IS ROCK CRITICISM DEAD?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (414 of them)

and that was like 5 or 6 yrs ago

cool app (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Wednesday, 17 June 2009 20:47 (fourteen years ago) link

I mean, for every Christian out there who only listens to Christian rock, there are a bazillion others who listen to other things as well or who actively abhor Christian rock; it's not nearly as simple as "I am THIS so I only listen to THAT".

HIS VAGINA IS MAKING HIM CRAVE SALAD. (HI DERE), Wednesday, 17 June 2009 20:47 (fourteen years ago) link

this is where the whole "identity politics" aspect of music ties in as well - ie, "I am this kind of person and I subscribe to these cultural tenets, ergo I enjoy Christian/country/R&B/indie music. This music comes to me through this outlet, which more often than not plays things I enjoy." rinse and repeat

x-post

― Kitchen Paper Towel (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, June 17, 2009 8:43 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

i was sitting next to this dude on a plane a couple weeks ago and he was scrolling through all these bands on his itunes and i didn't know one of them so i was spying on him, them some michael w. smith popped up...so i finally was like "ah dude is a big xian born again" dude...but then all of a sudden "ill communication" by the beasties popped up and also "what's the story morning glory" so who knows?

IUAU812 (M@tt He1ges0n), Wednesday, 17 June 2009 20:47 (fourteen years ago) link

Haha in fairness, I think that like 80% of MN listens to Michael W. Smith!

HIS VAGINA IS MAKING HIM CRAVE SALAD. (HI DERE), Wednesday, 17 June 2009 20:48 (fourteen years ago) link

Chuck Eddy and I have a few Amy Grant albums that Mike Huckabee and his band might wanna cover on Sunday nights.

Bud Huxtable (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 17 June 2009 20:48 (fourteen years ago) link

I mean, for every Christian out there who only listens to Christian rock, there are a bazillion others who listen to other things as well or who actively abhor Christian rock; it's not nearly as simple as "I am THIS so I only listen to THAT".

I see no one raised this complaint when Whiney "objectively" cited the compartmentalized listening tastes of Bonnarroo attendees

Kitchen Paper Towel (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 17 June 2009 20:49 (fourteen years ago) link

I, for one, didn't listen to the talk because I'm still at work; my reactions are to the discussion much more than they are to the source material. At any rate, I think croupier was reacting against that in his posts.

HIS VAGINA IS MAKING HIM CRAVE SALAD. (HI DERE), Wednesday, 17 June 2009 20:50 (fourteen years ago) link

that MINDSET grr

HIS VAGINA IS MAKING HIM CRAVE SALAD. (HI DERE), Wednesday, 17 June 2009 20:50 (fourteen years ago) link

I'm getting my threads confused. Shouldn't Shakey be attacking Ferris Bueller again?

Bud Huxtable (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 17 June 2009 20:51 (fourteen years ago) link

actually i didn't but one thing that i thought whiney was weird (a little off shakey's point here) but was the fact that while you sort of decried the camps of fans on the bonerro tweetfest (god what a term)...you yourself seemed to just write off all the "jam band crap" which, for me, if i went to bonerroo would be the most interesting thing to check out, just cuz it's sort of the roots of the fest and who the fuck knows, maybe like string cheese incident would rock my sox off in a live setting?

IUAU812 (M@tt He1ges0n), Wednesday, 17 June 2009 20:51 (fourteen years ago) link

well Dan to sum up (pardon me for paraphrasing here Whiney) part of his point was that people's tastes are in general becoming very NARROW - listeners find a comfortable sub-section of music that they are into and they stick with it, they are oblivious to things going on outside it, and there's no critical mechanism readily available to break those listeners out of that.

x-post

Kitchen Paper Towel (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 17 June 2009 20:53 (fourteen years ago) link

if i went to bonerroo would be the most interesting thing to check out, just cuz it's sort of the roots of the fest and who the fuck knows, maybe like string cheese incident would rock my sox off in a live setting?

lolz M@tt I love you bro

Kitchen Paper Towel (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 17 June 2009 20:53 (fourteen years ago) link

" there's no critical mechanism readily available to break those listeners out of that."

somewhere sasha frere jones is raising his hand eagerly

Philip Nunez, Wednesday, 17 June 2009 20:55 (fourteen years ago) link

btw String Cheese Incident likely WOULD rock yr sox off in a live setting, I ushered a show they did with Bela Fleck and MMW and they were great

HIS VAGINA IS MAKING HIM CRAVE SALAD. (HI DERE), Wednesday, 17 June 2009 20:57 (fourteen years ago) link

"well Dan to sum up (pardon me for paraphrasing here Whiney) part of his point was that people's tastes are in general becoming very NARROW - listeners find a comfortable sub-section of music that they are into and they stick with it, they are oblivious to things going on outside it, and there's no critical mechanism readily available to break those listeners out of that."

Is Whiney not aware of the existence of specialty music mags prior to the www?

Alex in SF, Wednesday, 17 June 2009 20:57 (fourteen years ago) link

I see no one raised this complaint when Whiney "objectively" cited the compartmentalized listening tastes of Bonnarroo attendees

Never said their tastes were, I said their tweets were

Whiney G. Weingarten, Wednesday, 17 June 2009 20:58 (fourteen years ago) link

xpost

yeah it's one of those things i'm like totally curious about but have no desire to actively make the effort to go to

like i wish a world famous hippie jam band would come play in my backyard for free

IUAU812 (M@tt He1ges0n), Wednesday, 17 June 2009 20:59 (fourteen years ago) link

well Dan to sum up (pardon me for paraphrasing here Whiney) part of his point was that people's tastes are in general becoming very NARROW - listeners find a comfortable sub-section of music that they are into and they stick with it, they are oblivious to things going on outside it, and there's no critical mechanism readily available to break those listeners out of that.

call me crazypants but isn't this EXACTLY the thing croupier called him out about?

HIS VAGINA IS MAKING HIM CRAVE SALAD. (HI DERE), Wednesday, 17 June 2009 20:59 (fourteen years ago) link

bonnaroo is fucking awesome btw

Whiney G. Weingarten, Wednesday, 17 June 2009 20:59 (fourteen years ago) link

jesus god, someone take these prepositions away from me before I kill again

HIS VAGINA IS MAKING HIM CRAVE SALAD. (HI DERE), Wednesday, 17 June 2009 21:00 (fourteen years ago) link

i think whiney's core point (lolz about fleet foxes and the like aside) that thoughtful criticism -- actual criticism -- is hard to find and probably going to get harder is well put and well taken.

who the fuck knows, maybe like string cheese incident would rock my sox off in a live setting?

one thing i liked about bonnaroo the 2 times i've gone is that i ended up going to see and sometimes enjoying bands i never would have. i let myself be dragged by my dancing-hippie-girl friend to both string cheese incident and widespread panic, and while it's hardly the kind of stuff i'm going to listen to in any other setting, in an open field with a big enthusiastic crowd it was pretty entertaining.

would you ask tom petty that? (tipsy mothra), Wednesday, 17 June 2009 21:03 (fourteen years ago) link

dan I'll let croupier speak for himself but no I don't think that was his original cricitism of Whiney

Kitchen Paper Towel (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 17 June 2009 21:06 (fourteen years ago) link

haha hard to believe but all I originally said was that whiney bitching about NPR playing fleet foxes because shitty critics like them was pretty off-key from an overall defense of music criticism. If you're actually trying to argue that critics are worth supporting, you can't complain when they succeed in getting an act attention just because you think your tastes are better.

da croupier, Wednesday, 17 June 2009 21:10 (fourteen years ago) link

best thread in... awhile! (guess i'm a little cranky today, IRL i just yelled at a guy in a wheelchair who ran into me on the sidewalk)

m coleman, Wednesday, 17 June 2009 22:17 (fourteen years ago) link

It is a good thread and I'd say more on here if I weren't fighting a frickin' cold/headache/earache combination.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 17 June 2009 22:18 (fourteen years ago) link

is rock critic dead?

velko, Wednesday, 17 June 2009 22:24 (fourteen years ago) link

yeah, good thread. i actually read everything you people had to say, and god knows i haven't done that in a long time. hahahahaha!

scott seward, Wednesday, 17 June 2009 22:32 (fourteen years ago) link

my whole point about the lifestyle accessory comment was related to croupier's point that most people don't listen to/experience/absorb music in terms m coleman was describing (ie " pop music as MUSIC at its core? why can't listeners -- or critics -- be responding to music when they like a pop song?") - its not just about appreciation of craft for most people, what the music signifies is often just as/if not MORE important. So identity politics is always a crucial component of criticism - it gets beyond the "wow the drum programming on this song is really well done" sorta analysis and into the music's subtext, its social role, its political signifiers, its relationship to musical history, its context, which is really (imho) what most people are engaging with when they listen to music. Not just the average listener, but music obsessives like us as well. That was what I meant by lifestyle accessory - that music is a part of a larger, deeper identity for most people - and not just a medium to be appreciated for its strictly technical merits (ie, "that guitar solo is really hard to play" or "this beat is fun to dance to", although that stuff all figures in as well on a surface level).

Kitchen Paper Towel (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 17 June 2009 22:45 (fourteen years ago) link

Whiney asks for more people to offer WHY they listen to the music they do - which more often than not is gonna come down to some level of lifestyle/identity politics kinda thing, and not so much appreciation of technical craft (although you will get weird exceptions to this like people who claim to listen to Dragonforce because all the musicians are SO AMAZING. But even guys who, say, privelege indie rock over rap because hip hop isn't made by "real musicians" are betraying their own identity politics more than their engaging with the actual craft of either genre)

Kitchen Paper Towel (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 17 June 2009 22:48 (fourteen years ago) link

That was what I meant by lifestyle accessory - that music is a part of a larger, deeper identity for most people

that makes sense, though "accessory" might be a little off. you're really talking about how people draw personal meaning from art and incorporate it into their lives and identities, etc. and i think the HOW and WHY that whiney's asking can take a lot of different forms. i'm sympathetic to the argument that more music critics should actually know more about music from a technical standpoint, because it really does make a difference in understanding something about how it works. otoh i'm sympathetic to the idea that most music fans don't really know much about music per se, and so a good populist critic doesn't have to understand the mechanics to talk insightfully about the way music functions socially or politically or whatever. probably the real thing is that you can do good, interesting critical work from either direction (even if a lot of the best of it is going to incorporate some elements of both) -- and that there isn't enough good, interesting critical work being done from any perspective. (and that some of the relatively few places that have provided forums for that kind of thing are either moving away from it or are just plain disappearing from the landscape.)

would you ask tom petty that? (tipsy mothra), Wednesday, 17 June 2009 23:00 (fourteen years ago) link

"What critic thinks the music they enjoy is common and conventional? That would be an impressively self-aware conservative critic."

I don't think many critics actively promote the music they listen to on these terms, but I think there are lots and lots of critics for whom the fact that a piece of music is generally indicative of a popular trend rather than somehow seemingly unique is not a barrier to it being great. Perhaps they would only explicitly promote its commonality/conventionality if it seemed to perfectly encapsulate the best qualities of the trend it typifies.

I know that for a long time I've been wary of music criticism that automatically looks for the innovative auteur in any given field of music on the basis that the "shining star against a sea of undifferentiated generic mulch" narrative makes for such an easy story to write. In the case of my favourite dance sub-genres I'm much more likely to be enthusiastic about something that portrays the "rules" of the genre in its best light (including by demonstrating their inherent flexibility), rather than something that seeks to "break the rules".

Re literature criticism versus music criticism, I wouldn't say there's a massive divide here with close reading on one side and identity politics on the other. Lots of people (critics and otherwise) love novels because they identify with the character. Most popular music sets up the performer as the "character" of the music, such that it's harder in every day terms to distinguish between the identity politics of the singer and the identity politics of the song than it is with an author and their book.

In terms of narrow/blinkered listening vs eclecticism, I would have thought that quite obviously the worst of all possible worlds is blinkered eclecticism: the thing about an "indie mindset" (which I'll use as my strawman example) is that it does allow for the enjoyment and even critical celebration of certain hip hop, certain dance music, certain metal, and so on. Insofar as its critical rules become detached from any particular sonic signifiers they are much harder to identify and so much harder to challenge.

I think generally a purist is preferable to that because their rigorous focus (or, to put it negatively, self-policing) mostly forces them to think harder about why they will like or not like something - even if you disagree with the choice they end up making at least you can see that it is a choice.

Tim F, Wednesday, 17 June 2009 23:02 (fourteen years ago) link

the thing about an "indie mindset" (which I'll use as my strawman example) is that it does allow for the enjoyment and even critical celebration of certain hip hop, certain dance music, certain metal, and so on. Insofar as its critical rules become detached from any particular sonic signifiers they are much harder to identify and so much harder to challenge.

lolz honestly this makes me think of those Christian music fans who will listen to any genre of music as long as its, y'know, about Jesus

Kitchen Paper Towel (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 17 June 2009 23:06 (fourteen years ago) link

Yeah, def. some interesting stuff here. A few things I don't get:

Like the connection between tweeting about 1,000 LPs in a year and the death of criticism. Is this just a Nero fiddles as Rome burns kind of situation? It seems like this kind of approach was presented as a solution, and if so, I don't follow.

Also, there are some interesting questions here about whether pointing people toward good stuff is what criticism should aspire to.

Mark, Wednesday, 17 June 2009 23:06 (fourteen years ago) link

I think plenty of lit (and definitely film) critics are very invested in personal readings of works rather than technical/close readings (certainly seemed like a vast majority of the lit crit I read in college was of that type and not of the "let's look at what writer X is doing with similes here" in paragraph to.) It's not unique to music criticism at all.

Alex in SF, Wednesday, 17 June 2009 23:09 (fourteen years ago) link

music criticism should aspire to just be good writing because it'll never be music

cool app (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Wednesday, 17 June 2009 23:10 (fourteen years ago) link

the only reason to write about music is to use music as a crutch to get the pen to the paper

cool app (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Wednesday, 17 June 2009 23:11 (fourteen years ago) link

"whether pointing people toward good stuff is what criticism should aspire to"
I'm totally fine with critics doing this instead of apple 'music genius' or pandora doing this.

Philip Nunez, Wednesday, 17 June 2009 23:14 (fourteen years ago) link

some dude killin it itt

autogucci cru (deej), Wednesday, 17 June 2009 23:16 (fourteen years ago) link

btw i really dont see how thoughtful music crit is going to disappear any more than the written word as a medium for expression is going to disappear. can we be honest abt the fact that a giant majority of the critics making a living off of music writing were embracing a whole lot of received wisdom, filling in staid narratives like madlbs (ie tim's innovator against a sea of genericism) & generally saying a lot of dumb shit?

autogucci cru (deej), Wednesday, 17 June 2009 23:18 (fourteen years ago) link

im honestly not sure i ever liked music criticism as a 'job'. im doing it anyway because there are a few people i like who do it really really well & help me think about the music i listen to in different ways but thats such a small group, & always has been ... i cant say that since ive been reading rolling stone ive ever been particularly moved by a review (this is not a whiney diss ive never read his work in RS)

autogucci cru (deej), Wednesday, 17 June 2009 23:19 (fourteen years ago) link

^^ I think golden age of music criticism arguments are basically like golden age of music arguments. Just as people mentally screen out the unfathomably popular, now forgotten stuff that haunted the charts in 1982 or whenever, people tend to focus on that one lifechanging article they read back in (insert year) and ignore that most critics have been autobots since day dot.

(on the golden age of music point, one of the finest Freaky Trigger articles ever was when Tom Ewing and Greg Scarth did a head-to-head on the top 20 UK records of 1982 versus the top 20 UK records of 2002, and 2002 won by some marginal amount)

Tim F, Wednesday, 17 June 2009 23:23 (fourteen years ago) link

can we be honest abt the fact that a giant majority of the critics making a living off of music writing were embracing a whole lot of received wisdom, filling in staid narratives like madlbs (ie tim's innovator against a sea of genericism) & generally saying a lot of dumb shit?

^^^^please please let's

Kitchen Paper Towel (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 17 June 2009 23:24 (fourteen years ago) link

Basically, can we be honest abt the fact that a giant majority of the people making a living off of anything are embracing a whole lot of received wisdom, filling in staid narratives like madlbs & generally saying a lot of dumb shit?

Tim F, Wednesday, 17 June 2009 23:25 (fourteen years ago) link

Sure and all the people lamenting the death of the team sportswriter are basically full of shit too.

Alex in SF, Wednesday, 17 June 2009 23:30 (fourteen years ago) link

haha it's the same mixed feelings i have about all the "death of the newspaper" lamentations. on one hand, it's sad. on the other, most of them are pretty bad.

would you ask tom petty that? (tipsy mothra), Wednesday, 17 June 2009 23:30 (fourteen years ago) link

(but it's not like they're being replaced by anything better, i guess is the problem in these cases)

would you ask tom petty that? (tipsy mothra), Wednesday, 17 June 2009 23:31 (fourteen years ago) link

the thing vs. newspapers is that paying for actual reporting is different than 'music criticism'

autogucci cru (deej), Wednesday, 17 June 2009 23:31 (fourteen years ago) link

"music criticism" is not journalism.

music journalism, im worried about

autogucci cru (deej), Wednesday, 17 June 2009 23:32 (fourteen years ago) link

Sure and all the people lamenting the death of the team sportswriter are basically full of shit too.

― Alex in SF, Wednesday, June 17, 2009 11:30 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

yeah columnists for the most part i'm not gonna mourn, at least my local clowns but yeah we are blessed with some great beat writers and i'll be sad to see them go.

IUAU812 (M@tt He1ges0n), Wednesday, 17 June 2009 23:33 (fourteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.