XXXTentacion - ?

wait i thought morrissey was racist morrissey

that sentence can be read two ways. ... if u prefer say "known racist"

"Sad!" makes people want to be in denial, obviously.

warning reddit, but the story of the beat for "Never":

https://www.reddit.com/r/WeAreTheMusicMakers/comments/8t8khu/a_story_of_how_xxxtentacion_took_my_music_and_i/

XXX started rapping after seeing the Salem Levi's Fader Fort performance on YouTube

ok I think dude's style was actually pretty great and I might have gotten into his music if he weren't an abuser but this is still a sick & fair burn

his misdeeds were reflective not of our culture of indifference to the mistreatment of women as a whole but reflective of teenagers' culture of indifference to pretty much everything

― we æt so many shimripl (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, June 19, 2018 5:52 PM (two days ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

this resonates, but it's not just an indifference to me, but the inability to figure out what things have an actual weight in life. the inability to figure out what's going too far, what's forgivable, what's part of playing a persona and what is actually showing who you are. there are so many people who put on cynical personas or do things for a reaction and it takes a lot of development to make it beyond that. some people never change

the cynic in me says that jahseh onfroy crafted this stage persona that was emotionally stunted, dark, and violent and he happened to be an emotionally stunted, violent kid off stage. maybe he decided that was all he had to give the world, or never felt like showing even the people in his life that he had more than that

― mh, Thursday, June 21, 2018 4:34 PM (two days ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

good post mh I feel this

There’s a six-hour, open-casket memorial service for this guy happening Wednesday, at the Florida Panthers stadium. “Cell phones and cameras strictly prohibited.”

any murals yet?

xxpost: how is beating a pregnant woman as part of a persona better than doing it naturally?

Yeesh

https://youtu.be/0Fv6z8DoA2I

https://www.billboard.com/articles/columns/chart-beat/8462525/xxxtentacion-sad-no-1-hot-100

xxpost: how is beating a pregnant woman as part of a persona better than doing it naturally?

― ✖✖✖ (Moka), Sunday, June 24, 2018 12:56 AM (yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

beats me, eminem sold a shitload of records in character though

Eminem didn’t actually beat women in character though. It’s not the same playing a character that says he’ll kill or rape a woman than doing it. It’s not in good taste but it’s not a crime to say stupid, shocking shit for laughs.

Take the song “guilty conscience”, as the “bad conscience” Eminem advocates raping a 15 year old and killing a woman. Dre is supposed to be the “good conscience” but later on Eminem breaks the fourth wall and says “you’re going to take advice from the guy who slapped Dee Barnes?” which is the “bad” character calling bullshit on the supposedly good character. It’s all played as shock comedy and noone in their right mind should take the song as anything other than dark humor.

Now if Eminem was actually raping or beating women then you have your point.

uh, have you heard "Kim"?

that shit about him lifting people's music is pretty fucked up. they are all completely within their rights to sue...someone.

I’m not going to defend Eminem’s lyrics, I’m just saying it’s apples and oranges. Rapping about killing someone =/= actually killing someone. It’s not X’s lyrics which are under the light here.

that's fine, but your "shock comedy" angle doesn't make sense in the context of an extended murder fantasy like "Kim"

He also happened to beat up a blow up doll version of his ex wife on stage to the cheers of his fans, driving her to attempt suicide

if you want to believe Eminem's autobiographical songs, he admits to hitting her in "Bad Husband" and "Love the Way You Lie" gets physical too.

that shit about him lifting people's music is pretty fucked up. they are all completely within their rights to sue...someone.

― akm, Monday, 25 June 2018 19:36 (one hour ago) Permalink

This isn’t even on the spectrum of abusing a woman. Childish Gambino was just accused of the same thing, artists across the board do this. I guess what bugs me about this post isn’t that it’s wrong to advocate for artists to be paid for their contributions, but how ilx threads like this start adding up all the bad things he may have done like they’re Tells and we’ll get to a tipping point where hes definitively evil, that his true essence has been uncovered with a preponderance of evidence: he beat a woman! That’s enough

Also scratching my head at how enlisting other potential or real woman beaters makes it normal or more acceptable somehow.

In 2018 OJ would still have walked free it seems.

my point, I guess, in retrospect is: this guy shouldn't be lauded for anything. he seems to have been a horrible, violent, misogynist and he's not a legitimate artist either so don't come back with "separate the man from the art" arguments (not that anyone here is) because his art is fake too.

These articles could explain why the kids liked him, without making the slippage into mythologizing / portraying him as a rebel who can’t be constrained by society etc.

This one sort of does what I described above (though it ends in a bit of a muddle): https://pitchfork.com/thepitch/what-the-rise-of-xxxtentacion-says-about-being-a-fan-today/

xp
That probably is the second whitest thing I have read on this board.

First would be "Live by the Sword, Die by the Sword." In response to an unarmed black man being gunned down in the street.

To be clear I'm referring to the OJ comment

Which is daft even in isolation from all this

I don't know much about this guy's music so I might be way off here but are people in danger of downplaying the extent to which the nasty, vicious, transgressive side might be, for a significant enough minority of his fanbase, actually part of the appeal? I mean it's not like we aren't living in a world where lots of repellent moral voids amass huge followings, the internet is a sewer of men who are old enough to know better explaining away or downplaying abuse or worse, not to mention creepy incel types or whatever.

I'm not talking about teenagers being teenagers here, or people who connected with his music for other reasons, but it doesn't feel like it can be neatly or easily separated from everything else that's happening right now.

Xpost: Hey I also wrote that comment!

Congrats, you are now a graduate of the dog whistle school of "he was no angel".

my point, I guess, in retrospect is: this guy shouldn't be lauded for anything. he seems to have been a horrible, violent, misogynist and he's not a legitimate artist either so don't come back with "separate the man from the art" arguments (not that anyone here is) because his art is fake too.

― akm, Monday, June 25, 2018 4:40 PM (fifty-two minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

this is just a weird way to parse this problem to me ... if him abusing women isn't going to stop someone from disliking him why would "he doesnt even make his own songs" puff daddy criticism going to be the final straw

"his art is fake" welcome to art 101

I'm sure it must have occurred to somebody/anybody that as with many rap artists, "authenticity" is considered an asset-- and for many rap fans, that means a history of poverty and criminality.

Which is to say, an XXXTentacion fan could have zero desire to beat women, and could even condemn XXXTentacion's violence toward women, but still have that objectifying part of them where their appreciation for their favourite rapper's work is increased by their perceived hardness, their perceived criminality

I myself do not digest music (rap or otherwise) this way and smile politely whenever any artist gets to the part where they make claims within or without their practice, claims that project themselves closer toward their desired position (aesthetically and politically) within their genre of choice-- whether it's affectation of criminality, affectation of DIY, affectation of community, affectation of "safe space", affectation of poverty, or whatever.

i think most of his fans loved x because they felt that he spoke to them and for them, not because he was hard or authentic or a horrible misogynist. Unfortunately.

why not both? especially in this particular moment?

I’m sure it can be both, but at this particular moment I’m not sure polarizing things is the way to go. I’ve had quite a few conversations with young and heartbroken x fans this week and they all feel as if the media is misrepresenting what they feel is the essential part of what he meant to them by focusing on the controversy instead of the music. I always try to argue that you can’t wholly separate those entities when it comes to x, but these people mostly seem to come from somewhere genuine.

I mean, I believe his main group of fans — not people who just casually liked the songs but have an idea of who he was — are people in their teens/early 20s, both male and female, who see a conflicted, even violent, relationship and internal angst as romantic

cynically, I think the same people thought Jared Leto’s Joker character was really cool

that’s fair. i also feel like the misogyny of this moment and the way notoriety is a better way to get attention than discussion of one’s music - not to mention the extremely well worn trope of the tortured artist who has to work out their demons by abusing the women who support him - needs to be at least nodded at.

i don’t doubt that elsewhere on soundcloud there are artists who can speak to adolescent pain as concisely and provocatively. but they didn’t get the “mugshot as promo photo” leg up and it’s fucked up to even think of that as a “leg up.” american culture has always fetishized the outlaw and teenage culture fetishizes the rebel Who Is Just Saying but this is another level.

xp

Cynically, I think most true fans of music at some point fall in love w an artist who is not - strictly speaking - good for them.

Xp

I don’t disagree with you, Maura. I’m not comfortable w his notoriety either. I do think that a good part of this has to do with him being the guy who captures a general cultural hopelessness the best for a lot of young listeners atm. They love him because he defied genres and limits in so many ways, and they identify with a certain radical vulnerability that doesn’t code as «hiphop» to them but goes straight to sone sort of depressed essence.

yeah i think you’re right on that point.

I'm trying to discern whiney and deej's positions aside from everyone is wrong and corny?

i am arguing against what i think are actively harmful/useless ideological positions

I'm sure it must have occurred to somebody/anybody that as with many rap artists, "authenticity" is considered an asset-- and for many rap fans, that means a history of poverty and criminality.

Which is to say, an XXXTentacion fan could have zero desire to beat women, and could even condemn XXXTentacion's violence toward women, but still have that objectifying part of them where their appreciation for their favourite rapper's work is increased by their perceived hardness, their perceived criminality

I myself do not digest music (rap or otherwise) this way and smile politely whenever any artist gets to the part where they make claims within or without their practice, claims that project themselves closer toward their desired position (aesthetically and politically) within their genre of choice-- whether it's affectation of criminality, affectation of DIY, affectation of community, affectation of "safe space", affectation of poverty, or whatever.

― nevertheless, he stopped (flamboyant goon tie included), Monday, June 25, 2018 5:48 PM (one hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

hip-hop's relationship to authenticity is imo so much more complex than the caricature captured here ... but this is a problem in general w continental philosophy which believes in an absolute ability to transcend identity vs. a philosophical pov in which there's an absolute racial boundary which cannot be 'transcended'

there are absurd ways in which authenticity is valued but there are also legitimate ones! and this is eternally negotiable ie, does this person represent ideas of a community or do they falsify experience in the pursuit of capital, what hyperbole is ok in terms of artistic license & what is exploitative, ppl benefiting for themselves from the stories of others, etc.

im not saying this abt xxx in particular who has a very particular relationship to the authentic, but acting as if 'authenticity' doesn't mean difft things in different contexts & doesnt serve a purpose is misleading imo

but this is a problem in general w continental philosophy which believes in an absolute ability to transcend identity

Please expand.

there are absurd ways in which authenticity is valued but there are also legitimate ones

Feel free to expand on this, too, because I don’t think “authenticity” is ever a legitimate value. It’s always bullshit. At best it’s harmless bullshit, like astrology, but at worst it’s literally lethal.

i mean you can say the same of pretty much any concept! 'science' 'rationality' etc

'the economy'

like no conceptual generality is 'real' its a shortcut for articulating more complex concepts