and if you just want to know what the best music is there's http://www.acclaimedmusic.net/
― niels, Tuesday, 11 September 2018 15:35 (five years ago) link
guess what comprises that site's lists tho
― lowercase (eric), Tuesday, 11 September 2018 15:36 (five years ago) link
In the span of a few posts we went from ILM considering its own poll of the 80s where Daydream Nation and Nation of Millions are banned, to slagging Pitchfork for only looking for the “coolest” music.
― sctttnnnt (pgwp), Tuesday, 11 September 2018 15:37 (five years ago) link
I haven't looked at this list and don't plan to, but I would like to say one thing about this observation:
no AOR/MOR like REO, Air Supply, Rick Springfield, Styx, Bonnie Tyler, Bryan Adams, John Cougar Mellencampm, Christopher Cross, Foreigner
This is kind of equivalent to the 70s though, isn't it? On similarly-minded best of the 70s lists, we don't see much love for these kinds of standard pop / rock bands. Granted, that stuff wasn't as prevalent in the 70s, but when was the last time 'Afternoon Delight' received any sort of retroactive love? It's been a while; and with good reason.
no hair metal Warrant, Ratt, Def Leppard, Cinderella, Quiet Riot, Whitesnake etcetc even Van Halen (unless I missed 1984)
This is probably for the best that these kinds of bands are left out. Overwhelmingly, these bands were not very unique, nor all that interesting. If the list was supposed to be "most popular" then their absence would be a valid discrepancy.
no new wave one/two hits like Cutting Crew, Fixx, Kim Wilde, Simple Minds, Wang Chung, Men at Work
Definitely agree that Simple Minds and Men at Work should have had at least a little representation. But again, with a lot of these types of bands, they just weren't that remarkable besides the big single.
no Eliminator by ZZ Top
And thank fuck for that.
no Police Synchronicity
That's pretty inexcusable. My pick would have been Zenyatta Mondatta though.
no Dire Straits Brothers in Arms
Again, most popular ≠ best. While I do agree that Dire Straits deserve a mention for earlier albums, Brothers in Arms has not aged well. My pick would have been Love Over Gold.
none of the huge soundtracks that were so dominant like Top Gun, Footloose, Dirty Dancing, Pretty in Pink, Flashdance
Most popular ≠ best.
no boomer comeback stuff like Henley, Raitt, Heart, Boston, Aerosmith, Genesis/Collins
Of the ones you mentioned, I'm glad that none were represented. Did Tom Petty have much of a showing in this list? If not, he should have. I know he's not a 60s guy, but I definitely include him in that mode of bands. I mean, he was in the Traveling Wilburies.
no pop/R&B (except Madonna, Whitney) stuff like Paula Abdul, Bobby Brown, Bananarama
What about the early New Jack Swing stuff, like Guy? That stuff definitely needed to be repped for.
Also, let's not forget that the 70s list they did a few years back had absolutely zero prog rock on it. So, yeah. That's what we're dealing with when discussing pfork lists.
In general, yeah: I'm over these kinds of lists. I know that most of the bands / albums I hold really dear to me will never make one of these lists, so my interest is very little. Anymore, it's just not that much fun when you basically know what the top picks are going to be. Further, it's really taking the fun out of it when a site like pfork starts to renege on their old lists and revise. That just takes a lot of the earnestness and genuineness out of it. Definitely feels at this point like they're just trying to appease an audience. "Hey, don't like this list? It's okay, wait a few years and we'll do another one."
― Totally different head. Totally. (Austin), Tuesday, 11 September 2018 15:38 (five years ago) link
"Kinda funny" isn't really slagging off, tbf. xp
― The nexus of the crisis (Sund4r), Tuesday, 11 September 2018 15:39 (five years ago) link
Personally I’m stoked on listening to stuff on the list I hadn’t heard before, and I’m stoked on most of this thread’s discussion on what’s missing. There is something fruitful on all that. But the horse jockeying stuff is irrelevant. The ultimate goal of the list and the attendant discussion is to expand the canon. No need to besmirch the site or it’s writers.
― sctttnnnt (pgwp), Tuesday, 11 September 2018 15:41 (five years ago) link
ums was not saying this
― princess of hell (BradNelson), Tuesday, 11 September 2018 15:42 (five years ago) link
Yeah I don’t think (most) anyone here is “slagging” or besmirching?
― stan in the place where you work (morrisp), Tuesday, 11 September 2018 15:42 (five years ago) link
i for one tried to vote for the guy s/t bc it's 100 percent amazing (i'd vote for it over don't be cruel even) but like... it doesn't have that kind of momentum among the majority of ppl who contributed to this list
― princess of hell (BradNelson), Tuesday, 11 September 2018 15:43 (five years ago) link
when was the last time 'Afternoon Delight' received any sort of retroactive love?
July 10, 2018: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/arts-and-entertainment/wp/2018/07/10/skyrockets-in-flight-afternoon-delight-the-story-behind-starland-vocal-bands-one-big-hit/?utm_term=.9ad80728c46b
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 11 September 2018 15:45 (five years ago) link
(this is serious -- I genuinely have no idea what people want from these lists. it seems like no matter what people pick, it's wrong, which is incredibly demoralizing)
― aloha darkness my old friend (katherine), Tuesday, September 11, 2018 11:00 AM (thirty-five minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
As a music critic you should know that once something is published it is fair game to criticize it. Plus, every time you establish a canon and rejects some people's favorite music you are going to find yourself having to justify your choices. I don't think those things are complicated or controversial.
― Van Horn Street, Tuesday, 11 September 2018 15:45 (five years ago) link
no Eliminator by ZZ TopAnd thank fuck for that.
FIGHTING WORDS
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 11 September 2018 15:46 (five years ago) link
I know that, but there's a difference between being criticized and always being criticized with no counterbalance
― aloha darkness my old friend (katherine), Tuesday, 11 September 2018 15:46 (five years ago) link
ums didn't even say those albums should be on the list
― niels, Tuesday, 11 September 2018 15:47 (five years ago) link
Is Pitchfork going to post the individual ballots? I would be interested in seeing any ILX posters' ballots.
― jmm, Tuesday, 11 September 2018 15:47 (five years ago) link
FIGHTING WORDSirl lol
― niels, Tuesday, 11 September 2018 15:48 (five years ago) link
yeah but eliminator should be on the list
xps
― guardians of the gums: i am tooth (voodoo chili), Tuesday, 11 September 2018 15:48 (five years ago) link
these lists do have a use in being decent gateways for people exploring older decades of music for the very first time and i think despite the many blindspots this thread has pointed out the new p4k one is the best attempt at a genuinely broad and inclusive 80s canon. its interesting to compare it to the then-contemporary rolling stone list which is certainly more inclusive than the 2002 p4k list but seems very idiosyncratic these days - like i dont think young people even here in australia care about midnight oil anymore
― ufo, Tuesday, 11 September 2018 15:48 (five years ago) link
What is the point of listicles if not having readers pick it apart and lauding/criticizing it?
― lbi's life of limitless european glamour (Le Bateau Ivre), Tuesday, 11 September 2018 15:48 (five years ago) link
people exploring older decades of music for the very first time
let's be honest, who are these ppl that are reading Pfork and exploring older decades of music for the very first time? That seems like two mutually exclusive sets to me.
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 11 September 2018 15:50 (five years ago) link
these lists don't serve any purpose apart from harvesting clicks from old music nerds
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 11 September 2018 15:51 (five years ago) link
xp lots of kids who only know anything from the strokes onward
― lowercase (eric), Tuesday, 11 September 2018 15:51 (five years ago) link
or radiohead i guess
― lowercase (eric), Tuesday, 11 September 2018 15:52 (five years ago) link
as a contributor it led me to discover a lot of new-to-me music which is p cool, i hope the bottom 100 serves the same purpose for a reader
― princess of hell (BradNelson), Tuesday, 11 September 2018 15:52 (five years ago) link
Several ILXors were saying it's a solid list upthread. I don't think the response has been overwhelmingly negative, it's just more interesting (and entertaining) to focus on the omissions.
― pomenitul, Tuesday, 11 September 2018 15:52 (five years ago) link
I honestly love the list, as I said there's about 40 albums I'm now compelled to listen to that I haven't heard or even heard of. This is how I approach lists in general, but somehow I doubt that's how readers will approach and part of it is the numerical order, like saying that Control is better than Paul's Boutique seems more important than saying 'That Laurie Spiegel record might be interesting to you'. Like even approaching the list the way I said I did, like a gold mine of new content, I found myself trying to understand why SY's Sister didn't place.
New theory is that numerical lists are inherently rockist.
― Van Horn Street, Tuesday, 11 September 2018 15:53 (five years ago) link
if there were a way to do these kind of lists without ranking i'd be very into it but... people click on these things to see the ranking
― princess of hell (BradNelson), Tuesday, 11 September 2018 15:54 (five years ago) link
lots of kids who only know anything from the strokes onward
Kids still know about The Strokes?
― MarkoP, Tuesday, 11 September 2018 15:54 (five years ago) link
maybe this is just my experience having been an extremely online music nerd teen a decade ago but digging through various p4k best of lists was certainly pretty formative for discovering music beyond Muse
― ufo, Tuesday, 11 September 2018 15:54 (five years ago) link
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, September 11, 2018 11:50 AM (two minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
Pitchfork first lists of the 80s and the second they did for the 90s had a massive impact on me.
― Van Horn Street, Tuesday, 11 September 2018 15:55 (five years ago) link
nobody knows about the Strokes
xp
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 11 September 2018 15:55 (five years ago) link
no i had an identical experience ufo
the '90s and '80s pfork lists were my record buying guides for years xxp
― princess of hell (BradNelson), Tuesday, 11 September 2018 15:55 (five years ago) link
if there were a way to do these kind of lists without ranking i'd be very into it
Mm. I mean, I've contributed to a couple of these lists in recent years and all, but there's a reason I stopped making my own ranked lists many years back.
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 11 September 2018 15:55 (five years ago) link
OK then! news to me about these lists' impacts
xxp
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 11 September 2018 15:56 (five years ago) link
I don't care about the ranking because my ballot is invariably so different from what gets published that my rankings get lost in the overall number sludge
― aloha darkness my old friend (katherine), Tuesday, 11 September 2018 15:56 (five years ago) link
― princess of hell (BradNelson), Tuesday, September 11, 2018 11:52 AM (fifty-four seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
It reminded me to finally check out Nuno Canavarro beyond Mr. Wollogallu, which I love!
― Evan, Tuesday, 11 September 2018 15:57 (five years ago) link
xps ime the post-punk revival is a big cut-off point w younger people for some reason, at least w rock (e.g. w hip-hop it's more like the early '10s onward)
― lowercase (eric), Tuesday, 11 September 2018 15:58 (five years ago) link
Is Pitchfork going to post the individual ballots? I would be interested in seeing any ILX posters' ballots.― jmm, Tuesday, September 11, 2018 11:47 AM (nine minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― jmm, Tuesday, September 11, 2018 11:47 AM (nine minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
... and there it is
― 5th Ward Weeaboo (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 11 September 2018 15:59 (five years ago) link
that said I'm probably an outlier here because I never really used collective lists as a method of finding new music -- I mostly just followed my own taste and comparisons to other artist. like, I didn't get into Kate Bush because of her placement on any list, but because someone compared her voice to Sarah Brightman once
― aloha darkness my old friend (katherine), Tuesday, 11 September 2018 16:00 (five years ago) link
Also its insane to say that Peter Gabriel's three 80s records had no impact on the hipster zeitgeist of the last 15 years
― 5th Ward Weeaboo (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 11 September 2018 16:00 (five years ago) link
I was happy to see Melt, but come on, So is the correct answer.
― guardians of the gums: i am tooth (voodoo chili), Tuesday, 11 September 2018 16:06 (five years ago) link
― ufo, Tuesday, September 11, 2018 10:54 AM (eight minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
this was true for teenaged-me too fwiw
(the only real complaint I have about lists in general, as A Thing, is that generally people's criteria for adding something to this kind of list include that a specific record must have had some kind of influence on other musicians, the world, etc. which is understandable but does lead to a self-reinforcing aspect, because the way records get that influence is via lists like these, and so on.)
― aloha darkness my old friend (katherine), Tuesday, 11 September 2018 16:07 (five years ago) link
Like I said, I haven't looked at this list, but I can guarantee there's no Chameleons, no Sound, no Feelies, etc. I name these bands because they're among my favorites, but if we're going to just go off retroactive "how influential was this?" kind of rankings, those bands need to be repped for. But they never will be. Not on lists like this.
― Totally different head. Totally. (Austin), Tuesday, 11 September 2018 16:08 (five years ago) link
xxp It's broad and inclusive from a specifically UK/US viewpoint though, right? I mean, I think I counted two albums in the top 50 that weren't US or UK and those were both from Ireland. There's nothing wrong with that - in fact (as noted upthread by various people) part of the fun of these things is understanding more about what the people making the list think is cool.
It's certainly broader than their previous 100 but lobbing in a tiny handful of African (or even Jamaican!) releases into the lower reaches of the list feels like thoughtless, token nods at breadth. Of course, it's actually a reflection that the majority of the contributors from a particular (cultural) place and time. I realise it's not exactly a news story that most Pitchfork contribs aren't terribly interested in (say) African music from the 80s. But I do think we should keep in mind that the list's "breadth" is pretty bounded.
Anyway these lists are fun for disagreeing with, that's what I use them for.
― Tim, Tuesday, 11 September 2018 16:09 (five years ago) link
Gabriel not on Spotify until this summer also a factor.
― The Silky Veils of Alfred (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 11 September 2018 16:10 (five years ago) link
Many xpostsAh, I must have missed that Melt was on there
― 5th Ward Weeaboo (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 11 September 2018 16:10 (five years ago) link
Feelies are at #107
― President Keyes, Tuesday, 11 September 2018 16:11 (five years ago) link
And truly, if we're going down that route of "obscure, but really influential" albums, Shrimp Boat's Speckly should be in the top twenty. But again, that will never happen.
― Totally different head. Totally. (Austin), Tuesday, 11 September 2018 16:11 (five years ago) link
if anyone needs the list written out so they can quickly ctrl+f before posting http://www.brooklynvegan.com/pitchfork-lists-the-200-best-albums-of-the-1980s/
― princess of hell (BradNelson), Tuesday, 11 September 2018 16:12 (five years ago) link