Hard to find around here. Not exactly "Walmart" material. Really enjoyed this thread. When I get it, I'll sit in the bathtub late at night with a glass of wine for the first listen on the boombox, then give general impressions here the next a.m.
― Darren Skuja, Thursday, 25 May 2006 12:40 (twenty years ago)
― Darren Skuja (Darren Skuja), Thursday, 25 May 2006 14:20 (twenty years ago)
So, after a few listens, what are your reactions? Does the first half overshadow the second half? I saw that in a few reviews. Who will do a track by track summary? :)
Cheers
― Darren Skuja (Darren Skuja), Saturday, 27 May 2006 05:03 (twenty years ago)
― patrick urstad, Saturday, 27 May 2006 06:39 (twenty years ago)
― thomas, Saturday, 27 May 2006 14:40 (twenty years ago)
The daffy/donald duck part is just plain ridiculous - really the lowest point of the whole affair and the point at which my suspicions were confirmed that the emperor wears no clothes on this one.
― Twitchety Twitch Manic Toy System (Bimble...), Sunday, 28 May 2006 04:41 (twenty years ago)
― gekoppel (Gekoppel), Sunday, 28 May 2006 11:59 (twenty years ago)
I don't find it over-pretentious though, that's what stunned me on a first listen, how utterly coherent the whole sound frontier & the vocals/words became. Wierd for weirds sake (or at least the perception of it, however wrong that impression or first taste is) usually turns me right off I have to say. I can't stand most Xui Xui I've heard and am still fence-sitting on Animal Collective til I hear more that convinces me. I know where you're coming from with the confounding = cred points thing, but hmmm, it's worked for me so far more like a rock record than anything SO obtuse (I guess I'd concur with what Raw Patrick said upthread, it has accessibility IMO). I'd like to say I have very broad, adventurous tastes is music... but I think I'm actually a pretty conservative listener all told.
The Donald Duck part is terrifying (in context) though! Actually, when I did go back I stopped before track 9 because I just couldn't face it again so soon :-O
I'd agree there are spots where the achievements are thinner or become less satisfactory, and it takes some commitment to hear through as an album whole. But "Clara"! That track alone seems the most fully-formed single song embodiment of the aims of "The Drift"
― fandango (fandango), Sunday, 28 May 2006 13:58 (twenty years ago)
― fandango (fandango), Sunday, 28 May 2006 13:59 (twenty years ago)
― gekoppel (Gekoppel), Sunday, 28 May 2006 17:03 (twenty years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 28 May 2006 19:00 (twenty years ago)
tilt is a walk in the park compared to drift. seriously, just put the first track on after listening to drift, it's like you're walking on clouds. tilt has 3-4 straight up beautiful songs; drift has none. i love 'em both, mind
― boy child, Sunday, 28 May 2006 19:05 (twenty years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 28 May 2006 19:08 (twenty years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 28 May 2006 19:09 (twenty years ago)
the interesting thing about climate of hunter to me is that it now seems so obviously of a piece with tilt and the drift
― boy child, Sunday, 28 May 2006 19:14 (twenty years ago)
― gekoppel (Gekoppel), Sunday, 28 May 2006 22:20 (twenty years ago)
― Darren Skuja (Darren Skuja), Monday, 29 May 2006 03:59 (twenty years ago)
― Twitchety Twitch Manic Toy System (Bimble...), Monday, 29 May 2006 04:29 (twenty years ago)
― Darren Skuja (Darren Skuja), Thursday, 1 June 2006 20:10 (twenty years ago)
MATH IS HARD.
sorry, i just really fucking hate when people use this argument. see more "arty European films" dude.
― hstencil (hstencil), Thursday, 1 June 2006 20:21 (twenty years ago)
I don't feel that was about this myself, but it's a valid position to take (though yes the "arty European film" dig is cliched to hell).
I haven't figured out if this is really too hard a listen to be ultimately worth it yet... in 6 months, a year maybe. It pretty much defines "not an everyday record".
― fandango (fandango), Thursday, 1 June 2006 20:38 (twenty years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 2 June 2006 02:02 (twenty years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 2 June 2006 02:03 (twenty years ago)
― Darren Skuja (Darren Skuja), Saturday, 3 June 2006 02:26 (twenty years ago)
― Twitchety Twitch Manic Toy System (Bimble...), Sunday, 4 June 2006 06:27 (twenty years ago)
Still don't know what I think of The Drift. I like it a lot and I'm still playing it, but I guess it hasn't got right under my skin the way Tilt did. For the moment, I'm thinking Tilt is the better record.
― Revivalist (Revivalist), Tuesday, 6 June 2006 08:47 (twenty years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Tuesday, 6 June 2006 11:20 (twenty years ago)
― Lee is Free (Lee is Free), Tuesday, 6 June 2006 12:41 (twenty years ago)
― jed_ (jed), Tuesday, 6 June 2006 12:50 (twenty years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Tuesday, 6 June 2006 12:51 (twenty years ago)
― Lee is Free (Lee is Free), Tuesday, 6 June 2006 13:14 (twenty years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 6 June 2006 14:16 (twenty years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Tuesday, 6 June 2006 14:22 (twenty years ago)
lee dude, where do you live? one of our stores is probably near ya.
― hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 6 June 2006 14:34 (twenty years ago)
― Lee is Free (Lee is Free), Tuesday, 6 June 2006 18:19 (twenty years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 6 June 2006 18:28 (twenty years ago)
I was cleaning out and old closet - and there it was - Tilt!!! It's been in my head for years, so owning the actual cd was unimportant to me. However, I think I'll give it some spins while I await The Drift.....
― Darren Skuja (Darren Skuja), Thursday, 8 June 2006 21:51 (nineteen years ago)
Mixing "singing" vocals with brutal dissonance such as that found on "Cue" or "Jolson and Jones" is my favorite sound in the world. If anyone has anything to recommend, feel free.
This album is brilliant. I already like it better than Tilt after two listens, and I'm not just saying that in an it's-new-so-I-should-spew-great-things-about-it-and-then-put-it-away-after-two-months way.
― Lee is Free (Lee is Free), Friday, 9 June 2006 02:41 (nineteen years ago)
― Lee is Free (Lee is Free), Tuesday, 13 June 2006 18:48 (nineteen years ago)
I noticed this, too - I may be giving him way too much credit, but for some reason I assumed he chose to phrase it this way for a reason (to heighten the mortification?)
― PeopleFunnyBoy (PeopleFunnyBoy), Tuesday, 13 June 2006 22:03 (nineteen years ago)
2. The thread of apocalyptic alliteration which runs right the way through the record ("pow pow," "psst psst").
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Wednesday, 14 June 2006 06:39 (nineteen years ago)
fascinating, complex, terrifying, a worthwhile listen, but ultimately something i'd at best play once or twice more. i make myself watch horror movies. i slogged through hegel during my junior year continental philosophy class. even though it's got some beautiful language and i love joyce it took me over a year to finish "ulysses". and i decided to listen to "the drift" cause i figgered i'd learn something, or at least have an unpleasant experience that i could look back on for inspiration/whatever. i did, and now i'm done. i respect him a great deal for making it, and it's got lots of things in it to think about, but i really can't deal with it. bravo, scott. you've made a fucked up masterpiece that's borderline unlistenable.
but who knows, maybe i'll wander back to it someday and i'll feel differently.
― Emily B (Emily B), Wednesday, 14 June 2006 22:26 (nineteen years ago)
― Joe (Joe), Thursday, 15 June 2006 00:02 (nineteen years ago)
I'm lovin' it.
And yes, I'd pay any amount of money to see this performed live, pretty much as is... sequentially.
― aDOring NUTbians (donut), Thursday, 15 June 2006 04:51 (nineteen years ago)
...but I really can't think of any album, modern or older, that is a more succinct aural obliteration of a hard-on than this record...
...which isn't a bad thing at all! This is one of the best albums I've heard, period. But never put this CD anywhere in visibility on a date, much less play it to "get in the mood", which really goes without saying. But if you never heard the album before, get swooned in by the 4AD art, buy it, then decide to play it while snuggling against that crush of yours on the couch -- expecting something morose but still celestial and emotional and warming -- your night, or even perhaps your life, will be instantly ruined.
Well, unless you're both into snuff. O fuck I should shut up now, bed time *sniffle* bye bye.
― aDOring NUTbians (donut), Thursday, 15 June 2006 05:02 (nineteen years ago)
― aDOring NUTbians (donut), Thursday, 15 June 2006 05:04 (nineteen years ago)
First time I spun it late at night - very intriguing - some superb snippets of "song" in every track - actually some wonderful melodies - love the lyrics - track 1 sounds "80s" - track 10 is absolutely fucking brilliant - the end of track 9 was indeed quite scary when I first heard it - I went to bed, fell asleep, racoons killing each other in my back yard awoke me, and strangely, they sounded similar to the end of track 9 - I was freaked - did not sleep!
Now, after many spins, the end of track 9 makes me chuckle! :)
This is a wonderful CD. It really does have 10 distinct parts to it. His voice is fucking something to behold. I like it much more than Tilt. It will take me weeks to get my head around it - but the sign of a great CD is that I want to play it over and over.....
― Darren Skuja (Darren Skuja), Saturday, 1 July 2006 02:22 (nineteen years ago)
I say Tilt is best, but by a hairs breadth...
― gekoppel (Gekoppel), Saturday, 1 July 2006 11:25 (nineteen years ago)
Holy. Fucking. Shit.
― Toad Roundgrin (noodle vague), Friday, 7 July 2006 08:28 (nineteen years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 28 July 2006 15:00 (nineteen years ago)