I have had it up to here waiting for the Beatles catalogue to be remastered

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (6248 of them)

As for remastered White Album: seek out the German Direct Metal Master pressing of the White Album via the usual sites.
Got a link? I found it here in six parts, but I couldn't join the files because I couldn't find the password.
Help!

Jazzbo, Wednesday, 3 June 2009 16:51 (seventeen years ago)

http://musicinyourbrain.blogspot.com/2008/12/beatles-white-album-german-direct-metal.html

tylerw, Wednesday, 3 June 2009 17:40 (seventeen years ago)

^^^ that's where I got it from yesterday. It's noticably better than any other version I've heard, but the last second of Savoy Truffle is cut off.

nate woolls, Wednesday, 3 June 2009 18:07 (seventeen years ago)

http://www.thebeatlesrockband.com/cinematic.php

Kitchen Paper Towel (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 9 June 2009 20:39 (seventeen years ago)

The entire package seems interesting. Almost like I need to get myself a gaming console.

But, as for the remasters: Quicktime? Why? :)

Geir Hongro, Tuesday, 9 June 2009 20:48 (seventeen years ago)

because the video portions are only like 10 minutes long, I think. If you get the box set you'll get them all strung together on DVD. I don't anticipate them being very interesting though. It would have made more sense to put together a DVD of the promo videos (if these are all included I'll be shocked)

akm, Tuesday, 9 June 2009 21:01 (seventeen years ago)

beatles rock band is a lot of fun, they did a nice job with the presentation too.

i would never want a book's autograph (M@tt He1ges0n), Tuesday, 9 June 2009 21:27 (seventeen years ago)

Have you already played it?

Darin, Tuesday, 9 June 2009 23:41 (seventeen years ago)

Holy cra-cra-crap that animation thing is cool. I really like that shot of them 'sitting in an English garden'.

Makes me kinda wish they just went ahead and made a Beatles anime.

Adam Bruneau, Tuesday, 9 June 2009 23:42 (seventeen years ago)

What, like Yellow Submarine...?

Sickamous Mouthall (Scik Mouthy), Wednesday, 10 June 2009 06:35 (seventeen years ago)

I don't anticipate them being very interesting though.

Surely, in the case of The Beatles, so much is said, so much is written, that there is likely to be anything much about the proccess behind the albums that isn't already covered. If not before, at least the "Anthology" series should take care of most of the facts that the world would need to know. So I agree there.

Geir Hongro, Wednesday, 10 June 2009 10:26 (seventeen years ago)

I just saw the Beatles at Shea Stadium at a big screen theater last week. It was followed by the live footage from one of their last shows in Japan.

Seeing John just freak out and start speaking in tongues to 50,000 people who can't hear or understand him is still pretty affecting. And so are the performances. I'm guessing they did a lot of studio patchwork on these after the fact? The vocals sound awfully good considering the circumstances...

Nate Carson, Wednesday, 10 June 2009 10:51 (seventeen years ago)

Ah, thank you Wikipedia.

"The film is not a completely candid concert film, however, as overdubs were recorded by the Beatles in London in January 1966 to cover audio problems throughout the concert recording."

Nate Carson, Wednesday, 10 June 2009 10:52 (seventeen years ago)

So the Box set pics are here!

Looking good. Doesn't give to much away mind but enough for now.

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_0FaQ7TxM2U0/SjL3N31gKRI/AAAAAAAABEw/hE1dAweO8_E/s1600-h/beatlesstereoofficial.jpg

piscesx, Saturday, 20 June 2009 10:09 (seventeen years ago)

Hmm

Well they're here anyways

http://wogew.blogspot.com/2009/06/postcard-from-berlin.html

piscesx, Saturday, 20 June 2009 10:10 (seventeen years ago)

Aiee, $350 is not what I was hoping for. Why would the mono one be more expensive? Actually, why would I buy mono at all?

Ismael Klata, Saturday, 20 June 2009 11:32 (seventeen years ago)

£200 for the mono set (from Amazon "List Price £237"!) and £170 for the stereo (List Price £202!).

I was expecting around the £200 mark TBH, but it wouldn't have surprised me in the slightest had they gone even higher.

Officer Pupp, Saturday, 20 June 2009 11:37 (seventeen years ago)

sometimes the US price isn't just the price in pounds though...

attack! attack! "stick stickly" youtube video 2:48 nvr frgt (M@tt He1ges0n), Saturday, 20 June 2009 17:31 (seventeen years ago)

Can anyone recommend me an art criticism-angled book on the Beatles, specifically their days hanging out with German art students and how it affected their subsequent work? I would say mainly about 'the Hamburg days' but Klaus Voorman did alot of work with them even through Lennon's solo career.

I'd love to read something well-written taking their career in that context.

Adam Bruneau, Tuesday, 23 June 2009 19:18 (seventeen years ago)

listened to that 10-minute "Revolution, Take 21" outtake yesterday --- eeeyowch it is good. Screw the remasters, release more stuff like that! (Kidding ... remasters & outtakes, plz)

tylerw, Tuesday, 23 June 2009 19:50 (seventeen years ago)

Adam, this book is great:

http://i.i.com.com/cnwk.1d/i/bto/20071001/9780307353375.jpg

This book took 20 years to write and it shows - extremely well researched and short on gossip. Fantastic musical critiques and social analysis. Oh, and there's quite a bit on the 1960-61 Hamburg/Liverpool era.

Darin, Tuesday, 23 June 2009 23:15 (seventeen years ago)

^Love that book!

Nate Carson, Tuesday, 23 June 2009 23:51 (seventeen years ago)

xxxpost

Amazon UK are listing the box sets for pre-order at £134 for Stereo and £158 for Mono, whic seems pretty reasonable to me.

Guilty_Boksen, Wednesday, 24 June 2009 06:55 (seventeen years ago)

Again, why is the Mono more expensive? It seems to have less discs in it.

Mark G, Wednesday, 24 June 2009 08:53 (seventeen years ago)

They've come down a lot since I posted those prices a few days ago. Plus they've dropped the "list price". Interesting. In a good way.

Officer Pupp, Wednesday, 24 June 2009 17:10 (seventeen years ago)

http://larryfire.files.wordpress.com/2009/06/beatlesstereoofficial.jpg

tylerw, Tuesday, 7 July 2009 15:31 (sixteen years ago)

These are the mono ones, right? I mean, they don't exist to me at all. Mono doesn't exist to me whenever stereo is available..

Geir Hongro, Tuesday, 7 July 2009 15:39 (sixteen years ago)

[imghttp://www.puppiesandflowers.com/blogimages/bear-covering-eyes.jpg[/img]

tylerw, Tuesday, 7 July 2009 15:47 (sixteen years ago)

oops
http://www.puppiesandflowers.com/blogimages/bear-covering-eyes.jpg

tylerw, Tuesday, 7 July 2009 15:47 (sixteen years ago)

geir, even now, it must be said...you are a weird bird homie

bodyguard/publicist Tank (M@tt He1ges0n), Tuesday, 7 July 2009 16:19 (sixteen years ago)

and no, i think that is the stereo box set .... you may look at it, Geir. IT EXISTS.

tylerw, Tuesday, 7 July 2009 16:21 (sixteen years ago)

Not in the shops before 090909, no :)

Geir Hongro, Tuesday, 7 July 2009 16:31 (sixteen years ago)

Someone photoshop some 2001 monkeys caressing that Beatles box.

Adam Bruneau, Tuesday, 7 July 2009 21:25 (sixteen years ago)

looking forward to downloading the mono one.

The Sorrows of Young Jeezy (jim), Tuesday, 7 July 2009 21:26 (sixteen years ago)

that picture is actually some kind of Second Life computer-generated proto-copy of the box set. weird. geir is actually correct that it doesn't exist!

matinee, Tuesday, 7 July 2009 22:25 (sixteen years ago)

Geir, "Let it be" was never released in Mono, so that's the Stereo set.

Alright?

Mark G, Tuesday, 7 July 2009 22:25 (sixteen years ago)

http://www.beatles-unlimited.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/beatles-mono-boxset300.jpg

There you go, the Mono set.

Mark G, Tuesday, 7 July 2009 22:27 (sixteen years ago)

ah good, i like that box better since it will fit in my CD racks instead of that big booze bottle box shaped thing for the stereo

bodyguard/publicist Tank (M@tt He1ges0n), Tuesday, 7 July 2009 22:31 (sixteen years ago)

Anyone worked out why the mono (less CDs in it) is more expensive?

Mark G, Tuesday, 7 July 2009 22:34 (sixteen years ago)

http://images.amazon.com/images/G/01/richmedia/images/cover.gif

Mark G, Tuesday, 7 July 2009 22:53 (sixteen years ago)

Anyone worked out why the mono (less CDs in it) is more expensive?

I think it's because the mono box is a limited edition

matinee, Tuesday, 7 July 2009 23:01 (sixteen years ago)

not the most solid evidence, but cd japan does mark their listings differently by that token:
http://www.cdjapan.co.jp/search3.html?q=beatles+box+set&step=20&r=any&order=score&media=

matinee, Tuesday, 7 July 2009 23:06 (sixteen years ago)

Anyone worked out why the mono (less CDs in it) is more expensive?

The mono set actually contains two copies of the product - one in each speaker - so Apple is overlooking the opportunity to charge double the money. The stereo set only has 50% of the product in each speaker.

Adam Bruneau, Wednesday, 8 July 2009 00:49 (sixteen years ago)

Just checked a minute ago, and Amazon.co.uk have bumped the prices back up - £200 for mono and £160 for stereo.

Officer Pupp, Saturday, 11 July 2009 08:19 (sixteen years ago)

Beatles.com is now showing a clip of the Revolver mini-doc.

Darin, Monday, 13 July 2009 17:45 (sixteen years ago)

Appears to be rather weak chopped up version of the Anthology stuff.

Darin, Monday, 13 July 2009 19:14 (sixteen years ago)

clips up over at amazon http://www.amazon.com/gp/entity/The-Beatles/B000APTK6K though I'm not sure whether that's the best way to judge how good these sound ... will listen when i get home from work. wonder if the price for the box set will come down at some point? right now, it is out of my price range ...

tylerw, Monday, 20 July 2009 14:42 (sixteen years ago)

Does anyone know which stereo mixes will be used on the first 2 albums? Will they use the original 2 track mixes or new remixes that George Martin have been playing with the thought of making? (Most of those songs would probably sound better with one channel in the middle and the other one to the left/right rather than one extreme right and the other one extreme left, but that would also be kind of revisionist)

Geir Hongro, Monday, 20 July 2009 17:46 (sixteen years ago)

Yeah, but does anybody actually like it like that?

Mark G, Monday, 20 July 2009 17:48 (sixteen years ago)

Does anyone know which stereo mixes will be used on the first 2 albums? Will they use the original 2 track mixes or new remixes that George Martin have been playing with the thought of making? (Most of those songs would probably sound better with one channel in the middle and the other one to the left/right rather than one extreme right and the other one extreme left, but that would also be kind of revisionist)

― Geir Hongro, Monday, July 20, 2009 5:46 PM (4 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

stereo mixes in general for those albums is revisionist

I'm a Matt...I'm a DC (M@tt He1ges0n), Monday, 20 July 2009 17:51 (sixteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.