Thing was, I wasn't able to write for some reason. After Anthem, I just had writer's block, so I rented this cabin in Big Sur, brought my guitar and a hot plate, and just forced myself to write, man. And something about the peace and tranquility of being up there, man, songs just started pouring out
― Paul Ponzi, Friday, 18 January 2019 16:26 (five years ago) link
^the cabin would be in the UP, tho (as they’re Michiganders)
― i stan corrected (morrisp), Friday, 18 January 2019 16:36 (five years ago) link
"We've been listening to a lot of Yes."
― We were never Breeting Borting (President Keyes), Friday, 18 January 2019 16:57 (five years ago) link
"We want to take advantage of the studio as instrument, you know? Brian Wilson. Pet Sounds."
― flappy bird, Friday, 18 January 2019 17:34 (five years ago) link
Well, the "new tracks" page seems to be finished. Nothing at all since December 4 and it's now January 10.
Shame, that page introduced me to some absolutely incredible music.
looks like it's back:https://pitchfork.com/reviews/tracks/ariana-grande-7-rings/
― We were never Breeting Borting (President Keyes), Friday, 18 January 2019 20:27 (five years ago) link
Won't argue against the track being a letdown, but not because of its "sneering tone" or lack of "empathy"... weird critique.
― i stan corrected (morrisp), Friday, 18 January 2019 21:06 (five years ago) link
lol what the hell is with giving the dreaming 7.7 but the sensual world 9.4
― ufo, Saturday, 19 January 2019 06:02 (five years ago) link
and i really object to kate bush being called "very queer" in the dreaming review - "gay/queer icon" would have been fine but she isn't a queer person
― ufo, Saturday, 19 January 2019 06:46 (five years ago) link
Some more good GVF rock-cliche quotes here: https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-news/greta-van-fleet-on-the-grammys-why-its-time-to-stop-the-zeppelin-comparisons-779296/
“We hope to get an album out this year. This time, we feel less pressure than we did before the last one. We can’t wait to explore a little more of the Greta Van Fleet universe.”
― i stan corrected (morrisp), Saturday, 19 January 2019 15:54 (five years ago) link
You may be interested to learn that he has “always wanted to play with Paul McCartney.”
― i stan corrected (morrisp), Saturday, 19 January 2019 15:55 (five years ago) link
Tracy Chapman gets a 9.4 in today’s retrospective review, yet it was not among Pfork’s “Best 200 Albums of the 1980s”: https://pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/tracy-chapman-tracy-chapman/Meanwhile — to pull a semi-random example of an album that is on the Top 200 list, and which has also been retroactively reviewed by Pfork in the past year — Raw Like Sushi only received an 8.0: https://pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/neneh-cherry-raw-like-sushi/Two great albums, one rated higher than the other... yet only the lower-rated one made the Top 200 list. Is it b/c Tracy Chapman doesn’t meet the criteria of being “influential”?:
But Tracy Chapman didn’t change the course of a Top 40 ecosystem in tune with the era’s glorification of wealth and greed. Rather, the album was produced in isolation from popular music, and in defiance of it. She wasn’t a herald of change within the industry so much as she was an example of the innovation to be found outside of it.
― i stan corrected (morrisp), Sunday, 20 January 2019 21:55 (five years ago) link
I disagree strongly with those premises. "The era’s glorification of wealth and greed"? More so than hip-hop in the go-go '90s? And what makes this (solid) album an example of innovation in the Suzanne Vega era?
― Your sweetie-pie-coo-coo I love ya (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 20 January 2019 22:06 (five years ago) link
Yeah, one could make the same statements about, say, Graceland, a big hit album released a year prior to Tracy Chapman, and which lands at #49 on the 1980s list (Pitchfork hasn’t given that LP the retrospective treatment, tho its expanded reissue got a 9.2 in 2012: https://pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/16843-graceland-25th-anniversary-edition/).
― i stan corrected (morrisp), Sunday, 20 January 2019 22:25 (five years ago) link
(The only reason I’m playing Pitchfork Police here is that the Chapman album felt like one of the more notable omissions on the 1980s list, and the 9.4 rating shows they rate it highly, so...?)
― i stan corrected (morrisp), Sunday, 20 January 2019 22:33 (five years ago) link
Tracy Chapman gets a 9.4 in today’s retrospective review, yet it was not among Pfork’s “Best 200 Albums of the 1980s”: https://pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/tracy-chapman-tracy-chapman/Meanwhile — to pull a semi-random example of an album that is on the Top 200 list, and which has also been retroactively reviewed by Pfork in the past year — Raw Like Sushi only received an 8.0: https://pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/neneh-cherry-raw-like-sushi/Two great albums, one rated higher than the other... yet only the lower-rated one made the Top 200 list. Is it b/c Tracy Chapman doesn’t meet the criteria of being “influential”?:But Tracy Chapman didn’t change the course of a Top 40 ecosystem in tune with the era’s glorification of wealth and greed. Rather, the album was produced in isolation from popular music, and in defiance of it. She wasn’t a herald of change within the industry so much as she was an example of the innovation to be found outside of it.― i stan corrected (morrisp), Sunday, January 20, 2019 4:55 PM (one hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
Meanwhile — to pull a semi-random example of an album that is on the Top 200 list, and which has also been retroactively reviewed by Pfork in the past year — Raw Like Sushi only received an 8.0: https://pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/neneh-cherry-raw-like-sushi/
Two great albums, one rated higher than the other... yet only the lower-rated one made the Top 200 list. Is it b/c Tracy Chapman doesn’t meet the criteria of being “influential”?:
But Tracy Chapman didn’t change the course of a Top 40 ecosystem in tune with the era’s glorification of wealth and greed. Rather, the album was produced in isolation from popular music, and in defiance of it. She wasn’t a herald of change within the industry so much as she was an example of the innovation to be found outside of it.― i stan corrected (morrisp), Sunday, January 20, 2019 4:55 PM (one hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
Confirming this will flag the post for the attention of the moderators. Posters whose posts get many flags may be limited from posting or banned from the site.
Flag this post?
― flopson, Sunday, 20 January 2019 22:59 (five years ago) link
make it so
― Number None, Sunday, 20 January 2019 23:00 (five years ago) link
?
― i stan corrected (morrisp), Sunday, 20 January 2019 23:02 (five years ago) link
oh man did you guys know that if you type ‘what does’ into google one of the first autocompletes is ‘what does sb mean’?
― flopson, Sunday, 20 January 2019 23:04 (five years ago) link
man wow that Tracy Chapman review is ridiculous
― Οὖτις, Monday, 21 January 2019 16:48 (five years ago) link
We didn't talk much about Saturday's Kate Bush reviews (outside of Carr's problematic characterization of Bush as "queer"), but I found this bit, from her review of The Dreaming striking:
Then there’s “The Dreaming,” a parable of a real, historical, and contemporary group of Aboriginal people as timeless, noble savages in a tragically ruined Eden that lectures the center of empire about their (our) political and environmental violence. Bush narrates in a grotesquely exaggerated Australian accent over a thicket of exotic animal sounds, both holdovers from music hall and vaudeville’s racist “ethnic humor” tradition, a kind of distancing that suggests that settler Australians are somehow less civilized and thus more responsible for their white supremacist beliefs than the Empire that shipped them there in the first place. In telling this story in this way—without accurate depictions of people, and without credit, understanding, monetary remuneration, proper cultural context, or employment of indigenous musicians—she unfairly extracts cultural (and economic) value from Aboriginal suffering just as the characters in the song mine their land. As a rich text to meditate on colonial, racial, and sexual violence, it is actually quite useful—but not in the way Bush intended.
My favourite song on the album (and one of my top 3 or so Bush tunes overall), I'm curious as to how I'll hear it from now on.
― Timothée Charalambides (cryptosicko), Monday, 21 January 2019 16:53 (five years ago) link
like it's weird how it promotes the "out of nowhere" narrative, ignoring, say, the context of Joan Armatrading as a precedent or Michelle Shocked and K.D. Lang as contemporaries
― Οὖτις, Monday, 21 January 2019 17:02 (five years ago) link
xps
also it's just... not a good album? The most memorable thing about Fast Car is the lick that's lifted from John Cougar Mellencamp, and lots of the record is suuuuuuper-clunky lyrically
― Οὖτις, Monday, 21 January 2019 17:03 (five years ago) link
the joan armatrading revival cant come soon enough though i guess it’s just as likely to never come lol
― jolene club remix (BradNelson), Monday, 21 January 2019 17:32 (five years ago) link
walk under ladders is at least a 9.4
― jolene club remix (BradNelson), Monday, 21 January 2019 17:35 (five years ago) link
Bush narrates in a grotesquely exaggerated Australian accent
literally just learnt that this is what she's supposedly doing here
― sans lep (sic), Monday, 21 January 2019 18:34 (five years ago) link
― jolene club remix (BradNelson), Monday, January 21, 2019
check her out her very-1986 album!
― Your sweetie-pie-coo-coo I love ya (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 21 January 2019 19:04 (five years ago) link
Is that the one with all the Peter Gabriel folks on it?
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 21 January 2019 19:25 (five years ago) link
I guess a lot of them have Peter Gabriel folks on them. Jerry Marotta, Tony Levin, David Rhodes, Manu Katche ...
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 21 January 2019 19:28 (five years ago) link
agree
― geoffreyess, Monday, 21 January 2019 19:35 (five years ago) link
wait which JCM song does Fast Car rip
― flappy bird, Tuesday, 22 January 2019 18:43 (five years ago) link
"Suckin' on a Chili Dog (Slight Return)"
― ebro the letter (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 22 January 2019 18:46 (five years ago) link
the "Fast Car" guitar lick/chord progression has always sounded to me like it was lifted from the acoustic line in the verse of "Jack and Diane"
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 22 January 2019 18:49 (five years ago) link
eh there's some similarity to say lifted is a bit much
also fast car is like 10X better of a song
― Blues Guitar Solo Heatmap (Free Download) (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Tuesday, 22 January 2019 18:56 (five years ago) link
^agreed
― i stan corrected (morrisp), Tuesday, 22 January 2019 18:57 (five years ago) link
ok yeah I hear that, but it's only half of the riff and it's an insert that only occurs a couple times
― flappy bird, Tuesday, 22 January 2019 19:04 (five years ago) link
THIS is the version of Fast Car to worry about:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xJWxkYu8WgU
― Good cop, Babcock (Chinaski), Tuesday, 22 January 2019 19:31 (five years ago) link
always glad to see that video surface again
― Fuck the NRA (ulysses), Tuesday, 22 January 2019 19:34 (five years ago) link
― Blues Guitar Solo Heatmap (Free Download) (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Tuesday, January 22, 2019 10:56 AM (forty-seven minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― ( ͡☉ ͜ʖ ͡☉) (jim in vancouver), Tuesday, 22 January 2019 19:44 (five years ago) link
omg that jim o'rourke thing is great
― Blues Guitar Solo Heatmap (Free Download) (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Tuesday, 22 January 2019 19:57 (five years ago) link
lol I love how he doesn't even play the riff himself, he just loops the intro to the song and sings over it before going bananas in MaxMSP or something for 20 minutes.
― flappy bird, Tuesday, 22 January 2019 20:10 (five years ago) link
If Pitchfork goes behind a paywall I will scream a scream that cracks heaven and pass through all the known realms to fight God himself https://t.co/80uMMelnim— Jeremy Gordon (@jeremypgordon) January 23, 2019
Oh boy
― josh az (2011nostalgia), Wednesday, 23 January 2019 15:16 (five years ago) link
lmao no one will read it
― jolene club remix (BradNelson), Wednesday, 23 January 2019 15:19 (five years ago) link
So as someone who still relies on Pitchfork as my primary daily source of reviews and recommendations, what alternative would folks suggest if this comes to pass?
― enochroot, Wednesday, 23 January 2019 15:24 (five years ago) link
Why not pay for something that is your "primary daily source of reviews and recommendations"?
― Uptown VONC (Le Bateau Ivre), Wednesday, 23 January 2019 15:24 (five years ago) link
I dunno, paywalls are psychologically hard to accept. The internet's all about paths of least resistance.
― jmm, Wednesday, 23 January 2019 15:36 (five years ago) link
The link about putting content behind paywalls is behind a paywall for me.
― Position Position, Wednesday, 23 January 2019 15:46 (five years ago) link
maybe it won’t apply to pfrok since it’s not in print?
― flopson, Wednesday, 23 January 2019 15:49 (five years ago) link
― jolene club remix (BradNelson), Wednesday, January 23, 2019 10:19 AM (twenty-nine minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
yeah otm lol. won’t take em long to figure this out
― flopson, Wednesday, 23 January 2019 15:50 (five years ago) link
what kinda geniuses they got working up in there anyway
― j., Wednesday, 23 January 2019 15:51 (five years ago) link