, 22 August 2025 05:13 (nine months ago)

:)

assert (matttkkkk), Friday, 22 August 2025 05:25 (nine months ago)

(intro is a bit goofy but hey, it was 30 years ago)

assert (matttkkkk), Friday, 22 August 2025 05:37 (nine months ago)

I'd still go to this because she will play Bright Yellow Gun while playing a show as Muses, despite who is in the band; but she wont' do that as 50 Ft. Wave or solo (probably).

― I? not I! He! He! HIM! (akm), Friday, 30 May 2025 15:42 bookmarkflaglink

fwiw I saw her solo a few years ago and she did in fact play Bright Yellow Gun

Colonel Poo, Friday, 22 August 2025 12:01 (nine months ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.