delia gonzalez & gavin russom - the days of mars

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (420 of them)

i think the american beauty soundtrack sounds more like music for 18 musicians than 'where you go i go too' does

zzz (deej), Monday, 29 June 2009 20:05 (sixteen years ago)

black meteor star sounds like dirty-ass legowelt to me which is obviously a very good thing. comparisons to drone or dronerock or whatever is completely wacky, "the days of mars" i can see though

winston, Monday, 29 June 2009 20:07 (sixteen years ago)

Where You Go I Go Too has a synth line from Supernature and sounds like Giorgio Moroder. Not really sure why anyone would call it "dronerock", whatever that is meant to signify, instead of disco.

the shock will be coupled with the need to dance (jim), Monday, 29 June 2009 20:09 (sixteen years ago)

I can hear elements of one style of music, inside a piece of music written in another style, because I can separate out what different instruments are doing a lot more clearly than a non-musician, I suspect.

― Violent In Design (Masonic Boom), Monday, June 29, 2009 3:05 PM (7 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

http://www.soulstrut.com/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/ehhzu7.gif

zzz (deej), Monday, 29 June 2009 20:10 (sixteen years ago)

i can definitely see why someone would say BSM has more in common with dronerock than disco or house. i don't think it really has as much to do with being a musician as with how you like to contextualize what you listen to.

karl...arlk...rlka...lkar..., Monday, 29 June 2009 20:31 (sixteen years ago)

if we're talking dronerock = harmonia and stuff like that, ok

winston, Monday, 29 June 2009 20:33 (sixteen years ago)

that's how i interpreted it

karl...arlk...rlka...lkar..., Monday, 29 June 2009 20:37 (sixteen years ago)

to me dronerock = les rallizes denudes, VUs, tony conrad + faust, etc.

psychgawsple, Monday, 29 June 2009 20:43 (sixteen years ago)

but i do have such rigid definitions after all

psychgawsple, Monday, 29 June 2009 20:48 (sixteen years ago)

more sweet sweet dronerock here

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U9aVCRIau6s

winston, Monday, 29 June 2009 20:57 (sixteen years ago)

is this drone(rock)?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MQl4IiljvMI

moonship journey to baja, Monday, 29 June 2009 21:01 (sixteen years ago)

cause to me it sounds like loop or something with a 4/4 beat

moonship journey to baja, Monday, 29 June 2009 21:01 (sixteen years ago)

are those supposed to sound like BSM?

karl...arlk...rlka...lkar..., Monday, 29 June 2009 22:05 (sixteen years ago)

BMS*

karl...arlk...rlka...lkar..., Monday, 29 June 2009 22:09 (sixteen years ago)

I think BMS sounds far closer to the "Adonai Elohim" than Harmonia but I'm being an ass so I'll stop.

winston, Monday, 29 June 2009 22:14 (sixteen years ago)

need to hear this record so I can have a contrarian opinion about it

❉❉❉❉❉❉❉❉Plaxico❉❉❉❉❉❉❉❉❉ (I know, right?), Monday, 29 June 2009 22:15 (sixteen years ago)

i still think it sounds more like acid house than dronerock, but i was just sayin i can see where she was comin from.

karl...arlk...rlka...lkar..., Monday, 29 June 2009 22:57 (sixteen years ago)

I think my issue whenever Kate starts talking about dronerock in relation to dance music is that the elements she's referring to are common to vast swathes of techno. Perhaps some of the current crop of producers wear their dronerock/Krautrock influences on their sleeves more, but there's always been, if not cross-pollination, then a shared or similar approach to music, partly because they have some of their roots in the same places. I think one reason why saying "this is just dronerock" rubs people up the wrong way is because it isn't giving enough credit to techno.

All the Black Meteoric Star stuff I've heard sounds fantastic by the way. Sound is huge, would love to see it live.

Matt DC, Monday, 29 June 2009 23:37 (sixteen years ago)

I mean, we're talking about two genres that are built on texture, repetition and build. Of course they're going to have elements in common because the artists in question are adopting similar processes, albeit with different gear and instrumentation.

Matt DC, Monday, 29 June 2009 23:40 (sixteen years ago)

I ordered the BMS album tonight based almost entirely on the praise in this thread. It had better be good... (Honestly though, I do really like the Delia/Gavin stuff from the past few years so not too worried.)

I just wish he hadn't adopted the "ilxor" moniker (ilxor), Tuesday, 30 June 2009 01:42 (sixteen years ago)

Another reason people might be getting rubbed the wrong way is that it sounds like dronerock is being used to (rhetorically) legitimatize techno/house/minimalism etc. (it just sounds like that, whether that's what's being said, I can't and won't say. I'm getting is "what's drone rock is good, and what's good is drone rock" and while you can hear anything in anything if you want, that logic loses a lot of meaning without boundaries of what drone rock is to begin with. It's also kind of selective, too, I hear Jeff mills as much as Neu in Music for 18 Musicians for instance.

EDB, Tuesday, 30 June 2009 02:07 (sixteen years ago)

And people may not agree with me here either, but drone rock or drone rockness isn't an inherently good thing, either.

EDB, Tuesday, 30 June 2009 02:09 (sixteen years ago)

Matt DC and EDB OTM; you put into words the thoughts my asshole brain is incapable of expressing.

winston, Tuesday, 30 June 2009 03:55 (sixteen years ago)

if we're talking dronerock = harmonia and stuff like that, ok

― winston, Monday, 29 June 2009 20:33 (Yesterday) Bookmark

Yes. Michael Rother / the less meandering end of Cluster is exactly what I'm thinking of. It's no accident that I saw Cluster and James Holden playing a show together a few months ago.

I mean, we're talking about two genres that are built on texture, repetition and build.

Yes, this is what I'm saying. Exactly.

Of course they're going to have elements in common because the artists in question are adopting similar processes, albeit with different gear and instrumentation.

I'm not so sure about the different gear and instrumentation any more. It's not as if Dronebobbins (to coin a phrase, to avoid the rockist connotations of "dronerock" because I include a lot of krauty stuff, spacey stuff, dronepop in the larger genre of "drone" as well as your pure LaMonte Young/Terry Reilly stuff) avoids the use of synthesisers, sequencers, programming, etc. The only real difference is in the drumming/beats - that dronebobbins tend to stick to motorik/rock-based 4/4 straight rhythms while the dance stuff will stick on disco rhythms and house rhythms with more synchopation (or not - as I've discovered.)

I'm certainly not intending to "priviledge" dronerock over techno or anything - it's just that most of my musical experience is in other areas. I've been learning about "dance" or "club" music (whatever the hell that means, these terms seem so clumbsy - as if you can't dance to The Sonics!) - but as it's not my primary experience of music, I often need to find a way *in* to this kind of thing. And my easiest way in to it is through the repetative/drone/textural element. I'm not trying to "legitimise" anything. I'm just finding mine own way into a kind of music that I don't have the cultural or other reference points for.

I often feel like people on these threads are saying to me "because you come from a rock/pop background, you don't have a *right* to have an opinion on this music" which really rubs *me* the wrong way.

Violent In Design (Masonic Boom), Tuesday, 30 June 2009 08:37 (sixteen years ago)

Listening to this now. To my non-trained ear I can hear a lot more (say) Basic Channel than (say) Faust, although there is definitely a krautrock thing going on. It's definitely a techno record though, were one forced to assign it to a single genre.

Achtung Blobby (Neil S), Tuesday, 30 June 2009 09:11 (sixteen years ago)

personally, "drone" to me has always constituted a distinct lack of motorik style rhythms or anything of the Steve Reich variety. If there are rhythms, they're of the microtonal type, or the big it takes minutes to get around each beat type. Drone as more specifically, the Theater of Eternal Music style, not like a rock band or dance producers plodding on and on. Something like Music for 18 Musicians may have subtle movements, but it's so detailed and frenetic that it has an excitement that is very un-dronelike. I guess the very definition of drone is of sustained notes, where motorik, acid house, etc are definined by rhythms and patterns.

dan selzer, Tuesday, 30 June 2009 12:55 (sixteen years ago)

I mean, we're talking about two genres that are built on texture, repetition and build.

Although you realize this could mean practically anything.

I think what I mean to say, though, is that drone is not the beginning or end of the story, but a small piece amid it. I'm wouldn't criticize anyone for accessing other forms of music through it, but but think of it as the gateway not the goal (and it might be limiting to comprehend things as structured so by a particular framework too, perhaps).

EDB, Tuesday, 30 June 2009 14:22 (sixteen years ago)

Never mind, I've learned my lesson. I'm never going to praise anything I like, on ILM, ever again for fear I might get the genre wrong and be told my reasons for liking it are totally illegitimate.

Violent In Design (Masonic Boom), Tuesday, 30 June 2009 14:25 (sixteen years ago)

i believe we've been quite unfair to kate here - she's obviously using "drone" the way some people use the word "funk"; i.e. a record doesn't have to be a scratchy 45 with a brass section for someone to say "this is pure funk".

moonship journey to baja, Tuesday, 30 June 2009 15:46 (sixteen years ago)

^^^^^^^^ yes. OTM. See also how some people use the phrase "soul".

"drone", "wub" - all these things are just my way of saying "this record brings the goodness"

Violent In Design (Masonic Boom), Tuesday, 30 June 2009 15:50 (sixteen years ago)

i think we're being pretty reasonable actually. nobody is denying anyone their opinion here, simply stating their own.

i think it's interesting that some of you think of BMS as drone, but i don't need to agree! i started this whole thing by saying that her description was misleading, not rong or 'bad' or anything. people are allowed to disagree, yeh?

psychgawsple, Tuesday, 30 June 2009 17:24 (sixteen years ago)

so I guess I'm the only one who likes Days of Mars better than the BMS record then? (of course when it comes to that record I am very much the demented governess who believes the baby is her own; it's probably my favorite record of the decade.)

passed on the lead in "all i can do is crossups cuz ihave no skills" (jamescobo), Tuesday, 30 June 2009 19:12 (sixteen years ago)

oh i much prefer Days of Mars. this doesn't do much for me.

jed_, Tuesday, 30 June 2009 19:55 (sixteen years ago)

I prefer Days... as well (one of my fave records of the last 5 years), but I like the BMS record too...

Neil S, Tuesday, 30 June 2009 20:37 (sixteen years ago)

i also prefer Days of Mars. i like the BMS and would love to see it live, but i doubt i'll come back to it nearly as much as Days of Mars.

karl...arlk...rlka...lkar..., Tuesday, 30 June 2009 21:01 (sixteen years ago)

i think it's too early to tell if i'll like this one more. i've always liked 'days of mars' but it continues to grow on each time i pull it out, and i could see the same thing happening with black meteoric star

psychgawsple, Tuesday, 30 June 2009 21:16 (sixteen years ago)

I don't know how BMS can be as good as Days of Mars, but I kinda lump in the Carl Craig mix in with Days...

Which makes it an unstoppable monster frying all who cower before it.

Hamildan, Tuesday, 30 June 2009 21:27 (sixteen years ago)

personally I find the beats on BMS kind of distracting. part of the charm of Days of Mars for me was how passively you could listen to it - I used to listen to it first thing at work when I was still half asleep.

passed on the lead in "all i can do is crossups cuz ihave no skills" (jamescobo), Tuesday, 30 June 2009 22:13 (sixteen years ago)

carl craig relevee is pretty holy shit the first time you play it for anyone

❉❉❉❉❉❉❉❉Plaxico❉❉❉❉❉❉❉❉❉ (I know, right?), Tuesday, 30 June 2009 23:27 (sixteen years ago)

this is pretty good too i suppose

❉❉❉❉❉❉❉❉Plaxico❉❉❉❉❉❉❉❉❉ (I know, right?), Tuesday, 30 June 2009 23:27 (sixteen years ago)

a weirdy mix by gavin. (at bottom)

http://www.20jazzfunkgreats.co.uk/wordpress/2009/06/22/sister-electras-ballad/

(jaxon) ( .) ( .) (jaxon), Wednesday, 1 July 2009 02:03 (sixteen years ago)

So, erm, basically, Gavin Russom is channelling 4AD circa about 1989?

Whoa, he even has a HNIA track on his mix?

I might actually be in love. (question is, does he *look* like the DDB he's so clarly chanelling?)

Violent In Design (Masonic Boom), Wednesday, 1 July 2009 08:29 (sixteen years ago)

He looks like a disgusting dirty hippy is what he looks like.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 1 July 2009 08:37 (sixteen years ago)

Ah! He looks like a missing member of Faust. Awesome. I want his shirt.

Anyway, this is not appropriate. I'm annoyed because one of my sodding colleagues called when I was halfway through that mix... oh, it did pause and save my place. Good. I keep waiting for Danielle Dax to burst in with some mad 4-track chanting.

I want to hear him remix Bishi. That's what I'd really like to hear. Yes.

Violent In Design (Masonic Boom), Wednesday, 1 July 2009 08:41 (sixteen years ago)

have you heard his petar dundov/britney remixes, kate?

i really want to hear days of mars now - never bothered at the time b/c someone said something about it which was really offputting to me (can't even remember what that was).

lex pretend, Wednesday, 1 July 2009 09:02 (sixteen years ago)

Psygawpl linked the Petar Dundov thing on the other thread, yes, I liked it.

Violent In Design (Masonic Boom), Wednesday, 1 July 2009 09:24 (sixteen years ago)

so yeah the black meteoric star is pretty rocky

❉❉❉❉❉❉❉❉Plaxico❉❉❉❉❉❉❉❉❉ (I know, right?), Wednesday, 1 July 2009 18:09 (sixteen years ago)

one month passes...

Days of Mars is pretty damn awesome.

hüzün (Masonic Boom), Saturday, 15 August 2009 09:33 (sixteen years ago)

yeah one of my favourites of the decade. would love to have heard a remixed version of the whole thing, the carl craig version of 'relevee' doesnt get old at all

vain_bowers, Saturday, 15 August 2009 13:41 (sixteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.